ADDENDUM.

Strauss, J., 10, Rue Madame, Paris. M.D.; Agrégé at Med. Fac.; Physician at the Tenon Hospital.Author of “Des lésions rénales dans leur rapport avec l’hyperthropethie cardiaque,” Arch. Gén. de Méd., Jan., 1882.

Strauss, J., 10, Rue Madame, Paris. M.D.; Agrégé at Med. Fac.; Physician at the Tenon Hospital.

Author of “Des lésions rénales dans leur rapport avec l’hyperthropethie cardiaque,” Arch. Gén. de Méd., Jan., 1882.

Stroganow, N., St. Petersburg.Author of “Beiträge zur Kenntniss des Oxydations processes im normalen und Erstickungs-blute.”—Pflüger’s Archiv., Vol. XII., p. 18.Made experiments in the Laboratory of Prof. Hoppe-Seyler in Strasburg.Dogs asphyxiated with an apparatus constructed by direction of Prof. Hoppe-Seyler after the model of that of Régnault and Reiset.

Stroganow, N., St. Petersburg.

Author of “Beiträge zur Kenntniss des Oxydations processes im normalen und Erstickungs-blute.”—Pflüger’s Archiv., Vol. XII., p. 18.

Made experiments in the Laboratory of Prof. Hoppe-Seyler in Strasburg.

Dogs asphyxiated with an apparatus constructed by direction of Prof. Hoppe-Seyler after the model of that of Régnault and Reiset.

Studiati, Cesare.Prof. Pisa University.

Suchard(Prof.), 9, Avenue de l’Observatoire, Paris. M.D.; Prof. of Gen. Anat., College of France.

Talma, G.Prof. Utrecht University.Author of: “Ueber die Folgen Arterienverschlusses in den verschiedenen Organen,” Centralbl. f. d. Med. Wissenschaften, No. 46 (1879), p. 817; “Zur Genese der Herztöne,” Pflüger’s Arch., Vol. XVIII. (1880), p. 275; “Nog. eens over hart en arterietonen,” Nederl. Tijdschr. v. Geneesk, 1880, p. 661; “Beiträge zur Kenntniss des Einflusses der Respiration auf die Circulation des Blutes,” Pflüger’s Arch., Vol. XXIX. (1882), p. 311.Experiments on dogs and rabbits to study the effect of respiration on the circulation of the blood.

Talma, G.Prof. Utrecht University.

Author of: “Ueber die Folgen Arterienverschlusses in den verschiedenen Organen,” Centralbl. f. d. Med. Wissenschaften, No. 46 (1879), p. 817; “Zur Genese der Herztöne,” Pflüger’s Arch., Vol. XVIII. (1880), p. 275; “Nog. eens over hart en arterietonen,” Nederl. Tijdschr. v. Geneesk, 1880, p. 661; “Beiträge zur Kenntniss des Einflusses der Respiration auf die Circulation des Blutes,” Pflüger’s Arch., Vol. XXIX. (1882), p. 311.

Experiments on dogs and rabbits to study the effect of respiration on the circulation of the blood.

Tamburini(Sig.). Prof. at Institut. Psychiatrique of Reggio.Joint author (with Seppilli) of “Contribuzione allo studio sperimentale del ipnotismo;” “Rivist. sper. di Psichiat.,” 1882, p. 268; and “Arch. ital. de Biologie,” Vol. II., 1882.Experiments on hypnotism in the human subject.

Tamburini(Sig.). Prof. at Institut. Psychiatrique of Reggio.

Joint author (with Seppilli) of “Contribuzione allo studio sperimentale del ipnotismo;” “Rivist. sper. di Psichiat.,” 1882, p. 268; and “Arch. ital. de Biologie,” Vol. II., 1882.

Experiments on hypnotism in the human subject.

Teissier, Junr.(Prof.), 16, Quai Tilsitt, Lyons. Prof. of Clin. Med., Med. Fac. Univ. Lyons.“Made a series of experiments at the Collége de France to prove the dangers attending the introduction of the negative pole of the battery into the aneurismal sac (M. Ciniselli’s method). These researches were made on dogs.”—Gaz. Med. de Paris, 1878, p. 129.

Teissier, Junr.(Prof.), 16, Quai Tilsitt, Lyons. Prof. of Clin. Med., Med. Fac. Univ. Lyons.

“Made a series of experiments at the Collége de France to prove the dangers attending the introduction of the negative pole of the battery into the aneurismal sac (M. Ciniselli’s method). These researches were made on dogs.”—Gaz. Med. de Paris, 1878, p. 129.

Thin, George, 22, Queen Anne Street, Cavendish Square, W. M.D., St. And., 1860; L.R.C.S. Edin., 1858 (Edin.), Contrib. on Histological, Pathological, and Dermatological subjects in various Journs. and Trans.Held a License for Vivisection at University College, London; the New Physiological Theatre and the Rooms comprised in the Physiological Laboratory, together with the Curator’s Room, in 1883. Certificate Dispensing with obligation to kill same year.

Held a License for Vivisection at University College, London; the New Physiological Theatre and the Rooms comprised in the Physiological Laboratory, together with the Curator’s Room, in 1883. Certificate Dispensing with obligation to kill same year.

Tiegel, E.Asst. at Physiol. Inst., Strasburg, and Private Prof.Author of “Notizen über Schlangenblut,” Pflüger’s Arch., Vol. XXIII. (1880), p. 278.

Tiegel, E.Asst. at Physiol. Inst., Strasburg, and Private Prof.

Author of “Notizen über Schlangenblut,” Pflüger’s Arch., Vol. XXIII. (1880), p. 278.

Tigerstetd, R. A. A.Prof. Stockholm University.Author of “Studien ueber mechanische Nervenreigung,” 1 Abth. Helsingfors, 1880; “Die durch einen Konstanten Strom in den Nerven hervorgerufenen Veränderungen der Erregbarkeit mittels mechanischer Reizung untersucht.”—Mittheil vom physiol. Laborat., Stockholm, Bk. I., 1882, etc.

Tigerstetd, R. A. A.Prof. Stockholm University.

Author of “Studien ueber mechanische Nervenreigung,” 1 Abth. Helsingfors, 1880; “Die durch einen Konstanten Strom in den Nerven hervorgerufenen Veränderungen der Erregbarkeit mittels mechanischer Reizung untersucht.”—Mittheil vom physiol. Laborat., Stockholm, Bk. I., 1882, etc.

Tommasi-Crudeli, Corrado.B. at Piere, Santo Stefano, 1834; Prof. extraord. of Path. Hist. at Inst. di Studii Superiori, Florence, 1863; Prof. of Path. Anat. Univ. of Palermo, 1865; Founded Physiol. and Pathol. Inst. at Rome, 1870.

Topinard(Mons.), 103, Rue de Rennes, Paris. M.D.; Prof. at the Institute of Anthropology.

Toussaint, H.Prof. at the Veterinary School, Toulouse; Prof. Physiol. Fac. Sci., Toulouse, 1880.Author of “Identité de la septicémie expérimentale aiguë et du choléra des poules.”—Compt. Rend., Vol. XCI. (1880), p. 301; “Note contenne dans un pli cacheté et relative à un procédé pour la vaccination du mouton et du jeune chien.”—Ibid., p. 303.

Toussaint, H.Prof. at the Veterinary School, Toulouse; Prof. Physiol. Fac. Sci., Toulouse, 1880.

Author of “Identité de la septicémie expérimentale aiguë et du choléra des poules.”—Compt. Rend., Vol. XCI. (1880), p. 301; “Note contenne dans un pli cacheté et relative à un procédé pour la vaccination du mouton et du jeune chien.”—Ibid., p. 303.

Traube, Ludwig.B. at Ratibon, 1818; d. at Berlin, 1876. Geheimrath.

Trojanow(Dr.), St. Petersburg.Author of “The influence of extended scalds on the animal organism” (In Russian), St. Petersburg, 1882.

Trojanow(Dr.), St. Petersburg.

Author of “The influence of extended scalds on the animal organism” (In Russian), St. Petersburg, 1882.

Truman, Edgar Beckit, 31, Derby Road, Nottingham. M.D. St. And., 1861; M.R.C.S. Eng. and L.S.A., 1860 (Guy’s); Sen. Exhib. and Gold Medallist in Med., Guy’s; Prizem. Phys. Soc.; F.C.S.; Pub. Analyst, Nottingh. Boro’ and Co.Contrib. Pop. Sci. Rev., 1863, &c.Held a License for Vivisection at 31, Derby Road, Nottingham, in 1882 and 1883. Certificates for Experiments without Anæsthetics, 1882 and 1883. No Experiments returned.

Contrib. Pop. Sci. Rev., 1863, &c.

Held a License for Vivisection at 31, Derby Road, Nottingham, in 1882 and 1883. Certificates for Experiments without Anæsthetics, 1882 and 1883. No Experiments returned.

Turner, George, High Street, Hoddesdon, Herts. L.R.C.P. Lond., 1872; M.R.C.S. Eng., 1872; Sanit. Sci. Cert., Cambridge, 1875; (Guy’s and Montpellier); Prizem. Guy’s Hosp. 1869, 1871; F.C.S.; late Med. Off. Health and Analyst, Portsmouth Boro’; Sanit. Med. Off. Portsmouth; Res. Med. Off. Lond. Fever Hosp. and Chef de Clinique intérimaire, Hôpital St. Eloi, Montpellier.Held a License for Vivisection at Portsmouth Borough Laboratory in 1878 and 1879. No Experiments returned.

Held a License for Vivisection at Portsmouth Borough Laboratory in 1878 and 1879. No Experiments returned.

Vacher, Francis, 36, Hamilton Square, and 49, Shrewsbury Road, Birkenhead. F.R.C.S. Edin., 1878; L.R.C.P. Edin., 1867 (Edin.); Hon. Sec. N. Western Ass.; Med. Off. Health; House Surg. Roy. Matern. Hosp. Edin. Contrib. Liverp. and Manch. Med. Surg. Reps. etc., etc.Held a License for Vivisection at[1]35, Park Road, South Birkenhead in 1878. Certificates dispensing with obligations to kill, and for testing previous discoveries. No Experiments returned.[1]This place has been withdrawn from the Register at the request of Mr. Vacher.

Held a License for Vivisection at[1]35, Park Road, South Birkenhead in 1878. Certificates dispensing with obligations to kill, and for testing previous discoveries. No Experiments returned.

[1]This place has been withdrawn from the Register at the request of Mr. Vacher.

Valentin, Gabriel Gustav.B. at Breslau, 1810; d. at Geneva, 1883. M.D., Breslau, 1832; Prof. Physiol., Univ. of Berne, 1836 to 1881.Author of “De functionibus nervorum cerebralium et nervi sympathici,” Berne, 1839; “Grundriss der Physiologie des Menschen,” Brunswick, 1846; “Beiträge zur Anatomie und Physiologie des nerven u. des Muskelsystems,” Leipsig, 1863; “Versuch einer physiologischen Pathologie der Nerven,” Leipsig, 1864; “Versuch einer physiologischen Pathologie des Herzens und der Blutgefässe,” Leipsig u. Heidelberg, 1866, etc.Made experiments with strychnine on frogs.—Arch. f. exper. Pathologie, p. 337.

Valentin, Gabriel Gustav.B. at Breslau, 1810; d. at Geneva, 1883. M.D., Breslau, 1832; Prof. Physiol., Univ. of Berne, 1836 to 1881.

Author of “De functionibus nervorum cerebralium et nervi sympathici,” Berne, 1839; “Grundriss der Physiologie des Menschen,” Brunswick, 1846; “Beiträge zur Anatomie und Physiologie des nerven u. des Muskelsystems,” Leipsig, 1863; “Versuch einer physiologischen Pathologie der Nerven,” Leipsig, 1864; “Versuch einer physiologischen Pathologie des Herzens und der Blutgefässe,” Leipsig u. Heidelberg, 1866, etc.

Made experiments with strychnine on frogs.—Arch. f. exper. Pathologie, p. 337.

Vallon(Mons.), No. 1, Rue Cabanio, Paris. Phys. Hosp. for Mental Disease.

Valmont(Prof.), 90, Rue de la Boëtie, Paris. Med. Fac.; Prof. of Pharmacol.

Veltà(Prof.), Bologna University.

Verderi(Prof.), Parma University.

Vierordt, K. von.Prof. of Physiol. Med. Fac., Tübingen University.Author of “Physiologie des Athmens,” Karlsruhe, 1845; “Die Lehre vom Arterienpuls in gesunden und kranken Zuständen,” 1855; “Grundriss der Physiologie des Menschen,” Tübingen, 1861; “Ueber Stehen und Gehen,”Ibid., 1865; “Die Einheit der Wissenschaft,” Ibid., 1865; “Der Zeitsinn nach Versuchen,”Ibid., 1868.

Vierordt, K. von.Prof. of Physiol. Med. Fac., Tübingen University.

Author of “Physiologie des Athmens,” Karlsruhe, 1845; “Die Lehre vom Arterienpuls in gesunden und kranken Zuständen,” 1855; “Grundriss der Physiologie des Menschen,” Tübingen, 1861; “Ueber Stehen und Gehen,”Ibid., 1865; “Die Einheit der Wissenschaft,” Ibid., 1865; “Der Zeitsinn nach Versuchen,”Ibid., 1868.

Vincent, E.M.D.; Prof. Med. Fac., Lyons; Chief Surg. La Charité, Lyons.Contrib. “Plaies pénétrantes intrapéritonéales de la Vessie;” “Revue de Chirurgie,” Vol. I., 1881, p. 556.Made 29 experiments on dogs. Exp. VII.: Abdominal walls of dog cut open with scissors, bladder drawn out, shot at with revolver. Bladder sewn together; the wound healed, the dog was again used for an experiment on the ossification of the marrow, and at the end of a month killed.

Vincent, E.M.D.; Prof. Med. Fac., Lyons; Chief Surg. La Charité, Lyons.

Contrib. “Plaies pénétrantes intrapéritonéales de la Vessie;” “Revue de Chirurgie,” Vol. I., 1881, p. 556.

Made 29 experiments on dogs. Exp. VII.: Abdominal walls of dog cut open with scissors, bladder drawn out, shot at with revolver. Bladder sewn together; the wound healed, the dog was again used for an experiment on the ossification of the marrow, and at the end of a month killed.

Vintschgau, M. von.Prof. of Exper. Physiol. Med. Fac., Innspruck University.Contrib. to “Handbuch der Physiologie,” edited by Prof. Hermann of Zurich, Leipsig, 1879.Author of “Beiträge zur Physiologie des Geschmacksinnes,” Pflüger’s Archiv., Vols. XIX and XX. (1879); “Die Physiologische Reactionzeit und der Ortsinn der Haut,”Ibid., Vol. XXII. (1880); “Untersuchungen ueber die Frage ob die Geschwindigkeit der Fortpflanzung der Nervenerregung von Reizstärke abhängig ist,”Ibid., Vol. XXX. (1882).

Vintschgau, M. von.Prof. of Exper. Physiol. Med. Fac., Innspruck University.

Contrib. to “Handbuch der Physiologie,” edited by Prof. Hermann of Zurich, Leipsig, 1879.

Author of “Beiträge zur Physiologie des Geschmacksinnes,” Pflüger’s Archiv., Vols. XIX and XX. (1879); “Die Physiologische Reactionzeit und der Ortsinn der Haut,”Ibid., Vol. XXII. (1880); “Untersuchungen ueber die Frage ob die Geschwindigkeit der Fortpflanzung der Nervenerregung von Reizstärke abhängig ist,”Ibid., Vol. XXX. (1882).

Virchow, Rudolf.Born at Schivelbein, Pomerania, 1821. M.D. (Berlin) 1843; Prosect. Univ. Berlin, 1847; Public Prof. in Ordinary of Path. Anat., Gen. Path, and Therapeutics Univ. Berlin; Director Path. Inst.; Hon. Mem. Roy. Med. Soc. London, 1850; Corr. Mem. French Acad. of Med., 1859.Author of “Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur Wissenschaftlichen Medicin,” Frankfort, 1856; “Die cellular Pathologie in ihrer Begründung auf physiologische und pathologische Gewebelehre,” Berlin, 1859; “Ueber die Erziehung des Weibes für seinen Beruf,” Berlin, 1865; “Menschen und Affenschädel,” 1866; “Die Aufgabe der Naturwissenschaften in den neuen nationalen Leben Deutschlands,” Berlin, 1871; “Die Freiheit der Wissenschaft im modernen Staat,” Berlin, 1877, &c., &c. Editor of “Virchow’s Archiv.”

Author of “Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur Wissenschaftlichen Medicin,” Frankfort, 1856; “Die cellular Pathologie in ihrer Begründung auf physiologische und pathologische Gewebelehre,” Berlin, 1859; “Ueber die Erziehung des Weibes für seinen Beruf,” Berlin, 1865; “Menschen und Affenschädel,” 1866; “Die Aufgabe der Naturwissenschaften in den neuen nationalen Leben Deutschlands,” Berlin, 1871; “Die Freiheit der Wissenschaft im modernen Staat,” Berlin, 1877, &c., &c. Editor of “Virchow’s Archiv.”

Vogt, Carl.B. at Giessen, 1817; Studied Giessen and Bern; M.D. 1839; Found. Scient. Soc. of German Doctors in Paris; Prof. Univ. Giessen, 1847; Prof. Comp. Anat. Med. Fac. Univ. Geneva, 1852.Author of “Im Gebirge und auf den Gletschern,” Soleure, 1843; “Lehrbuch der Geologie und Petrefacktenkunde,” Brunswick, 1846; “Physiologische Briefe,” Stuttgard, 1845-46; Ibid., Paris, 1875; “Ocean und Mittelmeer,” Frankfort, 1848; “Untersuchungen ueberThierstaaten,” 1851; “Bilder aus dem Thierleben,” 1852; “Koehlerglaube und Wissenschaft,” 1833; “Vorlesungen ueber den Menschen,” 1864; “Vorlesungen ueber nützliche und schädliche Thiere,” 1856; “Die Mikrocephalen oder Affenmenschen,” 1866, &c.

Vogt, Carl.B. at Giessen, 1817; Studied Giessen and Bern; M.D. 1839; Found. Scient. Soc. of German Doctors in Paris; Prof. Univ. Giessen, 1847; Prof. Comp. Anat. Med. Fac. Univ. Geneva, 1852.

Author of “Im Gebirge und auf den Gletschern,” Soleure, 1843; “Lehrbuch der Geologie und Petrefacktenkunde,” Brunswick, 1846; “Physiologische Briefe,” Stuttgard, 1845-46; Ibid., Paris, 1875; “Ocean und Mittelmeer,” Frankfort, 1848; “Untersuchungen ueberThierstaaten,” 1851; “Bilder aus dem Thierleben,” 1852; “Koehlerglaube und Wissenschaft,” 1833; “Vorlesungen ueber den Menschen,” 1864; “Vorlesungen ueber nützliche und schädliche Thiere,” 1856; “Die Mikrocephalen oder Affenmenschen,” 1866, &c.

Voit, Carl von.B. at Amborga, Bavaria, 1831. Studied Med. at Monaco and Wurzburg, and in the Labs. of Pettenkofer, Wächter, and Bischoff. Prof. of Med. Univ. Monaco, 1863; Prof. Physiol. Med. Fac., Univ. of Munich, 1883.Joint author with Prof. Bischoff of “Die Gesetze der Ernährung des Fleischfressers,” Leipsig and Heidelberg, 1860; “Untersuchungen ueber den Einfluss des Kochsalzes, des Kaffees und der Muskelbewegungen auf den Stoffwechsel,” Munich, 1860; Editor of “Zeitschrift fuer Biologie,” Munich and Leipsig. Contrib. to “Handbuch der Physiologie,” edited by L. Herrmann of Zurich, Leipsig, 1879.

Joint author with Prof. Bischoff of “Die Gesetze der Ernährung des Fleischfressers,” Leipsig and Heidelberg, 1860; “Untersuchungen ueber den Einfluss des Kochsalzes, des Kaffees und der Muskelbewegungen auf den Stoffwechsel,” Munich, 1860; Editor of “Zeitschrift fuer Biologie,” Munich and Leipsig. Contrib. to “Handbuch der Physiologie,” edited by L. Herrmann of Zurich, Leipsig, 1879.

Vulpian, A., 24, Rue Soufflot, Paris. M.D. Paris, 1854; Prof. Path. Anat. Med. Faculty, 1867; Prof. Comp. and Exper. Path., 1872; Mem. Acad. of Sciences, 1876.Author of “Leçon sur la Physiologie générale et comparée du système nerveux,” 1866; “Leçons sur l’appareil vaso-moteur,” 1874; “Maladies du système nerveux,” 1879.“M. Vulpian has recently made a large number of experiments to ascertain the degree and character of the mechanical excitability of the grey cortex of the brain. In mammals, dog, cat, and rabbit, in the normal condition, he could never produce in this way the slightest movement either in the limbs of the opposite side, or in those of the same side. The mechanical stimulation was produced by rubbing the surface of the cortex with a small sponge, or a fragment of amadou, or with the points of dissection forceps.… If therefore movement resulted from such stimulation in the experiments of Couty, the effect must have been purely accidental or the consequence of some experimental error. The results were also negative when Vulpian repeated the experiments after having produced inflammation of the surface of the sigmoid gyrus by tincture of cantharides, by essence of mustard or by nicotine.”—Lancet, Sept. 16, 1882, p. 453.“I have made the section of the facial nerve at its entrance into the internal auditory meatus, in several dogs, … in other dogs I succeeded in dividing the facial nerve near its real origin, below the floor of the fourth ventricle. The results were absolutely identical … I had to undertake other experiments to find out what would be the effect of the inter cranian section of the trigeminal nerve on the chorda tympani. These experiments were made on rabbits. Although numerous, they gave but few significant results, because several of the animals did not live long enough after the operation for the divided nerves to show any very decided changes; or else because in several of them, the section of the nerve was far from being complete.”—Acad. des Sciences, April, 1878.—Archives Gen. de Méd., 1878, p. 751.

Vulpian, A., 24, Rue Soufflot, Paris. M.D. Paris, 1854; Prof. Path. Anat. Med. Faculty, 1867; Prof. Comp. and Exper. Path., 1872; Mem. Acad. of Sciences, 1876.

Author of “Leçon sur la Physiologie générale et comparée du système nerveux,” 1866; “Leçons sur l’appareil vaso-moteur,” 1874; “Maladies du système nerveux,” 1879.

“M. Vulpian has recently made a large number of experiments to ascertain the degree and character of the mechanical excitability of the grey cortex of the brain. In mammals, dog, cat, and rabbit, in the normal condition, he could never produce in this way the slightest movement either in the limbs of the opposite side, or in those of the same side. The mechanical stimulation was produced by rubbing the surface of the cortex with a small sponge, or a fragment of amadou, or with the points of dissection forceps.… If therefore movement resulted from such stimulation in the experiments of Couty, the effect must have been purely accidental or the consequence of some experimental error. The results were also negative when Vulpian repeated the experiments after having produced inflammation of the surface of the sigmoid gyrus by tincture of cantharides, by essence of mustard or by nicotine.”—Lancet, Sept. 16, 1882, p. 453.

“I have made the section of the facial nerve at its entrance into the internal auditory meatus, in several dogs, … in other dogs I succeeded in dividing the facial nerve near its real origin, below the floor of the fourth ventricle. The results were absolutely identical … I had to undertake other experiments to find out what would be the effect of the inter cranian section of the trigeminal nerve on the chorda tympani. These experiments were made on rabbits. Although numerous, they gave but few significant results, because several of the animals did not live long enough after the operation for the divided nerves to show any very decided changes; or else because in several of them, the section of the nerve was far from being complete.”—Acad. des Sciences, April, 1878.—Archives Gen. de Méd., 1878, p. 751.

Wagner, Rudolf.B. at Bayreuth, 1805. Geheimrath and Prof. Physiol. and Zool., Univ. of Göttingen; Mem. Roy. Soc. of Sciences, Gott.

Walker, James.214, Union Street, Aberdeen. M.B. Aberd. and C.M. (Highest Honours), 1873 (Univ. Aberd.).Held a License for Vivisection at University Aberdeen Physiological Laboratory and Materia Medica Department, Marischal College, in 1881. Certificate for Experiments without Anæsthetics in 1881. No Experiments returned.

Walker, James.214, Union Street, Aberdeen. M.B. Aberd. and C.M. (Highest Honours), 1873 (Univ. Aberd.).

Held a License for Vivisection at University Aberdeen Physiological Laboratory and Materia Medica Department, Marischal College, in 1881. Certificate for Experiments without Anæsthetics in 1881. No Experiments returned.

Walton, George L.M.D. Boston, U.S.A. Contrib. of “Reflex movements of the frog under the influence of strychnia,” “Journ. of Physiol.,” Vol. III., p. 308; “The physiological action of Methylkyanethine,”Ibid., p. 349.Experiments on frogs, dogs, and rabbits, made in the Leipsig Physiol. Laboratory.

Experiments on frogs, dogs, and rabbits, made in the Leipsig Physiol. Laboratory.

Waters, William Horscroft, B.A. Camb.Held a License for Vivisection at Owen’s College, Manchester, Physiological Laboratory in 1883, also at University Cambridge Physiological Laboratory New Museum in 1879-80-81-82-83. Certificates for Illustrations of Lectures in 1880-81-82-83. No Experiments returned in 1882 and 1883.

Waters, William Horscroft, B.A. Camb.

Held a License for Vivisection at Owen’s College, Manchester, Physiological Laboratory in 1883, also at University Cambridge Physiological Laboratory New Museum in 1879-80-81-82-83. Certificates for Illustrations of Lectures in 1880-81-82-83. No Experiments returned in 1882 and 1883.

Weber, Arthur, 33, Boulevard des Batignolles, Paris. Prof. Gen. Anat. College of France.

Weir-Mitchell, S. M.D.; Mem. Nat. Acad. of Sciences, U.S.A.

Weisman(Dr.), Prof. of Physiol. and Prosector of Univ., Freiburg in Baden.

Wells, Sir T. Spencer, Bart., 3, Upper Grosvenor Street, W. F.R.C.S. Eng. (Hon.), 1844; M. 1841; F.K.Q.C.P. Irel. (Hon.), 1867; Dub. and St. Thos.’s; Mem. Counc. (Vice-Pres. 1880); R.C.S. Eng.; Fell. Roy. Med. Chir. Soc.; Mem. Roy. Inst., Path. Soc.; Imp. Soc. Surg. Paris; Soc. of Med. Paris, and Soc. of Phys. Sweden; Hon. Mem. several foreign learned Societies; Surg. to Queen’s Household; Cons. Surg. Samarit. Hosp. for Women and Children; late Prof. of Surg. and Path. R.C.S. Eng.; formerly Surg. Roy. Navy.Author of “Diseases of the Ovaries, their Diagnosis and Treatment,” 1865 and 1872; “Ten Series of 100 cases of Ovariotomy;” Med. Chir. Trans. 1859-80, and numerous contributions to Medical Papers.“If we could hope in diseased women for the same series of changes as have been observed in healthy dogs and rabbits, we might agree more completely with the conclusions of the German experimenters. But it is one thing to remove a piece of a uterine horn, or a healthy ovary, or a bit of omentum or mesentery, from a dog or a rabbit, and a very different thing to remove a large uterine or ovarian tumour from a woman whose general health has been more or less affected by the growth of the tumour.”—Diseases of the Ovaries, London, 1872, p. 372.“I made experiments upon animals for which I have been vilified, but for which I do not reproach myself.… They corroborate what was known before, that abdominal wounds well adjusted unite readily. This was not what I wanted. They proved more, and were the visible standing evidence which I did want—that, though the other tissues might be brought together, if the cut edgesof the peritoneum were left free, they retracted, direct union did not take place, and secondary evil consequences resulted.… Without this convincing demonstration in my hands, I might have gone on for years, bowing to precepts and oblivious of principles, sometimes taking up the peritoneum and sometimes leaving it loose, with perplexity to myself and danger to my patients.”—Ovarian and Uterine Tumours, London, 1882, pp. 197-98.“Fifteen years after my first operation (in 1842), T. S. Wells came to Manchester to be present at one of my operations, and made many inquiries, amongst which—‘Did I include the peritoneum in my interrupted sutures?’ I replied, ‘Certainly;’ and gave as my reason, that in two cases where the suture had not included the peritoneum hernial protrusions had followed. I also added, that peritonitis could only be set uponce, whether the sutures included the peritoneum or not. I was for some time after in correspondence with Mr. Wells, but never heard of vivisection in connection with ovariotomy, nor can I perceive any advantage that ovariotomy has received from such experiments. All my operations from first to last have shown the same average amount of success—about 75 per cent. I have never practised nor yet countenanced vivisection. I have given up operating after 400 cases and about 100 deaths.”—Letter of Dr. Clay, dated April 6th, 1880.“The whole progress of abdominal surgery dates from the first successful case of ovariotomy performed by Robert Houston in 1701. Failing to see the lesson taught by this, and led astray by vivisection, no further success was achieved till 1809, by Ephraim McDowell, and it was not till 1867 that any substantial gain was made. Disregarding all the conclusions of experiment, Baker Brown showed us how to bring our mortality of ovariotomy down to 10 per cent., and again, in 1876, Keith proved that it might be still further reduced. The methods of this reduction were such as only experience on human patients could indicate; experiments on animals could and did teach nothing, for operations have been performed on thousands of animals every year for centuries, and nothing whatever has been learnt from this wholesale vivisection.”—Lawson Tait, F.R.C.S., “Uselessness of Vivisection,” p. 27.

Author of “Diseases of the Ovaries, their Diagnosis and Treatment,” 1865 and 1872; “Ten Series of 100 cases of Ovariotomy;” Med. Chir. Trans. 1859-80, and numerous contributions to Medical Papers.

“If we could hope in diseased women for the same series of changes as have been observed in healthy dogs and rabbits, we might agree more completely with the conclusions of the German experimenters. But it is one thing to remove a piece of a uterine horn, or a healthy ovary, or a bit of omentum or mesentery, from a dog or a rabbit, and a very different thing to remove a large uterine or ovarian tumour from a woman whose general health has been more or less affected by the growth of the tumour.”—Diseases of the Ovaries, London, 1872, p. 372.

“I made experiments upon animals for which I have been vilified, but for which I do not reproach myself.… They corroborate what was known before, that abdominal wounds well adjusted unite readily. This was not what I wanted. They proved more, and were the visible standing evidence which I did want—that, though the other tissues might be brought together, if the cut edgesof the peritoneum were left free, they retracted, direct union did not take place, and secondary evil consequences resulted.… Without this convincing demonstration in my hands, I might have gone on for years, bowing to precepts and oblivious of principles, sometimes taking up the peritoneum and sometimes leaving it loose, with perplexity to myself and danger to my patients.”—Ovarian and Uterine Tumours, London, 1882, pp. 197-98.

“Fifteen years after my first operation (in 1842), T. S. Wells came to Manchester to be present at one of my operations, and made many inquiries, amongst which—‘Did I include the peritoneum in my interrupted sutures?’ I replied, ‘Certainly;’ and gave as my reason, that in two cases where the suture had not included the peritoneum hernial protrusions had followed. I also added, that peritonitis could only be set uponce, whether the sutures included the peritoneum or not. I was for some time after in correspondence with Mr. Wells, but never heard of vivisection in connection with ovariotomy, nor can I perceive any advantage that ovariotomy has received from such experiments. All my operations from first to last have shown the same average amount of success—about 75 per cent. I have never practised nor yet countenanced vivisection. I have given up operating after 400 cases and about 100 deaths.”—Letter of Dr. Clay, dated April 6th, 1880.

“The whole progress of abdominal surgery dates from the first successful case of ovariotomy performed by Robert Houston in 1701. Failing to see the lesson taught by this, and led astray by vivisection, no further success was achieved till 1809, by Ephraim McDowell, and it was not till 1867 that any substantial gain was made. Disregarding all the conclusions of experiment, Baker Brown showed us how to bring our mortality of ovariotomy down to 10 per cent., and again, in 1876, Keith proved that it might be still further reduced. The methods of this reduction were such as only experience on human patients could indicate; experiments on animals could and did teach nothing, for operations have been performed on thousands of animals every year for centuries, and nothing whatever has been learnt from this wholesale vivisection.”—Lawson Tait, F.R.C.S., “Uselessness of Vivisection,” p. 27.

Wertheim, G.Prof. Med. Fac. Vienna University.Roasted 30 living dogs.—Annual Report of Rudolph Institute, Vienna, 1867, pp. 172, 183.

Wertheim, G.Prof. Med. Fac. Vienna University.

Roasted 30 living dogs.—Annual Report of Rudolph Institute, Vienna, 1867, pp. 172, 183.

Wilischanin, Paul.M.D., St. Petersburg.Made experiments in the Clinical Lab. of Prof. Botkin.Produced fever in dogs and rabbits by injecting decomposed defibrinised blood, to try the effect of warm water injections.—Centralbl. f. d. Med. Wiss., Sept. 22, 1883, No. 38.

Wilischanin, Paul.M.D., St. Petersburg.

Made experiments in the Clinical Lab. of Prof. Botkin.

Produced fever in dogs and rabbits by injecting decomposed defibrinised blood, to try the effect of warm water injections.—Centralbl. f. d. Med. Wiss., Sept. 22, 1883, No. 38.

Williams, C. J. B., 49, Upper Brook Street, W. M.D. Edin., 1824; F.R.C.P. Lond. 1840; (Edin. Paris, and St. Georg.), F.R.S.; Pres. Roy. Med. and Chir. Soc. Lond.; Phys. Extr. to H.M. the Queen; formerly Prof. Med. and Clin. Med. Univ. Coll.; Pres. (1st) Path. and New Syd. Socs.Author of “Principles of Medicine,” 1856; Several Courses of Lectures on Physiol. and Clin. Med.; “Medical Gazette,” 1835-45, &c., &c.

Author of “Principles of Medicine,” 1856; Several Courses of Lectures on Physiol. and Clin. Med.; “Medical Gazette,” 1835-45, &c., &c.

Williams, Dawson, 4, Oxford and Cambridge Mansions, Marylebone Road, N.W. M.D. (worthy of gold medal), 1881. M.B. Lond. (Gold Medal in Med.) and B.S. 1879; M.R.C.S. Eng. (Univ. Coll.)Held a License for Vivisection at University College, London, New Physiological Theatre and Laboratory and Curator’s Rooms in 1882 and 1883. Certificate dispensing with obligation to kill, 1882 and 1883. No experiments returned in 1882.

Williams, Dawson, 4, Oxford and Cambridge Mansions, Marylebone Road, N.W. M.D. (worthy of gold medal), 1881. M.B. Lond. (Gold Medal in Med.) and B.S. 1879; M.R.C.S. Eng. (Univ. Coll.)

Held a License for Vivisection at University College, London, New Physiological Theatre and Laboratory and Curator’s Rooms in 1882 and 1883. Certificate dispensing with obligation to kill, 1882 and 1883. No experiments returned in 1882.

Wirtz, S. H.Prof. Utrecht University.

Wittich, W. von.Prof. of Physiol. Med. Fac. Königsberg University.Contributor to “Handbuch der Physiologie,” edited by Prof. Hermann, of Zurich, Leipsig, 1879.

Wittich, W. von.Prof. of Physiol. Med. Fac. Königsberg University.

Contributor to “Handbuch der Physiologie,” edited by Prof. Hermann, of Zurich, Leipsig, 1879.

Wolfenden, Richard Norris, 64, Welbeck Street, Cavendish Square. B.A. Camb. (Honours in Nat. Sci.) 1876; M.B. 1880 (Camb., St. Barthol. and Char. Cross); Lect. on Pract. Physiol. Char. Cross Hosp.; late House Phys. Lond. Hosp.Author of “Physiological Chemistry for the Laboratory,” 1880; Contrib. “Med. Times and Gaz.,” etc., etc.Held a License for Vivisection at Charing Cross Hospital Medical School, No. 62 and 63, Chandos Street, in 1881 and 1882. Certificate for Illustrations of Lectures in 1881 and 1882. No experiments returned in 1882.

Author of “Physiological Chemistry for the Laboratory,” 1880; Contrib. “Med. Times and Gaz.,” etc., etc.

Held a License for Vivisection at Charing Cross Hospital Medical School, No. 62 and 63, Chandos Street, in 1881 and 1882. Certificate for Illustrations of Lectures in 1881 and 1882. No experiments returned in 1882.

Wooldridge, Leonard Charles, 12, Querstrasse, Leipsic, Germany. M.D., M.R.C.S. Eng., 1879; George Henry Lewes Student.Author of “Zur Gerinnung des Blutes,” Du Bois Reymond’s Archiv, 1883, p. 389 (Physiol. Abtheil); “Ueber die Function der Kammernerven des Säugthierherzens,”Ibid., p. 522.Made experiments in the Physiol. Inst., Leipsig, on the exposed heart nerves of dogs.

Wooldridge, Leonard Charles, 12, Querstrasse, Leipsic, Germany. M.D., M.R.C.S. Eng., 1879; George Henry Lewes Student.

Author of “Zur Gerinnung des Blutes,” Du Bois Reymond’s Archiv, 1883, p. 389 (Physiol. Abtheil); “Ueber die Function der Kammernerven des Säugthierherzens,”Ibid., p. 522.

Made experiments in the Physiol. Inst., Leipsig, on the exposed heart nerves of dogs.

Worm, Müller Jacob.B. at Bergen, 1834. Studied Med. and Nat. Sci. at Christiana; Practised Med. in Christiana from 1860-1865; studied ophthalmology Vienna and Brun, 1866, and then dedicated himself to Physiology; Private Prof. Christiana, 1870; Prof. Extraord., 1873; Prof. in Ord., 1878; Pres. Norwegian Med. Soc.Contrib. various articles to Pflüger’s “Archiv,” “Untersuchungen aus dem physiol. Lab. in Wurzburg,” “Poggendorff’s Annalen,” etc.

Contrib. various articles to Pflüger’s “Archiv,” “Untersuchungen aus dem physiol. Lab. in Wurzburg,” “Poggendorff’s Annalen,” etc.

Wurtz, Ch. Adolphe.B. at Strasburg, 1817; d. in Paris, 1884. M.D. Strasburg, 1843; Dean of Faculty of Med., Paris, 1865; Prof. Med. Chemistry; Prof. Organic Chemistry Faculty of Sciences, 1876.“Mémoires sur les ammoniaques composeés,” 1856; “Sur l’insalubrité des résidus provenant des distilleries,” 1857; “Leçons de philosophie chinique,” 1864; “Traité élémentaire de chimie médicale,” 1864; “Leçons élémentaires de chimie moderne,” 1866; “Dictionnaire de chimie pure et appliquée,” 1868-1878; etc.

Wurtz, Ch. Adolphe.B. at Strasburg, 1817; d. in Paris, 1884. M.D. Strasburg, 1843; Dean of Faculty of Med., Paris, 1865; Prof. Med. Chemistry; Prof. Organic Chemistry Faculty of Sciences, 1876.

“Mémoires sur les ammoniaques composeés,” 1856; “Sur l’insalubrité des résidus provenant des distilleries,” 1857; “Leçons de philosophie chinique,” 1864; “Traité élémentaire de chimie médicale,” 1864; “Leçons élémentaires de chimie moderne,” 1866; “Dictionnaire de chimie pure et appliquée,” 1868-1878; etc.

Wyatt, William Thomas, 1, Shaftesbury Villas, Stamford Hill, N. M.A. Oxon., 1880; B.A. (1st Class Honours in Nat. Sci.), 1876; M.B. 1880; M.R.C.S., Eng., 1879 (Oxf. and St. Barthol.);Schol. in Anat. and Physiol., 1877; Foster Prizem. in 1878; and Kirke’s Gold Medallist St. Barthol.; formerly House Surgeon and House Phys. St. Barthol.Held a License for Vivisection at Saint Bartholomew’s Hospital Medical School in 1878. No experiments returned.

Held a License for Vivisection at Saint Bartholomew’s Hospital Medical School in 1878. No experiments returned.

Yeo, Gerald Francis, King’s College, Strand. W.C. M.D. Dub., 1871; M.B. and M.Ch., 1867; Dipl. in State Med., 1871; F.R.C.S. Eng., 1878; L.R.C.S.T. 1872 (T. C. Dub., Paris, Berlin, and Vienna); Prof. of Physiol. King’s Coll. London; Lect. on and Exam. in Physiol. R.C.S. Eng.; late. Asst. Surg. King’s Coll. Hosp.; and Lect. on Physiol. Carm. Sch. of Med. Dub.; Member of the Association for the Advancement of Medicine by Research.Author of “Diseases of the Kidney” (awarded Gold Medal of Path. Soc. Dub.); Contrib. to Proc. Path. Soc. Dub., etc., etc.Held a License for Vivisection at King’s College, London, Physiological Laboratory and Anatomical Theatre in 1878-79-80-81-82-83. Certificates for Illustrations of Lectures and for Dispensing with obligation to Kill in 1878-79-80-81. Certificate for Illustrations of Lectures in 1882 and 1883.“Why repeat the oft-told tale of horrors contained in the works of Claude Bernard, Paul Bert, Brown-Séquard, and Richet, in France; of Goltz, in Germany; and Flint, in America.”—G. F. Yeo, Fortnightly Review, March, 1882.“I am proud to call him (Goltz) my friend.”—G. F. Yeo, Contem. Review, May, 1882.[It was reported in theBritish Medical Journaland theLancetthat at a meeting of the Physiological Section of the International Medical Congress, held in London in 1881, Professor Ferrier had shown two monkeys, a portion of whose cortex had been removed by himself. As Professor Ferrier had no license for vivisection at the time, a prosecution was instituted against him for a breach of the law. When the case was brought into Court, theonuswas shifted on to Professor Yeo, who was a licensed vivisector. Below is a comparison between the facts as reported and the sworn evidence of the reporter of the one journal and the editor of the other:—]British Medical Journal.Published Report, 20th August, 1881.The members were shown two of the monkeys, a portion of whose cortex had been removed by Professor Ferrier. Concerning the first of these, Professor Ferrier said it had been his desire to remove as completely as possible the whole of the psycho-motor region. Whether in this he had succeeded perfectly could not be learnt for certainty until after apost-mortemexamination had been made.Reporter’s Sworn Evidence.17th November, 1881.Q. Did Professor Ferrier offer to exhibit two of the monkeys upon which he had so operated?A. At the Congress, no.Q. Did he subsequently?A. No; he showed certain of the members of the Congress two monkeys at King’s College.Q. What two monkeys?A. Two monkeys upon which an operation had been performed.Q. By whom?A. By Professor Yeo.Lancet.Published Report, 8th October, 1881.“The interest attaching to the discussion was greatly enhanced by the fact that Professor Ferrier was willing to exhibit two monkeys which he had operated upon some months previously.”…“In startling contrast to the dog were two monkeys exhibited by Professor Ferrier. One of them had been operated upon in the middle of January, the left motor area having been destroyed. There had resulted from the operation right sided hemiplegia, with conjugate deviation of eyes and of head. Facial paralysis was at first well marked, but ceased after a fortnight. From the first there had been paralysis of the right leg, though the animal was able to lift it up. The arm it had never been able to use. Lately, rigidity of the muscles of the paralysed limbs had been coming on. The other monkey, as a consequence of paralysis of its auditory centres, was apparently entirely unaffected by loud noises, as by the firing of percussion caps in close proximity to its head.”Counsel’s Statement.17th November, 1881.Dr.Wakley,sworn, examined by Mr. Waddy:—Q. Are you the editor of theLancet?A. I am.Q. Can you tell me who it was furnished his Report?A. I have the permission of the gentleman to give his name, Professor Gamgee, of Owen’s College, Manchester.Mr.Waddy: What I should ask is that one might have an opportunity of calling Professor Gamgee.Mr.Gully: I have my reasons for objecting to this. We have communicated with Professor Gamgee and I know very well that he will say precisely what was said by Dr. Roy.“At a meeting of the Physiological Section of the International Medical Congress held in London in 1881, Professor Goltz exhibited a dog, and Professors Ferrier and Yeo a monkey; from the brain of the dog a large area of the cortex had been removed without producing any such effect as, according to Professor Goltz, would necessarily result if the theory, as usually held, of the localisation of function of the cortex were true; from the brain of the monkey a definite part of the so-called motor area had been removed, and a localised paralysis produced—a paralysis which, according to Professors Ferrier and Yeo, could not result if that theory were not true.”—“On the Cortical Areas removed from the Brain of a Dog and from the Brain of a Monkey”a Report by Dr. Klein, Mr. Langley, and Professor Schäfer, Journal of Physiology, Vol. IV., 1884, p. 231.

Author of “Diseases of the Kidney” (awarded Gold Medal of Path. Soc. Dub.); Contrib. to Proc. Path. Soc. Dub., etc., etc.

Held a License for Vivisection at King’s College, London, Physiological Laboratory and Anatomical Theatre in 1878-79-80-81-82-83. Certificates for Illustrations of Lectures and for Dispensing with obligation to Kill in 1878-79-80-81. Certificate for Illustrations of Lectures in 1882 and 1883.

“Why repeat the oft-told tale of horrors contained in the works of Claude Bernard, Paul Bert, Brown-Séquard, and Richet, in France; of Goltz, in Germany; and Flint, in America.”—G. F. Yeo, Fortnightly Review, March, 1882.

“I am proud to call him (Goltz) my friend.”—G. F. Yeo, Contem. Review, May, 1882.

[It was reported in theBritish Medical Journaland theLancetthat at a meeting of the Physiological Section of the International Medical Congress, held in London in 1881, Professor Ferrier had shown two monkeys, a portion of whose cortex had been removed by himself. As Professor Ferrier had no license for vivisection at the time, a prosecution was instituted against him for a breach of the law. When the case was brought into Court, theonuswas shifted on to Professor Yeo, who was a licensed vivisector. Below is a comparison between the facts as reported and the sworn evidence of the reporter of the one journal and the editor of the other:—]

British Medical Journal.

Published Report, 20th August, 1881.

The members were shown two of the monkeys, a portion of whose cortex had been removed by Professor Ferrier. Concerning the first of these, Professor Ferrier said it had been his desire to remove as completely as possible the whole of the psycho-motor region. Whether in this he had succeeded perfectly could not be learnt for certainty until after apost-mortemexamination had been made.

Reporter’s Sworn Evidence.17th November, 1881.

Q. Did Professor Ferrier offer to exhibit two of the monkeys upon which he had so operated?

A. At the Congress, no.

Q. Did he subsequently?

A. No; he showed certain of the members of the Congress two monkeys at King’s College.

Q. What two monkeys?

A. Two monkeys upon which an operation had been performed.

Q. By whom?

A. By Professor Yeo.

Lancet.

Published Report, 8th October, 1881.

“The interest attaching to the discussion was greatly enhanced by the fact that Professor Ferrier was willing to exhibit two monkeys which he had operated upon some months previously.”…

“In startling contrast to the dog were two monkeys exhibited by Professor Ferrier. One of them had been operated upon in the middle of January, the left motor area having been destroyed. There had resulted from the operation right sided hemiplegia, with conjugate deviation of eyes and of head. Facial paralysis was at first well marked, but ceased after a fortnight. From the first there had been paralysis of the right leg, though the animal was able to lift it up. The arm it had never been able to use. Lately, rigidity of the muscles of the paralysed limbs had been coming on. The other monkey, as a consequence of paralysis of its auditory centres, was apparently entirely unaffected by loud noises, as by the firing of percussion caps in close proximity to its head.”

Counsel’s Statement.17th November, 1881.

Dr.Wakley,sworn, examined by Mr. Waddy:—

Q. Are you the editor of theLancet?

A. I am.

Q. Can you tell me who it was furnished his Report?

A. I have the permission of the gentleman to give his name, Professor Gamgee, of Owen’s College, Manchester.

Mr.Waddy: What I should ask is that one might have an opportunity of calling Professor Gamgee.

Mr.Gully: I have my reasons for objecting to this. We have communicated with Professor Gamgee and I know very well that he will say precisely what was said by Dr. Roy.

“At a meeting of the Physiological Section of the International Medical Congress held in London in 1881, Professor Goltz exhibited a dog, and Professors Ferrier and Yeo a monkey; from the brain of the dog a large area of the cortex had been removed without producing any such effect as, according to Professor Goltz, would necessarily result if the theory, as usually held, of the localisation of function of the cortex were true; from the brain of the monkey a definite part of the so-called motor area had been removed, and a localised paralysis produced—a paralysis which, according to Professors Ferrier and Yeo, could not result if that theory were not true.”—“On the Cortical Areas removed from the Brain of a Dog and from the Brain of a Monkey”a Report by Dr. Klein, Mr. Langley, and Professor Schäfer, Journal of Physiology, Vol. IV., 1884, p. 231.

Yule, C. J. F.M.A.; Lecturer on Exper. Physiol., Magdalen Coll. Oxford.Held a License for Vivisection at University Oxford Laboratory, Magdalen College in 1878 and 1882. Certificates for Illustrations of Lectures, 1878 and 1882.

Yule, C. J. F.M.A.; Lecturer on Exper. Physiol., Magdalen Coll. Oxford.

Held a License for Vivisection at University Oxford Laboratory, Magdalen College in 1878 and 1882. Certificates for Illustrations of Lectures, 1878 and 1882.

Zander, Richard.M.D.; Prosect. Anatom. Inst., Königsberg, Prussia.Contrib. to Centralblatt f. d. Med. Wissenchaften, 1879.“In the year 1878 I made a series of experiments on the results of section of the vagus in birds, occasioned by the title of the Prize Essay of the Medical Faculty of Königsberg,—According to Blainville and Billroth section of the nervi vagi in birds has no influence on the condition of the lungs. It is to be experimentally proved why birds die after this operation.… As my experiments in many points contradict those of Eichhorst, I will here shortly give the results of over eighty experiments on birds principally pigeons. My completed work, which was awarded the prize by the Medical Faculty on the 18th of Jan., will shortly appear.”—Centralbl. f. d. Med. Wiss., 1879, p. 99.

Zander, Richard.M.D.; Prosect. Anatom. Inst., Königsberg, Prussia.

Contrib. to Centralblatt f. d. Med. Wissenchaften, 1879.

“In the year 1878 I made a series of experiments on the results of section of the vagus in birds, occasioned by the title of the Prize Essay of the Medical Faculty of Königsberg,—According to Blainville and Billroth section of the nervi vagi in birds has no influence on the condition of the lungs. It is to be experimentally proved why birds die after this operation.… As my experiments in many points contradict those of Eichhorst, I will here shortly give the results of over eighty experiments on birds principally pigeons. My completed work, which was awarded the prize by the Medical Faculty on the 18th of Jan., will shortly appear.”—Centralbl. f. d. Med. Wiss., 1879, p. 99.

Zuntz, Nathan.Prof. of Anim. Physiol. Univ., Berlin; form. Prof. at Bonn; Direct. of the Agricul. Acad., Poppelsdorf.Author of “Beiträge zur Physiologie des Blutes,” Bonn, 1868; “Innervation der Athmung,” Biol. Centralbl., Vol. II., No. 6 (1882); “Ueber die Bedeutung der Amidsubstanzen für die thierische Ernährung,” Arch. f. Physiol. (1882); “Zur Theorie des Fiebers;” Centralbl. f. d. Med. Wiss., No. 32, 1882, p. 561.Made experiments with curare on rabbits.—“Ueber den Einfluss der Curarevergiftung auf den thierischen Stoffwechsel,” Pflüger’sArchiv, Vol. XII., p. 522.

Zuntz, Nathan.Prof. of Anim. Physiol. Univ., Berlin; form. Prof. at Bonn; Direct. of the Agricul. Acad., Poppelsdorf.

Author of “Beiträge zur Physiologie des Blutes,” Bonn, 1868; “Innervation der Athmung,” Biol. Centralbl., Vol. II., No. 6 (1882); “Ueber die Bedeutung der Amidsubstanzen für die thierische Ernährung,” Arch. f. Physiol. (1882); “Zur Theorie des Fiebers;” Centralbl. f. d. Med. Wiss., No. 32, 1882, p. 561.

Made experiments with curare on rabbits.—“Ueber den Einfluss der Curarevergiftung auf den thierischen Stoffwechsel,” Pflüger’sArchiv, Vol. XII., p. 522.

Sinéty, Louis de, 10, Rue de la Chaise, Paris. M.D., 1873. Formerly Prof. Gen. Anat. Med. Fac.Author of “De l’État du Foie chez les femelles en lactation” (Thèse), Paris, 1873; “Traité pratique de Gynécologie,” Paris, 1879; second edition, 1884.“On female guinea-pigs, which have only a single pair of mammæ, we have made the ablation of these glands during lactation.”—“Manuel Pratique de Gynécologie,” Paris, 1879, p. 778.“I wish to communicate to the Society the results that I have obtained by the ablation of the mammæ in animals. Dogs and rabbits with their six or eight mammæ were unable to survive these experiments. I chose in preference guinea-pigs, which have, as is known, only two mammæ, and in which the disposition of the ducts renders the operation easy, I might almost say harmless, even during the period of lactation; for out of six females operated on in the month of September not one died, and all of them are stillto-day subject to observation.”—Report of the Meeting of the Soc. de Biologie, December 20, 1873, “Gaz. Méd. de Paris,” 1874, p. 36.“I have myself made a fair number of experiments relative to the innervation of the mammary glands on female guinea-pigs.… Considering the contradictory results, it would be well to describe the experiments before arriving at any conclusions.… Experiment No. 1, June 10, 1874.—Guinea-pig in lactation. The mammary nerve on one side is laid bare, and insulated by means of a thread. The animal exhibits signs of acute pain, especially when the nerve is stimulated by an electric current; but the stimulation, prolonged during 10 minutes, produces no appreciable effect on the teats nor on the amount of milk secreted. I divided the nerve, and on the following day, June 11, there was as much milk in one gland as in the other; nor did the electric stimulation re-applied to both ends of the divided nerve produce any apparent effect on the glandular function.… I have selected these five experiments from those I had noted down in my book, as I made them under varying conditions. In all of them the results were negative.… Rochrig observed that in the goat the effects were different—as M. Lafont had said—which proves once more that the conclusions arrived at must not be generalized, and that the phenomena may vary considerably according to the species of animal.”—“De l’Innervation de la Mamelle,”Report de la Soc. de Biologie, October 25, 1879, “Gaz. Méd. de Paris,” 1879, p. 593.

Sinéty, Louis de, 10, Rue de la Chaise, Paris. M.D., 1873. Formerly Prof. Gen. Anat. Med. Fac.

Author of “De l’État du Foie chez les femelles en lactation” (Thèse), Paris, 1873; “Traité pratique de Gynécologie,” Paris, 1879; second edition, 1884.

“On female guinea-pigs, which have only a single pair of mammæ, we have made the ablation of these glands during lactation.”—“Manuel Pratique de Gynécologie,” Paris, 1879, p. 778.

“I wish to communicate to the Society the results that I have obtained by the ablation of the mammæ in animals. Dogs and rabbits with their six or eight mammæ were unable to survive these experiments. I chose in preference guinea-pigs, which have, as is known, only two mammæ, and in which the disposition of the ducts renders the operation easy, I might almost say harmless, even during the period of lactation; for out of six females operated on in the month of September not one died, and all of them are stillto-day subject to observation.”—Report of the Meeting of the Soc. de Biologie, December 20, 1873, “Gaz. Méd. de Paris,” 1874, p. 36.

“I have myself made a fair number of experiments relative to the innervation of the mammary glands on female guinea-pigs.… Considering the contradictory results, it would be well to describe the experiments before arriving at any conclusions.… Experiment No. 1, June 10, 1874.—Guinea-pig in lactation. The mammary nerve on one side is laid bare, and insulated by means of a thread. The animal exhibits signs of acute pain, especially when the nerve is stimulated by an electric current; but the stimulation, prolonged during 10 minutes, produces no appreciable effect on the teats nor on the amount of milk secreted. I divided the nerve, and on the following day, June 11, there was as much milk in one gland as in the other; nor did the electric stimulation re-applied to both ends of the divided nerve produce any apparent effect on the glandular function.… I have selected these five experiments from those I had noted down in my book, as I made them under varying conditions. In all of them the results were negative.… Rochrig observed that in the goat the effects were different—as M. Lafont had said—which proves once more that the conclusions arrived at must not be generalized, and that the phenomena may vary considerably according to the species of animal.”—“De l’Innervation de la Mamelle,”Report de la Soc. de Biologie, October 25, 1879, “Gaz. Méd. de Paris,” 1879, p. 593.

THE END.

Back to Index Next