Transcriber's notePrinter errors have been changed and are listed below. All other inconsistencies are as in the original.The following changes have been made to the text:Page 4: Was 'contine' (instead of one, and because one in the present instance actually determined the result, I willconfinemy observations to a single vote. For this purpose let us take one of the votes from Louisiana, that, for)Page 7: Was 'recived' (election of November 7, 1876, at which he was a candidate on the Republican electoral ticket, there wasreceivedat the Department of the Interior, from the hands of the President, this letter:)Page 22: Was 'de-facto' (when the office is temporary, existing but for a moment, even if the doctrine of ade factoofficer can be applied to such an office at all. In the present case, Brewster went into the State-House and voted)Page 22: Was 'de-facto' (where rival colleges of electors had acted at the same time in the same State. In those cases, as already observed, the question of ade factoelector could not arise. There was but one case, that of Wisconsin,)
Printer errors have been changed and are listed below. All other inconsistencies are as in the original.
The following changes have been made to the text:
Page 4: Was 'contine' (instead of one, and because one in the present instance actually determined the result, I willconfinemy observations to a single vote. For this purpose let us take one of the votes from Louisiana, that, for)
Page 7: Was 'recived' (election of November 7, 1876, at which he was a candidate on the Republican electoral ticket, there wasreceivedat the Department of the Interior, from the hands of the President, this letter:)
Page 22: Was 'de-facto' (when the office is temporary, existing but for a moment, even if the doctrine of ade factoofficer can be applied to such an office at all. In the present case, Brewster went into the State-House and voted)
Page 22: Was 'de-facto' (where rival colleges of electors had acted at the same time in the same State. In those cases, as already observed, the question of ade factoelector could not arise. There was but one case, that of Wisconsin,)