FOOTNOTES:[46]Cf. in reBradwell, 55Ill.535, Bradwell v. Illinois, 16 Wallace, 130, 1873.[47]In reMaguire, 57Cal.604.[48]Ex parteHayes, 98Cal.556.[49]Fosterv.Police Commissioners, 102Cal.483.[50]Peoplev.Williams, 189N. Y.131.[51]198 U. S. 45.[52]208 U. S. 412.[53]In reMorgan, 26Col.415;in reJacobs, 98N. Y.98.[54]Hutchins and Harrison,History of Factory Legislation,p.187.[55]Holdenv.Hardy, 169 U. S. 366, Lochnerv.New York, 198 U. S. 45.[56]In reMorgan, 26Col.415.[57]Since this article was written the Illinois supreme court has declared the ten-hour law constitutional.—Editor.[58]Hutchins and Harrison,History of Factory Legislation,p.84.[59]Ibid.,p.186.[60]155Ill.98.[61]Peoplev.Williams, 189N. Y.131, 134.[62]Mullerv.Oregon, 208 U. S. 412, 421-423.[63]R. L., 106, § 69.[64]“The moral dangers of night work are so obvious that they need only be mentioned: the danger of the streets at night, going to and from work, association with all kinds of men employes at late night hours; the difficulty for women who are away from their families, of living at respectable places and entering at night hours; the peril of the midnight recess in establishments that run all night long.” Josephine C. Goldmark,Annals American Academy of Political and Social Science, v. 28,p.64.[65]Hutchins and Harrison,p.85.[66]Hutchins and Harrison,pp.209-211.[67]Connollyv.Union Sewer Pipe Co., 184 U. S. 540.[68]Report1907,p.49.[69]Charities and the Commons, v. 17,p.839.[70]Schaezleinv.Cabaniss, 135Cal.466.[71]Buttfieldv.Stranahan, 192 U. S. 470, standards of quality of tea; Isenhourv.State, 157 Ind. 517, minimum standards of food and drug preparations, defining specific adulterations; Armsv.Ayer, 192Ill.601, determining number and location of fire escapes.[72]Burcherv.People, 41 Colo. 495. The reasoning of the decision is in some respects obscure, and the case cannot be regarded as typical.
[46]Cf. in reBradwell, 55Ill.535, Bradwell v. Illinois, 16 Wallace, 130, 1873.
[46]Cf. in reBradwell, 55Ill.535, Bradwell v. Illinois, 16 Wallace, 130, 1873.
[47]In reMaguire, 57Cal.604.
[47]In reMaguire, 57Cal.604.
[48]Ex parteHayes, 98Cal.556.
[48]Ex parteHayes, 98Cal.556.
[49]Fosterv.Police Commissioners, 102Cal.483.
[49]Fosterv.Police Commissioners, 102Cal.483.
[50]Peoplev.Williams, 189N. Y.131.
[50]Peoplev.Williams, 189N. Y.131.
[51]198 U. S. 45.
[51]198 U. S. 45.
[52]208 U. S. 412.
[52]208 U. S. 412.
[53]In reMorgan, 26Col.415;in reJacobs, 98N. Y.98.
[53]In reMorgan, 26Col.415;in reJacobs, 98N. Y.98.
[54]Hutchins and Harrison,History of Factory Legislation,p.187.
[54]Hutchins and Harrison,History of Factory Legislation,p.187.
[55]Holdenv.Hardy, 169 U. S. 366, Lochnerv.New York, 198 U. S. 45.
[55]Holdenv.Hardy, 169 U. S. 366, Lochnerv.New York, 198 U. S. 45.
[56]In reMorgan, 26Col.415.
[56]In reMorgan, 26Col.415.
[57]Since this article was written the Illinois supreme court has declared the ten-hour law constitutional.—Editor.
[57]Since this article was written the Illinois supreme court has declared the ten-hour law constitutional.—Editor.
[58]Hutchins and Harrison,History of Factory Legislation,p.84.
[58]Hutchins and Harrison,History of Factory Legislation,p.84.
[59]Ibid.,p.186.
[59]Ibid.,p.186.
[60]155Ill.98.
[60]155Ill.98.
[61]Peoplev.Williams, 189N. Y.131, 134.
[61]Peoplev.Williams, 189N. Y.131, 134.
[62]Mullerv.Oregon, 208 U. S. 412, 421-423.
[62]Mullerv.Oregon, 208 U. S. 412, 421-423.
[63]R. L., 106, § 69.
[63]R. L., 106, § 69.
[64]“The moral dangers of night work are so obvious that they need only be mentioned: the danger of the streets at night, going to and from work, association with all kinds of men employes at late night hours; the difficulty for women who are away from their families, of living at respectable places and entering at night hours; the peril of the midnight recess in establishments that run all night long.” Josephine C. Goldmark,Annals American Academy of Political and Social Science, v. 28,p.64.
[64]“The moral dangers of night work are so obvious that they need only be mentioned: the danger of the streets at night, going to and from work, association with all kinds of men employes at late night hours; the difficulty for women who are away from their families, of living at respectable places and entering at night hours; the peril of the midnight recess in establishments that run all night long.” Josephine C. Goldmark,Annals American Academy of Political and Social Science, v. 28,p.64.
[65]Hutchins and Harrison,p.85.
[65]Hutchins and Harrison,p.85.
[66]Hutchins and Harrison,pp.209-211.
[66]Hutchins and Harrison,pp.209-211.
[67]Connollyv.Union Sewer Pipe Co., 184 U. S. 540.
[67]Connollyv.Union Sewer Pipe Co., 184 U. S. 540.
[68]Report1907,p.49.
[68]Report1907,p.49.
[69]Charities and the Commons, v. 17,p.839.
[69]Charities and the Commons, v. 17,p.839.
[70]Schaezleinv.Cabaniss, 135Cal.466.
[70]Schaezleinv.Cabaniss, 135Cal.466.
[71]Buttfieldv.Stranahan, 192 U. S. 470, standards of quality of tea; Isenhourv.State, 157 Ind. 517, minimum standards of food and drug preparations, defining specific adulterations; Armsv.Ayer, 192Ill.601, determining number and location of fire escapes.
[71]Buttfieldv.Stranahan, 192 U. S. 470, standards of quality of tea; Isenhourv.State, 157 Ind. 517, minimum standards of food and drug preparations, defining specific adulterations; Armsv.Ayer, 192Ill.601, determining number and location of fire escapes.
[72]Burcherv.People, 41 Colo. 495. The reasoning of the decision is in some respects obscure, and the case cannot be regarded as typical.
[72]Burcherv.People, 41 Colo. 495. The reasoning of the decision is in some respects obscure, and the case cannot be regarded as typical.