FOOTNOTES:

FOOTNOTES:[44]The reference in the speech was to the murder of a waiter named Keating, in the spring of 1856, at Willard’s Hotel, by a drunken Congressman from California named Herbert. Great indignation was aroused by this unprovoked crime, and although after two trials, the jury failing to agree in the first, Herbert was acquitted, his usefulness as a representative was destroyed. “He remained in Congress till the end of his term,” says Gobright in hisRecollection of Men and Things at Washington, “but failed to be respected by his fellow-members,” p. 164.[45]Cong. Globe, p. 2, 1st Sess., 35th Cong., p. 1919.[46]Cong. Globe, p. 2, 1st. Sess. 35th Cong., p. 1919.[47]Cong. Globe, p. 2, 1st Sess. 35th Cong., p. 1919.[48]Cong. Globe, P. 2, 1st Sess. 35th Cong., pp. 1918-19.[49]Cong. Globe, p. 3, 1st Sess. 35th Cong., p. 2,977.[50]“The American Irish,” pp. 70-1-3.[51]Cong. Globe, Appendix, 1st Sess., 35th Cong., p. 430.[52]“Father Curley tells me that John C. Calhoun used to come to the College to talk philosophy with old Father Dzierozynsky.” Extract from a letter of the late Father J. S. Sumner, of Georgetown College, to the author.

[44]The reference in the speech was to the murder of a waiter named Keating, in the spring of 1856, at Willard’s Hotel, by a drunken Congressman from California named Herbert. Great indignation was aroused by this unprovoked crime, and although after two trials, the jury failing to agree in the first, Herbert was acquitted, his usefulness as a representative was destroyed. “He remained in Congress till the end of his term,” says Gobright in hisRecollection of Men and Things at Washington, “but failed to be respected by his fellow-members,” p. 164.

[44]The reference in the speech was to the murder of a waiter named Keating, in the spring of 1856, at Willard’s Hotel, by a drunken Congressman from California named Herbert. Great indignation was aroused by this unprovoked crime, and although after two trials, the jury failing to agree in the first, Herbert was acquitted, his usefulness as a representative was destroyed. “He remained in Congress till the end of his term,” says Gobright in hisRecollection of Men and Things at Washington, “but failed to be respected by his fellow-members,” p. 164.

[45]Cong. Globe, p. 2, 1st Sess., 35th Cong., p. 1919.

[45]Cong. Globe, p. 2, 1st Sess., 35th Cong., p. 1919.

[46]Cong. Globe, p. 2, 1st. Sess. 35th Cong., p. 1919.

[46]Cong. Globe, p. 2, 1st. Sess. 35th Cong., p. 1919.

[47]Cong. Globe, p. 2, 1st Sess. 35th Cong., p. 1919.

[47]Cong. Globe, p. 2, 1st Sess. 35th Cong., p. 1919.

[48]Cong. Globe, P. 2, 1st Sess. 35th Cong., pp. 1918-19.

[48]Cong. Globe, P. 2, 1st Sess. 35th Cong., pp. 1918-19.

[49]Cong. Globe, p. 3, 1st Sess. 35th Cong., p. 2,977.

[49]Cong. Globe, p. 3, 1st Sess. 35th Cong., p. 2,977.

[50]“The American Irish,” pp. 70-1-3.

[50]“The American Irish,” pp. 70-1-3.

[51]Cong. Globe, Appendix, 1st Sess., 35th Cong., p. 430.

[51]Cong. Globe, Appendix, 1st Sess., 35th Cong., p. 430.

[52]“Father Curley tells me that John C. Calhoun used to come to the College to talk philosophy with old Father Dzierozynsky.” Extract from a letter of the late Father J. S. Sumner, of Georgetown College, to the author.

[52]“Father Curley tells me that John C. Calhoun used to come to the College to talk philosophy with old Father Dzierozynsky.” Extract from a letter of the late Father J. S. Sumner, of Georgetown College, to the author.


Back to IndexNext