NOTES
Page8.
A general presentation of these data will be found inF. Ratzel, History of Mankind;Sophus Müller, Urgeschichte Europas.
Page9.
A. Penck, “Das Alter des Menschengeschlechtes” (Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, vol. xl, pp. 390et seq.);Penck and Brückner, Die Alpen im Eiszeitalter (Leipzig).
Page10.
Th. Waitz, Anthropologie der Naturvölker (2d ed.), vol. i, p. 381.
Page13.
Georg Gerland, Das Aussterben der Naturvölker;F. Ratzel, Anthropogeographie, vol. ii, pp. 330et seq.
Page14.
1.Henry Barth, Travels and Discoveries in North and Central Africa (2d ed., London, 1857-1858), vol. ii, pp. 253et seq.; vol. iii, pp. 425et seq., 528et seq.; vol. iv, pp. 406et seq., 579et seq.
2.Gustav Nachtigal, Sahărâ und Sûdân, vol. ii, pp. 391et seq., 691et seq.; vol. iii, pp. 270et seq., 355et seq.
Page16.
Mary White Ovington, Half a Man, the Status of the Negro in New York (New York, Longmans, Green, and Co., 1911).
Page18.
1.Robert Bennett Bean, “On a Racial Peculiarity in the Brain of the Negro” (American Journal of Anatomy, vol. iv [1905]).
2. Fr.P. Mall, “On Several Anatomical Characters of the Human Brain, said to vary according to Race and Sex, etc.” (Ibid., vol. ix, pp. 1-32).
Page21.
1.H. Klaatsch, “The Skull of the Australian Aboriginal” (Reports from the Pathological Laboratory of the Lunacy Department, New South Wales Government, vol. i, part iii [Sydney, 1908], pp. 3-167); “Der primitive Mensch der Vergangenheit und Gegenwart” (Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft deutscher Naturforscher und Aerzte, 80 Vers. zu Cöln, part i, p. 95); Anatomische Hefte, 1902.
2.C. H. Stratz den Haag, “Das Problem der Rasseneinteilung der Menschheit” (Archiv für Anthropologie, N. S., vol. i, pp. 189et seq.).
3.Otto Schoetensack, “Die Bedeutung Australiens für die Heranbildung des Menschen aus einer niederen Form” (Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, vol. xxxiii [1901], pp. 127et seq.).
4.D. J. Cunningham, “The Lumbar Curve in Man and Apes” (Cunningham Memoirs[Dublin, 1886]).
Page24.
1.Karl Pearson, “On the Relationship of Intelligence to Size and Shape of Head, and to other Physical and Mental Characters” (Biometrika, vol. v, pp. 136et seq.).
2.L. Manouvrier, “Les aptitudes et les actes dans leurs rapports avec la constitution anatomique et avec le milieu extérieur” (Bulletins de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris, 4oseries, vol. i [1890], pp. 918et seq.).
Page25.
P. Topinard, Éléments d’Anthropologie générale, p. 620. Thevalue for African negroes is here very small. Another series quoted by Topinard (Ibid., p. 622), consisting of 100 skulls of each group, gives the following averages: Parisians, 1551 cc.; Auvergnats, 1585 cc.; African negroes, 1477 cc.; New Caledonians, 1488 cc. (a misprint in Topinard’s book makes this appear as 1588 cc.).
Page26.
1.L. Manouvrier, “Sur l’interprétation de la quantité dans l’encéphale” (Mémoires de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris, 2d series, vol. iii, pp. 284, 277, 281).
2.F. Galton, “Head Growth in Students at Cambridge” (Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, vol. xviii, p. 156).
Page27.
A. da Costa Ferraira, “La capacité du crâne chez les Portugais” (Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris, Série V, vol. iv [1903], pp. 417et seq.).
Page28.
H. H. Donaldson, The Growth of the Brain (1895);Raymond Pearl, “Variation and Correlation in Brain-Weight” (Biometrika, vol. iv, pp. 13et seq.).
Page29.
Franklin P. Mall.See note 2 to p. 18.
Page36.
R. H. Lock, Recent Progress in the Study of Variation, Heredity and Evolution (1906), pp. 73et seq.;A. L. Bowley, Elements of Statistics (1901).
Page41.
R. Wiedersheim, Der Bau des Menschen (4th ed., 1908); The Structure of Man an Index to his Past History (1895).
Page44.
J. Kollmann, “Beiträge zur einer Kraniologie der Europäischen Völker” (Archiv für Anthropologie, vol. xiii; vol. xiv, pp. 1, 79, 179); “Die Rassenanatomie der Hand und die Persistenz der Rassenmerkmale” (Ibid., vol. xxviii, pp. 91et seq.).
Page45.
1.J. Deniker, The Races of Man.
2.B. A. Gould, Investigations in the Military and Anthropological Statistics of American Soldiers (New York, 1869);J. H. Baxter, Statistics, Medical and Anthropological (Washington, 1875).
3.H. P. Bowditch, “The Growth of Children” (Eighth Annual Report of the State Board of Health of Massachusetts[Boston, 1877]).
4.Geo. W. Peckham, “The Growth of Children” (Sixth Annual Report of the State Board of Health of Wisconsin).
5.Otto Ammon, Zur Anthropologie der Badener (Jena, 1899), p. 514;Edv. Ph. Mackeprang, “De Värnepligtiger Legemshøjde i Danmark” (Meddelelser om Danmarks Antropologi[Kopenhagen, 1907], vol. i);Hans Daae, Legemets udvikling hos Norges mandlige ungdom.
Page46.
William Z. Ripley, The Races of Europe (New York, 1899), p. 381.
Page48.
1. For general data on growth see S. Weissenberg, Das Wachstum des Menschen (1911).
2.F. BoasandC. Wissler, Statistics of Growth (Report of the U.S. Commissioner of Education for 1904, pp. 25-132).
Page49.
E. Meumann, Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die experimentelle Pädagogik (Leipzig, 1907), vol. i.
Page50.
1.Rieger, Ueber die Beziehungen der Schädellehre zu Psychologie, Psychiatrie und Ethnologie (1882).
2.Joseph Engel, Untersuchungen über Schädelformen (Prag, 1851).
3.G. Walcher, “Ueber die Entstehung von Brachy- und Dolichokephalie” (Zentralblatt für Gynäkologie, vol. xxix [1904], No. 7); see alsoAnton Nyström, “Ueber die Formenveränderungen des menschlichen Schädels und deren Ursachen” (Archiv für Anthropologie, vol. xxvii, pp. 211et seq.).
4.Otto Ammon, Zur Anthropologie der Badener (Jena, 1899), p. 641; Die natürliche Auslese beim Menschen (1893); see alsoDe Lapouge, “Recherches sur l’anthropologie de l’Ille-et-Vilaine” (Bulletin de la Société scientifique et médicale de l’Ouest[Rennes, 1895]).
Page51.
1.Ridolfo Livi, Antropometria Militare (Rome, 1896), pp. 87et seq.
2.F. C. Shrubsall, “Physical Characters and Morbid Proclivities” (St. Bartholomew’s Hospital Reports, 1904, vol. xxxix, pp. 63et seq.).
Page52.
See, for instance,W. Z. Ripley, The Races of Europe (New York, 1899).
Page53.
Franz Boas, Changes in Bodily Form of Descendants of Immigrants, being partial report on the results of an anthropological investigation for the U.S. Immigration Commission (Senate Document No. 208, 61st Congress, 2d session, Washington, 1910); Abstract of the Report on Changes in Bodily Form of Descendants of Immigrants (Washington, 1911).
Page59.
Walcher.See note 3 to p. 50.
Page60.
F. Boas, “The Cephalic Index” (American Anthropologist, N. S., vol. i, pp. 448et seq.).
Page65.
Gustav Fritsch, Die Eingeborenen Süd-Afrikas (Breslau, 1872), pp. 30et seq.
Page68.
1.C. Keller, “Die Haustiere als menschlicher Kulturerwerb” (Der Mensch und die Erde[Berlin, 1906], vol. i, pp. 165-304); Naturgeschichte der Haustiere (Berlin, 1905). Studer, Die prähistorischen Hunde in ihrer Beziehung zu den gegenwärtig lebenden Rassen (Zürich, 1901).
2.Beckmann, Geschichte und Beziehung der Rassen der Hunde (Brunswick, 1894-95).
Page69.
W. Bogoras, The Chukchee (Publications of the Jesup North Pacific Expedition [Leyden, 1904-1909], vol. vii, pp. 73et seq.). Compare, however,J. A. Allen, “Report on the Mammals collected in Northeast Siberia by the Jesup North Pacific Expedition” (Bulletin American Museum of Natural History[New York, 1903], vol. xix, p. 126).
Page73.
1.K. Pearson, “Mathematical Contributions to the Theory of Evolution, III” (Philosophical Transactions, 1896-97, pp. 253et seq.).
2.H. H. RisleyandE. A. Gait, Census of India, 1901 (Calcutta, 1903), vol. i, pp. 489et seq.
Page74.
1.G. Nachtigal, Sahărâ und Sûdân, vol. ii, pp. 424et seq.
2.Rudolf Martin, Die Inlandstämme der Malayischen Halbinsel (Jena, 1905), pp. 1011-1012.
Page77.
Francis Galton, Natural Inheritance.Karl Pearson, “Law of Ancestral Heredity” (Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, vol. lxii, pp. 387, 388); “Law of Reversion” (Ibid., vol. lxvi, pp. 142et seq.); “On a Criterion which may serve to test Various Theories of Inheritance” (Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie, vol. vii [1904], pp. 524et seq.).
Page78.
1.R. H. Lock, Recent Progress in the Study of Variation, Heredity and Evolution (1906);Bateson, Mendelism.
2.Franz Boas, “Zur Anthropologie der nordamerikanischen Indianer” (Verhandlungen der Berliner Gesellschaft für Anthropologie, Ethnologie u. Urgeschichte, vol. xxvii [1895], pp. 366et seq.); “The Half-Blood Indian” (Popular Science Monthly, vol. xlv [1894], pp. 761et seq.).
Page80.
F. von Luschan, “Die Tachtadschy und andere Ueberreste der alten Bevölkerung Lykiens” (Archiv für Anthropologie, vol. xix, pp. 31-53).
Page82.
Karl Pearson, “On the Laws of Heredity in Man” (Biometrika, vol. ii [1902-03], pp. 357et seq.);Franz Boas, “Heredity in Anthropometric Traits” (American Anthropologist, N. S., vol. ix [1907], pp. 453et seq.).
Page84.
1.Ch. B. Davenport, “Heredity of Eye-Color in Man” (Science, N. S., vol. xxvi [1907], pp. 589-592); “Heredity of Hair-Form in Man” (American Naturalist, vol. xlii, pp. 341-349).
2. G. andCh. Davenport, “Heredity of Hair-Color in Man” (American Naturalist, vol. xliii, pp. 193-211).
Page86.
Ottokar Lorenz, Lehrbuch der gesammten wissenschaftlichen Genealogie (Berlin, 1898), pp. 289et seq., 308, 310, 311.
Page89.
W. Johannsen, Elemente der exakten Erblichkeitslehre (Jena).
Page91.
M. D. andRaymond Pearl, “On the Relation of Race Crossing to the Sex Ratio” (Biological Bulletin, vol. xv [1908], pp. 194et seq.).
Page100.
1.Gustav Klemm, Allgemeine Cultur-Geschichte (Leipzig, 1843), vol. i, pp. 196et seq.His opinions are accepted byA. Wuttke, Geschichte des Heidentums (Breslau, 1852-53), vol. i, p. 36.
2.Carl Gustav Carus, “Ueber die ungleiche Befähigung der verschiedenen Menschheitsstämme für höhere geistige Entwicklung” (Denkschrift zum hundertjährigen Geburtsfeste Goethe’s, Leipzig, 1849).
3.J. A. de Gobineau, Essai sur l’inégalité des races humaines (Paris, 1853-55).
4.NottandGliddon, Types of Mankind (Philadelphia, 1854); Indigenous Races of the Earth (Philadelphia, 1857).
5.Theodor Waitz, Anthropologie der Naturvölker, vol. (2d ed., Leipzig, 1877).
6.Herbert Spencer, Principles of Sociology.
7.Edward B. Tylor, Researches into the Early History of Mankind; Primitive Culture.
Page101.
Theodor Waitz, Anthropologie der Naturvölker (2d ed., 1877), vol. i, p. 387.
Pages106,109.
Herbert Spencer, The Principles of Sociology (New York, 1893), vol. i, pp. 55et seq., 59-61.
Page111.
G. M. Sproat, Scenes and Studies of Savage Life (1868), p. 120.
Page112.
1.Herbert Spencer,l.c., p. 70.
2.Franz Boas, “The Growth of Indian Mythologies” (Journal of American Folk-Lore, vol. ix [1896], pp. 1-11).
3.J. Mooney, “The Ghost-Dance Religion” (Fourteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology, pp. 641et seq.).
Page113.
1.Oviedo y Valdés, Historia General y Natural de las Indias [1535-57] (Madrid, 1851-55), Bk. xlii, Chaps. 2, 3 (quoted fromSpencer, Descriptive Sociology, No. II, pp. 42-43).
2.Rudolf Lehmann, Schopenhauer.
Page114.
G. Tarde, Les Lois de l’Imitation.
Page116.
Francis Galton, Natural Inheritance; Hereditary Genius.Karl Pearson,Biometrika.
Page117.
1.A. Wernich, Geographisch-medicinische Studien nach den Erlebnissen einer Reise um die Erde (Berlin, 1878), pp. 81et seq.
2.Rudolf Virchow, “Die physischen Eigenschaften der Lappen” (Verhandlungen der Berliner Gesellschaft für Anthropologie, Ethnologie u. Urgeschichte, vol. vii [1875], pp. 34et seq.; also vol. xxii [1890], p. 411).
Page118.
1.W. H. R. Rivers, “Observations on the Senses of the Todas” (Journal of Psychology, vol. i [1905], pp. 322et seq.).
2. The complete results of this study have not been published. The tests on hearing were published byFrank G. Bruner, The Hearing of Primitive Peoples (New York,Science Press, 1908).
Page120.
Charles Darwin, Journal of Researches into the Natural History and Geology of the Countries visited during the Voyage of H. M. S.Beagleround the World (New York, 1895), pp. 228-229.
Page121.
A brief résumé ofFreud’stheory will be found in theAmerican Journal of Psychology, vol. xxi (1910).
Page126.
1. For a history of these attempts, seeP. Topinard, Éléments d’Anthropologie générale (Paris, 1885), pp. 1-147.
2.H. Huxley, “On the Geographical Distribution of the Chief Modifications of Mankind” (Journal of the Ethnological Society, N. S., vol. ii [1870], pp. 404-412).
Page127.
Friedrich Müller, Allgemeine Ethnographie (Vienna, 1879).
Page128.
W. Z. Ripley, The Races of Europe (New York, 1899);J. Deniker, The Races of Man (London, 1900).
Page129.
1.F. Sarasin, Ergebnisse naturwissenschaftlicher Forschungen auf Ceylon (Wiesbaden, 1892-93), vol. iii, pp. 569et seq.
2.E. Bälz, “Menschenrassen Ost-Asiens mit specieller Rücksicht auf Japan” (Verhandlungen der Berliner anthropologischen Gesellschaft, vol. xxxiii [1901], pp. 166-189);H. Ten Kate, “Anthropologisches und Verwandtes aus Japan” (Internationales Centralblatt für Anthropologie, vol. vii [1902], p. 659).
3.W. Jochelson, The Yukaghir and the Yukaghirized Tungus (Publications of the Jesup North Pacific Expedition, vol. ix [1910], p. 59).
Page131.
1.Franz Boas, “A. J. Stone’s Measurements of Natives of the Northwest Territories” (Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, vol. xiv [New York, 1901], pp. 53-68); “Zur Anthropologie der nordamerikanischen Indianer” (Verhandlungen der Berliner Gesellschaft für Anthropologie, Ethnologie und Urgeschichte, vol. xxvii [1895], pp. 367et seq.).
2.Pliny Earle Goddard, Life and Culture of the Hupa (University of California Publications, American Archæology and Ethnology, vol. i [Berkeley, 1903-04]);Washington Matthews, Navaho Legends (1897);P. A. G. Morice, “The Great Déné Race” (Anthropos, vols. i, ii, iv [1906, 1907, 1909]).
Page132.
A. L. Kroeber, Types of Indian Culture in California (University of California Publications, American Archæology and Ethnology, vol. ii [1904-07], pp. 81-103).
Page140.
See remarks inGeorg von der Gabelentz, Die Sprachwissenschaft (Leipzig, 1891), pp. 371et seq.
Page141.
Franz Boas, “On Alternating Sounds” (American Anthropologist, vol. ii [1889], pp. 47et seq.).
Page147.
J. W. Powell, Introduction to the Study of Indian Languages (2d ed., Washington, Bureau of Ethnology), pp. 69et seq.
Page156.
1.E. B. Tylor, Primitive Culture; Researches into the Early History of Mankind.
2.Herbert Spencer, The Principles of Sociology.
3.J. G. Frazer, The Golden Bough; Totemism and Exogamy.
4.A. Bastian, Ideale Welten (Berlin, 1892); Die Welt in ihren Spiegelungen unter dem Wandel der Völkergedankens (Berlin, 1887); Allerlei aus Volks- und Menschenkunde (Berlin, 1888); Geographische und ethnologische Bilder (Jena, 1873); etc.
5.Richard Andree, Ethnographische Parallelen und Vergleiche (Stuttgart, 1878; Neue Folge, Leipzig, 1889).
6.Albert H. Post, Grundriss der Ethnologischen Jurisprudenz (Oldenburg and Leipzig, 1894).
Page157.
1.Richard Andree, “Scapulimantia,” in Boas Anniversary Volume (New York, G. E. Stechert, 1906), pp. 143et seq.
2.Franz Boas, Indianische Sagen von der Nord-Pacifischen Küste Amerikas (Berlin, A. Asher, 1895), pp. 338-339.
3.Franz Heger, “Aderlassgeräthe bei den Indianern und Papuas” (Mittheilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft in Wien, vol. xxiii [1893], Sitzungsberichte, pp. 83-87).
Page158.
Roland B. Dixon, “Basketry Designs of the Indians of Northern California” (Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, vol. xvii, p. 28).
Page161.
1.Waldemar Bogoras, The Chukchee (Publications of the Jesup North Pacific Expedition, vol. vii [Leiden, 1904-09]);Franz Boas, The Central Eskimo (Sixth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology[Washington, 1888]).
2.Leonhard Schultze, Aus Namaland und Kalahari (Jena, 1907).
3.Rudolf Martin.(See note 2 to p. 74.)
Page162.
1.Bogoras, l.c., pp. 177et seq.;Boas, l.c., pp. 551et seq.(see note 1, p. 161).
2.Boas(Ibid., p. 595).
Page165.
K. Weule, Die Kultur der Kulturlosen (Stuttgart);F. Ratzel, Anthropogeographie, vol. ii (1891), p. 693.
Page167.
1.Ed. Hahn, Die Haustiere (Leipzig, 1896), pp. 464, 465;A. de Candolle, Origin of Cultivated Plants (New York, 1886), pp. 59et seq., 139et seq.
2.Karl von den Steinen, Durch Centralbrasilien (1886), pp. 310et seq.; Unter den Naturvölkern Zentral-Brasiliens (1894), pp. 210-212.
3.Berthold Laufer, “The Introduction of Maize into Eastern Asia” (Congrès International des Américanistes, xveSession, Quebec, 1907, vol. i, pp. 223et seq., particularly pp. 250-252). Regarding the introduction of tobacco into eastern Asia, seeJ. Rein, inPetermann’s Mitteilungen, vol. xxiv (1878), pp. 215et seq.
4.Victor Hehn, Kulturpflanzen und Haustiere (2d ed., Berlin, 1874).
Page169.
1.Ed. Hahn, Die Entstehung der Pflugkultur (Heidelberg, 1909).
2.Richard Laasch, Der Eid (Stuttgart, 1908). Laasch gives some examples of the oath in America. They are, however, remarkably few as compared to the vast material collected by him from the Old World.
Page171.
An exposition ofBastian’spoint of view may be found inTh. Achelis, Moderne Völkerkunde (Stuttgart, 1896), pp. 189et seq.
Page173.
1.Wilhelm Wundt, Völkerpsychologie (Leipzig, Engelmann).
2.Otto Stoll, Suggestion und Hypnotismus in der Völkerpsychologie (Leipzig, 1894).
Page176.
E. B. Tylor, Primitive Culture (3d ed., 1891), p. 16.
Page177.
E. B. Tylor, “On a Method of Investigating the Development of Institutions” (Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, vol. xviii [1889], pp. 245et seq.).
Page179.
1.Otis T. Mason, The Origins of Invention (London, 1895), pp. 315et seq.
2.W J McGee, “The Beginning of Zooculture” (American Anthropologist, vol. x [1897], pp. 215et seq.).
3.Ed. Hahn, Die Haustiere und ihre Beziehungen zur Wirtschaft des Menschen; Die Entstehung der Pflugkultur (Heidelberg, 1909).
Page180.
1.H. Colley March, inTransactions of the Lancashire and Cheshire Antiquarian Society, 1886, “Polynesian Ornament a Mythology” (Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, vol. xxii [1893], pp. 307et seq.).Hjalmar Stolpe, “Entwicklungserscheinungen in der Ornamentik der Naturvölker” (Mittheilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft in Wien, vol. xxii [1892], pp. 19et seq.).Charles H. Read, “On the Origin and Sacred Character of Certain Ornaments of the S. E. Pacific” (Journ. Anthr. Inst., vol. xxi [1892], pp. 139et seq.).
2.A. C. Haddon, “The Decorative Art of British New Guinea” (Cunningham Memoirs, No. X [Dublin, 1894]).
3.Karl von den Steinen, Unter den Naturvölkern Zentral-Brasiliens (Berlin, 1894).
4.W. H. Holmes, “Ancient Art of the Province of Chiriqui, Colombia” (Sixth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology[Washington, 1888], pp. 3et seq.);F. W. Putnam, “Conventionalism in Ancient American Art” (Bulletin Essex Institute, vol. xviii [1886], pp. 155-167);GeorgeGrant McCurdy, “The Armadillo in the Ancient Art of Chiriqui” (Fifteenth International Congress of Americanists[Quebec, 1907], vol. ii, pp. 147-163).
5.Von den Steinen, “Prähistorische Zeichen und Ornamente” (Bastian Festschrift[Berlin, 1896], pp. 247-288). The general theory of ornament has been treated from this point of view byH. Colley March, “The Meaning of Ornament, or its Archæology and its Psychology” (Transactions of the Lancaster and Cheshire Antiquarian Society, 1889).A. C. Haddon, Evolution in Art (1895).Ernst Grosse, Die Anfänge der Kunst (1894).
Page186.
Von den Steinen, “Die Bedeutung der Textilmuster für den geometrischen Stil der Naturvölker” (Correspondenz-Blatt der deutschen Gesellschaft für Anthropologie, Ethnologie und Urgeschichte, vol. xxxv [1904], p. 126);Max Schmidt, Indianerstudien in Zentral-Brasilien (Berlin, 1905), pp. 330et seq.;Franz Boas, “The Decorative Art of the North American Indians” (Popular Science Monthly, 1903, pp. 481-498);Heinrich Schurtz, Urgeschichte der Kultur (1900), p. 540;A. S. F. Hamlin, inThe American Architect and Building News(1898).
Page187.
1.Richard Andree, Ethnographische Parallelen und Vergleiche (Neue Folge, 1889), pp. 107et seq.
2.Washington Matthews, “The Gentile System of the Navajo Indians” (Journal of American Folk-Lore, vol. iii [1890], pp. 89-110).
Page188.
1.John G. Bourke, “Notes upon the Gentile Organization of the Apaches of Arizona” (Ibid., pp. 111-126).
2.J. Walter Fewkes, “The Kinship of a Tanoan-speaking Community in Tusayan” (American Anthropologist, vol. vii [1894], pp. 162et seq.).
3.Franz Boas, “The Social Organization and the Secret Societies of the Kwakiutl Indians” (Report of the U. S. National Museum for 1895[Washington, 1897], p. 333);John R. Swanton, “Contributions to the Ethnology of the Haida” (Publications of the Jesup North Pacific Expedition, vol. ii [Leiden, 1905-09], pp. 102et seq.).
Page191.
A. A. Goldenweiser, “Totemism, an Analytical Study” (Journal of American Folk-Lore, vol. xxiii [1910], pp. 179et seq.).
Page192.
Edward Westermarck, The Origin and Development of the Moral Ideas (London, 1906).
Page194.
1. For examples see, for instance,Franz Boas, Handbook of American Indian Languages (Bulletin 40, Bureau of American Ethnology[Washington, 1911]).
2.Carl Stumpf, Die Anfänge der Musik (Leipzig, 1911).
Page233.
Clark Wissler, “Decorative Art of the Sioux Indians” (Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, vol. xviii [New York, 1904], pp. 231-278).
Printed in the United States of America.
Printed in the United States of America.
Printed in the United States of America.