Chapter 131

1I do not share the objections raised by various writers to the term “supernatural.” It has the sanction of common usage; and I consider it preferable to the word “superhuman,” when applied to inanimate things or animals which are objects of worship.

2Morgan,Animal Life and Intelligence, p. 339.

3Romanes,Animal Intelligence, 455sq.

4Gillmore, quoted by King,The Supernatural, p. 80.

5Basil Hall, quotedibid.p. 81. See alsoibid.p. 78sqq.; Vignioli,Myth and Science, p. 58sqq.

6Sully,Studies of Childhood, p. 205sq.

But the primitive mind not only distinguishes between the natural and the supernatural, it makes, practically, yet a further distinction. The supernatural, like the natural, may be looked upon in the light of mechanical energy, which discharges itself without the aid of any volitional activity. This is, for instance, the case with the supernatural force inherent in a tabooed object; mere contact with such an object communicates the taboo infection. So also the baneful energy in a curse is originally conceived as a kind of supernatural miasma, which injures or destroys anybody to whom it cleaves; in fact, totaboo a certain thing commonly consists in charging it with a curse. On the other hand, supernatural qualities may also be attributed to the mental constitution of animate beings, especially to their will. Such an attribution makes them supernatural beings, as distinct from any ordinary individuals who, without being endowed with special miraculous gifts, may make use of supernatural mechanical energy in magical practices. This distinction is in many cases vague; a wizard may be looked upon as a god and a god as a wizard. But it is nevertheless essential, and is at the bottom of the difference between religion and magic. Religion may be defined as a belief in and a regardful7attitude towards a supernatural being on whom man feels himself dependent and to whose will he makes an appeal in his worship. Supernatural mechanical power, on the other hand, is applied in magic. He who performs a purely magical act utilises such power without making any appeal at all to the will of a supernatural being.8

7Though somewhat indefinite, the epithet “regardful” seems a necessary attribute of a religious act. We do not call it religion when a savage flogs his fetish to make it submissive.

8Seeinfra,Additional Notes.

This, I think, is what we generally understand by religion and magic. But in the Latin wordreligiothere seems to be no indication of such a distinction.Religiois probably related toreligare, which means “to tie.” It is commonly assumed that the relationship between these words implies that in religion man was supposed to be tied by his god. But I venture to believe that the connection between them allows of another and more natural interpretation—that it was not the man who was tied by the god, but the god who was tied by the man. This interpretation was suggested to me by certain ideas and practices prevalent in Morocco. The Moors are in the habit of tying rags to objects belonging to asíyid, that is, a place where a saint has, or is supposed to have, his grave, or where such a person is said to have sat or camped. In very many cases, at least, this tying of rags isʿârupon thesaint, andl-ʿârimplies the transference of a conditional curse.9Thus, in the Great Atlas Mountains I found a large number of rags tied to a pole which was stuck in a cairn dedicated to the great saint Mûlai ʿAbd-ŭl-Ḳâder, and when I asked for an explanation the answer was that petitioners generally fasten a strip of their clothes to the pole muttering some words like these:—“O saint, behold! I promised thee an offering, and I will not release (literally ‘open’) thee until thou attendest to my business.” If the petitioner’s wish is fulfilled he goes back to the place, offers the sacrifice which he promised, and unties the knot which he made. A Berber servant of mine from Aglu in Sûs told me that once when in prison he invoked Lälla Răḥma Yusf, a great female saint whose tomb is in a neighbouring district, and tied his turban, saying, “I am tying thee, Lälla Răḥma Yusf, and I am not going to open the knot till thou hast helped me.” Or a person in distress will go to her grave and knot the leaves of some palmetto growing in its vicinity, with the words, “I tied thee here, O saint, and I shall not release thee unless thou releasest me from the toils in which I am at present.” All this is what we should call magic, but the Romans would probably have called itreligio. They were much more addicted to magic than to true religion; they wanted to compel the gods rather than to be compelled by them. Theirreligiowas probably nearly akin to the Greek κατάδεσμος, which meant not only an ordinary tie, but also a magic tie or knot or a bewitching thereby.10Plato speaks of persons who with magical arts and incantations bound the gods, as they said, to execute their will.11Thatreligio, however, from having originally a magical significance,has come to be used in the sense which we attribute to the term “religion,” is not difficult to explain. Men make use of magic not only in relation to their fellow men, but in relation to their gods. Magical and religious elements are often almost inseparably intermingled in one and the same act; and, as we shall soon see, the magical means of constraining a god are often externally very similar to the chief forms of religious worship, prayer and sacrifice.

9See Westermarck, ‘L-ʿâr, or the Transference of Conditional Curses in Morocco,’ inAnthropological Essays presented to E. B. Tylor, p. 361sqq.

10I am indebted to my friend Mr. R. R. Marett for drawing my attention to this meaning of the word κατάδεσμος. So also the verb καταδέω means not only “to tie” but “to bind by magic knots” (Athenaeus,Deipnosophistæ, xv. 9, p. 670; Dio Cassius,Historia Romana, l. 5), and κατάδεσις is used to denote “a binding by magic knots” (Plato,Leges, xi. 933). See Liddell-Scott,Greek-English Lexicon, p. 754; Harrison,Prolegomena to the Study of Greek Religion, p. 138sqq.

11Plato,Respublica, ii. 364.

That mystery is the essential characteristic of supernatural beings is proved by innumerable facts. It is testified by language. The most prominent belief in the religion of the North American Indians was their theory ofmanitou, that is, of “a spiritual and mysterious power thought to reside in some material form.” The word is Algonkin, but all the tribes had some equivalent for it.12Thus the Dacotahs express the essential attribute of their deities by the termwakan, which signifies anything which they cannot comprehend, “whatever is wonderful, mysterious, superhuman, or supernatural.”13The Navaho worddĭgĭ’nlikewise means “sacred, divine, mysterious, or holy”;14and so does the Hidatsa termmahopa.15In Fiji “the native word expressive of divinity iskalou, which, while used to denote the people’s highest notion of a god, is also constantly heard as a qualification of anything great or marvellous.”16The Maoris of New Zealand applied the wordatua, which is generally translated as “god,” not only to spirits of every description, but to various phenomena not understood, such as menstruation and foreign marvels, a compass for instance, or a barometer.17The natives of Madagascar,says Ellis, designate by the termndriamanitra, or god, everything that exceeds the capacity of their understanding. “Whatever is new and useful and extraordinary, is called god…. Rice, money, thunder and lightning, and earthquakes, are all called god….Taratasy, or book, they call god, from its wonderful capacity of speaking by merely looking at it.”18The Monbuttu use the wordkilimafor anything they do not understand—the thunder, a shadow, the reflection in water, as well as the supreme being in which they vaguely believe.19The Masai conception of the deity (ngăi), says Dr. Thomson, “seems to be marvellously vague. I was Ngăi. My language was Ngăi. Ngăi was in the steaming holes…. In fact, whatever struck them as strange or incomprehensible, that they at once assumed had some connection with Ngăi.”20Mr. and Mrs. Hinde use “the Unknown” as their equivalent of the wordngăi.21

12Dorman,Origin of Primitive Superstitions, p. 226. Parkman,Jesuits in North America, p. lxxix. Brinton,Religions of Primitive Peoples, p. 102. Hoffman, ‘Menomini Indians,’ inAnn. Rep. Bur. Ethn.xiv. 39, n. 1.

13Schoolcraft,Archives of Aboriginal Knowledge, iv. 642. Dorsey, ‘Siouan Cults,’ inAnn. Rep. Bur. Ethn.xi. 366. McGee, ‘Siouan Indians,’ibid.xv. 182sq.

14Matthews,Navaho Legends, p. 37.

15Idem,Hidatsa Indians, p. 47sq.

16Williams and Calvert,Fiji, p. 183.

17Best, ‘Lore of the Whare-Kohanga,’ inJour. Polynesian Soc.xiv. 210. Dieffenbach,Travels in New Zealand, ii. 116, 118. The wordtupua(ortipua) is used in a very similar way (Tregear,Maori-Polynesian Comparative Dictionary, p. 557).

18Ellis,History of Madagascar, i. 390sqq.

19Burrows,Land of the Pigmies, p. 100.

20Thomson,Through Masai Land, p. 260.

21Hinde,Last of the Masai, p. 99.

The testimony of language is corroborated by kindred facts referring to the nature of those objects which are most commonly worshipped.22Among all the American tribes, says Mr. Dorman, “any remarkable features in natural scenery or dangerous places became objects of superstitious dread and veneration, because they were supposed to be abodes of gods.”23A great cataract, a difficult and dangerous ford in a river, a spring bubbling up from the ground, a volcano, a high mountain, an isolated rock, a curious or unusually large tree, the bones of the mastodon or of some other immense animal—all were looked upon by the Indians with superstitious respector were propitiated by offerings.24In Fiji “every object that is specially fearful, or vicious, or injurious, or novel,” is eligible for admission to the native Pantheon.25It is said that when the Aëtas of the Philippines saw the first locomotive passing through their country “they all fell upon their knees in abject terror, worshipping the strange monster as some new and powerful deity.”26Of the shamanistic peoples in Siberia Georgi writes, “All the celestial bodies, and all terrestrial objects of a considerable magnitude, all the phenomena of nature that can do good or harm, every appearance capable of conveying terror into a weak and superstitious mind, are so many gods to whom they direct a particular adoration.”27Among the Samoyedes “a curiously twisted tree, a stone with an uncommon shape would receive, and in some quarters still receives, not only veneration but actual ceremonial worship.”28Castrén states that the Ostyaks worshipped no other objects of nature but such as were very unusual and peculiar either in shape or quality.29The Lapps made offerings not only to large and strange-looking objects, but to places which were difficult to pass, or where some accident had occurred, or where they had been either exceptionally unlucky or exceptionally lucky in fishing or the chase.30The Ainu of Japan deify all objects and phenomena which seem to them extraordinary or dreadful.31In China “a steep mountain, or any mountain at all remarkable, is supposed to have a special local spirit, who acts as guardian.”32The average middle-class Hindu, according to Sir Alfred Lyall, worships stocks or stones which are unusual or grotesque in size, shape, or position; or inanimate things which are gifted with mysteriousmotion; or animals which he fears; or visible things, animate or inanimate, which are directly or indirectly useful and profitable or which possess any incomprehensible function or property.33From all parts of Africa we hear of similar cults.34The Negroes of Sierra Leone dedicate to their spirits places which “inspire the spectator with awe, or are remarkable for their appearance, as immensely large trees rendered venerable by age, rocks appearing in the midst of rivers, and having something peculiar in their form, in short, whatever appears to them strange or uncommon.”35When Tshi-speaking natives of the Gold Coast take up their abode near any remarkable natural feature or object, they worship and seek to propitiate its indwelling spirit; whereas they do not worship any of the heavenly bodies, the regularity of whose appearance makes little impression upon their minds.36Throughout East Africa the people seem to attach religious sanctity to anything of extraordinary size; in the island of Zanzibar, where the hills are low, they reverence the baobab tree, which is the largest growing there, and in all parts of the country where hills are not found they worship some great stone or tall tree.37In Morocco places of striking appearance are generally supposed to be haunted byjnûn(jinn) or are associated with some dead saint.38As I have elsewhere tried to show, the Arabicjinnwere probably “beings invented to explain what seems to fall outside the ordinary pale of nature, the wonderful and unexpected, the superstitious imaginations of men who fear”;39and the saint was in many cases only the successor of thejinn. Indeed, the superstitious dread of unusual objects is not altogether dead even among ourselves.It survives in England to this day in the habit of ascribing grotesque and striking landmarks or puzzling antiquities to the Devil, who became the residuary legatee of obsolete pagan superstitions in Christian countries.40

22See, besides the instances referred to below, Karsten,Origin of Worship, p. 14sqq.; von Brenner,Besuch bei den Kannibalen Sumatras, p. 220 (Bataks);Mitteil. d. Geograph. Gesellsch. zu Jena, iii. 14 (Bannavs, between Siam and Annam). In Lord Kames’sEssays on the Principles of Morality and Religionthere is (p. 309sqq.) an interesting discussion on the dread of unknown objects.

23Dorman,op. cit.p. 300. See also Müller,Geschichte der Amerikanischen Urreligionen, i. 52; Harmon,Voyages and Travels in the Interior of North America, p. 363sq.; Smith, ‘Myths of the Iroquois,’ inAnn. Rep. Bur. Ethn.ii. 51.

24Dorman,op. cit.pp. 279, 290, 291, 302, 303, 308, 313-315, 319. Chamberlain, inJour. American Folk-Lore, i. 157 (Mississagua Indians). Georgi,Russia, iii. 237sq.(Aleuts.)

25Williams and Calvert,op. cit.p. 183.

26Lala,Philippine Islands, p. 96.

27Georgi,op. cit.iii. 256.

28Jackson, inJour. Anthr. Inst.xxiv. 398.Cf.Castrén,Nordiska resor och forskningar, iii. 230.

29Castrén,op. cit.iii. 227.

30Ibid.iii. 210. Högström,Beskrifning öfver de til Sveriges Krona lydande Lapmarker, p. 182. Leem,Beskrivelse over Finmarkens Lapper, p. 442sq.Friis,Lappish Mythologi, p. 133sq.

31Sugamata, quoted inL’Anthropologie, x. 98.

32Edkins,Religion in China, p. 221.

33Lyall,Asiatic Studies, p. 7.

34Wilson,Western Africa, p. 388 (Mpongwe). Mockler-Ferryman,British Nigeria, p. 255. Fritsch,Die Eingeborenen Süd-Afrika’s, p. 340 (Hottentots).

35Winterbottom,Native Africans of Sierra Leone, i. 223.

36Ellis,Yoruba-speaking Peoples of the Slave Coast, p. 282.Idem,Tshi-speaking Peoples of the Gold Coast, p. 21.

37Chanler,Through Jungle and Desert, p. 188.

38See Westermarck,The Moorish Conception of Holiness (Baraka),passim.

39Idem, ‘Nature of the ArabĞinn,’ inJour. Anthr. Inst.xxix. 268.

40Lyall,op. cit.p. 9.

The common prevalence of animal worship is no doubt due to the mysteriousness of the animal world; the most uncanny of all creatures, the serpent, is also the one most generally worshipped. Throughout India we meet with the veneration of animals which by their appearance or habits startle human beings.41In the Indian tribes of North America animals of an unusual size were objects of some kind of adoration.42In certain parts of Africa a cock crowing in the evening or a crane alighting on a house-top is regarded as supernatural.43White men have often been taken for spirits by red, yellow, or black savages, when seen by them for the first time.44Religious veneration is among various races bestowed on persons suffering from some abnormality, such as deformity, albinoism, or madness.45Some South American Indians “regard as divinities all phenomenal children, principally such as are born with a larger number of fingers or toes than is natural.”46The Hindus venerate persons remarkable for any extraordinary qualities great valour, virtue, or even vice.47By performing miracles men directly prove that they are supernatural beings. The Muhammedan saints, like the Christian in olden days, are believed to perform all kinds of wonders, such as flying in the air, passing unhurtthrough fire, walking upon water, transporting themselves in a moment of time to immense distances, or supporting themselves and others with food in desert places.48When Muhammed first claimed to be the Prophet of Allah, he was urged to give proof of his calling by working some miracle; and though he uniformly denied that he possessed such power, it was nevertheless ascribed to him even by his contemporaries.49

41Ibid.p. 13.

42Dorman,op. cit.p. 258. Harmon,op. cit.p. 364.

43Macdonald,Religion and Myth, p. 39.

44Avebury,Origin of Civilisation, pp. 272, 273, 375. Goblet d’Alviella,Hibbert Lectures on the Origin and Growth of the Conception of God, p. 67. Schultze,Fetischismus, p. 224. In Australia and elsewhere white people were taken for ghosts by the natives (Fison and Howitt,Kamilaroi and Kurnai, p. 248; Brough Smyth,Aborigines of Victoria, ii. 269sq.; Tylor,Primitive Culture, ii. 5sq.; Spencer,Principles of Sociology, i. 170sq.).

45Schultze,op. cit.p. 222.Supra,i. 270sq.“Among many savage or barbarous peoples of the world albinos have been reserved for the priestly office” (Bourke, ‘Medicine-Men of the Apache,’ inAnn. Rep. Bur. Ethn.ix. 460).

46Guinnard,Three Years’ Slavery among the Patagonians, p. 144.

47Monier-Williams,Brāhmanism and Hindūism, p. 350. For criminal-worship in Sicily, see Peacock, ‘Executed Criminals and Folk-Medicine,’ inFolk-Lore, vii. 275.

48Lane,Arabian Society in the Middle Ages, p. 49. Westermarck, ‘Sul culto del santi nel Marocco,’ inActes du XII. Congrès International des Orientalistes, iii. 153sqq.Idem,The Moorish Conception of Holiness, p. 77sqq.

49Muir,Life of Mahomet, i. p. lxv.sq.Bosworth Smith,Mohammed and Mohammedanism, p. 19. Sell,Faith of Islám, p. 218.

The dead are objects of worship much more commonly than are the living. Whilst the human individual consisting of body and soul is as a rule well-known, the disembodied soul, seen only in dreams or visions, is a mysterious being which inspires the survivors with awe. Mr. Spencer and Mr. Grant Allen even regard the worship of the dead as “the root of every religion.”50But this is to carry the ghost theory to an extreme for which there is no justification in facts. The spirits of the dead are worshipped because they are held capable of influencing, in a mysterious manner, the welfare of the living; but there is no reason to assume that they were originally conceived as the only supernatural agents existing. We have noticed that even the lower animals show signs of the same feeling as underlies the belief in supernatural beings; and we can hardly suppose that they are believers in ghosts.

50Spencer,Principles of Sociology, i. 411. Grant Allen,The Evolution of the Idea of God, pp. 91, 433, 438, &c.

On account of their wonderful effects medicines, intoxicants, and stimulants, are frequently objects of veneration. Most of the plants for which the American Indians had superstitious feelings were such as have medical qualities;51tobacco was generally held sacred by them,52and so was cocoa in Peru.53The Vedic deificationof the drinksomawas due to its exhilarating and invigorating effects.54

51Dorman,op. cit.p. 298sq.Dorsey, ‘Siouan Cults,’ inAnn. Rep. Bur. Ethn.xi. 428.

52Mooney, ‘Myths of the Cherokee,’ inAnn. Rep. Bur. Ethn.xix. 439. Dorman,op. cit.p. 295.

53Dorman,op. cit.p. 295.

54Whitney, ‘Vedic Researches in Germany,’ inJour. American Oriental Soc.iii. 299. Macdonell,Vedic Mythology, p. 108.

Among all the phenomena of nature none is more wonderful, impressive, awe-inspiring than thunder, and none seems more generally to have given rise to religious veneration. But with growing reflection man finds a mystery even in events of daily occurrence. The Vedic poet, when he sees the sun moving freely through the heavens, asks how it comes that it does not fall downward, although “unpropped beneath, not fastened firm, and downward turned”;55and it seems to him a miracle that the sparkling waters of all rivers flow into one ocean without ever filling it.56“Verily,” says the Koran, “in the creation of the heavens and the earth, and in the succession of night and day, are signs to those possessed of minds.”57

55Rig-Veda, iv. 13. 5.

56Ibid.v. 85. 6.

57Koran, iii. 87.

The attribution of miraculous power to a certain object or being may be due to direct experience of some effect produced by it, as in the case of a medical plant, or a poisonous snake, or a miracle-working spring, or a Christian or Muhammedan saint. Or it may be based on the inference that objects with a strange and mysterious appearance also possess strange and mysterious powers. This inference, too, is in a way supported by facts. The unusual appearance of the object makes an impression on the person who sees it, and predisposes him to the belief that the object is endowed with secret powers. If then anything unusual actually happens in its neighbourhood or shortly after it has been seen, the strange event is attributed to the influence of the strange object. Thus a Siberian tribe came to regard the camel as the small-pox demon because, just when the animal had appeared among them for the first time with a passing caravan, the small-pox broke out.58Of the British Guiana Indian we aretold by Sir E. F. Im Thurn that if his eye falls upon a rock in any way abnormal or curious, and if shortly after any evil happens to him, he regards rock and evil as cause and effect, and perceives a spirit in the rock.59With the lapse of time the data of experience readily increase. If a certain object has gained the reputation of being supernatural, it is looked upon as the cause of all kinds of unusual events which may possibly be associated with it. When I visited the large cave Imi-ntaḳḳándut in the Great Atlas Mountains, the interior of which is said to contain a whole spirit city, my horse happened to stumble on my way back to my camp, and fell upon one of my servants who was carrying a gun. The gun was broken and the man became lame for some days. I was told that the accident was caused by the cave spirits, because they were displeased at my visit. When the following day I again passed the cave with my little caravan, heavy rain began to fall; and now the rain was attributed to the ill-temper of the spirits.

58Tiele,Elements of the Science of Religion, i. 70.

59Im Thurn,Indians of Guiana, p. 354.

Startling events are ascribed to the activity not only of visible, but of invisible supernatural agents. Thus sudden or strange diseases are, at the lower stages of civilisation, commonly supposed to be occasioned by a supernatural being, which has taken up its abode in the sick person’s body, or otherwise sent the disease.60Among the Maoris, for instance, “each disease was supposed to be occasioned by a different god, who resided in the part affected.”61The Australian Kurnai maintain that phthisis, pneumonia, bowel complaints, and insanity are produced by an evil spirit, “who is like the wind.”62According to Moorish beliefs convulsions, epileptic or paralytic fits, rheumatic or neuralgic pains, and certain rare and violent epidemics, like the cholera, are caused by spirits, which either strike their victim, or enter his body, or sometimes, in the case of an epidemic, shoot at thepeople with poisonous arrows. Indeed, unexpected events of every kind are readily ascribed to supernatural influence, in Morocco and elsewhere. Among the North American Indians “the storms and tempests were generally thought to be produced by aërial spirits from hostile lands.”63Among the Hudson Bay Indians “everything not understood is attributed to the working of one of the numerous spirits.”64“Dans toute l’Afrique,” says M. Duveyrier in his description of the Touareg, “il n’y a pas un individu, éclairé ou ignare, instruit ou illettré, qui n’attribue aux génies tout ce qui arrive d’extraordinaire sur la terre.”65Of the South African natives Livingstone writes, “Everything not to be accounted for by common causes, whether of good or evil, is ascribed to the Deity.”66With the progress of science the chain of natural causes is extended, and, as Livy puts it, it is left to superstition alone to see the interference of the deity in trifling matters. Among ourselves the ordinary truths of science are so generally recognised that in this domain God is seldom supposed to interfere. On the other hand, with regard to social events, the causes of which are often hidden, the idea of Providence is still constantly needed to fill up the gap of human ignorance.

Back to Index Next