Polygordius larvaFig. 142. Polygordius larva.(After Hatschek.)m.mouth;sg. supra-œsophageal ganglion;nph.nephridion;me.p.mesoblastic band;an.anus;ol.stomach.
Fig. 142. Polygordius larva.(After Hatschek.)
m.mouth;sg. supra-œsophageal ganglion;nph.nephridion;me.p.mesoblastic band;an.anus;ol.stomach.
For this purpose no better form can be selected than the interesting larva of Polygordius (videAgassiz,No.332, Schneider, No.352, and Hatschek,No.339), which was first discovered by Lovén, and believed by him to be the larva of an ordinary Chætopod. Its true nature was determined by Schneider.
At a very young stage the larva has the form (fig. 142) of a flattened sphere, with a small conical knob at the posterior extremity.
At the equator are situated two parallel ciliated bands[137], between which lies the ventrally placed mouth (m). The more conspicuous ciliated band is formed of a double row of cilia, and is situated in front of the mouth. The thinner ciliated band behind the mouth appears to be absent in the American species.
The mouth leads into an œsophagus, and this into a globular stomach (ol), which is continuous with a rectum terminating by an anus (an) placed at the hind end of the posterior conical knob. The whole alimentary tract is ciliated. In the American form of larva there is a ring of cilia round the anus, which is developed at a somewhat later stage in the form observed by Hatschek.
Polygordius larvaFig. 143 Polygordius larva.(From Alex. Agassiz.)
Fig. 143 Polygordius larva.(From Alex. Agassiz.)
The position of the ciliated bands and the alimentary tract enables us to divide the embryo into three regions: a præ-oral region bounded by the anterior ciliated band, a gastric region in which the embryonic stomach is situated, and an abdominal region formed of the posterior conicalportion, which by its subsequent elongation gives rise to the whole segmented portion of the future Polygordius.
At the front end of the præ-oral lobe is situated the early formed supra-œsophageal ganglion (sg) (first noticed by Agassiz) in connection with which is a pair of eyes, and a ramified system of nerves. The ganglion is marked externally by a crown of cilia.
Polygordius larvaFig. 144. Polygordius larva.(From Alex. Agassiz.)
Fig. 144. Polygordius larva.(From Alex. Agassiz.)
The larval epidermis bears a delicate cuticula, and is separated by a considerable interval from the walls of the alimentary tract. The space between the two represents a provisional body cavity, which is eventually replaced by the permanent body cavity formed between the two layers of the mesoblast. It is doubtful when the replacement takes place in the head. It probably does so very early. The mesoblast is present in the usual form of two bands (me.p) (germinal streaks), which are anteriorly continued into two muscular bands which pass through the embryonic body cavity to the front end of the præ-oral lobe. Another pair of contractile bands passes from the same region of the præ-oral lobe to the œsophagus.
There is no trace of the ventral nerve cord. The most remarkable organ of the larva is a paired excretory organ (nph) discovered by Hatschek. This is a ciliated canal with at first one and subsequently several funnel-shaped openings into the body cavity in front and an external opening behind. It is situated immediately anterior to the lateral band of mesoblast, and is parallel with, and dorsal to, the contractile band which passes off from this. It occupies therefore a position in front of the segmented region of the adult Polygordius.
Polygordius larvaFig. 145. Polygordius larva.(From Alex. Agassiz.)
Fig. 145. Polygordius larva.(From Alex. Agassiz.)
The changes by which this peculiar larval form reaches the adult condition will be easily gathered from an inspection offigs. 143‑148. They consist essentially in the elongation of what has been termed the abdominal region of the body, and the appearance of a segmentation in the mesoblast; the segments being formed from before backwards, and each fresh segment being interpolated between the anus-bearing end of the body and the last segment.
As the hind portion of the body becomes elongated the stomach extends into it, and gives rise to the mesenteron of the adult (figs. 143,144, and145). For a long time the anterior spherical dilated portion of the larva remains very large, consisting of a præ-oral lobe and a post-oral section. The two together may be regarded as constituting the head.
At a comparatively late stage a pair of tentacles arises from the frontend of the præ-oral lobe (fig. 146), and finally the head becomes relatively reduced as compared with the body, and gives rise to the simple head of the fully formed worm (fig. 148). The two ciliated bands disappear, the posterior vanishing first. The ciliated band at the hind end of the body also atrophies; and just in front of it the ring of wart-like prominences used by the adult to attach itself becomes developed.
Polygordius larvaFig. 146. Polygordius larva.(From Alex. Agassiz.)
Fig. 146. Polygordius larva.(From Alex. Agassiz.)
At the sides of the head there is formed a pair of ciliated pits, also found by Hatschek in the embryo of Criodrilus, and characteristic of many Chætopod larvæ, but persistent in the adult Polygordius, Saccocirrus, Polyophthalmus, etc. They are perhaps the same structures as the ciliated pits in Nemertines.
Polygordius larvaFig. 147. Polygordius larva.(From Alex. Agassiz.)
Fig. 147. Polygordius larva.(From Alex. Agassiz.)
During the external changes above described, by which the adult form of Polygordius is reached, a series of internal changes also takes place which are for the most part the same as in other Chætopoda; and do not require a detailed description. The nervous[138]and muscular systems have precisely the normal development. The division of the mesoblast into somites is not externally indicated. The organs most worthy of notice are the excretory organs.
The essential points in the above development of Polygordius are (1) the gradual elongation and corresponding segmentation of the post-cephalic part of the body; and (2) the relative reduction in size of the præ-oral lobe and its conversion together with the oral region into the head; (3) the atrophy of the ciliated bands. The conversion of the larva into the adult takes place in fact by the intercalation of a segmented regionbetween a large mouth-bearing portion of the primitive body and a small anus-bearing portion[139].
Polygordius larvaFig. 148. Polygordius larva.(From Alex. Agassiz.)
Fig. 148. Polygordius larva.(From Alex. Agassiz.)
The general mode of development of Chætopod larvæ is similar to the above except in details, which are however no doubt often of great importance. The history of the larvæ may be conveniently treated under three heads. (1) The form of the primitive unsegmented larva; (2) the arrangement of the cilia on the unsegmented larva, and on the larva at later stages; (3) the character of the metamorphosis and the development of the permanent external organs.
A larva similar to the Polygordius larva with a greatly developed præ-oral lobe is widely distributed amongst the Annelids.
Larva of PhyllodoceFig. 149. Larva of Phyllodoce.(From Alex. Agassiz.)
Fig. 149. Larva of Phyllodoce.(From Alex. Agassiz.)
An almost identical form is that of Nepthys scolopendroides (Claparède and Metschnikoff,No.336); that of Phyllodoce (fig. 149) is also very similar, and that of Saccocirrus (Metsch. and Clap.No.336,Pl.XIII.fig. 1), a very primitive form most nearly related to Polygordius, clearly belongs to the same type. Many other larval forms, such as that of Spio fuliginosus (Metsch. and Clap.No.336), Terebella, Nerine, etc., also closely approach this form.
Other really similar forms at first sight appear very different, but this is mainly owing to the fact that their præ-oral lobe never attains a considerable development. Its smallness, though obviously of no deep morphological significance, at once produces a very different appearance in a larva.
A good example of a larval form with a small præ-oral lobe is afforded by Capitella, which is figured by Clap. and Metsch. (No.336,Pl.XVII.fig. 2). The imperfect development of the præ-oral lobe is also generally characteristic of the Oligochæta. The persistence of a relatively large præ-oral lobe for so long a time as in Polygordius is very unusual.
The arrangement of the cilia in Chætopod larvæ has been employed as a means of classifying them. Although a classification so framed has no morphological value, yet the terms themselves which have been invented are convenient. The terms most usually employed areAtrochæ,Monotrochæ,Telotrochæ,Polytrochæ,Mesotrochæ. The polytrochæ may again be subdivided into Polytrochæ proper,Nototrochæ,Gasterotrochæ, andAmphitrochæ.
The atrochæ contain forms (fig. 139) in which the larva is at first coated by an uniform covering of cilia, which, though it may subsequently disappear from certain areas, does not break up into a series of definite bands.
The monotrochæ or cephalotrochæ are larvæ in which only a single præ-oral ring is developed (fig. 150B).
Two Chætopod larvæFig. 150. Two Chætopod larvæ.(From Gegenbaur.)o.mouth;i.intestine;a.anus;v.præ-oral ciliated band;w.peri-anal ciliated band.
Fig. 150. Two Chætopod larvæ.(From Gegenbaur.)
o.mouth;i.intestine;a.anus;v.præ-oral ciliated band;w.peri-anal ciliated band.
In the telotrochæ there is present a præ-oral and a post-oral,i.e.peri-anal ring (fig. 150A); the latter sometimes having the form of a peri-anal patch.
The polytrochæ are segmented larvæ with perfect or imperfect rings of cilia on the segments of the body—usually one ring to each segment—between the two characteristic telotrochal rings. When these rings are complete the larvæ are polytrochæ proper, when they are only half rings they are either nototrochæ or gasterotrochæ. Sometimes there are both dorsal and ventral half rings which do not however correspond, such forms constitute the amphitrochæ.
In the mesotrochæ one or two rings are present in the middle of the body, and the characteristic telotrochal rings are absent.Larvæ do not necessarily continue to belong to the same group at all ages. A larva may commence as a monotrochal form and then become telotrochal and from this pass into a polytrochal condition, etc.
The atrochal forms are to be regarded as larvæ which never pass beyond the primitive stage of uniform ciliation, which in other instances may precede that of definite rings. They usually lose their cilia early, as in the cases of Serpula and other larvæ described below.
The atrochal larvæ are not common. The following history of an Eunicidan larva (probably Lumbriconereis) from Claparède and Metschnikoff (No.336) will illustrate their general history.
In the earliest stage noticed the larva has a spherical form, the præ-oral lobe not being very well marked. In the interior is a globular digestive tract. The cilia form a broad central band leaving free a narrow space at the apex of the præ-oral lobe, and also a circumanal space. At the apex of the præ-oral lobe is placed a bunch of long cilia, and a patch of cilia also marks out the anal area.
As the larva grows older it becomes elongated, and the anterior bunch of cilia is absorbed. The alimentary canal divides itself into pharynx and intestine. The former opens (?) by the mouth in the middle of the central band of cilia, the latter in the anal patch. The setæ indicating the segmentation are formed successively in the posterior ring-like area free from cilia. The cilia disappear after the formation of two segments.
In Lumbricus, the embryo of which ought perhaps to be grouped with the atrochæ, the cilia (Kleinenberg) cover a ventral tract of epiblast between the two mesoblastic cords, and are continued anteriorly to form a circle round the mouth.
The monotrochal larvæ are provided only with the important præ-oral ciliated ring before mentioned. In the majority of cases they are transitional forms destined very shortly to become telotrochal, and in such instances they usually have a more or less spherical body which is nearly divided into two equal halves by a ciliated ring. In some few instances, such as Polynoe, Dasychone, etc., the monotrochal characters are not lost till the larval cilia are exuviated.
The telotrochal forms (of which examples are shewn infigs. 144,150, etc.) may (1) start as monotrochal; or (2) from the first have a telotrochal character; or (3) be derived from atrochal forms. The last mode of origin probably represents the ancestral one.
Their mode of development is well illustrated by the case of Terebella nebulosa (videMilne-Edwards,No.347). The embryo is at first a nearly spherical ciliated mass. One end slightly elongates and becomes free from cilia, and, acquiring dorsally two eye-spots, constitutes a præ-oral lobe. The elongation continues at the opposite end, and near this is formed a narrow area free from cilia. The larva now has the same characters as the atrochal Eunicidan larva described above. It consists of a non-ciliated præ-oral lobe, followed by a wide ciliated band, behind which is a ring-like area free from cilia; and behind this again a peri-anal patch of cilia. The ring-like area free from cilia is, as in the Eunicidan larva, the region which becomes segmented. It soon becomes longer, and is then divided into two segments; a third and fourth etc. non-ciliated segment becomes successively interposed immediately in front of the peri-anal patch; and, after a certain number of segments have become formed, there appear on some of the hinder of them short tubercles, provided with single setæ (the notopodia), which are formed from before backwards, like the segments.
The mouth, anus, and intestine become in the meantime clearly visible. The mouth is on the posterior side of the ciliated band, and the anus in the centre of the peri-anal patch.
The ciliated band in front now becomes contracted and provided with long cilia. It passes below completely in front of the mouth, and constitutes, in fact, a well-marked præ-oral ring, while the cilia behind constitute an equally marked peri-anal ring. The larva has in fact now acquired all the characters of a true telotrochal form.
Only a comparatively small number of Chætopod larvæ remain permanently telotrochal. Of these Terebella nebulosa, already cited (though not Terebella conchilega), is one; Polygordius, Saccocirrus and Capitella are other examples of the same, though in the latter form the whole ventral surface becomes ciliated.
The majority of the originally telotrochal forms become polytrochal.
In most cases the ciliated rings or half rings of the polytrochal forms are placed at equal distances, one for each segment. They are especially prominent in surface-swimming larvæ, and are in rare cases preserved in the adult. In some instances (e.g.Nerine and Spio) the ventral half rings, instead of being segmentally arranged, are somewhat irregularly distributed amongst the segments, so that there does not seem to be a necessary correspondence between the ciliated rings and the segments. This is further shewn by the fact that the ciliated rings are not precursors of the true segmentation, but aredeveloped after the establishment of the segments, and thus seem rather to be secondarily adapted to the segments than primarily indicative of them.
In most Polytrochæ the rings are incomplete, so that they fall under the category of Nototrochæ or Gasterotrochæ.
The larva of Odontosyllis is an example of the former, and that of Magelona of the latter. The larvæ of Nerine and Spio, already quoted as examples of an unsegmented arrangement of the ventral ciliated half rings, are both amphitrochal forms.
As an example of a polytrochal form with complete ciliated rings Ophryotrocha puerilis may be cited. This form, discovered by Claparède and Metschnikoff, develops a complete ciliated ring on each segment: and the præ-oral ring, though at first single, becomes at a later period divided into two. This form is further exceptional in that the ciliated rings are persistent in the adult.
The unimportance of the character of the rings in the polytrochal forms is shewn by such facts as the absence of these rings in Terebella nebulosa and the presence of dorsal half rings in Terebella conchilega.
The mesotrochal forms are the rarest of Chætopod larvæ, and would seem to be confined to the Chætopteridæ.
Their most striking character is the presence of one or two complete ciliated rings which girth the body between the mouth and anus. The whole body is further covered with short cilia. The anus has a distinct dorsal situation, while on its ventral side there projects backwards a peculiar papilla.
The total absence of the typical præ-oral and of the peri-anal bands separates the mesotrochal larvæ very sharply from all the previous types.
A characteristic of many Chætopod larvæ is the presence of a bunch of cilia or a single flagellum at the apex of the præ-oral lobe. The presence of such a structure is characteristic of the larval forms of many other groups, Turbellarians, Nemertines, Molluscs, etc.
In the preceding section the mode of multiplication of the segments has already been sufficiently described[140].
Larva of PhyllodoceFig. 151. Larva of Phyllodoce from the ventral side.(From Alex. Agassiz.)
Fig. 151. Larva of Phyllodoce from the ventral side.(From Alex. Agassiz.)
Apart from the formation of the segments the larval metamorphosis consists in the atrophy of the provisional ciliated rings and other provisional organs, and in the acquirement of the organs of the adult.
The great variations in the nature of the Chætopod appendages render it impossible to treat this part of the developmental history of the Chætopoda in a systematic way.
The mode of development of the appendages is not constant, so that it is difficult to draw conclusions as to the primitive form from which the existing types of appendages are derived.
In a large number of cases the primitive rudiments of the feet exhibit no indication of a division into notopodium and neuropodium; while in other instances (e.g.Terebella and Nerine,fig. 152) the notopodium is first developed, and subsequently the neuropodium quite independently.
Larva of NerineFig. 152. Larva of Nerine, with provisional setæ.(From Alex. Agassiz.)
Fig. 152. Larva of Nerine, with provisional setæ.(From Alex. Agassiz.)
In many cases the setæ appear before there are any other visible rudiments of the feet (e.g.Lumbriconereis); while in other cases the reverse holds good. The gills are usually the last parts to appear.
Not only does the mode of development of the feet differ greatly in different types, but also the period. The appearance of setæ may afford the first external indication of segmentation, or the rudiments of the feet may not appear till a large number of segments are definitely established.
A very considerable number of Chætopod larvæ are provided with very long provisional setæ (figs. 152and153). These setæare usually placed at the sides of the anterior part of the body, immediately behind the head, and also sometimes on the posterior parts of the body. In some instances (e.g.fig. 153) they form the only appendages of the trunk. Alex. Agassiz has pointed out that setæ of this kind, though not found in existing Chætopods, are characteristic of the fossil forms. Setæ of this kind are found in chætopod-like larvæ of some Brachiopods (Argiope,fig. 136).
Embryo ChætopodFig. 153. Embryo Chætopod with provisional setæ.(From Agassiz.)
Fig. 153. Embryo Chætopod with provisional setæ.(From Agassiz.)
It is tempting to suppose that the long provisional bristles springing from the oral region are the setiform appendages handed down from the unsegmented ancestors of the existing Chætopod forms. Claparède has divided Chætopod larvæ into two great groups of Metachætæ and Perennichætæ, according as they possess or are without provisional setæ.
With reference to the head and its appendages it has already been stated that the head is primarily formed of the præ-oral lobe and of the peristomial region.
The embryological facts are opposed to the view that the præ-oral region either represents a segment or is composed of segments equivalent to those of the trunk. The embryonic peristomial region may, on the other hand, be regarded as in a certain sense the first segment. Its exact relations to the succeeding segments become frequently more or less modified in the adult. The præ-oral region is in most larvæ bounded behind by the ciliated ring already described. On the dorsal part of the præ-oral lobe in front of this ring are placed the eyes, and from it there may spring a variable number of processes which form antennæ or cephalic tentacles. The number and position of these latter are very variable. They appear as simple processes, sometimes arising in pairs, and atother times alternating on the two sides. There is frequently a median unpaired tentacle.
The development of the median tentacle in Terebella, where there is in the adult a great number of similar tentacles, is sufficiently remarkable to deserve special notice;videMilne-Edwards, Claparède, etc. It arises long before any of the other tentacles as a single anterior prolongation of the præ-oral lobe containing a parenchymatous cavity, which communicates freely with the general perivisceral cavity. It soon becomes partially constricted off at its base from the procephalic lobe, but continues to grow till it becomes fully half as long as the remainder of the body. A very characteristic figure of the larva at this stage is given by Claparède and Metschnikoff,Pl.XVII., Fig. 1 E. It now strikingly resembles the larval proboscis of Balanoglossus, and it is not easy to avoid the conclusion that they are homologous structures.
Another peculiar cephalic structure which deserves notice is the gill apparatus of the Serpulidæ.
Larva of SpirorbisFig. 154. Larva of Spirorbis.(From Alex. Agassiz.)The first odd tentacle (t) is shewn on the right side.Behind the præ-oral ciliated ring is the large collar.
Fig. 154. Larva of Spirorbis.(From Alex. Agassiz.)
The first odd tentacle (t) is shewn on the right side.Behind the præ-oral ciliated ring is the large collar.
In Dasychone (Sabella) the gill apparatus arises (Claparède and Metschnikoff,No.336) as a pair of membranous wing-like organs on the dorsal side of the præ-oral lobe immediately in front of the ciliated ring. Each subsequently becomes divided into two rays, and new rays then begin to sprout on the ventral side of the two pairs already present. A cartilaginous axis soon becomes formed in these rays, and after this is formed fresh rays sprout irregularly from the cartilaginous skeleton.
In Spirorbis spirillum as observed by Alex. Agassiz, the right gill-tentacle (fig. 154,t) first appears, and then the left, and subsequently the odd opercular tentacle which covers the right original tentacle. The third and fourth tentacles are formed successively on the two sides, and rapidly become branched in the succeeding stages.
With reference to the sense organs it may be noted that the eyes, or at any rate the cephalic pigment spots, are generally more numerous in the embryo than in the adult, and that they are usually present in the larvæ of the Sedentaria, though absent in the adults of these forms. The Sedentaria thus pass through a larval stage in which they resemble the Errantia.
Paired auditory vesicles of a provisional character have been found on the ventral side of the body, in the fourth segmentbehind the mouth, in the larva of Terebella conchilega (Claparède).
Mitraria.A peculiar larval Chætopod form known as Mitraria, the metamorphosis of which was first worked out by Metschnikoff, deserves a special notice.
This form (fig. 155A) in spite of its remarkable appearance can easily be reduced to the normal type of larva.
The mouth (m) and anus (an) (fig. 155A) are closely approximated, and situated within a vestibule the edge of which is lined by a simple or lobed ciliated ring. The shape of the body is somewhat conical. The cavity of the vestibule forms the base of the cone, and at the apex is placed a ciliated patch (sg). A pair of lobes (br) bear provisional setæ. The alimentary canal is formed of the three normal parts, œsophagus, stomach, and intestine.
Two stages in the development of MitrariaFig. 155. Two stages in the development of Mitraria.(After Metschnikoff.)m.mouth;an.anus;sg.supra-œsophageal ganglion;br.provisional bristles;pr.b.præ-oral ciliated band.
Fig. 155. Two stages in the development of Mitraria.(After Metschnikoff.)
m.mouth;an.anus;sg.supra-œsophageal ganglion;br.provisional bristles;pr.b.præ-oral ciliated band.
To compare this larva with an ordinary Chætopod larva one must suppose that the alimentary canal is abnormally bent, so that the post-oral ventral surface is reduced to the small space between the mouth and the anus. The ciliated band surrounding the vestibule is merely the usual præ-oral band, borne on the very much extended edge of the præ-oral lobe. The apex of the larva is the front end of the præ-oral lobe with the usual ciliated patch. The two lobes with provisional bristles are really dorsal and not posterior.
The correctness of the above interpretation is clearly shewn by the metamorphosis.
The first change consists in the pushing in of a fold of skin, between the mouth and anus, towards the intestine, which at the same time rapidly elongates, and forms the axis of a conical projection, which thereupon becomes segmented and is thereby shewn to be the rudiment of the trunk (fig. 155B). On the elongation of the trunk in this way the præ-oral lobe and its ciliated ring assume an appearance not very dissimilar to the same structures in Polygordius. At the ciliated apex of the præ-oral lobe a paired thickening of epiblast gives rise to the supra-œsophageal ganglia (sg). In the further metamorphosis, the præ-oral lobe and its ciliated ring gradually become reduced, and finally atrophy in the normal way, while the trunk elongates and acquires setæ. The dorsally situated processes with provisional setæ last for some time, but finally disappear. The young worm then develops a tube and shews itself as a normal tubicolous Chætopod.
Formation of Organs.
Except in the case of a few organs our knowledge of the formation of the organs in the Chætopoda is derived from investigations on the Oligochæta.
The embryo of the Oligochæta has a more or less spherical form, but it soon elongates, and becoming segmented acquires a distinct vermiform character. The ventral surface is however for a considerable time markedly convex as compared to the dorsal.
The ventrally placed mouth is surrounded by a well-marked lip, and in front of it is placed a small præ-oral lobe.
Embryo of lumbricus trapezoidesFig. 156. Section through the head of a young embryo of lumbricus trapezoides.(After Kleinenberg.)c.g.cephalic ganglion;cc.cephalic portion of the body cavity;x.œsophagus.
Fig. 156. Section through the head of a young embryo of lumbricus trapezoides.(After Kleinenberg.)
c.g.cephalic ganglion;cc.cephalic portion of the body cavity;x.œsophagus.
The epiblast.The epiblast cells at the commencement of the gastrula stage become much flattened, and on the completion of the invagination form an investment of flattened cells, only thickened in the neighbourhood of the mesoblastic bands (fig. 141B and C). In the Polychæta at any rate the statements of several investigators would seem to indicate that the cuticle is derived from the chorion. It is difficult to accept this conclusion, but it deserves further investigation.
Nervous system.The most important organ derived from the epiblastis the nervous system; the origin of which from this layer was first established by Kowalevsky (No.342).
Embryo of Lumbricus trapezoidesFig. 157. Section through part of the ventral wall of the trunk of an embryo of Lumbricus trapezoides.(After Kleinenberg.)m.longitudinal muscles;so.somatic mesoblast;sp.splanchnic mesoblast;hy.hypoblast;Vg.ventral nerve cord;vv.ventral vessel.
Fig. 157. Section through part of the ventral wall of the trunk of an embryo of Lumbricus trapezoides.(After Kleinenberg.)
m.longitudinal muscles;so.somatic mesoblast;sp.splanchnic mesoblast;hy.hypoblast;Vg.ventral nerve cord;vv.ventral vessel.
It arises[141](Kleinenberg,No.341) from two at first quite distinct structures,viz.(1) the supra-œsophageal rudiment and (2) the rudiment of the ventral cord. The former of these takes its origin as an unpaired dorsal thickening of the epiblast at the front end of the head (fig. 156,c.g.), which sends two prolongations downwards and backwards to meet the ventral cord. The latter arises as two independent thickenings of the epiblast, one on each side of the ventral furrow (fig. 157,Vg). These soon unite underneath the furrow, in the median line, and after being differentiated into segmentally arranged ganglionic and interganglionic regions become separated from the epiblast. Both the supra-œsophageal and ventral cord become surrounded by a layer of somatic mesoblast. The junction between the two parts of the central nervous system takes place comparatively late.
The mesoblast.It is to Kowalevsky (No.342) and Kleinenberg (No.341) that we mainly owe our knowledge of the history of the mesoblast. The fundamental processes which take place are (1) the splitting of the mesoblast into splanchnic and somatic layers with the body cavity between them, (2) the transverse division of the mesoblast of the trunk into distinct somites.
The former process commences in the cephalic mesoblastic commissure, where it results in the formation of a pair of cavities each with a thin somatic and thick splanchnic layer (fig. 156,cc); and thence extends gradually backwards into the trunk (fig. 141C,pp). In the trunk however the division into somites precedes the horizontal splitting of the mesoblast. The former process commences when the mesoblastic bands form widish columns quite separate from each other. These columns becomebroken up successively from before backwards into somewhat cubical bodies, in the centre of which a cavity soon appears. The cavity in each somite is obviously bounded by four walls, (1) an outer, the somatic, which is the thickest; (2) an inner, the splanchnic; and (3, 4) an anterior and posterior. The adjoining anterior and posterior walls of successive somites unite together to form the transverse dissepiments of the adult, which subsequently become very thin and are perforated in numerous places, thus placing in communication the separate compartments of the body cavity. The somites, though at first confined to a small area on the ventral side, gradually extend so as to meet their fellows above and below and form complete rings (fig. 157) of which the splanchnic layer (sp) attaches itself to the enteric wall and the somatic (so) to the epiblast. In Polygordius and probably also Saccocirrus and other forms the cavities of the somites of the two sides do not coalesce; and the walls which separate them constitute dorsal and ventral mesenteries. The two cavities in the cephalic commissure unite dorsally, but ventrally open into the first somite of the trunk.
The mesoblastic masses of the head are probably not to be regarded as forming a pair of somites equivalent to those in the trunk, but as forming the mesoblastic part of the præ-oral lobe, of which so much has been said in the preceding pages. Kleinenberg’s observations are however of great importance as shewing that the cephalic cavities are simply an anterior part of the true body cavity.
The splanchnic layer of the head cavity gives rise to the musculature of the œsophagus.
The somatic layer of the trunk somites becomes converted into the musculature of the body wall and the external peritoneal layer of body cavity. The first part of the muscular system to be definitely formed is the ventral band of longitudinal muscles which arises on each side of the nervous system in contact with the epidermis (fig. 157,m). How the circular muscles become subsequently formed outside these muscles has not been made out.
The splanchnic layer of the trunk somites gives rise to the muscular and connective-tissue wall of the mesenteron, and also to the walls of the vascular trunks. The ventral vessel is first formed (Kowalevsky) as a solid mass of cells which subsequentlybecomes hollowed out. The dorsal vessel in Lumbricus and Criodrilus is stated by Kowalevsky and Vejdovsky to be formed by the coalescence of two lateral vessels; a peculiarity which is probably to be explained by the late extension of the mesoblast into the dorsal region.
The layer from which the sacks for the setæ and the segmental organs spring is still doubtful. The sacks for the setæ are believed by Kowalevsky (No.342) to be epiblastic invaginations, but are stated by Hatschek (No.339) to be mesoblastic products. For the development of the segmental organs the reader is referred to the chapter on the excretory system.
In marine Polychæta the generative organs are no doubt mesoblastic products, as they usually spring from the peritoneal epithelium, especially the parts of it covering the vascular trunks.
The Alimentary Canal.In Lumbricus the enteric cavity is formed during the gastrula stage. In Criodrilus the hypoblast has at first no lumen, but this becomes very soon established. In Euaxes on the other hand, where there is a true epibolic gastrula, the mesenteron is at first represented by a solid mass of yolk (i.e.hypoblast) cells. As the central amongst these become absorbed a cavity is formed. The protoplasm of the yolk cells which line this cavity unites into a continuous polynuclear layer containing at intervals masses of yolk. These masses become gradually absorbed, and the protoplasmic wall of the mesenteron then breaks up into a cylindrical glandular epithelium similar to that of the other types.
In Lumbricus and Criodrilus the blastopore remains as the mouth, but in Euaxes a new mouth or rather stomodæum is formed by an epiblastic invagination between the front end of the two mesoblastic bands. This epiblastic invagination forms the permanent œsophagus; and in Lumbricus trapezoides and Criodrilus, where the oral opening is at first lined by hypoblast, the epiblast soon becomes inflected so as to line the œsophageal region. The splanchnic mesoblast of the cephalic region subsequently invests the œsophagus, and some of its cells penetrating between the adjoining epiblast cells give rise to a thick wall for this part of the alimentary tract; the original epiblast cells being reduced to a thin membrane. This mesoblastic wall is sharplyseparated from the muscular wall outside, which is also formed of splanchnic mesoblast.
The anus is a late formation.
Alternations of generations.
Amongst Chætopoda a considerable number of forms exhibit the phenomenon of alternations of generations, which in the same general way as in the case of the Cœlenterata, is secondarily caused by budding or fission.
The process of fission essentially consists in the division of a parent form into two zooids by the formation of a zone of fission between two old rings, which becomes differentiated (1) into an anal zone in front which forms the anal region of the anterior zooid, and (2) into a cephalic zone behind which forms the head and some of the succeeding segments of the posterior zooid. The anal zone is capable, by growth and successive segmentation, of giving rise to an indefinite number of fresh segments.
In Protula Dysteri, as shewn by Huxley, there is a simple fission into two in the way described. Sexual reproduction does not take place at the same time as reproduction by fission, but both zooids produced are quite similar and multiply sexually.
In the freshwater forms Nais and Chætogaster a more or less similar phenomenon takes place. By a continual process of growth in the anal zones, and the formation of fresh zones of fission whenever four or five segments are added in front of an anal zone, complicated chains of adhering zooids are produced, each with a small number of segments. As long as the process of fission continues sexual products are not developed, but eventually the chains break up, the individuals derived from them cease to go on budding, and, after developing a considerably greater number of segments than in the asexual state, reproduce themselves sexually. The forms developed from the ovum then repeat again the phenomenon of budding, etc., and so the cycle is continued[142].
The phenomena so far can hardly be described as cases ofalternation of generations. The process is however in certain types further differentiated. In Syllis (Quatrefages) fission takes place, the parent form dividing into two, of which only the posterior after its detachment develops sexual organs. The anterior asexual zooid continues to produce fresh sexual zooids by fission. In Myrianida also, where a chain of zooids is formed, the sexual elements seem to be confined to the individuals produced by budding.
The cases of Syllis and Myrianida seem to be genuine examples of alternations of generations, but a still better instance is afforded by Autolytus (Krohn,No.343, and Agassiz,No.333).
In Autolytus cornutus the parent stock, produced directly from the egg, acquires about 40‑45 segments, and then gives rise by fission, with the production of a zone of fission between about the13th and 14thrings, to a fresh zooid behind. This after becoming fully developed into either a male or a female is detached from the parent stock, from which it very markedly differs. The males and females are moreover very different from each other. In the female zooid the eggs are carried into a kind of pouch where they undergo their development and give rise to asexual parent stocks. After the young are hatched the female dies. The asexual stock, after budding off one asexual zooid, elongates again and buds off a second zooid. It never develops generative organs.
The life history of some species of the genus Nereis presents certain very striking peculiarities which have not yet been completely elucidated.
As was first shewn by Malmgren asexual examples of various species of Nereis may acquire the characters of Heteronereis and become sexually mature.
The metamorphosis of Nereis Dumerilii has been investigated by Claparède, who has arrived at certain very remarkable conclusions. He finds that there are two distinct sexual generations of the Nereis form of this species, and two distinct sexual generations of the Heteronereis form.
One sexual Nereis, characterized by its small size, is diœcious, the other discovered by Metschnikoff is hermaphrodite.
Of the Heteronereis sexual forms, both are diœcious, one is small, and swims on the surface, the other is larger and lives at the bottom.
How these various generations are mutually related has not been made out; but Claparède traced the passage of large asexual examples of the Nereis form into the large Heteronereis form.
Bibliography.
(332)Alex. Agassiz. “On the young stages of a few Annelids.”Annals Lyceum Nat. Hist. of New York,Vol.VIII.1866.(333)Alex. Agassiz. “On the embryology of Autolytus cornutus and alternations of generations, etc.”Boston Journal of Nat. History,Vol.VII.1859‑63.(334)W. Busch.Beobachtungen ü. Anat. u. Entwick. einiger wirbelloser Seethiere, 1851.(335)Ed. Claparède.Beobachtungen ü. Anat. u. Entwick. wirbelloser Thiere an d. Küste von Normandie. Leipzig, 1863.(336)Ed. Claparèdeu.E. Metschnikoff. “Beiträge z. Kenntniss üb. Entwicklungsgeschichte d. Chætopoden.”Zeit. f. wiss. Zool.Vol.XIX.1869.(337)E. Grube.Untersuchungen üb. Entwicklung d. Anneliden.Königsberg, 1844.(338)B. Hatschek.“Beiträge z. Entwick. u. Morphol. d. Anneliden.”Sitz. d. k. Akad. Wiss. Wien,Vol.LXXIV.1876.(339)B. Hatschek.“Studien über Entwicklungsgeschichte der Anneliden.”Arbeiten aus d. zoologischen Institute d. Universität Wien. Von C. Claus.HeftIII.1878.(340)Th. H. Huxley. “On hermaphrodite and fissiparous species of tubicolar Annelidæ (Protula).”Edinburgh New Phil. Journal,Vol.I.1855.(341)N. Kleinenberg. “The development of the earthworm Lumbricus trapezoides.”Quart. J. of Micr. Science,Vol.XIX.1879.Sullo sviluppo del Lumbricus trapezoides.Napoli, 1878.(342)A. Kowalevsky.“Embryologische Studien an Würmern u. Arthropoden.”Mém. Acad. Pétersbourg, SeriesVII.Vol.XVI.1871.(343)A. Krohn.“Ueber die Erscheinungen bei d. Fortpflanzung von Syllis prolifera u. Autolytus prolifer.”Archiv f. Naturgesch.1852.(344)R. Leuckart.“Ueb. d. Jugendzustände ein. Anneliden, etc.”Archiv f. Naturgesch.1855.(345)S. Lovén.“Beobachtungen ü. die Metamorphose von Anneliden.”Weigmann’sArchiv, 1842.(346)E. Metschnikoff.“Ueber die Metamorphose einiger Seethiere (Mitraria).”Zeit. f. wiss. Zool.Vol.XXI.1871.(347)M. Milne-Edwards.“Recherches zoologiques, etc.”Ann. Scie. Natur.III.Série,Vol.III.1845.(348)J. Müller.“Ueb. d. Jugendzustände einiger Seethiere.”Monats. d. k. Akad. Wiss.Berlin, 1851.(349)Max Müller.“Ueber d. weit. Entwick. von Mesotrocha sexoculata.”Müller’sArchiv, 1855.(350)Quatrefages. “Mémoire s. l’embryogénie des Annelides.”Ann. Scie. Natur.III.Série,Vol.X.1848.(351)M. Sars.“Zur Entwicklung d. Anneliden.”Archiv f. Naturgeschichte,Vol.XI.1845.(352)A. Schneider.“Ueber Bau u. Entwicklung von Polygordius.”Müller’sArchiv, 1868.(353)A. Schneider.“Entwicklung u. system. Stell. d. Bryozoen u. Gephyreen (Mitraria).”Archiv f. mikr. Anat.Vol.V.1869.(354)M. Schultze.Ueb. die Entwicklung von Arenicola piscatorum u. anderer Kiemenwürmer.Halle, 1856.(355)C. Semper.“Die Verwandschaftbeziehungen d. gegliederten Thiere.”Arbeiten a. d. zool.-zoot. Instit.Würzburg,Vol.III.1876‑7.(356)C. Semper.“Beiträge z. Biologie d. Oligochæten.”Arbeiten a. d. zool.-zoot. Instit.Würzburg,Vol.IV.1877‑8.(357)M. Stossich.“Beiträge zur Entwicklung d. Chætopoden.”Sitz. d. k. k. Akad. Wiss. Wien,B.LXXVII.1878.(358)R. v. Willemoes-Suhm.“Biologische Beobachtungen ü. niedrige Meeresthiere.”Zeit. f. wiss. Zool.Bd.XXI.1871.