[4]This is a common feature of haunted houses.—H.C.
[4]This is a common feature of haunted houses.—H.C.
[4]This is a common feature of haunted houses.—H.C.
Royalty and well-known personages have seen ghosts in all ages of the world’s history; certainly they are not exempt from the common run of humanity so far as ghostly visitations are concerned! Mr. Stead has compiled a number of notable cases of this character, of which the following are probably the most noteworthy:
Henry IV.of France told D’Aubigne that, in the presence of himself, the Archbishop of Lyons, and three ladies of the Court, the Queen (Margaret of Valois) saw the apparition of a certain Cardinal afterwards found to have died at the moment.
Abel the Fratricide, King of Denmark, still haunts the woods of Poole, near the city of Sleswig.
Valdemar IV.haunts Gurre Wood, near Elsinore.
Charles XI., of Sweden, accompanied by hischamberlain and state physician, witnessed the trial of the assassin of Gartavus III., which occurred nearly a century later.
James IV., of Scotland, was warned by an apparition against his intended expedition into England. He, however, proceeded and fell at Flodden Field.
Charles I., of England, was also warned by an apparition, but paying no heed, was disastrously defeated at Naseby.
Queen Elizabethis said to have been warned of her death by the apparition of her own double.
TrajanandCaracallaboth saw apparitions, which they recorded.
TheodosiusandJulian the Apostateboth beheld apparitions, at important crises in their lives.
Sir Robert Peeland his brother both saw Lord Byron in London when he was in reality lying dangerously ill of a fever in Patras. During the same fever, he also appeared to others.
Julius Caesar,Xerxes,Drusus,Pausanius,Dio(General of Syracuse),Admiral Coligniall saw apparitions, which made a deep impression on them in every case.
Napoleon, at St. Helena, saw and conversed with the apparition of Josephine, who warned him of his approaching death.Blucher, on the day of his death, was also told of it by an apparition.General Garfieldsaw and conversed with his father, latterly deceased.Lincolnhad a certain premonitory dream which occurred three times in relation to important battles, and the fourth on the eve of his assassination.
Dante, son of the poet, was visited in a dream by his father, who conversed with him and told him (correctly) where to find the missing thirteen cantos of the “Commedia.”
Goethesaw his own double riding by his side under conditions which really occurred years later.
Tassosaw and conversed with beings invisible to those about him.
Celliniwas dissuaded from suicide by the apparition of a young man who frequently visited and encouraged him.
Mozartwas visited by a mysterious person who ordered him to compose arequiem, and came frequently to inquire after its progress, but disappeared on its completion, which occurredjust in time for its performance at his own funeral.
Ben Johnsonwas visited by the apparition of his eldest son with the mark of a bloody cross upon his forehead at the moment of his death by the plague.
Thackerywrote: “It is all very well for you who have probably never seen spirit manifestations to talk as you do, but had you seen what I have witnessed you would hold a different opinion.”
Hugh Miller,Maria Edgeworth,Captain Marryat,Madame de Stael,Sir Humphrey Davy,William Harvey,Francis Bacon,Martin Luther,George Fox,Cardinal Newman,Bishop Wilberforce, and many others have seen apparitions, or held converse with the unseen world in one form or another, as recorded by themselves.
Among the famous historical hauntings, we must not forget to mention the famousCock Lane Ghostwhich occurred about 1760. According to a brief paragraph printed in theLondon Ledger, 1762, we read that:
“For some time a great knocking having been heard in the night, at the officiating parish clerk’s of St. Sepulchre’s, in Cock Lane near Smithfield, to the great terror of the family, and all means used to discover the meaning of ithaving failed, four gentlemen sat up there last Friday night, among whom was a clergyman standing withinside the door, who asked various questions. On his asking whether anyone had been murdered, no answer was made; but on his asking whether anyone had been poisoned, it knocked one and thirty times. The report current in the neighborhood is that a woman was some time ago poisoned, and buried in St. John’s Clerkenwell, by her brother-in-law.”
These knockings and phenomena occurred for a considerable time, until the whole community became interested in the manifestations. While various theories were advanced at the time—and since—to explain this ghost, no definite conclusion has ever been arrived at.
TheDrummer of Tedworthis a still older and equally famous ghost, who flourished about a hundred years before the Cock Lane Ghost, and was investigated (and the results carefully recorded) by Sir Joseph Glanvil, F.R.S., who wrote a book about the case: “Sadducismus Triumphatus,” which was also devoted to the general phenomena of witchcraft. Here, also, we find records of unaccountable “knockings” and similar phenomena, which lasted for a considerable time, and which have never yet been explained.
The ghost which invadedJohn Wesley’shouse stayed with them for several years, and manifested his presence in a variety of elaborate and ingenious ways. Those who are interested in this ghost and his doings should read Wesley’sJournal; also the various discussions,proandcon., which have appeared in theProceedingsof the Society for Psychical Research, from time to time. It is a most curious and suggestive record.
TheDevils of Loudonmight also be cited as an interesting case of psychic phenomena; and here trance, automatic speech, etc., were observed—as well as the usual physical phenomena. This is perhaps one of the earliest cases which was closely observed, and in which skeptical criticism was applied. This case will be found recorded in Mr. H. Addington Bruce’s “Historic Ghosts and Ghost Hunters.”
History abounds in cases showing the apparent intrusion of spiritual help in time of trouble, and in the annals of military history, these accounts are not lacking. On several occasions, the Crusaders thought that they saw angelic hosts fighting for them—phantom horsemen charging the enemy, when their own utter destruction seemed imminent. In the wars between the English and the Scotch, several such cases were cited, and the Napoleonic wars also furnished examples. But the most striking evidence of this character—because the newest—and supported, apparently, by a good deal of first-hand and sincere testimony, is that afforded by the Phantom Armies seen in France during the retreat of the British army from Mons—the field of Agincourt. Cut off by overwhelming numbers, and all but annihilated, the British army fought desperately, but the 80,000 were opposed by 300,000 Germans, backed by a terrificfire of artillery, and were indeed in a critical position. They were only saved, as we know, by the heroism of a small force of men—a rearguard—who were practically wiped out in consequence. At the most critical moment came what appeared to be angelic assistance. The tide of battle seemed to be stemmed by supernatural means. In a letter written by a soldier who actually witnessed these startling events, quoted by the Hon. Mrs. St. John Mildmay (North American Review, August, 1915), the following graphic account is given. Our soldier writes—
“The men joked at the shells and found many funny names for them, and had bets about them, and greeted them with music-hall songs, as they screamed in this terrific cannonade.... The climax seemed to have been reached, but ‘a seven-times heated hell’ of the enemy’s onslaught fell upon them, rending brother from brother. At that very moment, they saw from their trenches a tremendous host moving against their lines. Five hundred of the thousand (who had been detailed to fight the rear-guard action) remained, and as far as they could see the German infantry was pressing on against them, column by column, a grey world of men—10,000 of them, as it appeared afterwards. There was no hopeat all. Some of them shook hands. One man improvised a new version of the battle song Tipperary, ending ‘and we shan’t get there!’ And all went on firing steadily.... The enemy dropped line after line, while the few machine guns did their best. Everyone knew it was of no use. The dead grey bodies lay in companies and battalions, but others came on and on, swarming and advancing from beyond and beyond.
“‘World without end, Amen,’ said one of the British soldiers, with some irreverence, as he took aim and fired. Then he remembered a vegetarian restaurant in London, where he had once or twice eaten queer dishes of cutlets made of lentils and nuts that pretended to be steaks. On all the plates in this restaurant a figure of St. George was printed in blue with the motto,Adsit Anglis Sanctus Georgius(May St. George be a present help to England!) The soldier happened to know ‘Latin and other useless things,’ so now, as he fired at the grey advancing mass, 300 yards away, he uttered the pious vegetarian motto. He went on firing to the end, till at last Bill on his right had to clout him cheerfully on the head to make him stop, pointing out as he did so that the King’s ammunition cost money and was not lightly to be wasted....For, as the Latin scholar uttered his invocation, he felt something between a shudder and an electric shock pass through his body. The roar of the battle died down in his ears to a gentle murmur, and instead of it, he says, he heard a great voice louder than a thunder peal, crying ‘Array! Array!’ His heart grew hot as a burning coal, then it grew cold as ice within him, for it seemed to him a tumult of voices answered to the summons. He heard or seemed to hear thousands shouting:
“‘St. George! St. George!“‘Ha! Messire, Ha! Sweet Saint, grant us good deliverance!“‘St. George for Merrie England!“‘Harow! Harow! Monseigneur St. George, succour us, Ha! St. George! A low bow, and a strong bow, Knight of Heaven, aid us!’
“‘St. George! St. George!
“‘Ha! Messire, Ha! Sweet Saint, grant us good deliverance!
“‘St. George for Merrie England!
“‘Harow! Harow! Monseigneur St. George, succour us, Ha! St. George! A low bow, and a strong bow, Knight of Heaven, aid us!’
“As the soldier heard these voices, he saw before him, beyond the trench, a long line of shapes with a shining about them. They were like men who drew the bow, and with another shout their cloud of arrows flew singing through the air toward the German host. The other men in the trenches were firing all the while. Theyhad no hope, but they aimed just as if they had been shooting at Bisley.
“Suddenly one of these lifted up his voice in plain English. ‘Gawd help us,’ he bellowed to the man next him, ‘but we’re bloomin’ marvels! Look at those grey gentlemen! Look at them! They’re not going down in dozens or hundreds—itsthousandsit is! Look, look! There’s a regiment gone while I’m talking to ye!’
“‘Shut it,’ the other soldier bellowed, taking aim. ‘What are ye talkin’ about?’ But he gulped with astonishment even as he spoke, for indeed the grey men were falling by the thousands. The English could hear the guttural scream of their revolvers as they shot, and line after line crashed to the earth. All the while the Latin-bred soldier heard the cry ‘Harow, Harow! Monseigneur! Dear Saint! Quick to our aid! St. George help us!’
“The singing arrows darkened the air, the hordes melted before them. ‘More machine guns,’ Bill yelled to Tom. ‘Don’t hear them,’ Tom yelled back, ‘but thank God, anyway, that they have got it in the neck!’
“In fact, there were ten thousand dead German soldiers left before that salient of the English army, and consequently—no Sedan. In Germany the General Staff decided that theEnglish must have employed turpenite shells, as no wounds were discernible on the bodies of the dead soldiers. But the man who knew what nuts tasted like when they called themselves steak, knew also that St. George had brought his Agincourt Bowmen to help the English.”
Such accounts have been confirmed by others. Thus, Miss Phyllis Campbell, writing in “The Occult Review” (October, 1915), says:
“I tremble, now that it is safely past, to look back on the terrible week that brought the Allies to Vitry-le-Francois. We had not had our clothes off for the whole of that week, because no sooner had we reached home, too weary to undress, or to eat, and fallen on our beds, than the ‘chug-chug’ of the commandant’s car would sound into the silence of the deserted street, and the horn would imperatively summon us back to duty—because, in addition to our duties asambulancier auxiliare, we were interpreters to the post, now at this moment diminished to half-a-dozen.
“Returning at 4.30 in the morning, we stood on the end of the platform, watching the train crawl through the blue-green mist of the forest, into the clearing, and draw up with the first wounded from Vitry-le-Francois. It was packed with dead and dying and badly wounded.For a time we forgot our weariness in a race against time—removing the dead and dying, and attending to those in need. I was bandaging a man’s shattered arm with themajeurinstructing me, while he stitched a horrible gap in his head, when Madame de A——, the heroic president of the post, came and replaced me. ‘There is an English in the fifth wagon,’ she said. ‘He wants something—I think a holy picture!’
“The idea of an English soldier wanting a holy picture struck me, even in that atmosphere of blood and misery, as something to smile at—but I hurried away. ‘The English’ was a Lancashire Fusilier. He was propped in a corner, his left arm tied-up in a peasant woman’s handkerchief, and his head newly bandaged. He should have been in a state of collapse from loss of blood, for his tattered uniform was soaked and caked in blood, and his face paper-white under the dirt of conflict. He looked at me with bright, courageous eyes and asked for a picture or a medal (he didn’t care which) of St. George. I asked him if he was a Catholic. ‘No,’ he was Wesleyan Methodist, ... and he wanted a picture or a medal of St. George,because he had seen him on a white horse, leading the British at Vitry-le-Francois, when the Allies turned.
“There was an F.R.A. man, wounded in theleg, sitting beside him on the floor; he saw my look of amazement, and hastened in: ‘It’s true, sister,’ he said. ‘We all saw it. First there was a sort of yellow-mist like, sort of risin’ before the Germans as they came on the top of the hill—come on like a solid wall, they did—springing out of the earth just solid—no end to ’em! I just give up. No use fighting the whole German race, thinks I; it’s all up withus. The next minute comes this funny cloud of light, and when it clears off, there’s a tall man with yellow hair in golden armour, on a white horse, holding his sword up, and his mouth open as if he was saying: “Come on, boys! I’ll put the kybosh on the devils!” Sort of “This is my picnic” expression. Then, before you could say “knife,” the Germans had turned, and we were after them, fighting like ninety....’
“‘Where was this?’ I asked. But neither of them could tell. They had marched, fighting a rearguard action, from Mons, till St. George had appeared through the haze of light, and turned the enemy. They bothknewit was St. George. Hadn’t they seen him with a sword on every ‘quid’ they’d ever seen? The Frenchies had seen him too—ask them; but they said it was St. Michæl....”
Much additional testimony of a like naturemight be given—and has been collected by students of psychical research. If the spiritual world ever intervenes in matters mundane, it assuredly did so on this occasion. And it could hardly have chosen a more opportune time. Could the aspiring thoughts of the dead and dying, and those still living and fighting for their country, have drawn “St. George” to earth, to aid in again redeeming his country from a foreign foe? Could a simple “hallucination” have been so widespread and so prevalent? Or might there not have been some spiritual energy behind the visions thus seen—stimulating them, and inspiring and encouraging the stricken soldiers? We cannot say. We only know what the soldiers themselves say; and we also know the undoubted effects upon the enemy. For on both occasions were the Germans repulsed with terrible slaughter. Perhaps the vision of St. George led our soldiers into closer touch andrapportwith the consciousness of some high intelligence—or the veil was rent, separating the two worlds—as so often appears to be the case in apparitions and visions of this character.
[Note.—The above list does not pretend to be in any way exhaustive nor are the books quoted in any way equal in evidential value. They are merely types or examples of Ghost Stories, from various points of view; which, if the reader is interested, he may read with both pleasure and profit.]
Transcriber’s noteThe following 3 missing section headers were added to the table of contents: The Ghosts of Animals p. 53, Proofs of Immateriality p. 168, and Conduct of Animals in the House p. 169; but minor differences between the section headers in the table of contents and in the text were not corrected.Errors in punctuation were corrected.Several badly printed words were guessed from the context and filled in.Otherwise the original was preserved, including unusual and inconsistent spelling and hyphenation and unmatched double quotation marks.The following corrections were made, on page7 “Par’s” changed to “Paris” (in London, Paris, Rome, Venice)11 “occuping” changed to “occupying” (space-occupying entities)14 “wierd” changed to “weird” (in the still, weird hours of the night)63 “polteregists” changed to “poltergeists” (technically known as “poltergeists,”)79 “Boundry” changed to “Boundary” (Footfalls on the Boundary of Another World)106 “occurence” changed to “occurrence” (mention the occurrence of the night)110 “mutally” changed to “mutually” (We were mutually sorry to part)131 “trysing” changed to “trysting” (distance to the trysting place)146 “exterminalization” changed to “externalization” (what I saw and felt was an externalization of impressions)182 “lynig” changed to “lying” (While lying there a large glass paper-weight)183 “gneuine” changed to “genuine” (they never lived in a genuine one)186 extra blank line removed within poem (To follow and kill,/Or make tremble with fear.)191 “possesed” changed to “possessed” (The whimsical idea now possessed me to arrange the room)194 “etxent” changed to “extent” (conviction to the same extent as those)196 “slink” changed to “slunk” (but suddenly slunk away with its tail between its legs)196 “has” changed to “had” (the impression that it had seen)197 “fright-than” changed to “frightened than” (far less frightened than on any of my subsequent experiences)198 “pantasms” changed to “phantasms” (To these phantasms I have given the name)208 “familiary” changed to “familiarity” (familiarity breeds contempt)231 “assasin” changed to “assassin” (the trial of the assassin of Gartavus III.)238 “batallions” changed to “battalions” (companies and battalions)240 “gutteral” changed to “guttural” (could hear the guttural scream of their revolvers)241 “Vitry-le-Francoise” changed to “Vitry-le-Francois” (draw up with the first wounded from Vitry-le-Francois).Otherwise the original was preserved, including unusual and inconsistent spelling and hyphenation.
Transcriber’s note
The following 3 missing section headers were added to the table of contents: The Ghosts of Animals p. 53, Proofs of Immateriality p. 168, and Conduct of Animals in the House p. 169; but minor differences between the section headers in the table of contents and in the text were not corrected.
Errors in punctuation were corrected.
Several badly printed words were guessed from the context and filled in.
Otherwise the original was preserved, including unusual and inconsistent spelling and hyphenation and unmatched double quotation marks.
The following corrections were made, on page7 “Par’s” changed to “Paris” (in London, Paris, Rome, Venice)11 “occuping” changed to “occupying” (space-occupying entities)14 “wierd” changed to “weird” (in the still, weird hours of the night)63 “polteregists” changed to “poltergeists” (technically known as “poltergeists,”)79 “Boundry” changed to “Boundary” (Footfalls on the Boundary of Another World)106 “occurence” changed to “occurrence” (mention the occurrence of the night)110 “mutally” changed to “mutually” (We were mutually sorry to part)131 “trysing” changed to “trysting” (distance to the trysting place)146 “exterminalization” changed to “externalization” (what I saw and felt was an externalization of impressions)182 “lynig” changed to “lying” (While lying there a large glass paper-weight)183 “gneuine” changed to “genuine” (they never lived in a genuine one)186 extra blank line removed within poem (To follow and kill,/Or make tremble with fear.)191 “possesed” changed to “possessed” (The whimsical idea now possessed me to arrange the room)194 “etxent” changed to “extent” (conviction to the same extent as those)196 “slink” changed to “slunk” (but suddenly slunk away with its tail between its legs)196 “has” changed to “had” (the impression that it had seen)197 “fright-than” changed to “frightened than” (far less frightened than on any of my subsequent experiences)198 “pantasms” changed to “phantasms” (To these phantasms I have given the name)208 “familiary” changed to “familiarity” (familiarity breeds contempt)231 “assasin” changed to “assassin” (the trial of the assassin of Gartavus III.)238 “batallions” changed to “battalions” (companies and battalions)240 “gutteral” changed to “guttural” (could hear the guttural scream of their revolvers)241 “Vitry-le-Francoise” changed to “Vitry-le-Francois” (draw up with the first wounded from Vitry-le-Francois).
Otherwise the original was preserved, including unusual and inconsistent spelling and hyphenation.