FOOTNOTES:1As regards the distinctive characters of these various snakes, and of the majority of those that we shall describe in this book, we have followed the statements in the “Catalogue of the Snakes in the British Museum (Natural History),” vol. iii., by George Albert Boulenger, F.R.S. (London: Printed by order of the Trustees, 1896.)2Acad. de médecine, March 19, 1889.3Erpétologie générale, t. vii.4“Le serpent cracheur de la côte occidentale d’Afrique,”Société Zool. de France, 1895, p. 210. Bavay thinks that the Spitting Snake is aNaja haje, but the description that he gives of the head of the reptile, which was sent to him by Le Naour, certainly agrees with the characters ofSepedon. Moreover, I have satisfied myself that the many specimens ofNaja hajethat I have kept in captivity in my laboratory never possessed the faculty of spitting their poison to a distance.5“The Snakes of Australia,” Sydney, 1869.6L. Lannoy, “Thèse de doctorat ès sciences,” Paris, 1903, No. 1,138, série A, 454.7“Snake Commission Report,” 1874.8Bulletin de l’Académie de Médecine, t. x., 1883, p. 947.9Zeitschrift für Biologie, xxiii.10Kühne and Chittenden, “Ueber Albumosen,”Zeitschrift für Biologie, 1884.11Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, 29 février, 1896.12Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, 1896, p. 489.13Province médicale, 21 Septembre, 1901.14Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, New York, 1906.15Proc. Roy. Soc., London, lxxiv., 1904, pp. 108-109.16Ibid., pp. 104-108.17“Communication de l’Institut Sérothérapique de l’État danois,” tome i., Copenhagen, 1906.18Indian Annals, July, 1868.19Medical News, Philadelphia, 1884.20“Zur Pathologie des Schlangenbisses,”Forschungen der Medicin, Berlin, 1890.21Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, t. xii., 1898, p. 369.22Thèse Bordeaux, 1902.23Virchow’s Archiv für Pathologie, Anatomie, und Physiologie, Band 179, 1905.24Société de Médecine et de Chirurgie de São Paulo (Brazil), June 15, 1904.25Medical Record, September 15, 1900.26Lancet, January 2, August 20, October 22, 1904, and September 23, 1905.27Proceedings of the Royal Society, vol. lxxi., 1903.28“The Constitution of Snake-venom and Snake-sera,”University of Pennsylvania Medical Bulletin, vol. xv., 1902, p. 345.29Fontana, “On Poisons,” translated by J. Skinner: London, 1787.30Smithsonian Reports, 1854.31Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, 1860.32Medical Times and Gazette, vol. ii., 1873.33“On the Physiological Action of the Venom of the Australian Black Snake,”Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, July, 1895.34Indian Medical Gazette, December, 1901.35Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, November 4, 1899.36Ibid., October 28, 1899.37Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, June, 1904.38At the Serum-therapic Laboratory of São Paulo (Brazil), Dr. Vital, Brazil, is at the present time preparing serum specific againstLachesis-venom.39Medical Times and Gazette, vol. ii., 1873.40“The Thanatophidia of India.” Churchill, London, 1872.41“On the Physiological Action of the Venom of the Australian Black Snake,”Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, July 3, 1895.42Archives biologiques, 1897 and 1898;Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, October 28, 1899.43Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, October 28, 1899; November 4, 1899; July 26, 1902.44Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, June, 1904.45Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology, 1899-1900.46Journal of Experimental Medicine, March 17, 1902;University of Pennsylvania Medical Bulletin, November, 1902.47Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, June 16, 1902.48Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, No. 27, 1902.49Berliner klinische Wochenschrift, Nos. 38, 39, 1902; Nos. 2-4, 1903; Nos. 42-43, 1903.50Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, 1904, p. 387.51Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1905, No. 2, pp. 191-222.52Lancet, April 2, 1904, pp. 916-921.53“The Constitution of Snake-venoms and Snake-sera,”University of Pennsylvania Medical Bulletin, vol. xv., November, 1902, p. 345.54Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, August 11, 1902.55Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, June, 1904.56“Sur l’action protéolytique des venins,”Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, September, 1902, andThèse Paris, No. 1,138, 1903.57“On the Plurality of Cytolysins in Snake-venom,”University of Pennsylvania Medical Bulletin, vol. xvi., 1903, p. 163.58Ann. Soc. Méd. de Gand, 1905, fasc. 3.59Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, April, 1905.60Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, 1898.61Thèse Paris, No. 1138, 1903.62Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, August 11, 1902.63Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, January 11, 1896.64Wehrmann,Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, 1897 and 1898.65Carrière, “Sur le sort des toxines et des antitoxines dans le tube digestif,”ibid., 1898, p. 435.66British Medical Journal, 1895 and 1897.67Chatenay, “Les réactions leucocytaires vis-à-vis de certaines toxines,”Thèse Paris, 1894.68Flexner and Noguchi, “Snake-venom in Relation to Hæmolysis, Bacteriolysis, and Toxicity,”Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. vi., March 17, 1902.69“Trattado del veneno della vipera,” 1787.70Archiv für mikroskopische Anatomie, Bd. ix., 1873.71Morphologisches Jahrbuch, Bd. viii., 1883.72Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, January 20, 1894.73Archives de Physiologie, 1894.74Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris, January 22, 1894.75Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, January 13, 1894.76Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, 1897.77Archives italiennes de Biologie, 1888 and 1889.78Archives de Physiologie, 1894.79Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, July 25, 1903.80Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology, May, 1903.81Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology, 1900, p. 273.82Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, July 1, 1905.83“The Jungle Book,” by Rudyard Kipling. London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd. Reprint of 1905, pp. 183, 184.84Deutsche medicinische Wochenschrift, 1898.85Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, 1895, p. 639, and 1899, p. 77;Bulletin du Muséum d’Histoire naturelle, 1895, t. i., p. 294, t. ii., p. 100.86“Aperçu général sur l’Egypte.” Paris, 1840.87Brehm’s “Thierleben”; French edition, “Les Reptiles,” p. 480.88Maclure’s Magazine, April, 1894.89British Medical Journal, August 17, 1895.90Archives de médecine navale, 1867, p. 390.91Revue scientifique, 1892, p. 254.92Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, February 24, 1896.93“The Pharsalia of Lucan, translated into blank verse by Edward Ridley, Q.C., sometime Fellow of All Souls’ College, Oxford.” (London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1896). Book ix., p. 296, lines 1,046 to 1,065.94Journal of Physiology, vol. viii., 1887, p. 203.95“Les Vipères de France,” p. 136 (1889).96Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, 1892, p. 181.97Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, t. 118, February, 1894, p. 356, March, 1894, p. 720;Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, February, 1894, pp. 111, 120;Archives de Physiologie, July, 1894;Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, May, 1894, p. 275, April, 1895, p. 225.98British Medical Journal, June 15, 1895.99Cf.papers by George Lamb,Scientific Memoirs by Officers of the Medical and Sanitary Departments of the Government of India, New Series, Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 16; L. Rogers,Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, vol. lxxii., andLancet, February 6, 1904; C. J. Martin,Intercolonial Medical Journal of Australasia, August 20, 1897, April 20, 1898; Dr. Hunter,Lancet, January 2, 1904; Dr. Tidswell,Australasian Medical Gazette, April 21, 1902; A. Calmette,Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, May 2, 1904; Dr. Vital Brazil, “Contribution a l’étude de l’intoxication ophidienne” (separately published pamphlet), Paris, 1905; G. Bill,Intercolonial Medical Journal of Australasia, July 20, 1902.100Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, 1895, No. 4.101“The Nature of the Antagonism between Toxins and Antitoxins,”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, vol. lxiii., 1898, p. 420.102Calmette,Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, 1902, No. 24; Preston Kyes,Berliner klinische Wochenschrift, 1904, No. 19.103Berliner klinische Wochenschrift, 1905, No. 50.104Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris, September, 1881.105“Le venin de la vipère,” Paris, 1889.106Transactions of the Third Intercolonial Congress, 1892, p. 152.107“Les morsures de vipères chez les animaux,”Recueil de médecine vétérinaire d’Alfort, May 15, 1897.108Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, December 13, 1902; June 6, July 25, 1903; February 20, 1904.109Semaine médicale, June 24, 1903.110Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, May 19, 1906.111“El Latrodectus formidabilis de Chile,” by Fredérico Puga-Borne, Santiago, 1892; and “Biologia Centrali-Americana,” Arachnida, vol. ii., pl. 35.112Blackwell, “Experiments and Observations on the Poison of Araneida,”Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, 1855, p. 31. See also “Insect Life” (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1889), vol. i., parts 7, 8, 9 and 10, and vol. ii., part 5.113“Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Giftspinnen.” Stuttgart, 1901.114“Zur Kenntniss des Kreuzspinnengiftes,”Hofm. Beiträge, ii., p. 125, 1902.115Joyeux-Laffuie, “Appareil venimeux et venin de scorpion” (Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Science), Paris, 1883; andComptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, November 6, 1882.116“Ueber die Giftwirkung des Nordafrikanischen Skorpiones,”Zeitschrift für Biologie, Bd. xii., p. 170, 1876.117Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, 1885, p. 574.118Berliner klinische Wochenschrift, 1903, Nos. 42, 43.119Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, 1895, p. 232.120Proceedings of the Royal Society, vol. xlii., 1887, p. 17.121“L’immunité dans les maladies infectieuses,” Paris, 1901.122Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, November 15, 1904.123“La scolopendre et sa piqure,”Thèse Paris, 1887.124“Appareil venimeux et venin de la scolopendre,”Thèse Montpellier, 1885.125“Lehrbuch der Anatomie der Wirbellosen Tiere,” 1848.126Arch für anat. Wissensch., 1859.127Comptes rendus de l’Acad. des Sciences, 1884.128“Appareil glandulaire des hyménoptères,” Paris, 1894.129Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, 1898.130Annales sc. Anat. Zoologie, 8esérie, t. x., 1898.131Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, July 25, 1890.132Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, July 24, 1905.133Berliner klinische Wochenschrift, 1906, No. 44.134Comptes rendus de l’Académie de Médecine, t. liii., 1905, p. 498.135“Traité de zoologie médicale,” t. ii. (Paris).136Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, January 17, 1908.137Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, February 25, 1905.138“Les poissons venimeux,”Thèse Paris, 1889.139“Poissons venimeux et poissons vénéneux,”Archives de Physiologie, May, 1872;Archives de médecine navale, February, 1865, and January, 1881.140“Poissons venimeux et poissons vénéneux,”Thèse Paris, 1899.141“Les poissons vénéneux,” Paris, 1900.142“Sédentarité des poissons venimeux,”Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, 1895, p. 86.143Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, 1904, p. 666.144Thèse Paris, 1884.145Bulletin du Muséum d’histoire naturelle, 1899.146“Giftfische und Fischgifte,”Vorträge im Rostocker Fischerverein, 1902, andDie medizinische Wochenschrift, 1902.147Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, October 25 and November 8, 1902, and June 21, 1904;Journal de Physiologie, March, 1903.148Brehm (Sauvage’s translation), “Les Merveilles de la Nature—Reptiles et Batraciens” (Paris, 1885).149Hoppe-Seyler’s “Med.-chem. Untersuchungen,” Berlin, 1866.150Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, April 1, 1889, and January 29, 1890.151Ibid., 1890.152“Beitrage zur Kenntniss des Salamandarins und Salamanderalkaloïde,”Archiv. f. experimentale Pathologie und Pharmakologie, Bd. xli., 1898, p. 219, and Bd. xliii., 1900, p. 84.153Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, 1897, pp. 723, 823.154Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, April 21, 1851, and May, 1852.155Journal de Thérapeutique, 1877, p. 929.156Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, February 25, 1884.157Archives de Physiologie, 1893, p. 511.158Archiv für mikroskopische Anatomie, Bd. ii., 1889, p. 57.159“Zur Kenntniss des Krotengiftes,”Hofm. Beiträge, Bd. i., 1901, p. 575.160“Ueber Bufonin und Bufotalin,” Leipzig, 1902; andArchiv für experimentale Pathologie und Pharmakologie, December, 1902.161“Rapports des venins avec la biologie générale,”Revue générale des Sciences, December 30, 1903.162Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, December 14, 1903.163H. Coupin,La Nature, September 19, 1903.164“On theOrnithorhynchus paradoxus, its Venomous Spur and General Structure,”Trans. Linn. Soc., 1822, p. 622.165“Observations on the Femoral Gland of Ornithorhynchus and its Secretion;”Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales, vol. ix., July, 1894.166“Note sur la sécrétion venimeuse de l’Ornithorhynchus paradoxus,”Comptés rendus de la Société de Biologie, March 12, 1904.167“On the Effects of Wounds Inflicted by the Spurs of thePlatypus,”Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, 1876.168The photographs, by which this note was accompanied, are reproduced in Chapter IV. of this volume, pp. 155, 157, 158.169Polygala telophioides, Will.170We subsequently learnt that he had informed his friends of his intention, but had not said a word about it to his wife.171The thick and cloudy appearance of the contents of the bottles made us hesitate to have recourse to intravenous injection.
1As regards the distinctive characters of these various snakes, and of the majority of those that we shall describe in this book, we have followed the statements in the “Catalogue of the Snakes in the British Museum (Natural History),” vol. iii., by George Albert Boulenger, F.R.S. (London: Printed by order of the Trustees, 1896.)
1As regards the distinctive characters of these various snakes, and of the majority of those that we shall describe in this book, we have followed the statements in the “Catalogue of the Snakes in the British Museum (Natural History),” vol. iii., by George Albert Boulenger, F.R.S. (London: Printed by order of the Trustees, 1896.)
2Acad. de médecine, March 19, 1889.
2Acad. de médecine, March 19, 1889.
3Erpétologie générale, t. vii.
3Erpétologie générale, t. vii.
4“Le serpent cracheur de la côte occidentale d’Afrique,”Société Zool. de France, 1895, p. 210. Bavay thinks that the Spitting Snake is aNaja haje, but the description that he gives of the head of the reptile, which was sent to him by Le Naour, certainly agrees with the characters ofSepedon. Moreover, I have satisfied myself that the many specimens ofNaja hajethat I have kept in captivity in my laboratory never possessed the faculty of spitting their poison to a distance.
4“Le serpent cracheur de la côte occidentale d’Afrique,”Société Zool. de France, 1895, p. 210. Bavay thinks that the Spitting Snake is aNaja haje, but the description that he gives of the head of the reptile, which was sent to him by Le Naour, certainly agrees with the characters ofSepedon. Moreover, I have satisfied myself that the many specimens ofNaja hajethat I have kept in captivity in my laboratory never possessed the faculty of spitting their poison to a distance.
5“The Snakes of Australia,” Sydney, 1869.
5“The Snakes of Australia,” Sydney, 1869.
6L. Lannoy, “Thèse de doctorat ès sciences,” Paris, 1903, No. 1,138, série A, 454.
6L. Lannoy, “Thèse de doctorat ès sciences,” Paris, 1903, No. 1,138, série A, 454.
7“Snake Commission Report,” 1874.
7“Snake Commission Report,” 1874.
8Bulletin de l’Académie de Médecine, t. x., 1883, p. 947.
8Bulletin de l’Académie de Médecine, t. x., 1883, p. 947.
9Zeitschrift für Biologie, xxiii.
9Zeitschrift für Biologie, xxiii.
10Kühne and Chittenden, “Ueber Albumosen,”Zeitschrift für Biologie, 1884.
10Kühne and Chittenden, “Ueber Albumosen,”Zeitschrift für Biologie, 1884.
11Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, 29 février, 1896.
11Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, 29 février, 1896.
12Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, 1896, p. 489.
12Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, 1896, p. 489.
13Province médicale, 21 Septembre, 1901.
13Province médicale, 21 Septembre, 1901.
14Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, New York, 1906.
14Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, New York, 1906.
15Proc. Roy. Soc., London, lxxiv., 1904, pp. 108-109.
15Proc. Roy. Soc., London, lxxiv., 1904, pp. 108-109.
16Ibid., pp. 104-108.
16Ibid., pp. 104-108.
17“Communication de l’Institut Sérothérapique de l’État danois,” tome i., Copenhagen, 1906.
17“Communication de l’Institut Sérothérapique de l’État danois,” tome i., Copenhagen, 1906.
18Indian Annals, July, 1868.
18Indian Annals, July, 1868.
19Medical News, Philadelphia, 1884.
19Medical News, Philadelphia, 1884.
20“Zur Pathologie des Schlangenbisses,”Forschungen der Medicin, Berlin, 1890.
20“Zur Pathologie des Schlangenbisses,”Forschungen der Medicin, Berlin, 1890.
21Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, t. xii., 1898, p. 369.
21Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, t. xii., 1898, p. 369.
22Thèse Bordeaux, 1902.
22Thèse Bordeaux, 1902.
23Virchow’s Archiv für Pathologie, Anatomie, und Physiologie, Band 179, 1905.
23Virchow’s Archiv für Pathologie, Anatomie, und Physiologie, Band 179, 1905.
24Société de Médecine et de Chirurgie de São Paulo (Brazil), June 15, 1904.
24Société de Médecine et de Chirurgie de São Paulo (Brazil), June 15, 1904.
25Medical Record, September 15, 1900.
25Medical Record, September 15, 1900.
26Lancet, January 2, August 20, October 22, 1904, and September 23, 1905.
26Lancet, January 2, August 20, October 22, 1904, and September 23, 1905.
27Proceedings of the Royal Society, vol. lxxi., 1903.
27Proceedings of the Royal Society, vol. lxxi., 1903.
28“The Constitution of Snake-venom and Snake-sera,”University of Pennsylvania Medical Bulletin, vol. xv., 1902, p. 345.
28“The Constitution of Snake-venom and Snake-sera,”University of Pennsylvania Medical Bulletin, vol. xv., 1902, p. 345.
29Fontana, “On Poisons,” translated by J. Skinner: London, 1787.
29Fontana, “On Poisons,” translated by J. Skinner: London, 1787.
30Smithsonian Reports, 1854.
30Smithsonian Reports, 1854.
31Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, 1860.
31Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, 1860.
32Medical Times and Gazette, vol. ii., 1873.
32Medical Times and Gazette, vol. ii., 1873.
33“On the Physiological Action of the Venom of the Australian Black Snake,”Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, July, 1895.
33“On the Physiological Action of the Venom of the Australian Black Snake,”Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, July, 1895.
34Indian Medical Gazette, December, 1901.
34Indian Medical Gazette, December, 1901.
35Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, November 4, 1899.
35Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, November 4, 1899.
36Ibid., October 28, 1899.
36Ibid., October 28, 1899.
37Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, June, 1904.
37Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, June, 1904.
38At the Serum-therapic Laboratory of São Paulo (Brazil), Dr. Vital, Brazil, is at the present time preparing serum specific againstLachesis-venom.
38At the Serum-therapic Laboratory of São Paulo (Brazil), Dr. Vital, Brazil, is at the present time preparing serum specific againstLachesis-venom.
39Medical Times and Gazette, vol. ii., 1873.
39Medical Times and Gazette, vol. ii., 1873.
40“The Thanatophidia of India.” Churchill, London, 1872.
40“The Thanatophidia of India.” Churchill, London, 1872.
41“On the Physiological Action of the Venom of the Australian Black Snake,”Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, July 3, 1895.
41“On the Physiological Action of the Venom of the Australian Black Snake,”Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, July 3, 1895.
42Archives biologiques, 1897 and 1898;Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, October 28, 1899.
42Archives biologiques, 1897 and 1898;Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, October 28, 1899.
43Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, October 28, 1899; November 4, 1899; July 26, 1902.
43Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, October 28, 1899; November 4, 1899; July 26, 1902.
44Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, June, 1904.
44Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, June, 1904.
45Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology, 1899-1900.
45Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology, 1899-1900.
46Journal of Experimental Medicine, March 17, 1902;University of Pennsylvania Medical Bulletin, November, 1902.
46Journal of Experimental Medicine, March 17, 1902;University of Pennsylvania Medical Bulletin, November, 1902.
47Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, June 16, 1902.
47Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, June 16, 1902.
48Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, No. 27, 1902.
48Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, No. 27, 1902.
49Berliner klinische Wochenschrift, Nos. 38, 39, 1902; Nos. 2-4, 1903; Nos. 42-43, 1903.
49Berliner klinische Wochenschrift, Nos. 38, 39, 1902; Nos. 2-4, 1903; Nos. 42-43, 1903.
50Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, 1904, p. 387.
50Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, 1904, p. 387.
51Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1905, No. 2, pp. 191-222.
51Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1905, No. 2, pp. 191-222.
52Lancet, April 2, 1904, pp. 916-921.
52Lancet, April 2, 1904, pp. 916-921.
53“The Constitution of Snake-venoms and Snake-sera,”University of Pennsylvania Medical Bulletin, vol. xv., November, 1902, p. 345.
53“The Constitution of Snake-venoms and Snake-sera,”University of Pennsylvania Medical Bulletin, vol. xv., November, 1902, p. 345.
54Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, August 11, 1902.
54Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, August 11, 1902.
55Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, June, 1904.
55Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, June, 1904.
56“Sur l’action protéolytique des venins,”Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, September, 1902, andThèse Paris, No. 1,138, 1903.
56“Sur l’action protéolytique des venins,”Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, September, 1902, andThèse Paris, No. 1,138, 1903.
57“On the Plurality of Cytolysins in Snake-venom,”University of Pennsylvania Medical Bulletin, vol. xvi., 1903, p. 163.
57“On the Plurality of Cytolysins in Snake-venom,”University of Pennsylvania Medical Bulletin, vol. xvi., 1903, p. 163.
58Ann. Soc. Méd. de Gand, 1905, fasc. 3.
58Ann. Soc. Méd. de Gand, 1905, fasc. 3.
59Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, April, 1905.
59Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, April, 1905.
60Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, 1898.
60Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, 1898.
61Thèse Paris, No. 1138, 1903.
61Thèse Paris, No. 1138, 1903.
62Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, August 11, 1902.
62Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, August 11, 1902.
63Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, January 11, 1896.
63Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, January 11, 1896.
64Wehrmann,Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, 1897 and 1898.
64Wehrmann,Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, 1897 and 1898.
65Carrière, “Sur le sort des toxines et des antitoxines dans le tube digestif,”ibid., 1898, p. 435.
65Carrière, “Sur le sort des toxines et des antitoxines dans le tube digestif,”ibid., 1898, p. 435.
66British Medical Journal, 1895 and 1897.
66British Medical Journal, 1895 and 1897.
67Chatenay, “Les réactions leucocytaires vis-à-vis de certaines toxines,”Thèse Paris, 1894.
67Chatenay, “Les réactions leucocytaires vis-à-vis de certaines toxines,”Thèse Paris, 1894.
68Flexner and Noguchi, “Snake-venom in Relation to Hæmolysis, Bacteriolysis, and Toxicity,”Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. vi., March 17, 1902.
68Flexner and Noguchi, “Snake-venom in Relation to Hæmolysis, Bacteriolysis, and Toxicity,”Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. vi., March 17, 1902.
69“Trattado del veneno della vipera,” 1787.
69“Trattado del veneno della vipera,” 1787.
70Archiv für mikroskopische Anatomie, Bd. ix., 1873.
70Archiv für mikroskopische Anatomie, Bd. ix., 1873.
71Morphologisches Jahrbuch, Bd. viii., 1883.
71Morphologisches Jahrbuch, Bd. viii., 1883.
72Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, January 20, 1894.
72Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, January 20, 1894.
73Archives de Physiologie, 1894.
73Archives de Physiologie, 1894.
74Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris, January 22, 1894.
74Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris, January 22, 1894.
75Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, January 13, 1894.
75Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, January 13, 1894.
76Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, 1897.
76Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, 1897.
77Archives italiennes de Biologie, 1888 and 1889.
77Archives italiennes de Biologie, 1888 and 1889.
78Archives de Physiologie, 1894.
78Archives de Physiologie, 1894.
79Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, July 25, 1903.
79Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, July 25, 1903.
80Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology, May, 1903.
80Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology, May, 1903.
81Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology, 1900, p. 273.
81Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology, 1900, p. 273.
82Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, July 1, 1905.
82Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, July 1, 1905.
83“The Jungle Book,” by Rudyard Kipling. London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd. Reprint of 1905, pp. 183, 184.
83“The Jungle Book,” by Rudyard Kipling. London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd. Reprint of 1905, pp. 183, 184.
84Deutsche medicinische Wochenschrift, 1898.
84Deutsche medicinische Wochenschrift, 1898.
85Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, 1895, p. 639, and 1899, p. 77;Bulletin du Muséum d’Histoire naturelle, 1895, t. i., p. 294, t. ii., p. 100.
85Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, 1895, p. 639, and 1899, p. 77;Bulletin du Muséum d’Histoire naturelle, 1895, t. i., p. 294, t. ii., p. 100.
86“Aperçu général sur l’Egypte.” Paris, 1840.
86“Aperçu général sur l’Egypte.” Paris, 1840.
87Brehm’s “Thierleben”; French edition, “Les Reptiles,” p. 480.
87Brehm’s “Thierleben”; French edition, “Les Reptiles,” p. 480.
88Maclure’s Magazine, April, 1894.
88Maclure’s Magazine, April, 1894.
89British Medical Journal, August 17, 1895.
89British Medical Journal, August 17, 1895.
90Archives de médecine navale, 1867, p. 390.
90Archives de médecine navale, 1867, p. 390.
91Revue scientifique, 1892, p. 254.
91Revue scientifique, 1892, p. 254.
92Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, February 24, 1896.
92Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, February 24, 1896.
93“The Pharsalia of Lucan, translated into blank verse by Edward Ridley, Q.C., sometime Fellow of All Souls’ College, Oxford.” (London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1896). Book ix., p. 296, lines 1,046 to 1,065.
93“The Pharsalia of Lucan, translated into blank verse by Edward Ridley, Q.C., sometime Fellow of All Souls’ College, Oxford.” (London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1896). Book ix., p. 296, lines 1,046 to 1,065.
94Journal of Physiology, vol. viii., 1887, p. 203.
94Journal of Physiology, vol. viii., 1887, p. 203.
95“Les Vipères de France,” p. 136 (1889).
95“Les Vipères de France,” p. 136 (1889).
96Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, 1892, p. 181.
96Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, 1892, p. 181.
97Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, t. 118, February, 1894, p. 356, March, 1894, p. 720;Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, February, 1894, pp. 111, 120;Archives de Physiologie, July, 1894;Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, May, 1894, p. 275, April, 1895, p. 225.
97Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, t. 118, February, 1894, p. 356, March, 1894, p. 720;Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, February, 1894, pp. 111, 120;Archives de Physiologie, July, 1894;Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, May, 1894, p. 275, April, 1895, p. 225.
98British Medical Journal, June 15, 1895.
98British Medical Journal, June 15, 1895.
99Cf.papers by George Lamb,Scientific Memoirs by Officers of the Medical and Sanitary Departments of the Government of India, New Series, Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 16; L. Rogers,Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, vol. lxxii., andLancet, February 6, 1904; C. J. Martin,Intercolonial Medical Journal of Australasia, August 20, 1897, April 20, 1898; Dr. Hunter,Lancet, January 2, 1904; Dr. Tidswell,Australasian Medical Gazette, April 21, 1902; A. Calmette,Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, May 2, 1904; Dr. Vital Brazil, “Contribution a l’étude de l’intoxication ophidienne” (separately published pamphlet), Paris, 1905; G. Bill,Intercolonial Medical Journal of Australasia, July 20, 1902.
99Cf.papers by George Lamb,Scientific Memoirs by Officers of the Medical and Sanitary Departments of the Government of India, New Series, Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 16; L. Rogers,Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, vol. lxxii., andLancet, February 6, 1904; C. J. Martin,Intercolonial Medical Journal of Australasia, August 20, 1897, April 20, 1898; Dr. Hunter,Lancet, January 2, 1904; Dr. Tidswell,Australasian Medical Gazette, April 21, 1902; A. Calmette,Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, May 2, 1904; Dr. Vital Brazil, “Contribution a l’étude de l’intoxication ophidienne” (separately published pamphlet), Paris, 1905; G. Bill,Intercolonial Medical Journal of Australasia, July 20, 1902.
100Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, 1895, No. 4.
100Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, 1895, No. 4.
101“The Nature of the Antagonism between Toxins and Antitoxins,”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, vol. lxiii., 1898, p. 420.
101“The Nature of the Antagonism between Toxins and Antitoxins,”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, vol. lxiii., 1898, p. 420.
102Calmette,Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, 1902, No. 24; Preston Kyes,Berliner klinische Wochenschrift, 1904, No. 19.
102Calmette,Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, 1902, No. 24; Preston Kyes,Berliner klinische Wochenschrift, 1904, No. 19.
103Berliner klinische Wochenschrift, 1905, No. 50.
103Berliner klinische Wochenschrift, 1905, No. 50.
104Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris, September, 1881.
104Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris, September, 1881.
105“Le venin de la vipère,” Paris, 1889.
105“Le venin de la vipère,” Paris, 1889.
106Transactions of the Third Intercolonial Congress, 1892, p. 152.
106Transactions of the Third Intercolonial Congress, 1892, p. 152.
107“Les morsures de vipères chez les animaux,”Recueil de médecine vétérinaire d’Alfort, May 15, 1897.
107“Les morsures de vipères chez les animaux,”Recueil de médecine vétérinaire d’Alfort, May 15, 1897.
108Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, December 13, 1902; June 6, July 25, 1903; February 20, 1904.
108Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, December 13, 1902; June 6, July 25, 1903; February 20, 1904.
109Semaine médicale, June 24, 1903.
109Semaine médicale, June 24, 1903.
110Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, May 19, 1906.
110Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, May 19, 1906.
111“El Latrodectus formidabilis de Chile,” by Fredérico Puga-Borne, Santiago, 1892; and “Biologia Centrali-Americana,” Arachnida, vol. ii., pl. 35.
111“El Latrodectus formidabilis de Chile,” by Fredérico Puga-Borne, Santiago, 1892; and “Biologia Centrali-Americana,” Arachnida, vol. ii., pl. 35.
112Blackwell, “Experiments and Observations on the Poison of Araneida,”Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, 1855, p. 31. See also “Insect Life” (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1889), vol. i., parts 7, 8, 9 and 10, and vol. ii., part 5.
112Blackwell, “Experiments and Observations on the Poison of Araneida,”Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, 1855, p. 31. See also “Insect Life” (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1889), vol. i., parts 7, 8, 9 and 10, and vol. ii., part 5.
113“Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Giftspinnen.” Stuttgart, 1901.
113“Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Giftspinnen.” Stuttgart, 1901.
114“Zur Kenntniss des Kreuzspinnengiftes,”Hofm. Beiträge, ii., p. 125, 1902.
114“Zur Kenntniss des Kreuzspinnengiftes,”Hofm. Beiträge, ii., p. 125, 1902.
115Joyeux-Laffuie, “Appareil venimeux et venin de scorpion” (Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Science), Paris, 1883; andComptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, November 6, 1882.
115Joyeux-Laffuie, “Appareil venimeux et venin de scorpion” (Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Science), Paris, 1883; andComptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, November 6, 1882.
116“Ueber die Giftwirkung des Nordafrikanischen Skorpiones,”Zeitschrift für Biologie, Bd. xii., p. 170, 1876.
116“Ueber die Giftwirkung des Nordafrikanischen Skorpiones,”Zeitschrift für Biologie, Bd. xii., p. 170, 1876.
117Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, 1885, p. 574.
117Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, 1885, p. 574.
118Berliner klinische Wochenschrift, 1903, Nos. 42, 43.
118Berliner klinische Wochenschrift, 1903, Nos. 42, 43.
119Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, 1895, p. 232.
119Annales de l’Institut Pasteur, 1895, p. 232.
120Proceedings of the Royal Society, vol. xlii., 1887, p. 17.
120Proceedings of the Royal Society, vol. xlii., 1887, p. 17.
121“L’immunité dans les maladies infectieuses,” Paris, 1901.
121“L’immunité dans les maladies infectieuses,” Paris, 1901.
122Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, November 15, 1904.
122Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, November 15, 1904.
123“La scolopendre et sa piqure,”Thèse Paris, 1887.
123“La scolopendre et sa piqure,”Thèse Paris, 1887.
124“Appareil venimeux et venin de la scolopendre,”Thèse Montpellier, 1885.
124“Appareil venimeux et venin de la scolopendre,”Thèse Montpellier, 1885.
125“Lehrbuch der Anatomie der Wirbellosen Tiere,” 1848.
125“Lehrbuch der Anatomie der Wirbellosen Tiere,” 1848.
126Arch für anat. Wissensch., 1859.
126Arch für anat. Wissensch., 1859.
127Comptes rendus de l’Acad. des Sciences, 1884.
127Comptes rendus de l’Acad. des Sciences, 1884.
128“Appareil glandulaire des hyménoptères,” Paris, 1894.
128“Appareil glandulaire des hyménoptères,” Paris, 1894.
129Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, 1898.
129Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, 1898.
130Annales sc. Anat. Zoologie, 8esérie, t. x., 1898.
130Annales sc. Anat. Zoologie, 8esérie, t. x., 1898.
131Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, July 25, 1890.
131Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, July 25, 1890.
132Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, July 24, 1905.
132Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, July 24, 1905.
133Berliner klinische Wochenschrift, 1906, No. 44.
133Berliner klinische Wochenschrift, 1906, No. 44.
134Comptes rendus de l’Académie de Médecine, t. liii., 1905, p. 498.
134Comptes rendus de l’Académie de Médecine, t. liii., 1905, p. 498.
135“Traité de zoologie médicale,” t. ii. (Paris).
135“Traité de zoologie médicale,” t. ii. (Paris).
136Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, January 17, 1908.
136Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, January 17, 1908.
137Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, February 25, 1905.
137Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, February 25, 1905.
138“Les poissons venimeux,”Thèse Paris, 1889.
138“Les poissons venimeux,”Thèse Paris, 1889.
139“Poissons venimeux et poissons vénéneux,”Archives de Physiologie, May, 1872;Archives de médecine navale, February, 1865, and January, 1881.
139“Poissons venimeux et poissons vénéneux,”Archives de Physiologie, May, 1872;Archives de médecine navale, February, 1865, and January, 1881.
140“Poissons venimeux et poissons vénéneux,”Thèse Paris, 1899.
140“Poissons venimeux et poissons vénéneux,”Thèse Paris, 1899.
141“Les poissons vénéneux,” Paris, 1900.
141“Les poissons vénéneux,” Paris, 1900.
142“Sédentarité des poissons venimeux,”Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, 1895, p. 86.
142“Sédentarité des poissons venimeux,”Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, 1895, p. 86.
143Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, 1904, p. 666.
143Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, 1904, p. 666.
144Thèse Paris, 1884.
144Thèse Paris, 1884.
145Bulletin du Muséum d’histoire naturelle, 1899.
145Bulletin du Muséum d’histoire naturelle, 1899.
146“Giftfische und Fischgifte,”Vorträge im Rostocker Fischerverein, 1902, andDie medizinische Wochenschrift, 1902.
146“Giftfische und Fischgifte,”Vorträge im Rostocker Fischerverein, 1902, andDie medizinische Wochenschrift, 1902.
147Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, October 25 and November 8, 1902, and June 21, 1904;Journal de Physiologie, March, 1903.
147Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, October 25 and November 8, 1902, and June 21, 1904;Journal de Physiologie, March, 1903.
148Brehm (Sauvage’s translation), “Les Merveilles de la Nature—Reptiles et Batraciens” (Paris, 1885).
148Brehm (Sauvage’s translation), “Les Merveilles de la Nature—Reptiles et Batraciens” (Paris, 1885).
149Hoppe-Seyler’s “Med.-chem. Untersuchungen,” Berlin, 1866.
149Hoppe-Seyler’s “Med.-chem. Untersuchungen,” Berlin, 1866.
150Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, April 1, 1889, and January 29, 1890.
150Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, April 1, 1889, and January 29, 1890.
151Ibid., 1890.
151Ibid., 1890.
152“Beitrage zur Kenntniss des Salamandarins und Salamanderalkaloïde,”Archiv. f. experimentale Pathologie und Pharmakologie, Bd. xli., 1898, p. 219, and Bd. xliii., 1900, p. 84.
152“Beitrage zur Kenntniss des Salamandarins und Salamanderalkaloïde,”Archiv. f. experimentale Pathologie und Pharmakologie, Bd. xli., 1898, p. 219, and Bd. xliii., 1900, p. 84.
153Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, 1897, pp. 723, 823.
153Comptes rendus de la Société de Biologie, 1897, pp. 723, 823.
154Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, April 21, 1851, and May, 1852.
154Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, April 21, 1851, and May, 1852.
155Journal de Thérapeutique, 1877, p. 929.
155Journal de Thérapeutique, 1877, p. 929.
156Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, February 25, 1884.
156Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, February 25, 1884.
157Archives de Physiologie, 1893, p. 511.
157Archives de Physiologie, 1893, p. 511.
158Archiv für mikroskopische Anatomie, Bd. ii., 1889, p. 57.
158Archiv für mikroskopische Anatomie, Bd. ii., 1889, p. 57.
159“Zur Kenntniss des Krotengiftes,”Hofm. Beiträge, Bd. i., 1901, p. 575.
159“Zur Kenntniss des Krotengiftes,”Hofm. Beiträge, Bd. i., 1901, p. 575.
160“Ueber Bufonin und Bufotalin,” Leipzig, 1902; andArchiv für experimentale Pathologie und Pharmakologie, December, 1902.
160“Ueber Bufonin und Bufotalin,” Leipzig, 1902; andArchiv für experimentale Pathologie und Pharmakologie, December, 1902.
161“Rapports des venins avec la biologie générale,”Revue générale des Sciences, December 30, 1903.
161“Rapports des venins avec la biologie générale,”Revue générale des Sciences, December 30, 1903.
162Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, December 14, 1903.
162Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, December 14, 1903.
163H. Coupin,La Nature, September 19, 1903.
163H. Coupin,La Nature, September 19, 1903.
164“On theOrnithorhynchus paradoxus, its Venomous Spur and General Structure,”Trans. Linn. Soc., 1822, p. 622.
164“On theOrnithorhynchus paradoxus, its Venomous Spur and General Structure,”Trans. Linn. Soc., 1822, p. 622.
165“Observations on the Femoral Gland of Ornithorhynchus and its Secretion;”Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales, vol. ix., July, 1894.
165“Observations on the Femoral Gland of Ornithorhynchus and its Secretion;”Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales, vol. ix., July, 1894.
166“Note sur la sécrétion venimeuse de l’Ornithorhynchus paradoxus,”Comptés rendus de la Société de Biologie, March 12, 1904.
166“Note sur la sécrétion venimeuse de l’Ornithorhynchus paradoxus,”Comptés rendus de la Société de Biologie, March 12, 1904.
167“On the Effects of Wounds Inflicted by the Spurs of thePlatypus,”Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, 1876.
167“On the Effects of Wounds Inflicted by the Spurs of thePlatypus,”Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, 1876.
168The photographs, by which this note was accompanied, are reproduced in Chapter IV. of this volume, pp. 155, 157, 158.
168The photographs, by which this note was accompanied, are reproduced in Chapter IV. of this volume, pp. 155, 157, 158.
169Polygala telophioides, Will.
169Polygala telophioides, Will.
170We subsequently learnt that he had informed his friends of his intention, but had not said a word about it to his wife.
170We subsequently learnt that he had informed his friends of his intention, but had not said a word about it to his wife.
171The thick and cloudy appearance of the contents of the bottles made us hesitate to have recourse to intravenous injection.
171The thick and cloudy appearance of the contents of the bottles made us hesitate to have recourse to intravenous injection.
Transcriber’s Note:Inconsistent spelling and hyphenation are as in the original.
Inconsistent spelling and hyphenation are as in the original.