EXCERPTS FROM "THE WILL TO POWER" volume II
For hundreds of years, pleasure and pain have been represented as themotivesfor every action. Upon reflection, however, we are bound to concede that everything would have proceeded in exactly the same way, according to precisely the same sequence of cause and effect, if the states "pleasure" and "pain" had been entirely absent.8-9
Themeasureof the desire for knowledge depends upon the extent to whichthe Will to Powergrows in a certain species: a species gets a grasp of a given amount of reality,in order to master it, in order to enlist that amount in its service.12
It is our needs thatinterpret the world;our instincts and their impulses for and against. Every instinct is a sort of thirst for power....13
That a belief, however useful it may be for the preservation of a species, has nothing to do with the truth, may be seen from the fact that wemustbelieve in time, space, and motion, without feeling ourselves compelled to regard them as absolute realities.16
Truth is that hind of errorwithout which a certain species of living being cannot exist.20
In the formation of reason, logic, and the categories, it was aneedin us that was the determining power: not the need "to know," but to classify, to schematise, for the purpose of intelligibility and calculation.29
Logic is the attempt on our part to understand theactual world according to a scheme of Being devised by ourselves; or, more exactly, it is our attempt at making the actual world more calculable and more susceptible to formulation, for our own purposes....33
"Truth" is the will to be master over the manifold sensations that reach consciousness; it is the will toclassifyphenomena according to definite categories. In this way we start out with a belief in the "true nature" of things (we regard phenomena as real).
The character of the world in the process of Becomingis not susceptible of formulation;it is "false" and "contradicts itself."Knowledgeand the process of evolution exclude each other.Consequently,knowledge must be something else; it must be preceded by a will to make things knowable, a kind of Becoming in itself must create theimpressionofBeing.33-34
The chief error of psychologists:they regard the indistinct idea as of a lowerkindthan thedistinct;but that which keeps at a distance from our consciousness and which is thereforeobscure, mayon that very account be quite clear in itself.The fact that a thing becomes obscure is a question of the perspective of consciousness.42
The criterion of truth lies in the enhancement of the feeling of power.49
Logic was intended to be a method of facilitating thought:a means of expression,—not truth.... Later on it got toactlike truth....50
In a world which was essentially false, truthfulness would be ananti-natural tendency:its only purpose would be to provide a means of attaining to ahigher degree of falsity.51
We have absolutely no experience concerningcause;viewed psychologically we derive the whole conceptfrom the subjective conviction, thatweourselves are causes.55
"Truth" is not something which is present and which has to be found and discovered; it is somethingwhich has to be createdand whichgivesits nameto a process,or, better still, to the Will to overpower, which in itself has no purpose....60
The absolute is even an absurd concept: an "absolute mode of existence" is nonsense, the concept "being," "thing," is alwaysrelativeto us.
The trouble is that, owing to the old antithesis "apparent" and "real," the correlative valuations "little value" and "absolute value" have been spread abroad.83
Man seeks "the truth": a world that does not contradict itself, that does not deceive, that does not change, arealworld—a world in which there is no suffering: contradiction, deception, variability—the causes of suffering. He does not doubt that there is such a thing as a world as it ought to be; he would fain find a road to it.... Obviously, the will to truth ismerelythe longing for astable world.
The senses deceive; reason corrects the errors:therefore,it was concluded, reason is the road to a static state; the mostspiritualideas must be nearest to the "real world."88
The degree of a man's will-power may be measured from the extent to which he can dispense with the meaning in things, from the extent to which he is able to endure a world without meaning:because he himself arranges a small portion of it.90
There is no such thing as an established fact, everything fluctuates, everything is intangible, yielding; after all, the most lasting of all things are our opinions.103
That theworth of the worldlies in our interpretations (that perhaps yet other interpretations are possible somewhere, besides mankind's); that the interpretations made hitherto were perspective valuations, by means of which we were able to survive in life, i. e. in the Will to Power and in the growth of power; that everyelevation of maninvolves the overcoming of narrower interpretations; that every higher degree of strength or power attained, brings new views in its train, and teaches a belief in new horizons—these doctrines lie scattered through all my works.107
The triumphant concept"energy"with which our physicists created God and the world, needs yet to be completer: it must be given an inner will which I characterise as the "Will to Power"—that is to say, as an insatiable desire to manifest power; or the application and exercise of power as a creative instinct, etc....110
The unalterable sequence of certain phenomena does not prove any "law," but a relation of power between two or more forces.115
A quantum of power is characterised by the effect it produces and the influence it resists. The adiaphoric state which would be thinkable in itself, is entirely lacking. It is essentially a will to violence and a will to defend one's self against violence. It is not self-preservation: every atom exercises its influence over the whole of existence—it is thought out of existence if one thinks this radiation of will-power away. That is why I call it a quantum of "Will to Power." ...117-118
My idea is that every specific body strives to become master of all space, and to extend its power (its will to power), and to thrust back everything that resists it. But inasmuch as it is continually meeting the sameendeavours on the part of other bodies, it concludes by coming to terms with those (by "combining" with those) which are sufficiently related to it—and thus they conspire together for power.And the process continues.121
The influence of "environment" is nonsensicallyover-ratedin Darwin: the essential factor in the process of life is precisely the tremendous inner power to shape and to create forms, which merelyuses, exploits"environment."127
Thefeeling of being surcharged,the feeling accompanying anincrease in strength,quite apart from the utility of the struggle, is the actualprogress:from these feelings the will to war is first derived.128
A living thing seeks above all todischargeits strength:"self-preservation"is only one of the results thereof....128
The most fundamental and most primeval activity of a protoplasm cannot be ascribed to a will to self-preservation, for it absorbs an amount of material which is absurdly out of proportion with the needs of its preservation: and what is more, it doesnot"preserve itself" in the process, but actually falls topieces .... The instinct which rules here, must account for this total absence in the organism of a desire to preserve itself.
The will to power can manifest itself only againstobstacles:it therefore goes in search of what resists it—this is the primitive tendency of the protoplasm when it extends itspseudopodiaand feels about it. The act of appropriation and assimilation is, above all, the result of an additional building and rebuilding, until at last the subjected creature has become completely a part of thesuperior creature's sphere of power, and has increased the latter....130
Why is allactivity,even that of asense,associated with pleasure? Because, before the activity was possible, an obstacle or a burden was done away with. Or, rather, because all action is a process of overcoming, of becoming master of, and ofincreasingthefeeling of power?135
Man isnotonly an individual, but the continuation of collective organic life in one definite line. The fact thatmansurvives, proves that a certain species of interpretations (even though it still be added to) has also survived; that, as a system, this method of interpreting has not changed.152
The fundamental phenomena:innumerable individuals are sacrificed for the sake of a few,in order to make the few possible.—One must not allow one's self to be deceived; the case is the same withpeoplesandraces:they produce the "body" for the generation of isolated and valuableindividuals,who continue the great process.153
Life isnotthe continuous adjustment of internal relations to external relations, but will to power, which, proceeding from inside, subjugates and incorporates an ever-increasing quantity of "external" phenomena.153-154
Man as a species is not progressing. Higher specimens are indeed attained; but they do not survive. The general level of the species is not raised.... Man as a species does not represent any sort of progress compared with any other animal.157
The domestication (culture) of man does not sink very deep. When it does sink far below the skin it immediately becomes degeneration (type: the Christian). The"wild" man (or, in moral terminology, theevilman) is a reversion to Nature—and, in a certain sense, he represents a recovery, acurefrom the effects of "culture."...158
The strong always have to be upheld against the weak; and the well-constituted against the ill-constituted, the healthy against the sick and physiologically botched. If we drew our morals from reality, they would read thus: the mediocre are more valuable than the exceptional creatures, and the decadent than the mediocre; the will to nonentity prevails over the will to life....159
That species show an ascending tendency, is the most nonsensical assertion that has ever been made: until now they have only manifested a dead level. There is nothing whatever to prove that the higher organisms have developed from the lower.160
Man as he has appeared up to the present is the embryo of the man of the future;allthe formative powers which are to produce the latter, already lie in the former: and owing to the fact that they are enormous, the morepromising for the futurethe modern individual happens to be, the moresufferingfalls to his lot.161
The will to power is the primitive motive force out of which all other motives have been derived.162
From a psychological point of view the idea of "cause" is our feeling of power in the act which is called willing—our concept "effect" is the superstition that this feeling of power is itself the force which moves things....163
Life as an individual case (a hypothesis which may be applied to existence in general) strives after the maximum feeling of power; life is essentially a striving after more power; striving itself is only a straining after morepower; the most fundamental and innermost thing of all is this will.165
Man does not seek happiness and does not avoid unhappiness. Everybody knows the famous prejudices I here contradict. Pleasure and pain are mere results, mere accompanying phenomena—that which every man, which every tiny particle of a living organism will have, is an increase of power. In striving after this, pleasure and pain are encountered; it is owing to that will that the organism seeks opposition and requires that which stands in its way.... Pain as the hindrance of its will to power is therefore a normal feature, a natural ingredient of every organic phenomenon; man does not avoid it; on the contrary, he is constantly in need of it; every triumph, every feeling of pleasure, every event presupposes an obstacle overcome.172
Man is now master of the forces of nature, and master too of his own wild and unbridled feelings (the passions have followed suit, and have learned to become useful)—in comparison with primeval man, the man of to-day represents an enormous quantum of power, but not an increase in happiness. How can one maintain, then, that he has striven after happiness?174
"God" is the culminating moment: life is an eternal process of deifying and undeifying.But withal there is no zenith of values,but only a zenith ofpower.181
Man has one terrible and fundamental wish; he desires power, and this impulse, which is called freedom, must be the longest restrained. Hence ethics has instinctively aimed at such an education as shall restrain the desire for power; thus our morality slanders the would-be tyrant, and glorifies charity, patriotism, and the ambition of the herd.186
When the instincts of a society ultimately make it give up war and renounce conquest, it is decadent: it is ripe for democracy and the rule of shopkeepers.189
The maintenance of the military State is the last means of adhering to the great tradition of the past; or, where it has been lost, to revive it. By means of it the superior or strong type of man is preserved, and all institutions and ideas which perpetuate enmity and order of rank in States such as national feeling, protective tariffs, etc., may on that account seem justified.190
Concerning the future of marriage.—A supertax on inherited property, a longer term of military service for bachelors of a certain minimum age within the community.
Privileges of all sorts for fathers who lavish boys upon the world, and perhaps plural votes as well.
A medical certificate as a condition of any marriage, endorsed by the parochial authorities, in which a series of questions addressed to the parties and the medical officers must be answered ("family histories").
As a counter-agent to prostitution, or as its ennoblement, I would recommend leasehold marriages (to last for a term of years or months), with adequate provision for the children.
Every marriage to be warranted and sanctioned by a certain number of good men and true, of the parish, as a parochial obligation.193
Society ... should in many cases actually prevent the act of procreation, and may, without any regard for rank, descent, or intellect, hold in readiness the most rigorous forms of compulsion and restriction, and, under certain circumstances, have recourse to castration.194
The idea of punishment ought to be reduced to theconcept of the suppression of revolt, a weapon against the vanquished (by means of long or short terms of imprisonment). But punishment should not be associated in any way with contempt. A criminal is at all events a man who has set his life, his honour, his freedom at stake; he is therefore a man of courage. Neither should punishment be regarded as penance or retribution, as though there were some recognised rate of exchange between crime and punishment. Punishment does not purify, simply because crime does not sully.198
Should not the punishment fit the crime?200
"The will to power" is so loathed in democratic ages that the whole of the psychology of these ages seems directed towards its belittlement and slander.205
I am opposed to Socialism because it dreams ingenuously of "goodness, truth, beauty, and equal rights" (anarchy pursues the same ideal, but in a more brutal fashion).
I am opposed to parliamentary government and the power of the press, because they are the means whereby cattle become masters.206
The idea of a higher order of man is hated much more profoundly than monarchs themselves. Hatred of aristocracy always uses hatred of monarchy as a mask.207
Utility and pleasure are slave theories of life. "The blessing of work" is an ennobling phrase for slaves. Incapacity for leisure.208
There is no such thing as a right to live, a right to work, or a right to be happy: in this respect man is no different from the meanest worm.208
Fundamental errors:to regard the herd as an aim instead of the individual! The herd is only a means and nothingmore!But nowadays people are trying tounderstandthe herdas they would an individual, and to confer higher rights upon it than upon isolated personalities. In addition to this, all that makes for gregariousness,e.g.,sympathy, is regarded as themore valuableside of our natures.214-215
The will to powerappears:—
(a) Among the oppressed and slaves of all kinds, in the form of will to"freedom":the mere fact of breaking loose from something seems to be an end in itself (in a religio-moral sense: "One is only answerable to one's own conscience"; "evangelical freedom," etc., etc.).(b) In the case of a stronger species, ascending to power, in the form of the will to overpower. If this fails, then it shrinks to the "will to justice"—that is to say, to the will to the same measure of rights as the ruling caste possesses.(c) In the case of the strongest, richest, most independent, and most courageous, in the form of "love of humanity," of "love of the people," of the "gospel," of "truth," of "God," of "pity," of "self-sacrifice," etc., etc.; in the form of overpowering, of deeds of capture, of imposing service on some one, of an instinctive reckoning of one's self as part of a great mass of power to which one attempts to give a direction: the hero, the prophet, the Cæsar, the Saviour, the bell-wether.220-221
(a) Among the oppressed and slaves of all kinds, in the form of will to"freedom":the mere fact of breaking loose from something seems to be an end in itself (in a religio-moral sense: "One is only answerable to one's own conscience"; "evangelical freedom," etc., etc.).
(b) In the case of a stronger species, ascending to power, in the form of the will to overpower. If this fails, then it shrinks to the "will to justice"—that is to say, to the will to the same measure of rights as the ruling caste possesses.
(c) In the case of the strongest, richest, most independent, and most courageous, in the form of "love of humanity," of "love of the people," of the "gospel," of "truth," of "God," of "pity," of "self-sacrifice," etc., etc.; in the form of overpowering, of deeds of capture, of imposing service on some one, of an instinctive reckoning of one's self as part of a great mass of power to which one attempts to give a direction: the hero, the prophet, the Cæsar, the Saviour, the bell-wether.220-221
Individualismis a modest and still unconscious form of will to power; with it a single human unit seems to think it sufficient to free himself from the preponderating power of society (or of the State or Church). He does not set himself up in opposition as apersonality,but merely as a unit; he represents the rights of all other individuals as against the whole. That is to say, heinstinctively places himself on a level with every other unit: what he combats he does not combat as a person, but as a representative of units against a mass.227
There are no such things as moral actions: they are purely imaginary. Not only is it impossible to demonstrate their existence (a fact which Kant and Christianity, for instance, both acknowledge)—but they are not even possible. Owing to psychological misunderstanding, man invented anoppositeto the instinctive impulses of life, and believed that a new species of instinct was thereby discovered: aprimum mobilewas postulated which does not exist at all. According to the valuation which gave rise to the antithesis "moral" and "immoral," one should say:There is nothing else on earth but immoral intentions and actions.
The whole differentiation, "moral" and "immoral," arises from the assumption that both moral and immoral actions are the result of a spontaneous will—in short, that such a will exists; or in other words, that moral judgments can only hold good with regard to intuitions and actionsthat are free.But this whole order of actions and intentions is purely imaginary: the only world to which the moral standard could be applied does not exist at all:there is no such thing as a moral or an immoral action.230-231
There are two conditions in which art manifests itself in man even as a force of nature, and disposes of him whether he consent or not: it may be as a constraint to visionary states, or it may be an orgiastic impulse.240
Sexuality, intoxication, cruelty;all these belong to the oldestfestal joysof mankind, they also preponderate in budding artists.243
The desire for art and beauty is an indirect longingfor the ecstasy of sexual desire, which gets communicated to the brain.248
All art works as atonic;it increases strength, it kindles desire (i.e.,the feeling of strength), it excites all the more subtle recollections of intoxication....252
The inartistic states are: objectivity, reflection, suspension of the will.... The inartistic states are: those which impoverish, which subtract, which bleach, under which life suffers—the Christian.257
Would any link be missing in the whole chain of science and art, if woman, if woman's work, were excluded from it? Let us acknowledge the exception—it proves the rule—that woman is capable of perfection in everything which does not constitute a work: in letters, in memoirs, in the most intricate handiwork—in short, in everything which is not a craft....260-261
A man is an artist to the extent to which he regards everything that inartistic people call "form" as the actual substance, as the "principal" thing.261
The essential feature in art is its power of perfecting existence, its production of perfection and plenitude; art is essentially the affirmation, the blessing, and the deification of existence....263
The greatness of an artist is not to be measured by the beautiful feelings which he evokes: let this belief be left to the girls. It should be measured according to the extent to which he approaches the grand style, according to the extent to which he is capable of the grand style. This style and great passion have this in common—that they scorn to please; that they forget to persuade: that they command; that they will.... To become master of the chaos which is in one; to compel one's inner chaos to assume form; to become consistent, simple, unequivocal,mathematical, law—this is the great ambition here.277
A preference for questionable and terrible things is a symptom of strength; whereas the taste for pretty and charming trifles is characteristic of the weak and the delicate.287
Art is the great means of making life possible, the great seducer to life, the great stimulus of life.
Art is the only superior counter-agent to all will to the denial of life; it ispar excellencethe anti-Christian, the anti-Buddhistic, the anti-Nihilistic force.290
Quanta of power alone determine rank and distinguish rank: nothing else does.295
It is necessary forhighermen to declare war upon the masses! In all directions mediocre people are joining hands in order to make themselves masters. Everything that pampers, that softens, and that brings the "people" or "woman" to the front, operates in favour of universal suffrage—that is to say, the dominion ofinferiormen.297
Woman has always conspired with decadent types,—the priests, for instance,—against the "mighty," against the "strong," againstmen.Women avail themselves of children for the cult of piety, pity, and love:—themotherstands as the symbol ofconvincingaltruism.300
It isnecessaryto showthat a counter-movement is inevitably associatedwith any increasingly economical consumption of men and mankind, and with an ever more closely involved "machinery" of interests and services. I call this counter-movement theseparation of the luxurious surplus of mankind:by means of it a stronger kind, a higher type, must come to light, which has other conditions for its origin and for its maintenance than theaverage man. My concept, my metaphor for this type is, as you know, the word "Superman."305
Readers are beginning to see what I am combating—namely,economicoptimism: as if the general welfare of everybody must necessarily increase with the growing self-sacrifice of everybody. The very reverse seems to me to be the case,the self-sacrifice of everybody amounts to a collective loss;man becomesinferior—so that nobody knows what end this monstrous purpose has served.306-307
The root of all evil:that the slave morality of modesty, chastity, selfishness, and absolute obedience should have triumphed. Dominating natures were thus condemned (1) to hypocrisy, (2) to qualms of conscience,—creative natures regarded themselves as rebels against God, uncertain and hemmed in by eternal values.309
That whichmen of power and will are able to demand of themselvesgives them the standard for what they may also allow themselves. Such natures are the very opposite of theviciousand theunbridled:although under certain circumstances they may perpetrate deeds for which an inferior man would be convicted of vice and intemperance.
In this respect the concept,"all men are equal before God"does an extraordinary amount of harm; actions and attitudes of mind were forbidden which belonged to the prerogative of the strong alone, just as if they were in themselves unworthy of man. All the tendencies of strong men were brought into disrepute by the fact that the defensive weapons of the most weak (even of those who were weakest towards themselves) were established as a standard of valuation.311
The degeneration of the ruler and of the ruling classeshas been the cause of all the great disorders in history!312
The solitary type should not be valued from the standpoint of the gregarious type, orvice versa.320
Who would dare to disgust the mediocre of their mediocrity! As you observe, I do precisely the reverse: every step away from mediocrity—thus do I teach—leads toimmorality.324
What I combat: that an exceptional form should make war upon the rule—instead of understanding that the continued existence of the rule is the first condition of the value of the exception.325
One should not suppose the mission of a higher species to be theleadingof inferior men (as Comte does, for instance); but the inferior should be regarded as thefoundationupon which a higher species may live their higher life—upon which alone theycan stand.329
My consolation is, that the nature of man isevil,and this guarantees hisstrength!332
There is no true scholar who has not the instincts of a true soldier in his veins. To be able to command and to be able to obey in a proud fashion; to keep one's place in rank and file, and yet to be ready at any moment to lead; to prefer danger to comfort; not to weigh what is permitted and what is forbidden in a tradesman's balance; to be more hostile to pettiness, slyness, and parasitism than to wickedness. What is it that onelearnsin a hard school?—toobeyand tocommand.335
The means by which a strong species maintains itself:—
It grants itself the right of exceptional actions, as a test of the power of self-control and of freedom.
It abandons itself to states in which a man is not allowed to be anything else than a barbarian.
It tries to acquire strength of will by every kind of asceticism.
It is not expansive; it practises silence; it is cautious in regard to all charms.
It learns to obey in such a way that obedience provides a test of self-maintenance. Casuistry is carried to its highest pitch in regard to points of honour.
It never argues, "What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander"—but conversely! it regards reward, and the ability to repay, as a privilege, as a distinction.
It does not covetotherpeople's virtues.341
Theblind yieldingto a passion, whether it be generosity, pity, or hostility, is the cause of the greatest evil. Greatness of character does not consist in not possessing these passions—on the contrary, a man should possess them to a terrible degree: but he should lead them by the bridle....346
Education: essentially a means ofruiningexceptions in favour of the rule. Culture: essentially the means of directing taste against the exceptions in favour of the mediocre.349
What is noble?—The fact that one is constantly forced to be playing a part. That one is constantly searching for situations in which one is forced to put on airs. That one leaves happiness to thegreatest number:the happiness which consists of inner peacefulness, of virtue, of comfort, and of Anglo-angelic-back-parlour-smugness, à la Spencer. That one instinctively seeks for heavy responsibilities. That one knows how to create enemies everywhere, at a pinch even in one's self. That one contradicts thegreatest number,not in words at all, but by continually behaving differently from them.357
The first thing that must be done is to rear anew kindof man in whom the duration of the necessary will and the necessary instincts is guaranteed for many generations. This must be a new kind of ruling species and caste—this ought to be quite as clear as the somewhat lengthy and not easily expressed consequences of this thought. The aim should be to prepare atransvaluation of valuesfor a particularly strong kind of man, most highly gifted in intellect and will, and, to his end, slowly and cautiously to liberate in him a whole host of slandered instincts hitherto held in check....363-364
The revolution, confusion, and distress of whole peoples is in my opinion of less importance thanthe misfortunes which attend great individuals in their development.We must not allow ourselves to be deceived: the many misfortunes of all these small folk do not together constitute a sum-total, except in the feelings ofmightymen.369
The greatest men may also perhaps have great virtues, but then they also have the opposites of these virtues. I believe that it is precisely out of the presence of these opposites and of the feelings they suscitate, that the great man arises,—for the great man is the broad arch which spans two banks lying far apart.370
Ingreat menwe find the specific qualities of life in their highest manifestation: injustice, falsehood, exploitation. But inasmuch as their effect has always beenoverwhelming,their essential nature has been most thoroughly misunderstood, and interpreted as goodness.370-371
We mustnotmake men "better," we mustnottalk to them about morality in any form as if "morality in itself," or an ideal kind of man in general, could be taken for granted; but we mustcreate circumstancesin whichstronger men are necessary,such as for their part willrequire a morality (or, better still: a bodily and spiritual discipline) which makes men strong, and upon which they will consequently insist!379
We must not separate greatness of soul from intellectual greatness. For the former involvesindependence;but without intellectual greatness independence should not be allowed; all it does is to create disasters even in its lust of well-doing and of practising "justice." Inferior spiritsmustobey, consequently they cannot be possessed of greatness.380
I teach that there are higher and lower men, and that a single individual may under certain circumstances justify whole millenniums of existence—that is to say, a wealthier, more gifted, greater, and more complete man, as compared with innumerable imperfect and fragmentary men.386
He whodeterminesvalues and leads the will of millenniums, and does this by leading the highest natures—heis the highest man.386
We should attain to such a height, to such a lofty eagle's ledge, in our observation, as to be able to understand that everything happens,just as it ought to happen:and that all "imperfection," and the pain it brings, belong to all that which is most eminently desirable.389
Pleasureappears with the feeling of power.
Happinessmeans that power and triumph have entered into our consciousness.
Progressis the strengthening of the type, the ability to exercise great will-power: everything else is a misunderstanding and a danger.403
Man is a combination of thebeast and the superbeast:higher man a combination of the monster and the superman: these opposites belong to each other. With everydegree of a man's growth towards greatness and loftiness, he also grows downwards into the depths and into the terrible:...405
The word"Dionysian"expresses: a constraint to unity, a soaring above personality, the commonplace, society, reality, and above the abyss of theephemeral;the passionately painful sensation of superabundance, in darker, fuller, and more fluctuating conditions; an ecstatic saying of yea to the collective character of existence, as that which remains the same, and equally mighty and blissful throughout all change; the great pantheistic sympathy with pleasure and pain, which declares even the most terrible and most questionable qualities of existence good, and sanctifies them; the eternal will to procreation, to fruitfulness, and to recurrence; the feeling of unity in regard to the necessity of creating and annihilating.415-416
At this point I set up the Dionysus of the Greeks: the religious affirmation of Life, of the whole of Life, not of denied and partial Life....420
God on the Cross is a curse upon Life, a signpost directing people to deliver themselves from it;—Dionysus cut into pieces is a promise of Life: it will be for ever born anew, and rise afresh from destruction.421
In the following list no attempt has been made at completion. I have set down only the important and more useful works concerning Nietzsche and his philosophy, and have further limited myself to such volumes as are in English. I have omitted entirely the large number of essays on Nietzsche which have appeared in magazines, as well as those books which embody only the various Nietzschean ideas.
EXPOSITIONAL BOOKS
THE PHILOSOPHY OF FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE, by H. L. Mencken. A brilliantly written and extensive exposition of Nietzsche's thought, including an account of the philosopher's life, a discussion of his origins, a reply to his critics, and a chapter on how to study him. Mr. Mencken's book, though untechnical, is comprehensive, concise and admirably conceived. It constitutes one of the most valuable Nietzschean commentaries in English.
FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE: HIS LIFE AND WORK, by M. A. Mügge. A large and scholarly treatise of special value to the philosophical student. This work, a pioneer one, is somewhat ponderous and uninteresting, but none the less exhaustive; and contains a bibliography consisting of 850 titles.
THE PHILOSOPHY OF NIETZSCHE, by Georges H. Chatterton-Hill. A suggestive, academic study of the main points in the Nietzschean ethic. This book is tootechnical in places to appeal strongly to the beginner, but is invaluable as supplementary reading.
THE QUINTESSENCE OF NIETZSCHE, by J. M. Kennedy. An interesting and unassuming survey of Nietzsche's work, abounding with quotations.
NIETZSCHE: HIS LIFE AND WORKS, by Anthony M. Ludovici. Mr. Ludovici is the translator of many of Nietzsche's works into English, and has contributed to Dr. Levy's edition several prefaces and many explanatory notes. His book is complete and authoritative.
Other adequate commentaries are:THE GOSPEL OF SUPERMAN, by Henri Lichtenberger, translated from the French by J. M. Kennedy;FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE, by A. R. Orage;NIETZSCHE AS CRITIC, PHILOSOPHER, POET AND PROPHET, by Thomas Common;THE PHILOSOPHY OF FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE, by Grace Neal Dolson; andFRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE, by Georg Brandes, translated by A. G. Chater.
BIOGRAPHIES
THE LIFE OF NIETZSCHE, by Frau Förster-Nietzsche. This work, in two volumes, is the standard biography of Nietzsche, written by his sister. Though elaborate in detail and replete in personal correspondence and papers, it is not all that might be hoped for. One's devoted sister does not always make the most penetrating biographer.
THE LIFE OF FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE, by Daniel Halévy, translated from the French by J. M. Hone. M. Halévy has founded his work on that of Frau Förster-Nietzsche; and while his version improves on its model at many points, it is in places supposititious and over-drawn, and is conceived in too ironical a vein.
Unfortunately there is no adequate biography ofNietzsche in existence. Nor is there likely to be one, inasmuch as all the papers and data necessary for such an undertaking are in the possession of Nietzsche's sister.
BOOKS OF SELECTIONS
THE GIST OF NIETZSCHE, by H. L. Mencken.
NIETZSCHE IN OUTLINE AND APHORISM, by A. R. Orage.
NIETZSCHE: HIS MAXIMS, by J. M. Kennedy.