CHAPTER XIII.Woman in Industry.1.—Development and Extension of Female Labor.The endeavor of women to earn their own living and to attain personal independence is, to some extent at least, regarded as a just one by bourgeois society. The bourgeoisie requires an unhampered release of male and female labor power in order that industry may attain its highest degree of development. The perfection of machinery and the division of labor, whereby each single function in the process of production requires less strength and mechanical training than formerly, and the growing competition, not only between individual manufacturers, but also between entire manufacturing regions, states and countries—causes the labor power of woman to be sought more and more.The special causes which lead to an increased employment of female labor in a growing number of trades have been set forth in a previous chapter. One reason why employers resort more and more to the employment of women beside men, or instead of men, is, that women are accustomed to require less than men. Owing to their nature as sex beings, women are obliged to offer their labor power cheaper than men. They are, as a rule, more subjected to physical derangements that cause an interruption of their work, and owing to the complication and organization of modern industry, this may lead to an interruption in the whole process of production. Pregnancy and child-birth lengthen such periods of interruption.[125]The employer makes the most of this fact andfindsample indemnification for these occasional interruptions by the payment of considerably lower wages. Moreover the woman is tied to her particular abode or its immediate environment. She cannot change her abode as men are enabled to do in most cases. Female labor, especially the labor of married women workers appears particularly desirable to employers in still another way, as may be seen from the quotation from “Capital,” by Karl Marx on page 129. As a worker the married woman is “far more attentive and docile” than the unmarried one. Consideration for her children compels her to exert her strength to the utmost in order to earn what is needful for their livelihood, and she therefore quietly submits to much that the unmarried working woman would not submit to, far less so the working man. As a rule working women rarely combine with their fellow workers to obtain better working conditions. That also enhances their value in the eyes of the employers; sometimes they even are a good means to subdue rebellious male workers. Women moreover are more patient, they possess greater nimbleness and a more developed taste, qualities that make them better suited to many kinds of work than men.These womanly virtues the virtuous capitalist appreciates fully; and so, with the development of industry, the field of woman’s work is extended each year, but—and this is the decisive factor—without materially improving her social condition. Where female labor power is employed, it frequently releases male labor power. But the displaced male workers must earn their living; so they offer their labor power at lower wages, and this offer again depresses the wages of the female workers. The depression of wages becomes a screw set in motion by the constantly revolving process of developing industry, and as this process of revolution by labor-saving devices also releases female workers, the supply of “hands” is increased still more. New branches of industry counteract this constant production of surplus labor power, but not sufficiently to create better conditions of labor. In the new branches of industryalso, as for instance in the electrical, male workers are being displaced by female workers. In the motor factory of the General Electric Company most of the machines are tended by girls. Every increase in wages above a certain standard causes the employer to seek further improvement of his machinery, and to put the automatic machine in the place of human hands and human brains. In the beginning of the capitalistic era only male workers competed with one another on the labor market. Now sex is arrayed against sex, and age against age. Women displace men, and women in turn are displaced by young people and children. That is the “moral regime” of modern industry.This state of affairs would eventually become unbearable if the workers, by organization in their trade unions, would not counteract it with all their might. To the working woman, too, it is becoming a sheer necessity to join these industrial organizations, for as an individual she has still far less power of resistance than the working man. Working women are beginning to recognize this necessity. In Germany the following numbers were organized: in 1892, 4,355; in 1899, 19,280; in 1900, 22,884; in 1905, 74,411; in 1907, 136,929; in 1908, 138,443. In 1892 women constituted only 1.8 per cent. of all members of trade unions; in 1908 they constituted 7.6 per cent. According to the fifth international report of the trade union movement the numbers of female members were in Great Britain, 201,709; in France, 88,906; in Austria, 46,401.The endeavors of employers to lengthen the work day in order to extract larger profits from their workers is met with little resistance by women workers. That explains why in the textile industry, for instance, in which more than half of the workers are women the work day islongest. It was necessary therefore that government protection by limiting the hours of work should begin with this industry. Women being accustomed to an endless work day by their domestic activity, submit to the increased demands upon their labor power without offering resistance.[Version of the table for narrower screens]PERSONS EMPLOYED IN GAINFUL OCCUPATIONS.COUNTRIESYearofCensusEntire PopulationGainfully employedPersons gainfully employed in percentage of populationMaleFemaleBothMaleFemaleBothMaleFemaleBothGerman Empire190730,461,10031,259,42961,720,52918,599,2369,429,88128,092,11761.130.445.5Austria190012,852,69313,298,01526,150,7088,257,2945,850,15814,107,45264.244.053.9Hungary19009,582,1529,672,40719,254,5596,162,2982,668,6978,830,99564.327.645.9Russia189762,477,34863,162,673125,640,02125,995,2375,276,11231,271,34941.68.424.9Italy190116,155,13016,320,12332,475,25310,998,4625,284,06416,272,52668.032.450.1Switzerland19001,627,0251,688,4183,315,4331,057,187498,7601,556,57765.029.546.9France190118,916,88919,533,89938,450,78812,910,5656,804,51019,715,07568.234.851.3Belgium19003,324,8343,368,7146,693,5482,123,072948,2293,071,30163.828.145.9Netherlands18992,520,6032,583,5355,104,1381,497,159433,5481,930,70759.416.837.8Denmark19011,193,4481,256,0922,449,540752,559353,9801,106,53963.128.245.2Sweden19002,506,4362,630,0055,136,4411,422,979551,0211,974,00056.821.038.4Norway19001,066,6931,154,7842,221,477599,057277,613876,67056.124.039.5England and Wales190115,728,61316,799,23032,527,84310,156,9764,171,75114,328,72764.624.844.1Scotland19012,173,7552,298,3484,472,1031,391,188591,6241,982,81264.025.844.3Ireland19012,200,0402,258,7354,458,7751,413,943549,8741,963,81764.324.344.0Great Britain and Ireland190120,102,40821,356,31341,458,72112,962,1075,313,24918,275,35664.524.944.1United States of America[126]190039,059,24237,244,14576,303,38723,956,1155,329,80729,285,92261.314.338.4[126]These figures include 91,219 persons of the army and navy who were absent from the country while the census was taken.In other trades, such as millinery, manufacture of artificial flowers,etc.,[127]they reduce their own wages and lengthen their own work day by taking home extra work. They frequently do not even notice that thereby they become their own competitors and do not earn more in a sixteen hour day than they might in a well regulated ten-hour day.Thetable on page 212shows to what extent female labor has grown among various civilized nations, both in relation to the other sex and in relation to the entirepopulation.[128]Our table shows that the number of women employed in gainful occupations constitutes a considerable percentage of the entire population. The percentage is largest in Austria, France and Italy. This may be partly due to the manner of census-taking, as not only those female persons are counted, whose principal occupation is a gainful employment, but also those who perform incidental work for wages. The percentage is lowest in the United States. It is also important to compare the growth of the laboring population with former periods. Let us begin with Germany:[Version of the table for narrower screens]Years in which census was takenEntire PopulationPersons gainfully employedPersons gainfully employed in percentage of populationOf 100 persons gainfully employedMaleFemaleMaleFemaleMaleFemaleMaleFemale188222,150,74923,071,36413,415,4155,541,51760.5724.0271.2428.76189525,409,16126,361,12315,531,8416,578,35061.1324.9670.2529.75190730,461,10031,159,42918,599,2369,492,88161.0630.3766.2133.79This table shows firstly, that the number of persons gainfully employed increases more rapidly than the population; secondly, that the growth of female labor still exceeds this increase; thirdly, that the male laboring population is relatively stationary, while the femalelaboring population shows a relative and absolute growth, and lastly, that female labor at an increasing rate displaces male labor. The number of persons gainfully employed has increased from 1882 to 1895 by 16.6 per cent.; the number of men, by 15.8 per cent. and 19.35 per cent.; the number of women by 18.7 per cent. from 1882 to 1895, and by44.44per cent. from 1895 to 1907. The increase of the population from 1882 to 1895 was only 19.8 per cent., and from 1895 to 1907 only 19.34 per cent. So the entire number of persons gainfully employed has increased; but as the growth of the number of men gainfully employed has approximately kept pace with the growth of the population, the number of women gainfully employed has grown mostly. This shows that the struggle for existence requires greater efforts than formerly.From 1882 to 1895 and from 1895 to 1907 we find the following increase (+) and decrease (−) among the population of Germany:From 1882 to 1895From 1895 to 1907Female persons gainfully employed+ 1,005,290 = 23.60 per cent+ 2,979,105 = 56.59 per centMale persons gainfully employed+ 2,133,577 = 15.95 per cent+ 3,077,382 = 19.85 per centFemale servants+ 31,543 = 2.46 per cent− 64,574 = 4.91 per centMale servants− 17,151 = 40.35 per cent− 9,987 = 39.38 per centThe following table shows the number of persons gainfully employed in various trades:[Version of the table for narrower screens]188218951907MaleFemaleMaleFemaleMaleFemaleAgriculture, Forestry5,701,5872,534,9095,539,5382,753,1545,284,2714,598,986Industry and Mining5,269,4891,126,9766,760,1021,521,1189,152,3302,103,924Commerce and Traffic1,272,208298,1101,758,903579,6082,546,253931,373Various kinds of wage labor213,746183,836198,626233,685150,791320,904Public service and learned professions373,593115,272618,335176,648799,025288,311Army and Navy542,282—630,978—651,194—The following table shows the increase and decrease in various trades:[Version of the table for narrower screens]From 1882 to 1895From 1895 to 1907Female%Male%Female%Male%Agriculture, Forestry+ 218,2458.60− 162,0492.80+1,845,83267.04− 255,2674.61Industry and Mining+ 394,14235.00+1,490,61328.30+ 582,80638.31+2,392,22835.39Commerce and Traffic+ 281,49898.40+ 486,69538.30+ 351,76560.69+ 787,35044.76Various kinds of wage labor+ 50,02927.20− 15,1207.10+ 87,03937.22− 47,83524.08Public service and learned professions+ 61,37653.25+ 154,28533.25+ 111,663—+ 180,690—Army and Navy——+ 179,15339.65——+ 20,216—Total+1,005,29023.60+2,133,57715.90+2,979,105—+3,077,382—Among the persons gainfully employed there were:[Version of the table for narrower screens]18951907Female%Male%Female%Male%Independent1,069,00722.14,405,03931.31,052,165—4,438,123—Employees39,4180.81582,4074.1159,889—1,130,839—Laborers,etc.,excl.servants3,745,45577.099,071,09764.66,422,229—11,413,892—Total4,853,880= 100.0014,058,543= 100.007,634,283= 100.0016,982,854= 100.00The following shows the increase and decrease of women holdingindependentpositions from 1895 to 1907:[1907][1895][%]Industry (domestic industry)477,290519,492− 42,202= 8.10Commerce and traffic246,641202,616+ 44,025= 21.77Agriculture328,237346,896− 18,659= 9.04The greatest number of female persons were employed in the following trades:1907.1895.Agriculture4,585,7492,745,840Clothing and cleaning883,184713,021Commercial lines545,177299,829Textile industry528,235427,961Restaurants and cafés339,555261,450Articles of food and luxury248,962140,333Metal works73,03936,210Stone and pottery72,27039,555Paper industry67,32239,222Wood and carving industry48,02830,346The following are the trades in which more women than men are employed in Germany:Women.Men.Agriculture4,217,1322,737,768Textile industry466,210390,312Clothing trades403,879303,264Cleaning trades85,68458,035Restaurants and cafés266,930139,002Domestic service279,20836,791Nursing129,19778,520These figures clearly show us the prevailing state of affairs in Germany. Although the number of persons gainfully employed has increased more rapidly than the population, the growth of female labor still exceeds this increase. The employment of women is rapidly growing in all lines of industry. While the male laboring population is relatively stationary, the female laboring population shows a relative and absolute growth. In fact the increase in female labor constitutes the chief portion of the general increase of persons gainfully employed in the entire population. The number of female members of families supported by men rank from 70.81 per cent. in 1895 to 63.90 per cent. in 1907. Woman has become such a powerful factor in industry that the Philistine saying, the woman’s place is in the home, seems utterly void and ridiculous. In England the following numbers of persons were industrially employed:For every 100 persons gainfully employedTotalMaleFemaleMaleFem.187111,593,4668,270,1863,323,280——188111,187,5647,783,6463,403,91869.5930.41189112,751,9958,883,2544,016,23068.0931.91190114,328,72710,156,9764,171,75170.0929.91Within thirty years the number of men gainfully employed increased by 1,886,790 persons = 22.8 per cent.; the number of women gainfully employed increased by 848,471 = 25.5 per cent. It is especially noteworthy that during 1881, the year of a crisis, the number of menemparent one, since most of the wives and daughters ofnumber of women employed increased by 80,638. The relative decrease of female labor in 1901 is only an apparent one, since most of the wives and daughters of farmers are now counted as having no profession. Besides, during the last twenty years those industries have grown mostly in which male labor is chiefly employed, while the textile industry has relatively, and since 1891, positively declined.1881[1901]Percentage of increaseFemale workers among theseStone and pottery industry582,474805,185535,006Metal works and manufacture of machinery812,9151,228,5045261,233Building trades764,9111,128,680472,485Textile trades1,094,6361,155,3975663,222Nevertheless female labor has again increased at the expense of male labor. Only the share in increase of female labor that was 12.6 per cent. from 1851 to 1861 and 7.6 per cent. from 1871 to 1881 was reduced to 1.8 per cent. from 1891 to 1901. In the year 1907 the following numbers were counted in the textile industry: 407,360 men = 36.6 per cent. and 679,863 women = 63.4 per cent. In the clothing trades and in commerce female labor has increased much more. But it is furthermore seen that older women are displaced by younger ones, and as women under 25 are mostly unmarried and the older ones are mostly married, or widowed, it is seen that women are displaced by girls.The following are trades in which more women than men are employed in England:WomenMenDomestic service1,690,686124,263Clothing trades711,786414,637Textile trades663,222492,175Among these cotton328,793193,830wool and yarn153,311106,598hemp and jute104,58745,732silk22,5898,966embroidery28,9629,587In almost all the branches women receive considerable less pay than menfor the same amount of work. A recentinquiry showed that the average weekly wage in the textile industry was 28 shillings 1 penny for men, and only 15 shillings 5 pence for women.[129]In the bicycle industry where female labor has rapidly increased as a result of the introduction of machinery, women receive only from 12 to 18 shillings per week, where men received from 30 to 40 shillings.[130]The same conditions are met with in the manufacture of paper goods and shoes and in binderies. Women are paid especially low wages for the manufacture of underwear; 10 shillings per week is considered a good wage. “As a rule a woman earns half or one-third of a man’s wage.”[131]A similar difference in remuneration between men and women is met with in the postal service and in teaching. Only in the cotton industry in Lancashire both sexes working an equal length of time earned almost equal wages.In the United States we find the following development of female labor:188018901900Agriculture594,510678,884977,336Learned professions177,255311,687430,597Domestic and personal service1,181,3001,667,6512,095,449Commerce and transportation63,058228,421503,347Manufacture631,0341,027,9281,312,668%%%Total, women2,647,15714.73,914,57117.45,319,39718.8“men14,774,94285.318,821,09082.623,753,83681.217,422,09910022,735,66110029,073,233100Here we see that the number of women gainfully employed has grown from 3,914,571 in 1890 to 5,319,397 in 1900. It has increased more rapidly than the population which increased from 62,622,250 persons in 1890 to 76,303,387 in 1900; only by 21 per cent. In the same inexorable way the number of employed men is decreasing, since they are being displaced by women. Now for 100 persons gainfully employed there are 18.8 women, whilein 1880 there were not more than 14.7 per cent. Of 312 occupations there are only 9 in which no women are employed. According to the census of 1900, we even find among them 5 pilots, 45 engineers and firemen, 185 blacksmiths, 508 machinists, 11 well-borers, 8 boilermakers. “Of course these figures are not of great sociological importance, but they show that there are very few occupations from which women are absolutely excluded, either by their natural capacity or by law.”[132]Women are especially numerous in the following occupations: Servants and waitresses, 1,213,828; dressmaking, 338,144; farm labor, 497,886; laundresses, 332,665; teachers, 327,905; independent farmers, 307,788; textile workers, 231,458; housekeepers, 147,103; salesladies, 146,265; seamstresses, 138,724; nurses and midwives, 108,691; unqualified trades, 106,916. In these 12 occupations 3,583,333 = 74.1 per cent. of all bread-earning women have been counted. Besides there are 85,086 stenographers; 82,936 milliners; 81,000 clerks; 72,896 bookkeepers,etc., together 19 occupations, comprising over 50,000 women = 88.8 per cent. of all women breadwinners. Women predominate in the following trades:For every 100 persons employed.Manufacture of underwearWomen99.4Men0.6Millinery“98.0“2.0Dressmaking“96.8“3.2Manufacture of collars“77.6“22.4Weaving“72.8“27.2Manufacture of gloves“62.6“37.4Bookbinding“50.5“49.5Textile trades“50.0“50.0Housekeeping“94.7“5.3Nursing“89.9“10.1Laundry work“86.8“13.2Domestic service“81.9“18.1Boarding“83.4“16.6Stenographers“76.7“23.3Teachers“73.4“26.6Music teachers“56.9“43.1Of 4,833,630 women employed in gainful occupations aged 16 years and more, 3,143,712 were single, 769,477 were married, 857,005 were widowed, 63,436 were divorced. The American report says: “The increase in the percentage of persons gainfully employed was greatest for the married women, since it was by one-fourth greater in 1900 than in 1890. In 1890 there was only one married working woman among 22; in 1900 there was one among 18.” The number of widowed and divorced women is very great, both relatively and actually. In 1900 among 2,721,438 widowed women 857,005 = 31.5 were earning their living, and among divorced women the percentage was still greater. Of 114,935, these 49 per cent. were earning their own living in 1890 and 55.3 per cent. in 1900. Thus more women became self-supporting each year. Among the 303 occupations in which women are employed there are:79withlessthan100women59“““100 to 500“31“““500 to 1000“125“more“1000“63“““5000“Among 100 persons from 16 years up we find the following wage-scale:MenWomenLess than 7 dollars18Less than 7 dollars66.37 to 9 dollars15.47 to 9 dollars19.69 to 20 dollars60.69 to 15 dollars13.220 to 25 dollars4.815 to 20 dollars0.8More than 25 dollars220 to 25 dollars0.1Average weekly wage$11.16$6.17We see that 60.6 per cent. of the men earn more than $9, while only 13.2 per cent. of the women earn more than $9, and more than two-thirds (66.3 per cent.) earn less than $7.[133]The average weekly wage for men is $11.16; the average weekly wage for women $6.17, almost half of the man’s wages. Among government employes the difference is equally great. Among 185,874 persons engaged in civil service there were 172,053 men = 92.6 percent., and 13,821 women—7.4 per cent. In the District of Columbia, the seat of the national administration, the percentage of female labor amounts to 29 per cent. And yet 47.2 per cent. of the women earn less than $720, while only 16.7 per cent. of the men earn less than$720.[134]In France, according to the census of 1901, the laboring population amounted to 19,715,075 persons, 12,910,565 men and 6,804,510 women. They are distributed among various trades as follows:Men.Per Cent.Women.Per Cent.Agriculture5,517,617722,658,95228Commerce1,132,62165689,99935Dom’ticservice223,86123791,17677Learnedprof.226,56167173,27833Industry3,695,21363.52,124,64236.5“The female laboring population amounts to one-half of the male laboring population.”[135]As in all other countries, fewest women are employed at those occupations that require greatest physical strength (In mining 2.03 women for 100 men; in quarries 1.65; in metallurgy, 1.06). The greatest number of women are employed in the textile trades, 116 women for 100 men—in the clothing trades, in laundries, 1,247 women for 100 men, and in the manufacture of underwear 3,286 women for 100 men.[136]It generally holds true, asMme.C. Milhand states, that the greatest number of women are employed in those industries where the hours of work are particularly long and wages particularly low. “It is a sad fact that while the industries, where the hours of labor are short, only employ a few thousand women, those where the hours of work are long, employs hundreds of thousands of them.”[137]In regard to the wage scaleE. Levasseursays that a woman’s wage rarely amounts to two-thirds of a man’s wage and more frequently only to one-half.[138][125]A number of lists from sick-benefit funds, compiled by the factory inspector Schuler, showed that female members were ill 7.17 days annually, while male members were ill only 4.78 days annually. The duration of each illness was 24.8 for female members and 21.2 for male members. O. Schwartz, The results of the employment of married women in factories from the standpoint of public hygiene.—German quarterly gazette for public hygiene.[127]“This is especially the case in the clothing trade, but also in other industries such as the manufacture of toys, underwear, cigarettes, paper goodsetc.” R. Wilbrandt—Protection of working women and domestic industry.—Jena 1906.[128]Encyclopedia of Social Sciences.—H. Zahn, Statistics of professions and trades.[129]Textile Trades in 1906. London, 1909.[130]E. Cadbury, C. Matheson and C. Shaun—Women’s work and wages. London, 1906.[131]E. Cadbury and F. Shaun—Sweating. London. 1907.[132]Statistics of women at work. Washington, 1908.[133]Earnings of wage-earners. Bulletin 93, page 11. Washington, 1908.[134]Executive civil service of the United States. Washington, 1908.[135]C. Milhand—L’ouvrière en France. Paris, 1907.[136]E. Levasseur—Questions ouvrières et industrielles en France sous la troisième république.Paris, 1907.[137]C. Milhand—L’ouvrière en France. Paris, 1907.[138]E. Levasseur—Questions ouvrières et industrielles en France sous la troisième république.Paris, 1907.
CHAPTER XIII.Woman in Industry.1.—Development and Extension of Female Labor.The endeavor of women to earn their own living and to attain personal independence is, to some extent at least, regarded as a just one by bourgeois society. The bourgeoisie requires an unhampered release of male and female labor power in order that industry may attain its highest degree of development. The perfection of machinery and the division of labor, whereby each single function in the process of production requires less strength and mechanical training than formerly, and the growing competition, not only between individual manufacturers, but also between entire manufacturing regions, states and countries—causes the labor power of woman to be sought more and more.The special causes which lead to an increased employment of female labor in a growing number of trades have been set forth in a previous chapter. One reason why employers resort more and more to the employment of women beside men, or instead of men, is, that women are accustomed to require less than men. Owing to their nature as sex beings, women are obliged to offer their labor power cheaper than men. They are, as a rule, more subjected to physical derangements that cause an interruption of their work, and owing to the complication and organization of modern industry, this may lead to an interruption in the whole process of production. Pregnancy and child-birth lengthen such periods of interruption.[125]The employer makes the most of this fact andfindsample indemnification for these occasional interruptions by the payment of considerably lower wages. Moreover the woman is tied to her particular abode or its immediate environment. She cannot change her abode as men are enabled to do in most cases. Female labor, especially the labor of married women workers appears particularly desirable to employers in still another way, as may be seen from the quotation from “Capital,” by Karl Marx on page 129. As a worker the married woman is “far more attentive and docile” than the unmarried one. Consideration for her children compels her to exert her strength to the utmost in order to earn what is needful for their livelihood, and she therefore quietly submits to much that the unmarried working woman would not submit to, far less so the working man. As a rule working women rarely combine with their fellow workers to obtain better working conditions. That also enhances their value in the eyes of the employers; sometimes they even are a good means to subdue rebellious male workers. Women moreover are more patient, they possess greater nimbleness and a more developed taste, qualities that make them better suited to many kinds of work than men.These womanly virtues the virtuous capitalist appreciates fully; and so, with the development of industry, the field of woman’s work is extended each year, but—and this is the decisive factor—without materially improving her social condition. Where female labor power is employed, it frequently releases male labor power. But the displaced male workers must earn their living; so they offer their labor power at lower wages, and this offer again depresses the wages of the female workers. The depression of wages becomes a screw set in motion by the constantly revolving process of developing industry, and as this process of revolution by labor-saving devices also releases female workers, the supply of “hands” is increased still more. New branches of industry counteract this constant production of surplus labor power, but not sufficiently to create better conditions of labor. In the new branches of industryalso, as for instance in the electrical, male workers are being displaced by female workers. In the motor factory of the General Electric Company most of the machines are tended by girls. Every increase in wages above a certain standard causes the employer to seek further improvement of his machinery, and to put the automatic machine in the place of human hands and human brains. In the beginning of the capitalistic era only male workers competed with one another on the labor market. Now sex is arrayed against sex, and age against age. Women displace men, and women in turn are displaced by young people and children. That is the “moral regime” of modern industry.This state of affairs would eventually become unbearable if the workers, by organization in their trade unions, would not counteract it with all their might. To the working woman, too, it is becoming a sheer necessity to join these industrial organizations, for as an individual she has still far less power of resistance than the working man. Working women are beginning to recognize this necessity. In Germany the following numbers were organized: in 1892, 4,355; in 1899, 19,280; in 1900, 22,884; in 1905, 74,411; in 1907, 136,929; in 1908, 138,443. In 1892 women constituted only 1.8 per cent. of all members of trade unions; in 1908 they constituted 7.6 per cent. According to the fifth international report of the trade union movement the numbers of female members were in Great Britain, 201,709; in France, 88,906; in Austria, 46,401.The endeavors of employers to lengthen the work day in order to extract larger profits from their workers is met with little resistance by women workers. That explains why in the textile industry, for instance, in which more than half of the workers are women the work day islongest. It was necessary therefore that government protection by limiting the hours of work should begin with this industry. Women being accustomed to an endless work day by their domestic activity, submit to the increased demands upon their labor power without offering resistance.[Version of the table for narrower screens]PERSONS EMPLOYED IN GAINFUL OCCUPATIONS.COUNTRIESYearofCensusEntire PopulationGainfully employedPersons gainfully employed in percentage of populationMaleFemaleBothMaleFemaleBothMaleFemaleBothGerman Empire190730,461,10031,259,42961,720,52918,599,2369,429,88128,092,11761.130.445.5Austria190012,852,69313,298,01526,150,7088,257,2945,850,15814,107,45264.244.053.9Hungary19009,582,1529,672,40719,254,5596,162,2982,668,6978,830,99564.327.645.9Russia189762,477,34863,162,673125,640,02125,995,2375,276,11231,271,34941.68.424.9Italy190116,155,13016,320,12332,475,25310,998,4625,284,06416,272,52668.032.450.1Switzerland19001,627,0251,688,4183,315,4331,057,187498,7601,556,57765.029.546.9France190118,916,88919,533,89938,450,78812,910,5656,804,51019,715,07568.234.851.3Belgium19003,324,8343,368,7146,693,5482,123,072948,2293,071,30163.828.145.9Netherlands18992,520,6032,583,5355,104,1381,497,159433,5481,930,70759.416.837.8Denmark19011,193,4481,256,0922,449,540752,559353,9801,106,53963.128.245.2Sweden19002,506,4362,630,0055,136,4411,422,979551,0211,974,00056.821.038.4Norway19001,066,6931,154,7842,221,477599,057277,613876,67056.124.039.5England and Wales190115,728,61316,799,23032,527,84310,156,9764,171,75114,328,72764.624.844.1Scotland19012,173,7552,298,3484,472,1031,391,188591,6241,982,81264.025.844.3Ireland19012,200,0402,258,7354,458,7751,413,943549,8741,963,81764.324.344.0Great Britain and Ireland190120,102,40821,356,31341,458,72112,962,1075,313,24918,275,35664.524.944.1United States of America[126]190039,059,24237,244,14576,303,38723,956,1155,329,80729,285,92261.314.338.4[126]These figures include 91,219 persons of the army and navy who were absent from the country while the census was taken.In other trades, such as millinery, manufacture of artificial flowers,etc.,[127]they reduce their own wages and lengthen their own work day by taking home extra work. They frequently do not even notice that thereby they become their own competitors and do not earn more in a sixteen hour day than they might in a well regulated ten-hour day.Thetable on page 212shows to what extent female labor has grown among various civilized nations, both in relation to the other sex and in relation to the entirepopulation.[128]Our table shows that the number of women employed in gainful occupations constitutes a considerable percentage of the entire population. The percentage is largest in Austria, France and Italy. This may be partly due to the manner of census-taking, as not only those female persons are counted, whose principal occupation is a gainful employment, but also those who perform incidental work for wages. The percentage is lowest in the United States. It is also important to compare the growth of the laboring population with former periods. Let us begin with Germany:[Version of the table for narrower screens]Years in which census was takenEntire PopulationPersons gainfully employedPersons gainfully employed in percentage of populationOf 100 persons gainfully employedMaleFemaleMaleFemaleMaleFemaleMaleFemale188222,150,74923,071,36413,415,4155,541,51760.5724.0271.2428.76189525,409,16126,361,12315,531,8416,578,35061.1324.9670.2529.75190730,461,10031,159,42918,599,2369,492,88161.0630.3766.2133.79This table shows firstly, that the number of persons gainfully employed increases more rapidly than the population; secondly, that the growth of female labor still exceeds this increase; thirdly, that the male laboring population is relatively stationary, while the femalelaboring population shows a relative and absolute growth, and lastly, that female labor at an increasing rate displaces male labor. The number of persons gainfully employed has increased from 1882 to 1895 by 16.6 per cent.; the number of men, by 15.8 per cent. and 19.35 per cent.; the number of women by 18.7 per cent. from 1882 to 1895, and by44.44per cent. from 1895 to 1907. The increase of the population from 1882 to 1895 was only 19.8 per cent., and from 1895 to 1907 only 19.34 per cent. So the entire number of persons gainfully employed has increased; but as the growth of the number of men gainfully employed has approximately kept pace with the growth of the population, the number of women gainfully employed has grown mostly. This shows that the struggle for existence requires greater efforts than formerly.From 1882 to 1895 and from 1895 to 1907 we find the following increase (+) and decrease (−) among the population of Germany:From 1882 to 1895From 1895 to 1907Female persons gainfully employed+ 1,005,290 = 23.60 per cent+ 2,979,105 = 56.59 per centMale persons gainfully employed+ 2,133,577 = 15.95 per cent+ 3,077,382 = 19.85 per centFemale servants+ 31,543 = 2.46 per cent− 64,574 = 4.91 per centMale servants− 17,151 = 40.35 per cent− 9,987 = 39.38 per centThe following table shows the number of persons gainfully employed in various trades:[Version of the table for narrower screens]188218951907MaleFemaleMaleFemaleMaleFemaleAgriculture, Forestry5,701,5872,534,9095,539,5382,753,1545,284,2714,598,986Industry and Mining5,269,4891,126,9766,760,1021,521,1189,152,3302,103,924Commerce and Traffic1,272,208298,1101,758,903579,6082,546,253931,373Various kinds of wage labor213,746183,836198,626233,685150,791320,904Public service and learned professions373,593115,272618,335176,648799,025288,311Army and Navy542,282—630,978—651,194—The following table shows the increase and decrease in various trades:[Version of the table for narrower screens]From 1882 to 1895From 1895 to 1907Female%Male%Female%Male%Agriculture, Forestry+ 218,2458.60− 162,0492.80+1,845,83267.04− 255,2674.61Industry and Mining+ 394,14235.00+1,490,61328.30+ 582,80638.31+2,392,22835.39Commerce and Traffic+ 281,49898.40+ 486,69538.30+ 351,76560.69+ 787,35044.76Various kinds of wage labor+ 50,02927.20− 15,1207.10+ 87,03937.22− 47,83524.08Public service and learned professions+ 61,37653.25+ 154,28533.25+ 111,663—+ 180,690—Army and Navy——+ 179,15339.65——+ 20,216—Total+1,005,29023.60+2,133,57715.90+2,979,105—+3,077,382—Among the persons gainfully employed there were:[Version of the table for narrower screens]18951907Female%Male%Female%Male%Independent1,069,00722.14,405,03931.31,052,165—4,438,123—Employees39,4180.81582,4074.1159,889—1,130,839—Laborers,etc.,excl.servants3,745,45577.099,071,09764.66,422,229—11,413,892—Total4,853,880= 100.0014,058,543= 100.007,634,283= 100.0016,982,854= 100.00The following shows the increase and decrease of women holdingindependentpositions from 1895 to 1907:[1907][1895][%]Industry (domestic industry)477,290519,492− 42,202= 8.10Commerce and traffic246,641202,616+ 44,025= 21.77Agriculture328,237346,896− 18,659= 9.04The greatest number of female persons were employed in the following trades:1907.1895.Agriculture4,585,7492,745,840Clothing and cleaning883,184713,021Commercial lines545,177299,829Textile industry528,235427,961Restaurants and cafés339,555261,450Articles of food and luxury248,962140,333Metal works73,03936,210Stone and pottery72,27039,555Paper industry67,32239,222Wood and carving industry48,02830,346The following are the trades in which more women than men are employed in Germany:Women.Men.Agriculture4,217,1322,737,768Textile industry466,210390,312Clothing trades403,879303,264Cleaning trades85,68458,035Restaurants and cafés266,930139,002Domestic service279,20836,791Nursing129,19778,520These figures clearly show us the prevailing state of affairs in Germany. Although the number of persons gainfully employed has increased more rapidly than the population, the growth of female labor still exceeds this increase. The employment of women is rapidly growing in all lines of industry. While the male laboring population is relatively stationary, the female laboring population shows a relative and absolute growth. In fact the increase in female labor constitutes the chief portion of the general increase of persons gainfully employed in the entire population. The number of female members of families supported by men rank from 70.81 per cent. in 1895 to 63.90 per cent. in 1907. Woman has become such a powerful factor in industry that the Philistine saying, the woman’s place is in the home, seems utterly void and ridiculous. In England the following numbers of persons were industrially employed:For every 100 persons gainfully employedTotalMaleFemaleMaleFem.187111,593,4668,270,1863,323,280——188111,187,5647,783,6463,403,91869.5930.41189112,751,9958,883,2544,016,23068.0931.91190114,328,72710,156,9764,171,75170.0929.91Within thirty years the number of men gainfully employed increased by 1,886,790 persons = 22.8 per cent.; the number of women gainfully employed increased by 848,471 = 25.5 per cent. It is especially noteworthy that during 1881, the year of a crisis, the number of menemparent one, since most of the wives and daughters ofnumber of women employed increased by 80,638. The relative decrease of female labor in 1901 is only an apparent one, since most of the wives and daughters of farmers are now counted as having no profession. Besides, during the last twenty years those industries have grown mostly in which male labor is chiefly employed, while the textile industry has relatively, and since 1891, positively declined.1881[1901]Percentage of increaseFemale workers among theseStone and pottery industry582,474805,185535,006Metal works and manufacture of machinery812,9151,228,5045261,233Building trades764,9111,128,680472,485Textile trades1,094,6361,155,3975663,222Nevertheless female labor has again increased at the expense of male labor. Only the share in increase of female labor that was 12.6 per cent. from 1851 to 1861 and 7.6 per cent. from 1871 to 1881 was reduced to 1.8 per cent. from 1891 to 1901. In the year 1907 the following numbers were counted in the textile industry: 407,360 men = 36.6 per cent. and 679,863 women = 63.4 per cent. In the clothing trades and in commerce female labor has increased much more. But it is furthermore seen that older women are displaced by younger ones, and as women under 25 are mostly unmarried and the older ones are mostly married, or widowed, it is seen that women are displaced by girls.The following are trades in which more women than men are employed in England:WomenMenDomestic service1,690,686124,263Clothing trades711,786414,637Textile trades663,222492,175Among these cotton328,793193,830wool and yarn153,311106,598hemp and jute104,58745,732silk22,5898,966embroidery28,9629,587In almost all the branches women receive considerable less pay than menfor the same amount of work. A recentinquiry showed that the average weekly wage in the textile industry was 28 shillings 1 penny for men, and only 15 shillings 5 pence for women.[129]In the bicycle industry where female labor has rapidly increased as a result of the introduction of machinery, women receive only from 12 to 18 shillings per week, where men received from 30 to 40 shillings.[130]The same conditions are met with in the manufacture of paper goods and shoes and in binderies. Women are paid especially low wages for the manufacture of underwear; 10 shillings per week is considered a good wage. “As a rule a woman earns half or one-third of a man’s wage.”[131]A similar difference in remuneration between men and women is met with in the postal service and in teaching. Only in the cotton industry in Lancashire both sexes working an equal length of time earned almost equal wages.In the United States we find the following development of female labor:188018901900Agriculture594,510678,884977,336Learned professions177,255311,687430,597Domestic and personal service1,181,3001,667,6512,095,449Commerce and transportation63,058228,421503,347Manufacture631,0341,027,9281,312,668%%%Total, women2,647,15714.73,914,57117.45,319,39718.8“men14,774,94285.318,821,09082.623,753,83681.217,422,09910022,735,66110029,073,233100Here we see that the number of women gainfully employed has grown from 3,914,571 in 1890 to 5,319,397 in 1900. It has increased more rapidly than the population which increased from 62,622,250 persons in 1890 to 76,303,387 in 1900; only by 21 per cent. In the same inexorable way the number of employed men is decreasing, since they are being displaced by women. Now for 100 persons gainfully employed there are 18.8 women, whilein 1880 there were not more than 14.7 per cent. Of 312 occupations there are only 9 in which no women are employed. According to the census of 1900, we even find among them 5 pilots, 45 engineers and firemen, 185 blacksmiths, 508 machinists, 11 well-borers, 8 boilermakers. “Of course these figures are not of great sociological importance, but they show that there are very few occupations from which women are absolutely excluded, either by their natural capacity or by law.”[132]Women are especially numerous in the following occupations: Servants and waitresses, 1,213,828; dressmaking, 338,144; farm labor, 497,886; laundresses, 332,665; teachers, 327,905; independent farmers, 307,788; textile workers, 231,458; housekeepers, 147,103; salesladies, 146,265; seamstresses, 138,724; nurses and midwives, 108,691; unqualified trades, 106,916. In these 12 occupations 3,583,333 = 74.1 per cent. of all bread-earning women have been counted. Besides there are 85,086 stenographers; 82,936 milliners; 81,000 clerks; 72,896 bookkeepers,etc., together 19 occupations, comprising over 50,000 women = 88.8 per cent. of all women breadwinners. Women predominate in the following trades:For every 100 persons employed.Manufacture of underwearWomen99.4Men0.6Millinery“98.0“2.0Dressmaking“96.8“3.2Manufacture of collars“77.6“22.4Weaving“72.8“27.2Manufacture of gloves“62.6“37.4Bookbinding“50.5“49.5Textile trades“50.0“50.0Housekeeping“94.7“5.3Nursing“89.9“10.1Laundry work“86.8“13.2Domestic service“81.9“18.1Boarding“83.4“16.6Stenographers“76.7“23.3Teachers“73.4“26.6Music teachers“56.9“43.1Of 4,833,630 women employed in gainful occupations aged 16 years and more, 3,143,712 were single, 769,477 were married, 857,005 were widowed, 63,436 were divorced. The American report says: “The increase in the percentage of persons gainfully employed was greatest for the married women, since it was by one-fourth greater in 1900 than in 1890. In 1890 there was only one married working woman among 22; in 1900 there was one among 18.” The number of widowed and divorced women is very great, both relatively and actually. In 1900 among 2,721,438 widowed women 857,005 = 31.5 were earning their living, and among divorced women the percentage was still greater. Of 114,935, these 49 per cent. were earning their own living in 1890 and 55.3 per cent. in 1900. Thus more women became self-supporting each year. Among the 303 occupations in which women are employed there are:79withlessthan100women59“““100 to 500“31“““500 to 1000“125“more“1000“63“““5000“Among 100 persons from 16 years up we find the following wage-scale:MenWomenLess than 7 dollars18Less than 7 dollars66.37 to 9 dollars15.47 to 9 dollars19.69 to 20 dollars60.69 to 15 dollars13.220 to 25 dollars4.815 to 20 dollars0.8More than 25 dollars220 to 25 dollars0.1Average weekly wage$11.16$6.17We see that 60.6 per cent. of the men earn more than $9, while only 13.2 per cent. of the women earn more than $9, and more than two-thirds (66.3 per cent.) earn less than $7.[133]The average weekly wage for men is $11.16; the average weekly wage for women $6.17, almost half of the man’s wages. Among government employes the difference is equally great. Among 185,874 persons engaged in civil service there were 172,053 men = 92.6 percent., and 13,821 women—7.4 per cent. In the District of Columbia, the seat of the national administration, the percentage of female labor amounts to 29 per cent. And yet 47.2 per cent. of the women earn less than $720, while only 16.7 per cent. of the men earn less than$720.[134]In France, according to the census of 1901, the laboring population amounted to 19,715,075 persons, 12,910,565 men and 6,804,510 women. They are distributed among various trades as follows:Men.Per Cent.Women.Per Cent.Agriculture5,517,617722,658,95228Commerce1,132,62165689,99935Dom’ticservice223,86123791,17677Learnedprof.226,56167173,27833Industry3,695,21363.52,124,64236.5“The female laboring population amounts to one-half of the male laboring population.”[135]As in all other countries, fewest women are employed at those occupations that require greatest physical strength (In mining 2.03 women for 100 men; in quarries 1.65; in metallurgy, 1.06). The greatest number of women are employed in the textile trades, 116 women for 100 men—in the clothing trades, in laundries, 1,247 women for 100 men, and in the manufacture of underwear 3,286 women for 100 men.[136]It generally holds true, asMme.C. Milhand states, that the greatest number of women are employed in those industries where the hours of work are particularly long and wages particularly low. “It is a sad fact that while the industries, where the hours of labor are short, only employ a few thousand women, those where the hours of work are long, employs hundreds of thousands of them.”[137]In regard to the wage scaleE. Levasseursays that a woman’s wage rarely amounts to two-thirds of a man’s wage and more frequently only to one-half.[138][125]A number of lists from sick-benefit funds, compiled by the factory inspector Schuler, showed that female members were ill 7.17 days annually, while male members were ill only 4.78 days annually. The duration of each illness was 24.8 for female members and 21.2 for male members. O. Schwartz, The results of the employment of married women in factories from the standpoint of public hygiene.—German quarterly gazette for public hygiene.[127]“This is especially the case in the clothing trade, but also in other industries such as the manufacture of toys, underwear, cigarettes, paper goodsetc.” R. Wilbrandt—Protection of working women and domestic industry.—Jena 1906.[128]Encyclopedia of Social Sciences.—H. Zahn, Statistics of professions and trades.[129]Textile Trades in 1906. London, 1909.[130]E. Cadbury, C. Matheson and C. Shaun—Women’s work and wages. London, 1906.[131]E. Cadbury and F. Shaun—Sweating. London. 1907.[132]Statistics of women at work. Washington, 1908.[133]Earnings of wage-earners. Bulletin 93, page 11. Washington, 1908.[134]Executive civil service of the United States. Washington, 1908.[135]C. Milhand—L’ouvrière en France. Paris, 1907.[136]E. Levasseur—Questions ouvrières et industrielles en France sous la troisième république.Paris, 1907.[137]C. Milhand—L’ouvrière en France. Paris, 1907.[138]E. Levasseur—Questions ouvrières et industrielles en France sous la troisième république.Paris, 1907.
The endeavor of women to earn their own living and to attain personal independence is, to some extent at least, regarded as a just one by bourgeois society. The bourgeoisie requires an unhampered release of male and female labor power in order that industry may attain its highest degree of development. The perfection of machinery and the division of labor, whereby each single function in the process of production requires less strength and mechanical training than formerly, and the growing competition, not only between individual manufacturers, but also between entire manufacturing regions, states and countries—causes the labor power of woman to be sought more and more.
The special causes which lead to an increased employment of female labor in a growing number of trades have been set forth in a previous chapter. One reason why employers resort more and more to the employment of women beside men, or instead of men, is, that women are accustomed to require less than men. Owing to their nature as sex beings, women are obliged to offer their labor power cheaper than men. They are, as a rule, more subjected to physical derangements that cause an interruption of their work, and owing to the complication and organization of modern industry, this may lead to an interruption in the whole process of production. Pregnancy and child-birth lengthen such periods of interruption.[125]The employer makes the most of this fact andfindsample indemnification for these occasional interruptions by the payment of considerably lower wages. Moreover the woman is tied to her particular abode or its immediate environment. She cannot change her abode as men are enabled to do in most cases. Female labor, especially the labor of married women workers appears particularly desirable to employers in still another way, as may be seen from the quotation from “Capital,” by Karl Marx on page 129. As a worker the married woman is “far more attentive and docile” than the unmarried one. Consideration for her children compels her to exert her strength to the utmost in order to earn what is needful for their livelihood, and she therefore quietly submits to much that the unmarried working woman would not submit to, far less so the working man. As a rule working women rarely combine with their fellow workers to obtain better working conditions. That also enhances their value in the eyes of the employers; sometimes they even are a good means to subdue rebellious male workers. Women moreover are more patient, they possess greater nimbleness and a more developed taste, qualities that make them better suited to many kinds of work than men.
These womanly virtues the virtuous capitalist appreciates fully; and so, with the development of industry, the field of woman’s work is extended each year, but—and this is the decisive factor—without materially improving her social condition. Where female labor power is employed, it frequently releases male labor power. But the displaced male workers must earn their living; so they offer their labor power at lower wages, and this offer again depresses the wages of the female workers. The depression of wages becomes a screw set in motion by the constantly revolving process of developing industry, and as this process of revolution by labor-saving devices also releases female workers, the supply of “hands” is increased still more. New branches of industry counteract this constant production of surplus labor power, but not sufficiently to create better conditions of labor. In the new branches of industryalso, as for instance in the electrical, male workers are being displaced by female workers. In the motor factory of the General Electric Company most of the machines are tended by girls. Every increase in wages above a certain standard causes the employer to seek further improvement of his machinery, and to put the automatic machine in the place of human hands and human brains. In the beginning of the capitalistic era only male workers competed with one another on the labor market. Now sex is arrayed against sex, and age against age. Women displace men, and women in turn are displaced by young people and children. That is the “moral regime” of modern industry.
This state of affairs would eventually become unbearable if the workers, by organization in their trade unions, would not counteract it with all their might. To the working woman, too, it is becoming a sheer necessity to join these industrial organizations, for as an individual she has still far less power of resistance than the working man. Working women are beginning to recognize this necessity. In Germany the following numbers were organized: in 1892, 4,355; in 1899, 19,280; in 1900, 22,884; in 1905, 74,411; in 1907, 136,929; in 1908, 138,443. In 1892 women constituted only 1.8 per cent. of all members of trade unions; in 1908 they constituted 7.6 per cent. According to the fifth international report of the trade union movement the numbers of female members were in Great Britain, 201,709; in France, 88,906; in Austria, 46,401.
The endeavors of employers to lengthen the work day in order to extract larger profits from their workers is met with little resistance by women workers. That explains why in the textile industry, for instance, in which more than half of the workers are women the work day islongest. It was necessary therefore that government protection by limiting the hours of work should begin with this industry. Women being accustomed to an endless work day by their domestic activity, submit to the increased demands upon their labor power without offering resistance.
[Version of the table for narrower screens]
[126]These figures include 91,219 persons of the army and navy who were absent from the country while the census was taken.
In other trades, such as millinery, manufacture of artificial flowers,etc.,[127]they reduce their own wages and lengthen their own work day by taking home extra work. They frequently do not even notice that thereby they become their own competitors and do not earn more in a sixteen hour day than they might in a well regulated ten-hour day.
Thetable on page 212shows to what extent female labor has grown among various civilized nations, both in relation to the other sex and in relation to the entirepopulation.[128]Our table shows that the number of women employed in gainful occupations constitutes a considerable percentage of the entire population. The percentage is largest in Austria, France and Italy. This may be partly due to the manner of census-taking, as not only those female persons are counted, whose principal occupation is a gainful employment, but also those who perform incidental work for wages. The percentage is lowest in the United States. It is also important to compare the growth of the laboring population with former periods. Let us begin with Germany:
[Version of the table for narrower screens]
This table shows firstly, that the number of persons gainfully employed increases more rapidly than the population; secondly, that the growth of female labor still exceeds this increase; thirdly, that the male laboring population is relatively stationary, while the femalelaboring population shows a relative and absolute growth, and lastly, that female labor at an increasing rate displaces male labor. The number of persons gainfully employed has increased from 1882 to 1895 by 16.6 per cent.; the number of men, by 15.8 per cent. and 19.35 per cent.; the number of women by 18.7 per cent. from 1882 to 1895, and by44.44per cent. from 1895 to 1907. The increase of the population from 1882 to 1895 was only 19.8 per cent., and from 1895 to 1907 only 19.34 per cent. So the entire number of persons gainfully employed has increased; but as the growth of the number of men gainfully employed has approximately kept pace with the growth of the population, the number of women gainfully employed has grown mostly. This shows that the struggle for existence requires greater efforts than formerly.
From 1882 to 1895 and from 1895 to 1907 we find the following increase (+) and decrease (−) among the population of Germany:
The following table shows the number of persons gainfully employed in various trades:
[Version of the table for narrower screens]
The following table shows the increase and decrease in various trades:
[Version of the table for narrower screens]
Among the persons gainfully employed there were:
[Version of the table for narrower screens]
The following shows the increase and decrease of women holdingindependentpositions from 1895 to 1907:
The greatest number of female persons were employed in the following trades:
The following are the trades in which more women than men are employed in Germany:
These figures clearly show us the prevailing state of affairs in Germany. Although the number of persons gainfully employed has increased more rapidly than the population, the growth of female labor still exceeds this increase. The employment of women is rapidly growing in all lines of industry. While the male laboring population is relatively stationary, the female laboring population shows a relative and absolute growth. In fact the increase in female labor constitutes the chief portion of the general increase of persons gainfully employed in the entire population. The number of female members of families supported by men rank from 70.81 per cent. in 1895 to 63.90 per cent. in 1907. Woman has become such a powerful factor in industry that the Philistine saying, the woman’s place is in the home, seems utterly void and ridiculous. In England the following numbers of persons were industrially employed:
Within thirty years the number of men gainfully employed increased by 1,886,790 persons = 22.8 per cent.; the number of women gainfully employed increased by 848,471 = 25.5 per cent. It is especially noteworthy that during 1881, the year of a crisis, the number of menemparent one, since most of the wives and daughters ofnumber of women employed increased by 80,638. The relative decrease of female labor in 1901 is only an apparent one, since most of the wives and daughters of farmers are now counted as having no profession. Besides, during the last twenty years those industries have grown mostly in which male labor is chiefly employed, while the textile industry has relatively, and since 1891, positively declined.
Nevertheless female labor has again increased at the expense of male labor. Only the share in increase of female labor that was 12.6 per cent. from 1851 to 1861 and 7.6 per cent. from 1871 to 1881 was reduced to 1.8 per cent. from 1891 to 1901. In the year 1907 the following numbers were counted in the textile industry: 407,360 men = 36.6 per cent. and 679,863 women = 63.4 per cent. In the clothing trades and in commerce female labor has increased much more. But it is furthermore seen that older women are displaced by younger ones, and as women under 25 are mostly unmarried and the older ones are mostly married, or widowed, it is seen that women are displaced by girls.
The following are trades in which more women than men are employed in England:
In almost all the branches women receive considerable less pay than menfor the same amount of work. A recentinquiry showed that the average weekly wage in the textile industry was 28 shillings 1 penny for men, and only 15 shillings 5 pence for women.[129]In the bicycle industry where female labor has rapidly increased as a result of the introduction of machinery, women receive only from 12 to 18 shillings per week, where men received from 30 to 40 shillings.[130]The same conditions are met with in the manufacture of paper goods and shoes and in binderies. Women are paid especially low wages for the manufacture of underwear; 10 shillings per week is considered a good wage. “As a rule a woman earns half or one-third of a man’s wage.”[131]A similar difference in remuneration between men and women is met with in the postal service and in teaching. Only in the cotton industry in Lancashire both sexes working an equal length of time earned almost equal wages.
In the United States we find the following development of female labor:
Here we see that the number of women gainfully employed has grown from 3,914,571 in 1890 to 5,319,397 in 1900. It has increased more rapidly than the population which increased from 62,622,250 persons in 1890 to 76,303,387 in 1900; only by 21 per cent. In the same inexorable way the number of employed men is decreasing, since they are being displaced by women. Now for 100 persons gainfully employed there are 18.8 women, whilein 1880 there were not more than 14.7 per cent. Of 312 occupations there are only 9 in which no women are employed. According to the census of 1900, we even find among them 5 pilots, 45 engineers and firemen, 185 blacksmiths, 508 machinists, 11 well-borers, 8 boilermakers. “Of course these figures are not of great sociological importance, but they show that there are very few occupations from which women are absolutely excluded, either by their natural capacity or by law.”[132]Women are especially numerous in the following occupations: Servants and waitresses, 1,213,828; dressmaking, 338,144; farm labor, 497,886; laundresses, 332,665; teachers, 327,905; independent farmers, 307,788; textile workers, 231,458; housekeepers, 147,103; salesladies, 146,265; seamstresses, 138,724; nurses and midwives, 108,691; unqualified trades, 106,916. In these 12 occupations 3,583,333 = 74.1 per cent. of all bread-earning women have been counted. Besides there are 85,086 stenographers; 82,936 milliners; 81,000 clerks; 72,896 bookkeepers,etc., together 19 occupations, comprising over 50,000 women = 88.8 per cent. of all women breadwinners. Women predominate in the following trades:
Of 4,833,630 women employed in gainful occupations aged 16 years and more, 3,143,712 were single, 769,477 were married, 857,005 were widowed, 63,436 were divorced. The American report says: “The increase in the percentage of persons gainfully employed was greatest for the married women, since it was by one-fourth greater in 1900 than in 1890. In 1890 there was only one married working woman among 22; in 1900 there was one among 18.” The number of widowed and divorced women is very great, both relatively and actually. In 1900 among 2,721,438 widowed women 857,005 = 31.5 were earning their living, and among divorced women the percentage was still greater. Of 114,935, these 49 per cent. were earning their own living in 1890 and 55.3 per cent. in 1900. Thus more women became self-supporting each year. Among the 303 occupations in which women are employed there are:
Among 100 persons from 16 years up we find the following wage-scale:
We see that 60.6 per cent. of the men earn more than $9, while only 13.2 per cent. of the women earn more than $9, and more than two-thirds (66.3 per cent.) earn less than $7.[133]The average weekly wage for men is $11.16; the average weekly wage for women $6.17, almost half of the man’s wages. Among government employes the difference is equally great. Among 185,874 persons engaged in civil service there were 172,053 men = 92.6 percent., and 13,821 women—7.4 per cent. In the District of Columbia, the seat of the national administration, the percentage of female labor amounts to 29 per cent. And yet 47.2 per cent. of the women earn less than $720, while only 16.7 per cent. of the men earn less than$720.[134]
In France, according to the census of 1901, the laboring population amounted to 19,715,075 persons, 12,910,565 men and 6,804,510 women. They are distributed among various trades as follows:
“The female laboring population amounts to one-half of the male laboring population.”[135]As in all other countries, fewest women are employed at those occupations that require greatest physical strength (In mining 2.03 women for 100 men; in quarries 1.65; in metallurgy, 1.06). The greatest number of women are employed in the textile trades, 116 women for 100 men—in the clothing trades, in laundries, 1,247 women for 100 men, and in the manufacture of underwear 3,286 women for 100 men.[136]It generally holds true, asMme.C. Milhand states, that the greatest number of women are employed in those industries where the hours of work are particularly long and wages particularly low. “It is a sad fact that while the industries, where the hours of labor are short, only employ a few thousand women, those where the hours of work are long, employs hundreds of thousands of them.”[137]In regard to the wage scaleE. Levasseursays that a woman’s wage rarely amounts to two-thirds of a man’s wage and more frequently only to one-half.[138]
[125]A number of lists from sick-benefit funds, compiled by the factory inspector Schuler, showed that female members were ill 7.17 days annually, while male members were ill only 4.78 days annually. The duration of each illness was 24.8 for female members and 21.2 for male members. O. Schwartz, The results of the employment of married women in factories from the standpoint of public hygiene.—German quarterly gazette for public hygiene.[127]“This is especially the case in the clothing trade, but also in other industries such as the manufacture of toys, underwear, cigarettes, paper goodsetc.” R. Wilbrandt—Protection of working women and domestic industry.—Jena 1906.[128]Encyclopedia of Social Sciences.—H. Zahn, Statistics of professions and trades.[129]Textile Trades in 1906. London, 1909.[130]E. Cadbury, C. Matheson and C. Shaun—Women’s work and wages. London, 1906.[131]E. Cadbury and F. Shaun—Sweating. London. 1907.[132]Statistics of women at work. Washington, 1908.[133]Earnings of wage-earners. Bulletin 93, page 11. Washington, 1908.[134]Executive civil service of the United States. Washington, 1908.[135]C. Milhand—L’ouvrière en France. Paris, 1907.[136]E. Levasseur—Questions ouvrières et industrielles en France sous la troisième république.Paris, 1907.[137]C. Milhand—L’ouvrière en France. Paris, 1907.[138]E. Levasseur—Questions ouvrières et industrielles en France sous la troisième république.Paris, 1907.
[125]A number of lists from sick-benefit funds, compiled by the factory inspector Schuler, showed that female members were ill 7.17 days annually, while male members were ill only 4.78 days annually. The duration of each illness was 24.8 for female members and 21.2 for male members. O. Schwartz, The results of the employment of married women in factories from the standpoint of public hygiene.—German quarterly gazette for public hygiene.
[127]“This is especially the case in the clothing trade, but also in other industries such as the manufacture of toys, underwear, cigarettes, paper goodsetc.” R. Wilbrandt—Protection of working women and domestic industry.—Jena 1906.
[128]Encyclopedia of Social Sciences.—H. Zahn, Statistics of professions and trades.
[129]Textile Trades in 1906. London, 1909.
[130]E. Cadbury, C. Matheson and C. Shaun—Women’s work and wages. London, 1906.
[131]E. Cadbury and F. Shaun—Sweating. London. 1907.
[132]Statistics of women at work. Washington, 1908.
[133]Earnings of wage-earners. Bulletin 93, page 11. Washington, 1908.
[134]Executive civil service of the United States. Washington, 1908.
[135]C. Milhand—L’ouvrière en France. Paris, 1907.
[136]E. Levasseur—Questions ouvrières et industrielles en France sous la troisième république.Paris, 1907.
[137]C. Milhand—L’ouvrière en France. Paris, 1907.
[138]E. Levasseur—Questions ouvrières et industrielles en France sous la troisième république.Paris, 1907.