FOOTNOTES:[1]Hæreticus animal pestilentissimum est: quamobrem punire debet antequam virus impietatis evomat, forasque projiciat.—Simancæ de Cathol. Institt., Tit.II, n. 17.[2]Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Toledo, Leg. 153, n. 331.—Burriel, Vidas de los Arzobispos de Toledo (Bibl. nacional, MSS. Ff, 194, fol. 8).[3]Las Quinquagenas, I, 342 (Madrid, 1880).[4]Revista crítica de Historia y Literatura, V, 148.[5]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Leg. 522, fol. 2.[6]MSS. of Library of Univ. of Halle, Yc, 20, T. VIII.[7]Instrucciones de 1484, § 12 (Arguello, fol. 4).[8]Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Toledo, Leg. 158, n. 431, 435.[9]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Leg. 552, fol. 44.[10]Ibidem, fol. 23.[11]Still, Protestant sailors arriving in Spanish ports, when not protected by treaty, and even prisoners of war in the American colonies, as we shall see hereafter, were claimed by the Inquisition.[12]Ferraris, Prompta Bibliotheca, s. v.Hæresis, n. 1-10.—Avila de Censuris ecclesiasticis, P.I, Dub. 10 (Lugduni, 1609).—Páramo, p. 570.[13]Cap. 1, § 1, Clement. v, iii.[14]Bibl. nacional, MSS., X, 157, fol. 244.[15]Boletin, XV, 579, 594.[16]Mich. Alberti Repert. Inquisit. s. v.Episcopus.—Arn. Albertini de agnoscendis Assertionibus Catholicis, Q.XI, n. 1 (Valentiæ, 1534).—Simancæ de Cath. Institt. Tit.XXV, n. 2, 3, 4.—Pegnæ Comment.LIVin Eymerici Direct. P.III.—Páramo, p. 536.Rojas (De Hæret. P.I, n. 442-3) appears to be the only writer who assumes that the Clementines render episcopal jurisdiction merely consultative.[17]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libro 1.[18]Simancæ de Cath. Institt., Tit.XXV, n. 5.[19]Llorente, Añales, II, 335.[20]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 926, fol. 139.[21]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libro 688, fol. 228, 517; Libro 939, fol. 69.[22]Concil. Tarraconens. ann. 1591, Lib. v, Tit. vi, Cap. 2 (Aguirre, VI, 319).[23]Decreta Sac. Congr. S. Officii, p. 284 (R. Archivio di Stato in Roma, Fondo camerale, Congr. del S. Offizio, vol. 3).The policy of the Roman Inquisition was wholly different. It recognized the traditional jurisdiction of the bishops and invited their coöperation. The bishop issued edicts at his discretion and could initiate prosecutions. Concurrence of course was necessary in sentences of torture and final judgement, but, if the bishop were the prosecutor, the inquisitor went to the episcopal palace for the consultations and also in other cases when the bishop acted personally and not by his Ordinary. It was all in accordance with the Clementines, except that all definitive sentences required confirmation by the Congregation.—Ibid. pp. 174-5, 177, 266-8, 272-3.[24]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 45, fol. 168.[25]Modo de Proceder, fol. 107 (Bibl. nacional, MSS., D, 122).[26]Libro XIII de Cartas (MSS. of Am. Philos. Society).[27]Benedicti PP. XIV de Synodo diœcesana, Lib.IX, cap. iv, n. 3.[28]Archivo de Simancas, Lib. 78, fol. 80.[29]Ibidem, Lib. 83, fol. 106.[30]MSS. of Royal Library of Copenhagen, 218b, p. 232.[31]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Leg. 562, fol. 28.[32]Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Valencia, Leg. 100.[33]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 4352; Lib. 890.[34]Páramo, p. 136.—Boletin, XV, 462.[35]Boletin, XV, 475.[36]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, I, 37.[37]Instrucciones de 1484, § 26 (Arguello, fol. 8).[38]Archivo gen. de la C. de Aragon, Registro 3684, fol. 76, 92, 97.[39]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. I de copias, fol. 3.—No such clause appears in later commissions.[40]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 1.[41]Ibidem, Lib. 3, fol. 27, 28, 62, 63, 72, 73, 186, 204, 242, 336.[42]Ibidem, Lib. 939, fol. 69.[43]Archivo de Simancas, Patronato real, Inquisicion, Leg. único, fol. 43.[44]Pragmáticas y altres Drets de Cathalunya, Lib.I, Tit. viii, cap. 1; Capitols concedits, § 26; Ibidem, cap. 2 (Barcelona, 1569, pp. 16,19).—Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. I de copias, fol. 219.[45]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 939, fol. 69, 118.[46]Bibl. pública de Toledo, Sala 5, Estante II, Tab. 3.[47]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 76, fol. 360; Lib. 77, fol. 30; Lib. 939, fol. 104.[48]Bibl. pública de Toledo,loc. cit.[49]MSS.penes me.[50]Córtes de Madrid del año de MDLII, Pet. lix (Valladolid, 1558, fol. xiv).[51]Archivo de Simancas, Patronato real, Inquisicion, Leg. único, fol. 76.[52]Ibidem, Visitos de Barcelona, Leg. 15, fol. 2.[53]MSS. of Library of Univ. of Halle, Yc, 20, Tom. III, XI.—Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 939, fol. 69.Yet the Ordinary’s signature is appended to the sentence of acquittal of Fray Joseph de Sigüenza, in 1592.—MSS. of Halle, Yc, 20, Tom. IV.[54]MSS. of Library of Univ. of Halle, Yc, 20, Tom. VII.[55]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 82, fol. 93.[56]Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Valencia, Leg. 9, n. 1, fol. 261, 275; Leg. 9, n. 2, fol 342.[57]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Sala 39, Leg. 52, fol. 2.[58]Ibidem, Lib. 876, fol. 1, 17, 30, 41, 42, 46.—Archivo de Alcalá, Estado, Leg. 2843.[59]Discusion del Proyecto sobre la Inquisicion, p. 449 (Cadiz, 1813).[60]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libros 559, 890.[61]Urbani PP. V, Bull.Apostolatus(Bullar. Roman. I, 261).[62]Cap. 3, 4, Extrav. Commun. Lib.V, Tit. ix.[63]Concil. Trident. Sess,XXIV, De Reform, cap. 6.—Pegnæ CommentCXLIn Eymerici Director. P. III.[64]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. I, fol. 92.—Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 926, fol. 260.[65]Instrucciones de 1484, § 5 (Arguello, fol. 4).[66]Clement. PP. VII, Bull.Cum sicut(Pegnæ Append, ad Eymerici Director.).[67]Eymerici Director. P. III, n. 59 cum Pegnæ Comment, xii.—Locati Opus Judiciale, s. v.Absolveren. 7 (Romæ, 1570).[68]Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Toledo, Leg. 498.—“Por la presente damos licencia a qualquiera sacerdote secular ó regular para que en forma de la santa Madre Iglesia pueda absolver y absuelve á F. de la excomunion por nos puesta á pedimiento de F., imponiendole penitencia saludable á su anima y conciencia.”[69]MSS. of Royal Library of Copenhagen, 214 fol.—MSS. of Bodleian Library, Arch Seld A, Subt. 15.[70]Simancæ de Cath. Institt., Tit.III, n. 5.[71]Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Valencia, Leg. 299, fol. 80.[72]Simancæ de Cath. Institt., Tit.XIII, n. 22.[73]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 939, fol. 126.[74]Corella, Praxis confessionale, P.I, Tract, i, Cap. 1, n. 8.[75]Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Toledo, Leg. 111, n. 42.[76]Ibidem, Inquisicion de Valencia, Leg. 15, n. 11, fol. 17.[77]Discusion del Proyecto sobre la Inquisicion, p. 446 (Cadiz, 1863).[78]MSS. Bibl. nacional de Lima, Protocolo 223, Expediente 5270.[79]Simancæ de Cath. Institt., Tit.XLII, n. 14.[80]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libro 559.[81]Archivo de Simancas, Lib. 82, fol. 89; Lib. 939, fol. 126.[82]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. III, fol. 464.—Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 83, fol. 30; Lib. 939, fol. 126; Lib. 941, fol. 3.[83]See the Author’s “History of Auricular Confession and Indulgences,” Appendix to Vol. III.[84]Pegnæ Comment.XXVin Eymerici Director. P. II.[85]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 939, fol. 126.[86]Hinojosa, Los Despachos de la Diplomacia Pontificia, I, 330.—Danvila y Collado, La Expulsion de los Moriscos, p. 223.—Bibl. nacional, MSS, D, 118, fol. 243.—Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 940, fol. 12.[87]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 54, fol. 176.—Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Valencia, Leg. 10, n. 2, fol. 39, 40, 52, 75, 114, 118.[88]MSS. of Royal Library of Copenhagen, 218b, pp. 326-7, 337.[89]Danvila y Collado, La Expulsion de los Moriscos, pp. 126, 129, 181, 183, 194.[90]Lucii PP. III Epist. 171 (Migne’s Patrol., CCI, 1299).[91]Ripoll, Bullar. Ord. Prædic. I, 252.—Eymerici Director. Inquis. P. III, Q, xxviii.—Hist. of Inquisition of Middle Ages, III, 71sqq.[92]Raynald. Annal. ann. 1329, n. 70-2.[93]Pegnæ Comment.LXXVIIin Eymerici Director. P. III.—Bullar. Roman. I, 420.[94]Ripoll, Bullar., IV, 22.—Wadding, Annal. Minor. ann. 1487, n. 8.[95]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. I, fol. 94.—Archivio Vaticano, Innocent. VIII, Regist. 686, fol. 103.—Boletin, XV, 582.[96]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 939, fol. 106.[97]Wadding,op. cit.T. VIII, Regest., n. xxi.I have not met with any special attribution of exemption to Dominicans, but a brief of Leo X, May 14, 1517, confirming all their privileges without exception, may have been construed as covering this.—Ripoll, IV, 343.[98]Archivo de Simancas,ubi sup.[99]Wadding, ann. 1524, n. xxiii.[100]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. I de copias, fol. 115.[101]Archivo de Simancas,ubi sup.[102]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. I de copias, fol. 79, 96.—Páramo, p. 607.This was extended to Italy, by a brief of Jan. 15, 1530.—Clem. PP. VII, Bullcum sicut(Pegnæ Append, ad Eymerici Director. p. 107).[103]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 939, fol. 106.[104]Wadding,op. cit., Tom. VIII, Regest. pp. 225-6.[105]Fontana, Documenti Vaticani contro l’Eresia Luterana, p. 122 (Roma, 1892).[106]Pauli PP. III Bull.In Apostolici, 21 Mart. 1592 (Pegnæ Append. ad Eymerici Director. p. 109).[107]Pauli PP. IV Bull.Cum sicut nuper, 16 Apl. 1559 (Bullar. Roman. II, 48).[108]Bibl. Vaticana, MS. Ottoboniano Lat. 495, p. 7.[109]Hinojosa, Los Despachos de la Diplomacia Pontificia, I, 326, 332.[110]Bibl. Vaticana, MS. Ottoboniano Lat. 495, fol. 50.[111]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisición, Lib. 53, fol. 20; Gracia y Justicia, Leg. 621, fol. 116.[112]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. IV, fol. 109, 111.—Páramo, p. 885.[113]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. IV, fol. 149; Lib. V, fol. 77.[114]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Libro V, fol. 73, 77.[115]Ibidem, Lib. V, fol. 78.[116]A copy of this edict, printed as a broadside, is in the Bodleian Library, Arch. S, 130.[117]Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Valencia, Leg. 1, n. 4, fol. 148.[118]Cap. 16 in Sexto, V, 3.—Mich. Alberti Repertor. Inquisit. s. v.Episcopus.[119]See Vol. I, p. 147.[120]Among the leading bishops of Jewish descent, at the time, Amador de los Rios enumerates (op. cit.III, 241) Alonso of Burgos, Juan de Malvenda of Coria, Alfonso de Valladolid of Valladolid, Alonso de Palenzuela of Ciudad-Rodrigo, Pedro de Aranda of Calahorra, Juan Arias Dávila of Segovia and Hernando de Talavera of Granada.[121]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. I, fol. 36.—Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 930, fol. 18.[122]Páramo, p. 151.[123]Amador de los Rios, III, 129-30.[124]Colmenares, Historia de Segovia, cap. xxxiii, § 2; cap. xxxv, §§ 7, 13.[125]Bergenroth, Calendar of Spanish State Papers, I, xlv.[126]Coleccion de Documentos, XVIII, 290.[127]Llorente, Añales, I, 212, 242.—Boletin, XV, 578, 590.—Burchardi Diarium, II, 409, 459, 494-5; III, 13 (Ed. Thuasne).[128]Archivo de Simancas, Patronato Real, Inquisition, Leg. único, fol. 22.[129]There is a somewhat mysterious case of a summons issued, in 1516, to the “Bishop of Daroca,” then in Burgos, to present himself to Ximenes, within fifteen days, under pain of loss of temporalities and citizenship. It was enclosed to the corregidor of Burgos with instructions to serve it in presence of a notary and, if the bishop did not obey, he was to be sent to the court under secure guard. Daroca is a town near Saragossa, which never was the seat of an episcopate, but the summons was signed by Cardinal Adrian, then Inquisitor-general of Aragon, and by Calcena in the name of the governors and was countersigned by the members of the Suprema.—Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. III, fol. 448.[130]Dormer, Añales de Aragon, Lib. I, cap. xxvii; Lib. II, cap. xx.—Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. III, fol. 521.—Gachard, Correspondance de Charles-quint et d’Adrian VI, p. 171.—Ferrer del Rio, Comunidades de Castilla, pp. 300-2, 393, 397, 399.—Constantin v. Höfler, Don Antonio de Acuña, p. 79.[131]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. I de copias, fol. 98.—Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libro 930, fol. 98.[132]The documents of the trial of Carranza, covering some forty thousand pages, are preserved in twenty-two folio volumes in the library of the Real Academia de la Historia and even from these there is a volume missing. The only writers whose accounts are based on these original sources are Llorente (Hist. crít. cap. xxxii-iv) and Menéndez Pelayo (Heterodoxos españoles, II, 359-415)—the one a defender of the accused and the other of the Holy Office. I have not had the opportunity of consulting these documents, but many of the more important have been printed and there are sources, aside from the inquisitorial records, which throw light on the motives which occasioned and controlled the events. These were not accessible to Llorente and appear to have escaped the attention of Menéndez Pelayo.[133]Gachard, Retraite et Mort de Charles-quint, II, 187, 188, 191, 202.[134]Gachard,op. cit., II, 195, 199, 354.[135]Gachard,op. cit., pp. 417, 418.[136]Menéndez Pelayo, Heterodoxos, II, 395.[137]In 1608 the see of Cuzco was estimated to be worth 40,000 ducats per annum.—Cabrera, Relaciones, p. 346.[138]Salazar de Mendoza, Vida de Fray D. Bartolomé de Carranza y de Miranda, cap.I-VII.—Salazar was a penitentiary of the cathedral of Toledo and wrote this work at the request of Carranza’s successor, the Inquisitor-general Quiroga. It was not printed until Valladares issued an edition in 1788. This I have not seen and my references are to a MS. copy.[139]Bzovii Annal. Eccles. ann. 1566, n. 89.—Salazar,op. cit., cap.VIII-X.[140]Salazar, cap.XI.—Coleccion de Documentos, V, 528.[141]Salazar, cap.XII.[142]Controversia de necessaria Residentia personali Episcoporum et aliorum inferiorum Pastorum. Lugduni, 1550. The first edition was of Venice, 1547; there was a third, Antwerp, 1554, and a reprint as late as 1767, in Madrid.[143]Caballero, Vida de Fray Melchor Cano, p. 624 (Madrid, 1871).[144]Philip’sconsultaand Cano’sparecerwere printed by Usoz y Rio in his “Reformistas antiguos españoles” (Dos Informaziones, Append. p. 27, Madrid, 1857) and more recently by Caballero, Vida de Melchor Cano, p. 512.[145]Caballero, pp. 502, 507, 508, 527-9, 530-2, 534-5.[146]Llorente, Hist. crít. cap.XXXII, Art. 1, n. 3.—Salazar, cap.VIII.—Menéndez Pelayo, II, 378.[147]Schäfer, Beiträge zur Geschichte des spanischen Protestantismus, III, 785-88, 791.The Consideration in question is not, as there stated, No. 65, but No. 54, in both the original Basle edition of “Le cento e dieci divine Considerazioni” (1550) and in the Spanish version of 1558, printed by Usoz y Rio. The mistake is probably that of a copyist, confusingLIVandLXV. The Spanish version seems to have circulated among the little group of heretics in Valladolid.
[1]Hæreticus animal pestilentissimum est: quamobrem punire debet antequam virus impietatis evomat, forasque projiciat.—Simancæ de Cathol. Institt., Tit.II, n. 17.
[1]Hæreticus animal pestilentissimum est: quamobrem punire debet antequam virus impietatis evomat, forasque projiciat.—Simancæ de Cathol. Institt., Tit.II, n. 17.
[2]Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Toledo, Leg. 153, n. 331.—Burriel, Vidas de los Arzobispos de Toledo (Bibl. nacional, MSS. Ff, 194, fol. 8).
[2]Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Toledo, Leg. 153, n. 331.—Burriel, Vidas de los Arzobispos de Toledo (Bibl. nacional, MSS. Ff, 194, fol. 8).
[3]Las Quinquagenas, I, 342 (Madrid, 1880).
[3]Las Quinquagenas, I, 342 (Madrid, 1880).
[4]Revista crítica de Historia y Literatura, V, 148.
[4]Revista crítica de Historia y Literatura, V, 148.
[5]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Leg. 522, fol. 2.
[5]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Leg. 522, fol. 2.
[6]MSS. of Library of Univ. of Halle, Yc, 20, T. VIII.
[6]MSS. of Library of Univ. of Halle, Yc, 20, T. VIII.
[7]Instrucciones de 1484, § 12 (Arguello, fol. 4).
[7]Instrucciones de 1484, § 12 (Arguello, fol. 4).
[8]Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Toledo, Leg. 158, n. 431, 435.
[8]Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Toledo, Leg. 158, n. 431, 435.
[9]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Leg. 552, fol. 44.
[9]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Leg. 552, fol. 44.
[10]Ibidem, fol. 23.
[10]Ibidem, fol. 23.
[11]Still, Protestant sailors arriving in Spanish ports, when not protected by treaty, and even prisoners of war in the American colonies, as we shall see hereafter, were claimed by the Inquisition.
[11]Still, Protestant sailors arriving in Spanish ports, when not protected by treaty, and even prisoners of war in the American colonies, as we shall see hereafter, were claimed by the Inquisition.
[12]Ferraris, Prompta Bibliotheca, s. v.Hæresis, n. 1-10.—Avila de Censuris ecclesiasticis, P.I, Dub. 10 (Lugduni, 1609).—Páramo, p. 570.
[12]Ferraris, Prompta Bibliotheca, s. v.Hæresis, n. 1-10.—Avila de Censuris ecclesiasticis, P.I, Dub. 10 (Lugduni, 1609).—Páramo, p. 570.
[13]Cap. 1, § 1, Clement. v, iii.
[13]Cap. 1, § 1, Clement. v, iii.
[14]Bibl. nacional, MSS., X, 157, fol. 244.
[14]Bibl. nacional, MSS., X, 157, fol. 244.
[15]Boletin, XV, 579, 594.
[15]Boletin, XV, 579, 594.
[16]Mich. Alberti Repert. Inquisit. s. v.Episcopus.—Arn. Albertini de agnoscendis Assertionibus Catholicis, Q.XI, n. 1 (Valentiæ, 1534).—Simancæ de Cath. Institt. Tit.XXV, n. 2, 3, 4.—Pegnæ Comment.LIVin Eymerici Direct. P.III.—Páramo, p. 536.Rojas (De Hæret. P.I, n. 442-3) appears to be the only writer who assumes that the Clementines render episcopal jurisdiction merely consultative.
[16]Mich. Alberti Repert. Inquisit. s. v.Episcopus.—Arn. Albertini de agnoscendis Assertionibus Catholicis, Q.XI, n. 1 (Valentiæ, 1534).—Simancæ de Cath. Institt. Tit.XXV, n. 2, 3, 4.—Pegnæ Comment.LIVin Eymerici Direct. P.III.—Páramo, p. 536.
Rojas (De Hæret. P.I, n. 442-3) appears to be the only writer who assumes that the Clementines render episcopal jurisdiction merely consultative.
[17]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libro 1.
[17]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libro 1.
[18]Simancæ de Cath. Institt., Tit.XXV, n. 5.
[18]Simancæ de Cath. Institt., Tit.XXV, n. 5.
[19]Llorente, Añales, II, 335.
[19]Llorente, Añales, II, 335.
[20]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 926, fol. 139.
[20]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 926, fol. 139.
[21]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libro 688, fol. 228, 517; Libro 939, fol. 69.
[21]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libro 688, fol. 228, 517; Libro 939, fol. 69.
[22]Concil. Tarraconens. ann. 1591, Lib. v, Tit. vi, Cap. 2 (Aguirre, VI, 319).
[22]Concil. Tarraconens. ann. 1591, Lib. v, Tit. vi, Cap. 2 (Aguirre, VI, 319).
[23]Decreta Sac. Congr. S. Officii, p. 284 (R. Archivio di Stato in Roma, Fondo camerale, Congr. del S. Offizio, vol. 3).The policy of the Roman Inquisition was wholly different. It recognized the traditional jurisdiction of the bishops and invited their coöperation. The bishop issued edicts at his discretion and could initiate prosecutions. Concurrence of course was necessary in sentences of torture and final judgement, but, if the bishop were the prosecutor, the inquisitor went to the episcopal palace for the consultations and also in other cases when the bishop acted personally and not by his Ordinary. It was all in accordance with the Clementines, except that all definitive sentences required confirmation by the Congregation.—Ibid. pp. 174-5, 177, 266-8, 272-3.
[23]Decreta Sac. Congr. S. Officii, p. 284 (R. Archivio di Stato in Roma, Fondo camerale, Congr. del S. Offizio, vol. 3).
The policy of the Roman Inquisition was wholly different. It recognized the traditional jurisdiction of the bishops and invited their coöperation. The bishop issued edicts at his discretion and could initiate prosecutions. Concurrence of course was necessary in sentences of torture and final judgement, but, if the bishop were the prosecutor, the inquisitor went to the episcopal palace for the consultations and also in other cases when the bishop acted personally and not by his Ordinary. It was all in accordance with the Clementines, except that all definitive sentences required confirmation by the Congregation.—Ibid. pp. 174-5, 177, 266-8, 272-3.
[24]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 45, fol. 168.
[24]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 45, fol. 168.
[25]Modo de Proceder, fol. 107 (Bibl. nacional, MSS., D, 122).
[25]Modo de Proceder, fol. 107 (Bibl. nacional, MSS., D, 122).
[26]Libro XIII de Cartas (MSS. of Am. Philos. Society).
[26]Libro XIII de Cartas (MSS. of Am. Philos. Society).
[27]Benedicti PP. XIV de Synodo diœcesana, Lib.IX, cap. iv, n. 3.
[27]Benedicti PP. XIV de Synodo diœcesana, Lib.IX, cap. iv, n. 3.
[28]Archivo de Simancas, Lib. 78, fol. 80.
[28]Archivo de Simancas, Lib. 78, fol. 80.
[29]Ibidem, Lib. 83, fol. 106.
[29]Ibidem, Lib. 83, fol. 106.
[30]MSS. of Royal Library of Copenhagen, 218b, p. 232.
[30]MSS. of Royal Library of Copenhagen, 218b, p. 232.
[31]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Leg. 562, fol. 28.
[31]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Leg. 562, fol. 28.
[32]Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Valencia, Leg. 100.
[32]Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Valencia, Leg. 100.
[33]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 4352; Lib. 890.
[33]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 4352; Lib. 890.
[34]Páramo, p. 136.—Boletin, XV, 462.
[34]Páramo, p. 136.—Boletin, XV, 462.
[35]Boletin, XV, 475.
[35]Boletin, XV, 475.
[36]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, I, 37.
[36]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, I, 37.
[37]Instrucciones de 1484, § 26 (Arguello, fol. 8).
[37]Instrucciones de 1484, § 26 (Arguello, fol. 8).
[38]Archivo gen. de la C. de Aragon, Registro 3684, fol. 76, 92, 97.
[38]Archivo gen. de la C. de Aragon, Registro 3684, fol. 76, 92, 97.
[39]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. I de copias, fol. 3.—No such clause appears in later commissions.
[39]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. I de copias, fol. 3.—No such clause appears in later commissions.
[40]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 1.
[40]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 1.
[41]Ibidem, Lib. 3, fol. 27, 28, 62, 63, 72, 73, 186, 204, 242, 336.
[41]Ibidem, Lib. 3, fol. 27, 28, 62, 63, 72, 73, 186, 204, 242, 336.
[42]Ibidem, Lib. 939, fol. 69.
[42]Ibidem, Lib. 939, fol. 69.
[43]Archivo de Simancas, Patronato real, Inquisicion, Leg. único, fol. 43.
[43]Archivo de Simancas, Patronato real, Inquisicion, Leg. único, fol. 43.
[44]Pragmáticas y altres Drets de Cathalunya, Lib.I, Tit. viii, cap. 1; Capitols concedits, § 26; Ibidem, cap. 2 (Barcelona, 1569, pp. 16,19).—Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. I de copias, fol. 219.
[44]Pragmáticas y altres Drets de Cathalunya, Lib.I, Tit. viii, cap. 1; Capitols concedits, § 26; Ibidem, cap. 2 (Barcelona, 1569, pp. 16,19).—Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. I de copias, fol. 219.
[45]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 939, fol. 69, 118.
[45]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 939, fol. 69, 118.
[46]Bibl. pública de Toledo, Sala 5, Estante II, Tab. 3.
[46]Bibl. pública de Toledo, Sala 5, Estante II, Tab. 3.
[47]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 76, fol. 360; Lib. 77, fol. 30; Lib. 939, fol. 104.
[47]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 76, fol. 360; Lib. 77, fol. 30; Lib. 939, fol. 104.
[48]Bibl. pública de Toledo,loc. cit.
[48]Bibl. pública de Toledo,loc. cit.
[49]MSS.penes me.
[49]MSS.penes me.
[50]Córtes de Madrid del año de MDLII, Pet. lix (Valladolid, 1558, fol. xiv).
[50]Córtes de Madrid del año de MDLII, Pet. lix (Valladolid, 1558, fol. xiv).
[51]Archivo de Simancas, Patronato real, Inquisicion, Leg. único, fol. 76.
[51]Archivo de Simancas, Patronato real, Inquisicion, Leg. único, fol. 76.
[52]Ibidem, Visitos de Barcelona, Leg. 15, fol. 2.
[52]Ibidem, Visitos de Barcelona, Leg. 15, fol. 2.
[53]MSS. of Library of Univ. of Halle, Yc, 20, Tom. III, XI.—Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 939, fol. 69.Yet the Ordinary’s signature is appended to the sentence of acquittal of Fray Joseph de Sigüenza, in 1592.—MSS. of Halle, Yc, 20, Tom. IV.
[53]MSS. of Library of Univ. of Halle, Yc, 20, Tom. III, XI.—Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 939, fol. 69.
Yet the Ordinary’s signature is appended to the sentence of acquittal of Fray Joseph de Sigüenza, in 1592.—MSS. of Halle, Yc, 20, Tom. IV.
[54]MSS. of Library of Univ. of Halle, Yc, 20, Tom. VII.
[54]MSS. of Library of Univ. of Halle, Yc, 20, Tom. VII.
[55]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 82, fol. 93.
[55]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 82, fol. 93.
[56]Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Valencia, Leg. 9, n. 1, fol. 261, 275; Leg. 9, n. 2, fol 342.
[56]Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Valencia, Leg. 9, n. 1, fol. 261, 275; Leg. 9, n. 2, fol 342.
[57]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Sala 39, Leg. 52, fol. 2.
[57]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Sala 39, Leg. 52, fol. 2.
[58]Ibidem, Lib. 876, fol. 1, 17, 30, 41, 42, 46.—Archivo de Alcalá, Estado, Leg. 2843.
[58]Ibidem, Lib. 876, fol. 1, 17, 30, 41, 42, 46.—Archivo de Alcalá, Estado, Leg. 2843.
[59]Discusion del Proyecto sobre la Inquisicion, p. 449 (Cadiz, 1813).
[59]Discusion del Proyecto sobre la Inquisicion, p. 449 (Cadiz, 1813).
[60]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libros 559, 890.
[60]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libros 559, 890.
[61]Urbani PP. V, Bull.Apostolatus(Bullar. Roman. I, 261).
[61]Urbani PP. V, Bull.Apostolatus(Bullar. Roman. I, 261).
[62]Cap. 3, 4, Extrav. Commun. Lib.V, Tit. ix.
[62]Cap. 3, 4, Extrav. Commun. Lib.V, Tit. ix.
[63]Concil. Trident. Sess,XXIV, De Reform, cap. 6.—Pegnæ CommentCXLIn Eymerici Director. P. III.
[63]Concil. Trident. Sess,XXIV, De Reform, cap. 6.—Pegnæ CommentCXLIn Eymerici Director. P. III.
[64]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. I, fol. 92.—Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 926, fol. 260.
[64]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. I, fol. 92.—Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 926, fol. 260.
[65]Instrucciones de 1484, § 5 (Arguello, fol. 4).
[65]Instrucciones de 1484, § 5 (Arguello, fol. 4).
[66]Clement. PP. VII, Bull.Cum sicut(Pegnæ Append, ad Eymerici Director.).
[66]Clement. PP. VII, Bull.Cum sicut(Pegnæ Append, ad Eymerici Director.).
[67]Eymerici Director. P. III, n. 59 cum Pegnæ Comment, xii.—Locati Opus Judiciale, s. v.Absolveren. 7 (Romæ, 1570).
[67]Eymerici Director. P. III, n. 59 cum Pegnæ Comment, xii.—Locati Opus Judiciale, s. v.Absolveren. 7 (Romæ, 1570).
[68]Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Toledo, Leg. 498.—“Por la presente damos licencia a qualquiera sacerdote secular ó regular para que en forma de la santa Madre Iglesia pueda absolver y absuelve á F. de la excomunion por nos puesta á pedimiento de F., imponiendole penitencia saludable á su anima y conciencia.”
[68]Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Toledo, Leg. 498.—“Por la presente damos licencia a qualquiera sacerdote secular ó regular para que en forma de la santa Madre Iglesia pueda absolver y absuelve á F. de la excomunion por nos puesta á pedimiento de F., imponiendole penitencia saludable á su anima y conciencia.”
[69]MSS. of Royal Library of Copenhagen, 214 fol.—MSS. of Bodleian Library, Arch Seld A, Subt. 15.
[69]MSS. of Royal Library of Copenhagen, 214 fol.—MSS. of Bodleian Library, Arch Seld A, Subt. 15.
[70]Simancæ de Cath. Institt., Tit.III, n. 5.
[70]Simancæ de Cath. Institt., Tit.III, n. 5.
[71]Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Valencia, Leg. 299, fol. 80.
[71]Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Valencia, Leg. 299, fol. 80.
[72]Simancæ de Cath. Institt., Tit.XIII, n. 22.
[72]Simancæ de Cath. Institt., Tit.XIII, n. 22.
[73]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 939, fol. 126.
[73]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 939, fol. 126.
[74]Corella, Praxis confessionale, P.I, Tract, i, Cap. 1, n. 8.
[74]Corella, Praxis confessionale, P.I, Tract, i, Cap. 1, n. 8.
[75]Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Toledo, Leg. 111, n. 42.
[75]Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Toledo, Leg. 111, n. 42.
[76]Ibidem, Inquisicion de Valencia, Leg. 15, n. 11, fol. 17.
[76]Ibidem, Inquisicion de Valencia, Leg. 15, n. 11, fol. 17.
[77]Discusion del Proyecto sobre la Inquisicion, p. 446 (Cadiz, 1863).
[77]Discusion del Proyecto sobre la Inquisicion, p. 446 (Cadiz, 1863).
[78]MSS. Bibl. nacional de Lima, Protocolo 223, Expediente 5270.
[78]MSS. Bibl. nacional de Lima, Protocolo 223, Expediente 5270.
[79]Simancæ de Cath. Institt., Tit.XLII, n. 14.
[79]Simancæ de Cath. Institt., Tit.XLII, n. 14.
[80]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libro 559.
[80]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libro 559.
[81]Archivo de Simancas, Lib. 82, fol. 89; Lib. 939, fol. 126.
[81]Archivo de Simancas, Lib. 82, fol. 89; Lib. 939, fol. 126.
[82]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. III, fol. 464.—Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 83, fol. 30; Lib. 939, fol. 126; Lib. 941, fol. 3.
[82]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. III, fol. 464.—Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 83, fol. 30; Lib. 939, fol. 126; Lib. 941, fol. 3.
[83]See the Author’s “History of Auricular Confession and Indulgences,” Appendix to Vol. III.
[83]See the Author’s “History of Auricular Confession and Indulgences,” Appendix to Vol. III.
[84]Pegnæ Comment.XXVin Eymerici Director. P. II.
[84]Pegnæ Comment.XXVin Eymerici Director. P. II.
[85]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 939, fol. 126.
[85]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 939, fol. 126.
[86]Hinojosa, Los Despachos de la Diplomacia Pontificia, I, 330.—Danvila y Collado, La Expulsion de los Moriscos, p. 223.—Bibl. nacional, MSS, D, 118, fol. 243.—Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 940, fol. 12.
[86]Hinojosa, Los Despachos de la Diplomacia Pontificia, I, 330.—Danvila y Collado, La Expulsion de los Moriscos, p. 223.—Bibl. nacional, MSS, D, 118, fol. 243.—Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 940, fol. 12.
[87]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 54, fol. 176.—Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Valencia, Leg. 10, n. 2, fol. 39, 40, 52, 75, 114, 118.
[87]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 54, fol. 176.—Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Valencia, Leg. 10, n. 2, fol. 39, 40, 52, 75, 114, 118.
[88]MSS. of Royal Library of Copenhagen, 218b, pp. 326-7, 337.
[88]MSS. of Royal Library of Copenhagen, 218b, pp. 326-7, 337.
[89]Danvila y Collado, La Expulsion de los Moriscos, pp. 126, 129, 181, 183, 194.
[89]Danvila y Collado, La Expulsion de los Moriscos, pp. 126, 129, 181, 183, 194.
[90]Lucii PP. III Epist. 171 (Migne’s Patrol., CCI, 1299).
[90]Lucii PP. III Epist. 171 (Migne’s Patrol., CCI, 1299).
[91]Ripoll, Bullar. Ord. Prædic. I, 252.—Eymerici Director. Inquis. P. III, Q, xxviii.—Hist. of Inquisition of Middle Ages, III, 71sqq.
[91]Ripoll, Bullar. Ord. Prædic. I, 252.—Eymerici Director. Inquis. P. III, Q, xxviii.—Hist. of Inquisition of Middle Ages, III, 71sqq.
[92]Raynald. Annal. ann. 1329, n. 70-2.
[92]Raynald. Annal. ann. 1329, n. 70-2.
[93]Pegnæ Comment.LXXVIIin Eymerici Director. P. III.—Bullar. Roman. I, 420.
[93]Pegnæ Comment.LXXVIIin Eymerici Director. P. III.—Bullar. Roman. I, 420.
[94]Ripoll, Bullar., IV, 22.—Wadding, Annal. Minor. ann. 1487, n. 8.
[94]Ripoll, Bullar., IV, 22.—Wadding, Annal. Minor. ann. 1487, n. 8.
[95]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. I, fol. 94.—Archivio Vaticano, Innocent. VIII, Regist. 686, fol. 103.—Boletin, XV, 582.
[95]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. I, fol. 94.—Archivio Vaticano, Innocent. VIII, Regist. 686, fol. 103.—Boletin, XV, 582.
[96]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 939, fol. 106.
[96]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 939, fol. 106.
[97]Wadding,op. cit.T. VIII, Regest., n. xxi.I have not met with any special attribution of exemption to Dominicans, but a brief of Leo X, May 14, 1517, confirming all their privileges without exception, may have been construed as covering this.—Ripoll, IV, 343.
[97]Wadding,op. cit.T. VIII, Regest., n. xxi.
I have not met with any special attribution of exemption to Dominicans, but a brief of Leo X, May 14, 1517, confirming all their privileges without exception, may have been construed as covering this.—Ripoll, IV, 343.
[98]Archivo de Simancas,ubi sup.
[98]Archivo de Simancas,ubi sup.
[99]Wadding, ann. 1524, n. xxiii.
[99]Wadding, ann. 1524, n. xxiii.
[100]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. I de copias, fol. 115.
[100]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. I de copias, fol. 115.
[101]Archivo de Simancas,ubi sup.
[101]Archivo de Simancas,ubi sup.
[102]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. I de copias, fol. 79, 96.—Páramo, p. 607.This was extended to Italy, by a brief of Jan. 15, 1530.—Clem. PP. VII, Bullcum sicut(Pegnæ Append, ad Eymerici Director. p. 107).
[102]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. I de copias, fol. 79, 96.—Páramo, p. 607.
This was extended to Italy, by a brief of Jan. 15, 1530.—Clem. PP. VII, Bullcum sicut(Pegnæ Append, ad Eymerici Director. p. 107).
[103]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 939, fol. 106.
[103]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 939, fol. 106.
[104]Wadding,op. cit., Tom. VIII, Regest. pp. 225-6.
[104]Wadding,op. cit., Tom. VIII, Regest. pp. 225-6.
[105]Fontana, Documenti Vaticani contro l’Eresia Luterana, p. 122 (Roma, 1892).
[105]Fontana, Documenti Vaticani contro l’Eresia Luterana, p. 122 (Roma, 1892).
[106]Pauli PP. III Bull.In Apostolici, 21 Mart. 1592 (Pegnæ Append. ad Eymerici Director. p. 109).
[106]Pauli PP. III Bull.In Apostolici, 21 Mart. 1592 (Pegnæ Append. ad Eymerici Director. p. 109).
[107]Pauli PP. IV Bull.Cum sicut nuper, 16 Apl. 1559 (Bullar. Roman. II, 48).
[107]Pauli PP. IV Bull.Cum sicut nuper, 16 Apl. 1559 (Bullar. Roman. II, 48).
[108]Bibl. Vaticana, MS. Ottoboniano Lat. 495, p. 7.
[108]Bibl. Vaticana, MS. Ottoboniano Lat. 495, p. 7.
[109]Hinojosa, Los Despachos de la Diplomacia Pontificia, I, 326, 332.
[109]Hinojosa, Los Despachos de la Diplomacia Pontificia, I, 326, 332.
[110]Bibl. Vaticana, MS. Ottoboniano Lat. 495, fol. 50.
[110]Bibl. Vaticana, MS. Ottoboniano Lat. 495, fol. 50.
[111]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisición, Lib. 53, fol. 20; Gracia y Justicia, Leg. 621, fol. 116.
[111]Archivo de Simancas, Inquisición, Lib. 53, fol. 20; Gracia y Justicia, Leg. 621, fol. 116.
[112]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. IV, fol. 109, 111.—Páramo, p. 885.
[112]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. IV, fol. 109, 111.—Páramo, p. 885.
[113]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. IV, fol. 149; Lib. V, fol. 77.
[113]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. IV, fol. 149; Lib. V, fol. 77.
[114]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Libro V, fol. 73, 77.
[114]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Libro V, fol. 73, 77.
[115]Ibidem, Lib. V, fol. 78.
[115]Ibidem, Lib. V, fol. 78.
[116]A copy of this edict, printed as a broadside, is in the Bodleian Library, Arch. S, 130.
[116]A copy of this edict, printed as a broadside, is in the Bodleian Library, Arch. S, 130.
[117]Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Valencia, Leg. 1, n. 4, fol. 148.
[117]Archivo hist. nacional, Inquisicion de Valencia, Leg. 1, n. 4, fol. 148.
[118]Cap. 16 in Sexto, V, 3.—Mich. Alberti Repertor. Inquisit. s. v.Episcopus.
[118]Cap. 16 in Sexto, V, 3.—Mich. Alberti Repertor. Inquisit. s. v.Episcopus.
[119]See Vol. I, p. 147.
[119]See Vol. I, p. 147.
[120]Among the leading bishops of Jewish descent, at the time, Amador de los Rios enumerates (op. cit.III, 241) Alonso of Burgos, Juan de Malvenda of Coria, Alfonso de Valladolid of Valladolid, Alonso de Palenzuela of Ciudad-Rodrigo, Pedro de Aranda of Calahorra, Juan Arias Dávila of Segovia and Hernando de Talavera of Granada.
[120]Among the leading bishops of Jewish descent, at the time, Amador de los Rios enumerates (op. cit.III, 241) Alonso of Burgos, Juan de Malvenda of Coria, Alfonso de Valladolid of Valladolid, Alonso de Palenzuela of Ciudad-Rodrigo, Pedro de Aranda of Calahorra, Juan Arias Dávila of Segovia and Hernando de Talavera of Granada.
[121]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. I, fol. 36.—Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 930, fol. 18.
[121]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. I, fol. 36.—Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. 930, fol. 18.
[122]Páramo, p. 151.
[122]Páramo, p. 151.
[123]Amador de los Rios, III, 129-30.
[123]Amador de los Rios, III, 129-30.
[124]Colmenares, Historia de Segovia, cap. xxxiii, § 2; cap. xxxv, §§ 7, 13.
[124]Colmenares, Historia de Segovia, cap. xxxiii, § 2; cap. xxxv, §§ 7, 13.
[125]Bergenroth, Calendar of Spanish State Papers, I, xlv.
[125]Bergenroth, Calendar of Spanish State Papers, I, xlv.
[126]Coleccion de Documentos, XVIII, 290.
[126]Coleccion de Documentos, XVIII, 290.
[127]Llorente, Añales, I, 212, 242.—Boletin, XV, 578, 590.—Burchardi Diarium, II, 409, 459, 494-5; III, 13 (Ed. Thuasne).
[127]Llorente, Añales, I, 212, 242.—Boletin, XV, 578, 590.—Burchardi Diarium, II, 409, 459, 494-5; III, 13 (Ed. Thuasne).
[128]Archivo de Simancas, Patronato Real, Inquisition, Leg. único, fol. 22.
[128]Archivo de Simancas, Patronato Real, Inquisition, Leg. único, fol. 22.
[129]There is a somewhat mysterious case of a summons issued, in 1516, to the “Bishop of Daroca,” then in Burgos, to present himself to Ximenes, within fifteen days, under pain of loss of temporalities and citizenship. It was enclosed to the corregidor of Burgos with instructions to serve it in presence of a notary and, if the bishop did not obey, he was to be sent to the court under secure guard. Daroca is a town near Saragossa, which never was the seat of an episcopate, but the summons was signed by Cardinal Adrian, then Inquisitor-general of Aragon, and by Calcena in the name of the governors and was countersigned by the members of the Suprema.—Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. III, fol. 448.
[129]There is a somewhat mysterious case of a summons issued, in 1516, to the “Bishop of Daroca,” then in Burgos, to present himself to Ximenes, within fifteen days, under pain of loss of temporalities and citizenship. It was enclosed to the corregidor of Burgos with instructions to serve it in presence of a notary and, if the bishop did not obey, he was to be sent to the court under secure guard. Daroca is a town near Saragossa, which never was the seat of an episcopate, but the summons was signed by Cardinal Adrian, then Inquisitor-general of Aragon, and by Calcena in the name of the governors and was countersigned by the members of the Suprema.—Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Lib. III, fol. 448.
[130]Dormer, Añales de Aragon, Lib. I, cap. xxvii; Lib. II, cap. xx.—Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. III, fol. 521.—Gachard, Correspondance de Charles-quint et d’Adrian VI, p. 171.—Ferrer del Rio, Comunidades de Castilla, pp. 300-2, 393, 397, 399.—Constantin v. Höfler, Don Antonio de Acuña, p. 79.
[130]Dormer, Añales de Aragon, Lib. I, cap. xxvii; Lib. II, cap. xx.—Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. III, fol. 521.—Gachard, Correspondance de Charles-quint et d’Adrian VI, p. 171.—Ferrer del Rio, Comunidades de Castilla, pp. 300-2, 393, 397, 399.—Constantin v. Höfler, Don Antonio de Acuña, p. 79.
[131]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. I de copias, fol. 98.—Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libro 930, fol. 98.
[131]Bulario de la Orden de Santiago, Lib. I de copias, fol. 98.—Archivo de Simancas, Inquisicion, Libro 930, fol. 98.
[132]The documents of the trial of Carranza, covering some forty thousand pages, are preserved in twenty-two folio volumes in the library of the Real Academia de la Historia and even from these there is a volume missing. The only writers whose accounts are based on these original sources are Llorente (Hist. crít. cap. xxxii-iv) and Menéndez Pelayo (Heterodoxos españoles, II, 359-415)—the one a defender of the accused and the other of the Holy Office. I have not had the opportunity of consulting these documents, but many of the more important have been printed and there are sources, aside from the inquisitorial records, which throw light on the motives which occasioned and controlled the events. These were not accessible to Llorente and appear to have escaped the attention of Menéndez Pelayo.
[132]The documents of the trial of Carranza, covering some forty thousand pages, are preserved in twenty-two folio volumes in the library of the Real Academia de la Historia and even from these there is a volume missing. The only writers whose accounts are based on these original sources are Llorente (Hist. crít. cap. xxxii-iv) and Menéndez Pelayo (Heterodoxos españoles, II, 359-415)—the one a defender of the accused and the other of the Holy Office. I have not had the opportunity of consulting these documents, but many of the more important have been printed and there are sources, aside from the inquisitorial records, which throw light on the motives which occasioned and controlled the events. These were not accessible to Llorente and appear to have escaped the attention of Menéndez Pelayo.
[133]Gachard, Retraite et Mort de Charles-quint, II, 187, 188, 191, 202.
[133]Gachard, Retraite et Mort de Charles-quint, II, 187, 188, 191, 202.
[134]Gachard,op. cit., II, 195, 199, 354.
[134]Gachard,op. cit., II, 195, 199, 354.
[135]Gachard,op. cit., pp. 417, 418.
[135]Gachard,op. cit., pp. 417, 418.
[136]Menéndez Pelayo, Heterodoxos, II, 395.
[136]Menéndez Pelayo, Heterodoxos, II, 395.
[137]In 1608 the see of Cuzco was estimated to be worth 40,000 ducats per annum.—Cabrera, Relaciones, p. 346.
[137]In 1608 the see of Cuzco was estimated to be worth 40,000 ducats per annum.—Cabrera, Relaciones, p. 346.
[138]Salazar de Mendoza, Vida de Fray D. Bartolomé de Carranza y de Miranda, cap.I-VII.—Salazar was a penitentiary of the cathedral of Toledo and wrote this work at the request of Carranza’s successor, the Inquisitor-general Quiroga. It was not printed until Valladares issued an edition in 1788. This I have not seen and my references are to a MS. copy.
[138]Salazar de Mendoza, Vida de Fray D. Bartolomé de Carranza y de Miranda, cap.I-VII.—Salazar was a penitentiary of the cathedral of Toledo and wrote this work at the request of Carranza’s successor, the Inquisitor-general Quiroga. It was not printed until Valladares issued an edition in 1788. This I have not seen and my references are to a MS. copy.
[139]Bzovii Annal. Eccles. ann. 1566, n. 89.—Salazar,op. cit., cap.VIII-X.
[139]Bzovii Annal. Eccles. ann. 1566, n. 89.—Salazar,op. cit., cap.VIII-X.
[140]Salazar, cap.XI.—Coleccion de Documentos, V, 528.
[140]Salazar, cap.XI.—Coleccion de Documentos, V, 528.
[141]Salazar, cap.XII.
[141]Salazar, cap.XII.
[142]Controversia de necessaria Residentia personali Episcoporum et aliorum inferiorum Pastorum. Lugduni, 1550. The first edition was of Venice, 1547; there was a third, Antwerp, 1554, and a reprint as late as 1767, in Madrid.
[142]Controversia de necessaria Residentia personali Episcoporum et aliorum inferiorum Pastorum. Lugduni, 1550. The first edition was of Venice, 1547; there was a third, Antwerp, 1554, and a reprint as late as 1767, in Madrid.
[143]Caballero, Vida de Fray Melchor Cano, p. 624 (Madrid, 1871).
[143]Caballero, Vida de Fray Melchor Cano, p. 624 (Madrid, 1871).
[144]Philip’sconsultaand Cano’sparecerwere printed by Usoz y Rio in his “Reformistas antiguos españoles” (Dos Informaziones, Append. p. 27, Madrid, 1857) and more recently by Caballero, Vida de Melchor Cano, p. 512.
[144]Philip’sconsultaand Cano’sparecerwere printed by Usoz y Rio in his “Reformistas antiguos españoles” (Dos Informaziones, Append. p. 27, Madrid, 1857) and more recently by Caballero, Vida de Melchor Cano, p. 512.
[145]Caballero, pp. 502, 507, 508, 527-9, 530-2, 534-5.
[145]Caballero, pp. 502, 507, 508, 527-9, 530-2, 534-5.
[146]Llorente, Hist. crít. cap.XXXII, Art. 1, n. 3.—Salazar, cap.VIII.—Menéndez Pelayo, II, 378.
[146]Llorente, Hist. crít. cap.XXXII, Art. 1, n. 3.—Salazar, cap.VIII.—Menéndez Pelayo, II, 378.
[147]Schäfer, Beiträge zur Geschichte des spanischen Protestantismus, III, 785-88, 791.The Consideration in question is not, as there stated, No. 65, but No. 54, in both the original Basle edition of “Le cento e dieci divine Considerazioni” (1550) and in the Spanish version of 1558, printed by Usoz y Rio. The mistake is probably that of a copyist, confusingLIVandLXV. The Spanish version seems to have circulated among the little group of heretics in Valladolid.
[147]Schäfer, Beiträge zur Geschichte des spanischen Protestantismus, III, 785-88, 791.
The Consideration in question is not, as there stated, No. 65, but No. 54, in both the original Basle edition of “Le cento e dieci divine Considerazioni” (1550) and in the Spanish version of 1558, printed by Usoz y Rio. The mistake is probably that of a copyist, confusingLIVandLXV. The Spanish version seems to have circulated among the little group of heretics in Valladolid.