[1834]StollCigalest.i.f.1.t.x.f.46.t.xxix.f.170.t.v.f.22.t.iv.f.19. &c.[1835]PlateX.Fig.3.[1836]In Latreille's whole genusPentatoma, including several Fabrician genera, theHemelytraare more substantial than in the subsequent tribes.[1837]See above, p.607.[1838]Ibid. p.600.[1839]My insect, which nearly resembles the Coleopterous genusCerylonLatr., agrees with Latreille's description in all respects, except that it cannot be said to bemembrana nulla apicali.[1840]ChabrierAnalyse, &c. 24.[1841]PlateX.Fig.3.b..[1842]Ibid.c..[1843]Ibid.d..[1844]PlateXXVIII.Fig.23.f´´´is thecoriumandg´´´themembranaof a species ofReduviusF.[1845]PlateXXVIII.Fig.23.[1846]ChabrierAnalyse, &c. 23.[1847]ChabrierSur le Vol des Ins.c. ii. 325—. and 326. Note 1.[1848]See above, p.572—.[1849]PlateXXVIII.Fig.9. a.[1850]See above, p.572.[1851]Ibid. p.560. andPlateXXVIII.Fig.11. a.[1852]PlateIX.Fig.5.[1853]Ibid.Fig.11. 12.g´´.[1854]StollSauterelles à Sabr. t.iv.f.12.t.vi.f.21. &c.[1855]Sur le Vol. des Ins.c. i. 424.[1856]The idea of dividing the wing of an insect into larger areas seems first to have been acted upon inMonogr. Apum Angl.(1801), in which those ofHymenopterawere stated to consist of three portions, viz.Basis,Medium,Apex(i. 211.); which mode of dividing them was at first adopted by M. Latreille (Gen. Crust. et Ins. iii. 226. Note 1.) The same learned author (Ibid. iv. 239.), with regard to theDiptera, made a near approximation to the plan of dividing wings into longitudinal areas, but by the addition of abasalarea, which interrupts the attention to the communication of the areas with theiraxes, he has rendered his system less perfect. Two of his terms—Costal AreaandIntermediate Area, are here adopted; but hisInternalis changed to theAnalArea, for the terminternalbelongs rather to the base of the wing. M. Latreille afterwards relinquished both these plans,N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.i. 248—.[1857]PlateX.andXXVIII.b..i..is the Postcostal Nervure.[1858]Ibid.c..n..is the Anal Nervure.[1859]Ibid.d..[1860]PlateX.Fig.7.h..i..k..[1861]Ibid.Fig.8. 9. 12.a*.[1862]Sur le Vol. des Ins.c. i. 428.[1863]See above, p.600.616.[1864]Vol.II. p.358—. See above, p.559.[1865]Vol.II. p.346—.[1866]JurineHymenopt.19. andt.v.[1867]PlateX.Fig.4.[1868]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.i. 251.[1869]See above, p.564,578,591.[1870]PlateX.h..[1871]Ibid.Fig.4, 11.m´´´.[1872]PlateX.Fig.14.k..[1873]Ibid.Fig.12.k..[1874]Ibid.Fig.8. 9.[1875]JurineHymenopt.t.v. Gen. 47.[1876]PlateX.Fig.4.[1877]Ibid.a.n.,o..[1878]Ibid.m..[1879]Ibid.l..[1880]Ibid.a.[1881]Ibid.o´´´.[1882]PlateII.Fig.1. Comp.Linn. Trans.xi.t.ix.f.1.[1883]PlateX.Fig.5.[1884]Ibid.n.,o.,p..[1885]StollSpectres,t.xviii.f.65.[1886]See above, p.624.[1887]Stoll figuresEmpusaas without them,t.ix.f.35. but? I have a nondesc.Phasma?without them.[1888]Jones inLinn. Trans.ii.t.viii.f.2.[1889]Ibid. f.5.[1890]Jones inLinn. Trans.ii.t.viii.f.7.[1891]Ibid.f.9.[1892]Ibid.f.2, 3, 6-9.[1893]I wonder Mr. Jones's plan of ascertaining the divisions or subgenera of butterflies by the neuration of their wings has never been followed up; it would I think furnish an easy clue for the extrication of the tribes of all theLepidoptera. I mean as subsidiary to more important characters.[1894]PlateX.Fig.6.l.,m..[1895]Ibid.Fig.8.[1896]PlateX.Fig.8. basale., medialf., apicalg..[1897]JurineHymenopt.t.v. Gen. 48.[1898]Ibid.Gen. 47.[1899]Ibid.Gen. 45, 46. Comp.PlateX.Fig.11.[1900]JurineIbid.Gen. 43.[1901]Ibid.t.iv. Gen. 47.[1902]Ibid.t.v. Gen. 40.[1903]Ibid.t.ii. Gen. 2.[1904]This is a remarkable insect belonging toVespaL., related to the hornets (V. Crabro), distinguished by having a semicircular piece taken out of the internal margin of each mandible, so that when these organs are closed there is a circular orifice,—whence the nameCyclostoma.[1905]JurineHymenopt.t.ii. Gen. 2.[1906]Ibid.Ord. ii. Gen. 2.[1907]Ibid.t.iii. Gen. 3.[1908]Ibid.t.v. Gen. 41.[1909]Ibid.t.xii. Gen. 40.[1910]Ibid.t.v. Gen. 39.[1911]Ibid.t.iv. Gen. 29.[1912]Ibid.t.v. Gen. 42.[1913]ThisCynipsinhabits a long polythalamous gall of the bramble.[1914]JurineIbid.t.ii. Gen. 11.[1915]Ibid.Ord. ii. Gen. 1.[1916]Ibid.t.iv. Gen. 23.[1917]Ibid.Gen. 30-32.[1918]Ibid.t.v. Gen. 40.[1919]PlateX.Fig.12, 15.c..[1920]Ibid.Fig.15.f..[1921]Ibid.Fig.12.g..[1922]Ibid.Fig.13.[1923]Ibid.Fig.15. c.[1924]Ibid.d.[1925]Ibid.Fig.14. e.[1926]Leach onEproboscideous Insects,Mem. Wern. Soc.1817.t.xxv.f.3, 5, 8, &c.[1927]Ibid. t.xxvi.f.7, 10, 13.[1928]Insects withshortelytra of course must fold their wings nearer the base than those withlongones.[1929]PlateX.Fig.4.o´´´.[1930]See above, p.611.[1931]See above, p.613, and ChabrierAnalyse, &c. 24.[1932]PlateXXIII.Fig.5.[1933]PlateX.Fig.5.[1934]PlateXXVIII.Fig.22.[1935]See above, p.608—.[1936]StollGrillons,t.iii. c.f.11-13.[1937]Ibid.t.i. c.f.1, 2.[1938]See above, p.636.[1939]See above, p.625.[1940]Ibid. p.635,637. &c.[1941]PlateX.Fig.4, 5. andXXVIII.Fig.21, 22.[1942]PlateX.Fig.6-14.[1943]Ibid.Fig.4, 5. andXXVIII.Fig.21, 22.[1944]PlateX.Fig.4.[1945]Ibid.Fig.5.[1946]PlateX.Fig.6.[1947]Ibid.Fig.8-11.[1948]Ibid.Fig.12-15.[1949]PlateXIV.Fig.4.[1950]Ibid.Fig.2.[1951]InGastropacha quercifolia, &c., amongst theNocturnal Lepidoptera, these sinuses exist, in the upper wingten, and in the lowernine, but without the folds.[1952]PlateXIV.Fig.1.s.[1953]Ibid.Fig.3.[1954]For some uses of hairs, see above. p.399—.[1955]Analyse, 24. He seems to think that certain crooked hairs, in some wings, supply the place of folds.Ibid.[1956]PlateX.Fig.13.[1957]Reaum. iv.t.xxxix.f.4-11.[1958]A portion of the antenna of the insect here mentioned is figuredPlateXII.Fig.23.[1959]De Geer i. 63—.[1960]Reaum. i. 200.[1961]Hoole'sLeeuwenhoek. i. 63—.[1962]De Geer has given 34 figures of different scales (i.t.iii.f.28); and inPlateXXII.Fig.6. a-w. 22 others, collected from Reaumur, are given.[1963]StollSauterelles à Sabre.Pterophylla ocellata t.i. ii.,Cigales,Fulgora laternaria t.i.f.i., andF. serrata t.xxix.f.170.[1964]Ibid.Sauter. de Passage,Locusta Dux t.i. 5.L. carinata t.v. b.f.16.L. cristatat.ix. b.f.30. &c. &c.[1965]PlateXXV.Fig.30.[1966]Scopoli, Hubner.[1967]PlateIII.Fig.1.[1968]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.viii. 257.[1969]See above, p.303.[1970]Sepp. I. i.t.vii.f.6.[1971]RœmerGenera t.xxii.f.2.[1972]Sepp I. iii.t.ii.f.7.[1973]Ibid. i.t.vi.f.7.[1974]Rœmerubi supr. t.xiv.f.1.[1975]Platesf.,r.,d†.[1976]See above, p.546—.[1977]Ibid.131—.[1978]Vol.II. p.307.[1979]De Geer i.t.xx.f.11.[1980]Règne Animal.iii. 546.[1981]PlateXXVII.Fig.44, 45.[1982]Vol.II. p.312,363,365.[1983]See above, p.546—.[1984]Anatom. Compar.i. 453.[1985]See above, p.308.[1986]PlateXXVII.Fig.18, 19.[1987]Mr. Montague describes the legs ofNycteribia, asdorsal(Linn. Trans.xi. 13); but Dr. Leach calls themlateral(Samouelle, 303).[1988]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.xxviii. 247.[1989]PlateXXIII.Fig.4.[1990]PlateXXVII.Fig.58. M. Savigny affirms that these insects cannot have, and really have not, but one pair to each segment; only that the segments are alternately membranous and shelly, and that the former are concealed under the latter (Anim. sans Vertebr.I. i. 44.): but,pace tanti viri, I cannot discover that anysutureseparates these portions from each other: so that, admitting his theory, they must be regarded as two segments soldered together.[1991]It is by this arrangement of the legs thatPachysomais principally distinguished, as a subgenus, fromScarabæusMcL.[1992]See above, p.37.[1993]Monogr. Ap. Angl.i.t.xi.Apis**. d. 2. α.f.18. ii. 296—.[1994]Oliv.Ins.68.t.i.f.8.[1995]Ibid.n. 6.t.iv.f.22.[1996]See above, p.305—.[1997]This variety appears to differ very little from theCurculio imperialisof Fabricius and Olivier, except in the remarkable hairiness of its legs.[1998]Vol.II. p.563.[1999]Oliv.Ins.n. 67.t.xx.f.156.[2000]See above, p.591. Some physiologists have been of opinion, that inbirds, what is called thethighshould properly be denominated thetibia, and that this last is really thetarsus. Illiger,Terminologie, 184. § 185. n. 1246.[2001]PlatesXIV.XV.XXVII.p.[2002]PlateXV.Fig.1.p´´,r´´.[2003]PlateXXVII.Fig.27.[2004]L. Dufour,Descr. des six Arachn.&c.:Annales Generales, &c. 1820. 19.t.lxix.f.7.d.[2005]PlateXIV.XV.XXVII.q´´.[2006]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.xvi. 195. xxvi. 157.[2007]PlateXXVII.Fig.12. b.[2008]PlateXXVII.Fig.20.q´´.[2009]Ibid.Fig.28.[2010]PlateXIV.XV.XXVII.r´´.[2011]See above, p.591,662.[2012]Vol.II. p.314—.[2013]Linn. Trans.xii.t.xxi.f.12.[2014]StollSpectres t.xvi.f.58, 59.[2015]Ibid.t.xviii.f.65.[2016]StollSpectres t.vii.f.25.[2017]Ibid. t.viii.f.30.[2018]Ibid. ubi supr.[2019]Ibid. t.x.f.40.[2020]PlateXIV.Fig.5. This appearance of scales on the thighs is principally confined to this tribe.[2021]PlateXXVII.Fig.23.[2022]Linn. Trans.xii.t.xxii.f.16.[2023]PlateXIV.Fig.5, andXXVII.Fig.15.r´´´.[2024]PlatesXIV.XV.XXVII.s´´.[2025]PlateXXVII.Fig.21.s´´´.M. Savigny (Anim. sans Vertèbr.1. i. 46. Noteb.) seems to think that this structure obtains in all hisApiropods; viz. the OctopodAptera,Arachnida, andMyriapoda: but it seems to meevidentonly in the two tribes mentioned in the text.[2026]PlateXXVII.Fig.6, 16, 17.t´´´.[2027]PlateXXVII.Fig.15.r´´´.[2028]Ibid.Fig.11.r´´´.[2029]Ibid.Fig.10.t´´´.[2030]PlateXXVII.Fig.8.Thigh.a. Protuberance. b. Semicircular cavity, c. Ridge.Fig.9.Tibia.a. Central cavity. b. Ridge. c. Exterior cavity.[2031]Ibid.Fig.6. a.[2032]Ibid.Fig.7. a.[2033]Ibid.Fig.15. Thigh ofLocustaLeach, a. Sinus in which the condyle of the tibia works.Fig.16. Tibia of Do. aa. Lateral condyles. b. Intermediate one.[2034]StollPunaises,t.x.f.67.t.xvi.f.114.[2035]StollPunaises, t.ii.f.14.t.viii.f.54.t.xxviii.f.201.PlateXV.Fig.2.[2036]See above, p.671.[2037]Oliv.Ins.n. 66.t.iii.f.12. CompareScarabæus longimanus,Ibidn. 3.t.iv.f.27.[2038]StollPunaises,t.iii.f.20.[2039]PlateXXVII.Fig.31.[2040]See above, p.306—.[2041]Oliv.Ins.n. 68.t.i.f.8. comp. n. 67.t.xii.f.83. andPlateXII.Fig.25.a.[2042]Vol.II. p.365. andPlateXV.Fig.5. 6.[2043]See above, p. 433, Note1239. and 404, Note1172.[2044]PlateXIV.Fig.5.[2045]It is remarkable that in this tribeallthe legs may be calledraptorious, though the thighs are not incrassated, for they are armed with a double series or more of fine long spurs, which enable them to catch and retain their prey.[2046]PlateXXVII.Fig.35.v´´´.Philos. Trans.1816.t.xix.f.8, 9. See above,Vol.II. p.331.[2047]See above, p.591,667, &c.[2048]Règne Animal, iii. 191. I have never had an opportunity to consult Bonelli'sObserv. Entomolog.on the genusCarabusL. in the Memoirs of the Turin Academy.[2049]PlateXV.Fig.6.v´´´.[2050]CoquebertIllustr. Ic.iii.t.xxi.f.3. D.[2051]PlateXXVII.Fig.29.v´´´.[2052]Most of Latreille's genera of ants are confirmed by differences in their spurs. ThusFormicais 1:1:1;Ponera1:2:2 with the internal intermediate one pectinated:Myrmica1:2:2 with all symmetrical, &c.[2053]PlateXXVII.Fig.29.v´´´.
[1834]StollCigalest.i.f.1.t.x.f.46.t.xxix.f.170.t.v.f.22.t.iv.f.19. &c.
[1835]PlateX.Fig.3.
[1836]In Latreille's whole genusPentatoma, including several Fabrician genera, theHemelytraare more substantial than in the subsequent tribes.
[1837]See above, p.607.
[1838]Ibid. p.600.
[1839]My insect, which nearly resembles the Coleopterous genusCerylonLatr., agrees with Latreille's description in all respects, except that it cannot be said to bemembrana nulla apicali.
[1840]ChabrierAnalyse, &c. 24.
[1841]PlateX.Fig.3.b..
[1842]Ibid.c..
[1843]Ibid.d..
[1844]PlateXXVIII.Fig.23.f´´´is thecoriumandg´´´themembranaof a species ofReduviusF.
[1845]PlateXXVIII.Fig.23.
[1846]ChabrierAnalyse, &c. 23.
[1847]ChabrierSur le Vol des Ins.c. ii. 325—. and 326. Note 1.
[1848]See above, p.572—.
[1849]PlateXXVIII.Fig.9. a.
[1850]See above, p.572.
[1851]Ibid. p.560. andPlateXXVIII.Fig.11. a.
[1852]PlateIX.Fig.5.
[1853]Ibid.Fig.11. 12.g´´.
[1854]StollSauterelles à Sabr. t.iv.f.12.t.vi.f.21. &c.
[1855]Sur le Vol. des Ins.c. i. 424.
[1856]The idea of dividing the wing of an insect into larger areas seems first to have been acted upon inMonogr. Apum Angl.(1801), in which those ofHymenopterawere stated to consist of three portions, viz.Basis,Medium,Apex(i. 211.); which mode of dividing them was at first adopted by M. Latreille (Gen. Crust. et Ins. iii. 226. Note 1.) The same learned author (Ibid. iv. 239.), with regard to theDiptera, made a near approximation to the plan of dividing wings into longitudinal areas, but by the addition of abasalarea, which interrupts the attention to the communication of the areas with theiraxes, he has rendered his system less perfect. Two of his terms—Costal AreaandIntermediate Area, are here adopted; but hisInternalis changed to theAnalArea, for the terminternalbelongs rather to the base of the wing. M. Latreille afterwards relinquished both these plans,N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.i. 248—.
[1857]PlateX.andXXVIII.b..i..is the Postcostal Nervure.
[1858]Ibid.c..n..is the Anal Nervure.
[1859]Ibid.d..
[1860]PlateX.Fig.7.h..i..k..
[1861]Ibid.Fig.8. 9. 12.a*.
[1862]Sur le Vol. des Ins.c. i. 428.
[1863]See above, p.600.616.
[1864]Vol.II. p.358—. See above, p.559.
[1865]Vol.II. p.346—.
[1866]JurineHymenopt.19. andt.v.
[1867]PlateX.Fig.4.
[1868]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.i. 251.
[1869]See above, p.564,578,591.
[1870]PlateX.h..
[1871]Ibid.Fig.4, 11.m´´´.
[1872]PlateX.Fig.14.k..
[1873]Ibid.Fig.12.k..
[1874]Ibid.Fig.8. 9.
[1875]JurineHymenopt.t.v. Gen. 47.
[1876]PlateX.Fig.4.
[1877]Ibid.a.n.,o..
[1878]Ibid.m..
[1879]Ibid.l..
[1880]Ibid.a.
[1881]Ibid.o´´´.
[1882]PlateII.Fig.1. Comp.Linn. Trans.xi.t.ix.f.1.
[1883]PlateX.Fig.5.
[1884]Ibid.n.,o.,p..
[1885]StollSpectres,t.xviii.f.65.
[1886]See above, p.624.
[1887]Stoll figuresEmpusaas without them,t.ix.f.35. but? I have a nondesc.Phasma?without them.
[1888]Jones inLinn. Trans.ii.t.viii.f.2.
[1889]Ibid. f.5.
[1890]Jones inLinn. Trans.ii.t.viii.f.7.
[1891]Ibid.f.9.
[1892]Ibid.f.2, 3, 6-9.
[1893]I wonder Mr. Jones's plan of ascertaining the divisions or subgenera of butterflies by the neuration of their wings has never been followed up; it would I think furnish an easy clue for the extrication of the tribes of all theLepidoptera. I mean as subsidiary to more important characters.
[1894]PlateX.Fig.6.l.,m..
[1895]Ibid.Fig.8.
[1896]PlateX.Fig.8. basale., medialf., apicalg..
[1897]JurineHymenopt.t.v. Gen. 48.
[1898]Ibid.Gen. 47.
[1899]Ibid.Gen. 45, 46. Comp.PlateX.Fig.11.
[1900]JurineIbid.Gen. 43.
[1901]Ibid.t.iv. Gen. 47.
[1902]Ibid.t.v. Gen. 40.
[1903]Ibid.t.ii. Gen. 2.
[1904]This is a remarkable insect belonging toVespaL., related to the hornets (V. Crabro), distinguished by having a semicircular piece taken out of the internal margin of each mandible, so that when these organs are closed there is a circular orifice,—whence the nameCyclostoma.
[1905]JurineHymenopt.t.ii. Gen. 2.
[1906]Ibid.Ord. ii. Gen. 2.
[1907]Ibid.t.iii. Gen. 3.
[1908]Ibid.t.v. Gen. 41.
[1909]Ibid.t.xii. Gen. 40.
[1910]Ibid.t.v. Gen. 39.
[1911]Ibid.t.iv. Gen. 29.
[1912]Ibid.t.v. Gen. 42.
[1913]ThisCynipsinhabits a long polythalamous gall of the bramble.
[1914]JurineIbid.t.ii. Gen. 11.
[1915]Ibid.Ord. ii. Gen. 1.
[1916]Ibid.t.iv. Gen. 23.
[1917]Ibid.Gen. 30-32.
[1918]Ibid.t.v. Gen. 40.
[1919]PlateX.Fig.12, 15.c..
[1920]Ibid.Fig.15.f..
[1921]Ibid.Fig.12.g..
[1922]Ibid.Fig.13.
[1923]Ibid.Fig.15. c.
[1924]Ibid.d.
[1925]Ibid.Fig.14. e.
[1926]Leach onEproboscideous Insects,Mem. Wern. Soc.1817.t.xxv.f.3, 5, 8, &c.
[1927]Ibid. t.xxvi.f.7, 10, 13.
[1928]Insects withshortelytra of course must fold their wings nearer the base than those withlongones.
[1929]PlateX.Fig.4.o´´´.
[1930]See above, p.611.
[1931]See above, p.613, and ChabrierAnalyse, &c. 24.
[1932]PlateXXIII.Fig.5.
[1933]PlateX.Fig.5.
[1934]PlateXXVIII.Fig.22.
[1935]See above, p.608—.
[1936]StollGrillons,t.iii. c.f.11-13.
[1937]Ibid.t.i. c.f.1, 2.
[1938]See above, p.636.
[1939]See above, p.625.
[1940]Ibid. p.635,637. &c.
[1941]PlateX.Fig.4, 5. andXXVIII.Fig.21, 22.
[1942]PlateX.Fig.6-14.
[1943]Ibid.Fig.4, 5. andXXVIII.Fig.21, 22.
[1944]PlateX.Fig.4.
[1945]Ibid.Fig.5.
[1946]PlateX.Fig.6.
[1947]Ibid.Fig.8-11.
[1948]Ibid.Fig.12-15.
[1949]PlateXIV.Fig.4.
[1950]Ibid.Fig.2.
[1951]InGastropacha quercifolia, &c., amongst theNocturnal Lepidoptera, these sinuses exist, in the upper wingten, and in the lowernine, but without the folds.
[1952]PlateXIV.Fig.1.s.
[1953]Ibid.Fig.3.
[1954]For some uses of hairs, see above. p.399—.
[1955]Analyse, 24. He seems to think that certain crooked hairs, in some wings, supply the place of folds.Ibid.
[1956]PlateX.Fig.13.
[1957]Reaum. iv.t.xxxix.f.4-11.
[1958]A portion of the antenna of the insect here mentioned is figuredPlateXII.Fig.23.
[1959]De Geer i. 63—.
[1960]Reaum. i. 200.
[1961]Hoole'sLeeuwenhoek. i. 63—.
[1962]De Geer has given 34 figures of different scales (i.t.iii.f.28); and inPlateXXII.Fig.6. a-w. 22 others, collected from Reaumur, are given.
[1963]StollSauterelles à Sabre.Pterophylla ocellata t.i. ii.,Cigales,Fulgora laternaria t.i.f.i., andF. serrata t.xxix.f.170.
[1964]Ibid.Sauter. de Passage,Locusta Dux t.i. 5.L. carinata t.v. b.f.16.L. cristatat.ix. b.f.30. &c. &c.
[1965]PlateXXV.Fig.30.
[1966]Scopoli, Hubner.
[1967]PlateIII.Fig.1.
[1968]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.viii. 257.
[1969]See above, p.303.
[1970]Sepp. I. i.t.vii.f.6.
[1971]RœmerGenera t.xxii.f.2.
[1972]Sepp I. iii.t.ii.f.7.
[1973]Ibid. i.t.vi.f.7.
[1974]Rœmerubi supr. t.xiv.f.1.
[1975]Platesf.,r.,d†.
[1976]See above, p.546—.
[1977]Ibid.131—.
[1978]Vol.II. p.307.
[1979]De Geer i.t.xx.f.11.
[1980]Règne Animal.iii. 546.
[1981]PlateXXVII.Fig.44, 45.
[1982]Vol.II. p.312,363,365.
[1983]See above, p.546—.
[1984]Anatom. Compar.i. 453.
[1985]See above, p.308.
[1986]PlateXXVII.Fig.18, 19.
[1987]Mr. Montague describes the legs ofNycteribia, asdorsal(Linn. Trans.xi. 13); but Dr. Leach calls themlateral(Samouelle, 303).
[1988]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.xxviii. 247.
[1989]PlateXXIII.Fig.4.
[1990]PlateXXVII.Fig.58. M. Savigny affirms that these insects cannot have, and really have not, but one pair to each segment; only that the segments are alternately membranous and shelly, and that the former are concealed under the latter (Anim. sans Vertebr.I. i. 44.): but,pace tanti viri, I cannot discover that anysutureseparates these portions from each other: so that, admitting his theory, they must be regarded as two segments soldered together.
[1991]It is by this arrangement of the legs thatPachysomais principally distinguished, as a subgenus, fromScarabæusMcL.
[1992]See above, p.37.
[1993]Monogr. Ap. Angl.i.t.xi.Apis**. d. 2. α.f.18. ii. 296—.
[1994]Oliv.Ins.68.t.i.f.8.
[1995]Ibid.n. 6.t.iv.f.22.
[1996]See above, p.305—.
[1997]This variety appears to differ very little from theCurculio imperialisof Fabricius and Olivier, except in the remarkable hairiness of its legs.
[1998]Vol.II. p.563.
[1999]Oliv.Ins.n. 67.t.xx.f.156.
[2000]See above, p.591. Some physiologists have been of opinion, that inbirds, what is called thethighshould properly be denominated thetibia, and that this last is really thetarsus. Illiger,Terminologie, 184. § 185. n. 1246.
[2001]PlatesXIV.XV.XXVII.p.
[2002]PlateXV.Fig.1.p´´,r´´.
[2003]PlateXXVII.Fig.27.
[2004]L. Dufour,Descr. des six Arachn.&c.:Annales Generales, &c. 1820. 19.t.lxix.f.7.d.
[2005]PlateXIV.XV.XXVII.q´´.
[2006]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.xvi. 195. xxvi. 157.
[2007]PlateXXVII.Fig.12. b.
[2008]PlateXXVII.Fig.20.q´´.
[2009]Ibid.Fig.28.
[2010]PlateXIV.XV.XXVII.r´´.
[2011]See above, p.591,662.
[2012]Vol.II. p.314—.
[2013]Linn. Trans.xii.t.xxi.f.12.
[2014]StollSpectres t.xvi.f.58, 59.
[2015]Ibid.t.xviii.f.65.
[2016]StollSpectres t.vii.f.25.
[2017]Ibid. t.viii.f.30.
[2018]Ibid. ubi supr.
[2019]Ibid. t.x.f.40.
[2020]PlateXIV.Fig.5. This appearance of scales on the thighs is principally confined to this tribe.
[2021]PlateXXVII.Fig.23.
[2022]Linn. Trans.xii.t.xxii.f.16.
[2023]PlateXIV.Fig.5, andXXVII.Fig.15.r´´´.
[2024]PlatesXIV.XV.XXVII.s´´.
[2025]PlateXXVII.Fig.21.s´´´.M. Savigny (Anim. sans Vertèbr.1. i. 46. Noteb.) seems to think that this structure obtains in all hisApiropods; viz. the OctopodAptera,Arachnida, andMyriapoda: but it seems to meevidentonly in the two tribes mentioned in the text.
[2026]PlateXXVII.Fig.6, 16, 17.t´´´.
[2027]PlateXXVII.Fig.15.r´´´.
[2028]Ibid.Fig.11.r´´´.
[2029]Ibid.Fig.10.t´´´.
[2030]PlateXXVII.Fig.8.Thigh.a. Protuberance. b. Semicircular cavity, c. Ridge.Fig.9.Tibia.a. Central cavity. b. Ridge. c. Exterior cavity.
[2031]Ibid.Fig.6. a.
[2032]Ibid.Fig.7. a.
[2033]Ibid.Fig.15. Thigh ofLocustaLeach, a. Sinus in which the condyle of the tibia works.Fig.16. Tibia of Do. aa. Lateral condyles. b. Intermediate one.
[2034]StollPunaises,t.x.f.67.t.xvi.f.114.
[2035]StollPunaises, t.ii.f.14.t.viii.f.54.t.xxviii.f.201.PlateXV.Fig.2.
[2036]See above, p.671.
[2037]Oliv.Ins.n. 66.t.iii.f.12. CompareScarabæus longimanus,Ibidn. 3.t.iv.f.27.
[2038]StollPunaises,t.iii.f.20.
[2039]PlateXXVII.Fig.31.
[2040]See above, p.306—.
[2041]Oliv.Ins.n. 68.t.i.f.8. comp. n. 67.t.xii.f.83. andPlateXII.Fig.25.a.
[2042]Vol.II. p.365. andPlateXV.Fig.5. 6.
[2043]See above, p. 433, Note1239. and 404, Note1172.
[2044]PlateXIV.Fig.5.
[2045]It is remarkable that in this tribeallthe legs may be calledraptorious, though the thighs are not incrassated, for they are armed with a double series or more of fine long spurs, which enable them to catch and retain their prey.
[2046]PlateXXVII.Fig.35.v´´´.Philos. Trans.1816.t.xix.f.8, 9. See above,Vol.II. p.331.
[2047]See above, p.591,667, &c.
[2048]Règne Animal, iii. 191. I have never had an opportunity to consult Bonelli'sObserv. Entomolog.on the genusCarabusL. in the Memoirs of the Turin Academy.
[2049]PlateXV.Fig.6.v´´´.
[2050]CoquebertIllustr. Ic.iii.t.xxi.f.3. D.
[2051]PlateXXVII.Fig.29.v´´´.
[2052]Most of Latreille's genera of ants are confirmed by differences in their spurs. ThusFormicais 1:1:1;Ponera1:2:2 with the internal intermediate one pectinated:Myrmica1:2:2 with all symmetrical, &c.
[2053]PlateXXVII.Fig.29.v´´´.