[801]Vol.II.LetterXXII.Vol.III.LettersXXXIV.-XXXVI.[802]Vol.II. p.280,295—,306,310—. &c.[803]Philos. Trans.1818. 174.t.viii.f.4-6.[804]See above, p.150—.[805]Schmetterl.105.[806]Philos. Trans.1819. 172, 174, 187.[807]Anat. Comp.i. 90.[808]Philos. Trans.1819. 175.[809]Cuv.ubi supr.90—.[810]Cuv.Ibid.i. 89—.[811]See above, p.85.[812]LyonetAnat.t.iv.f.3.[813]Ibid.93—.[814]Cuv.Anat. Comp.i. 134.[815]ChabrierSur le Vol des Ins.c. i. 445.[816]PlateXXI.Fig.6.a.[817]De Geer iv.t.xv.f.11.m n, o p.[818]LyonetAnat.93.[819]LyonetAnat.t.xiii.f.1, 2.[820]RamdohrAnat.t.v.f.1.e.f.3.[821]Chabr.ubi supr.440—.[822]Ibid.442, &c.[823]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.xxii. 80.[824]Vol.III. p.663,670. See above p.21.[825]ChabrierSur le Vol des Ins.c. i. 446.[826]Vol.III. p.411.[827]Ubi supr.437, 439.[828]PlateXXII.Fig.11, 12. c. Chabrierubi supr.c. iii.t.xi. viii.f.9. S. D.i, k.c. i. 440—.[829]PlateXXII.Fig.11, 12. c. ChabrierSur le Vol des Ins.c. iii.t.xi. viii.f.9. S. D.i, k.c. i. 440—.[830]Cuv.Anat. Comp.i. 94—.[831]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.xxii. 80.[832]Ubi supr.101—.[833]Vol.I. p.67.[834]Anat. Comp.i. 432—.[835]Anat.t.vii.f.2. left hand.[836]Ibid.right hand.[837]Ibid.115—.[838]Cuv.ubi supr.[839]Vol.III. p.135—.[840]Anat. Comp.i. 447.[841]Vol.III. p.366.PlateXXVII.Fig.1, 4. n´.[842]Ibid.Fig.3. n´.[843]PlateXXVII.Fig.1.a.[844]Vol.III. p.367—,541,584.PlateXXII.Fig.7. Cuv.ubi supr.448.[845]PlateXXVII.Fig.5.a.[846]Anat. Comp.i. 136.[847]De Geer iv.t.xv.f.11.o, p.[848]Marcel de SerresComparaison, &c.3—.[849]Ibid.4.[850]Ibid.5.[851]PlateXXII.Fig.11.h´.[852]Vol.III. p.579.[853]PlateXXII.Fig.6.Vol.III. p.585—.[854]Cuv.Anat. Comp.i. 436.PlateXXI.Fig.6.[855]Ibid.a, b.LyonetAnat.37.[856]Cuv.ubi supr.458—.Vol.III. p.368,378,382.[857]Cuv.ubi supr.459.[858]Chabr.Sur le Vol des Ins.c. i. 441.[859]Chabr.Sur le Vol des Ins.c. i. 415.[860]Ibid.[861]Ibid.c. iii. 344.t.viii.f.8, 9.[862]Ibid.c. i. 440.[863]Ibid.444.[864]Ibid.445. c. iii. 359.[865]Ibid.c. ii. 332. c. iii. 359.[866]Ibid.c. i. 445.[867]Ibid.c. iv. 78.[868]Chabr.Sur le Vol des Ins.c. i. 415, 442. c. iv. 80.[869]Ibid.c. i. 442.[870]Ibid.439—.[871]ChabrierAnalyse, 28. The latter part of this passage is copied from a MS. note of the author's in my copy.—W. K.[872]ChabrierAnalyse, Ibid.Sur le Vol des Ins.c. i. 445.Vol.III. p.617.[873]Analyseubi supr.[874]Sur le Vol des Ins.c. i. 448, c. ii. 336.[875]Vol.III. p.579.—[876]Chabr.Ibid.c. i. 443. ii. 316, 332.[877]Chabr.Sur le Vol des Ins.c. ii. 333.[878]Ibid.332.PlateXXII.Fig.11, 12. c. A cupuliform process is also observable at the side of the metaphragm. Ibid.Fig.10. a.[879]Chabr.Ibid.c. iv.t.xi.-4.f.14.[880]Ibid.c. i. 445. xi.-8.f.8, 9.[881]Chabr.Sur le Vol des Ins.c. ii. 336. note 1.Vol.III. p.292—.[882]Chabr.Ibid.c. i. 447.[883]See above, p.66—.[884]See above, p.73—.[885]ChabrierSur le Vol des Ins.c. i.Addend.298.[886]See above, p.178—.[887]Vol.III. p.700—.[888]Chabr.ubi supr.c. i. 422.[889]Cuv.Anat. Comp.i. 451.[890]Chabr.Analyse25.Sur le Vol des Ins.c. i. 423, 452.Addend.301.[891]See above, p.83.[892]LyonetAnat.t.xiii.f.1, 2.[893]LyonetAnat.t.xiii. 188—, 584.[894]Ibid.189.[895]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.xxx. 421.[896]Arachnid.9.t.i.f.7.r.[897]Ibid.o.[898]Ibid.10.[899]Arachnid.45.t.iii.f.31.m, n, q, r, t.[900]Vol.II. p.309—.[901]MouffetTheatr.275.[902]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.xxviii. 249.[903]Phil. Acc. of Works of Nat.144.[904]Clark inLinn. Trans.iii. 309.[905]Fn. Suec.1799.[906]Anatomy of Expression in Painting, 170.[907]BonnetŒuvr.ii. 124.[908]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.xxii. 81.[909]1 Cor. xv. 50—.[910]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.ubi. supr.[911]Swamm.Bibl. Nat.t.xviii.f.2.l, m, n, o.Reaum. v.t.xxix.f.7.m, n, o, p, q.[912]Vol.II.LetterXXVI.[913]De Bombyc.5.[914]Reaum. ii. 185—.[915]Vol.II. p.186.[916]t.vi.f.3.[917]These directions for dissecting are chiefly taken from Swammerdam,Lifexiv.— and LyonetAnat.7—.[918]Ps.civ. 29.[919]Hist. Animal.l. viii. c. 27.[920]The Principles of Botany and of Vegetable Physiology, § 310-353.[921]Dr. Leach, from a communication of Sir Joseph Banks, has given a very interesting history of a spider which, having lost five of its legs, from a web-weaver had become a hunter; these legs it afterwards reproduced, though shorter than the others.Linn. Trans.xi. 393. Comp.N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.ii. 282.[922]Vol.I. p.55—.[923]Vol.II. p.166—.[924]HuberAbeillesii. 409.[925]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.i. 42.[926]De Geer i. 72—.[927]Reaum. iv. 342.[928]Naturf.xii. 224.t.v.f.8.[929]Naturf.xvi.t.iv.f.1-3.[930]HuberFourmis, 174. note 1.[931]Vol.II. p.365.[932]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.i. 42.[933]De Geer vi. 75. Latr.Hist. Nat.xiv. 371.[934]JacquinCollectan.iii.t.xxiii.f.7.[935]De Geerubi supr.[936]Dr. Bevan asserts (The Honey-bee, 197) "that we have no evidence that pollen constitutes any part of the food ofadultbees." Had he consulted Reaumur (v. 418) he would have found that this great man examined the proceedings of a bee with a magnifying glass, and distinctly saw her devour very deliberately the masses of pollen on her hind legs. He says also (Ibid. 419.) that if the stomach and intestines are opened, they will be found filled with that substance.[937]SchirachHist.&c. 54. Reaum. v. 713.N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.i. 42.[938]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.i. 42. SchirachHist.56.[939]Latr.Hist. Nat.xiv. 163—.N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.iv. 134—.[940]Œuvr.ii. 48—.[941]Lesser L. ii. 121.[942]Synops. Meth. Fung.687.g.63.n.1, 2.[943]Ibid.4.g.1.n.4.[944]Vol.III. p.335—.[945]Vol.I. p.267—.[946]Mon. Ap. Angl.ii. 111.Linn. Trans.xi. 90—.[947]Reaum. ii. 439.[948]Ibid.415. Mouffet 57.[949]Hist. Ins.Præf. xv.[950]Cat. Cant.137.[951]See above, p.162—.[952]Reaum. vi. 306.[953]Fn. Suec.1626.[954]Linn. Trans.iii. 26.[955]De Geer i. 608. Linné has made a mistake with regard to the Ichneumon here alluded to, in calling De Geer's saltatorious IchneumonI. Muscarum, and referring for it tot.xxxii.f.19, 20 of that author; whereas the Ichneumon that preys upon the aphidivorous flies does not jump, and is figured by De Geer 605.t.xxxiv.f.26-29. The jumping one feeds on the larva of aCoccinella.[956]VallisnieriLettere, &c. 80.[957]Reaum. vi. 296—.[958]Linné evidently has described another species underI. Ovulorum, inFn. Suec.1644.[959]De Geer i. 593—.[960]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.vi. 10.[961]Geoffr.Hist. Ins. Par.ii. 361.[962]Linn. Trans.v. 102—.[963]PlateXX.Fig.22.a.[964]De Geer ii. 850—.[965]Reaum. ii. 444—.[966]De Geer ii. 863—.[967]PanzerFn. Germ. Init.lxxii. 4.[968]De Geer, i. 583—. ii. 822—. 907.[969]Reaum. vi. 312.[970]Leeuwenh.Epist.Oct. 6, 1700. De Geer ii. 869.[971]Ibid.i. 604.[972]Rai.Hist. Ins.259—.[973]See above, p.217; andVol.I. p.356.[974]Ibid.348.[975]Reaum. vi. 303—.[976]Reaum. ii. 454—.[977]De Geer ii. 879—.[978]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.xvii. 513.[979]De Geer vi. 411—.[980]Vol.I. p.172.[981]Linn. Trans.iv. 236.[982]Vol.I. p.50—.170—. Since that Volume of the present Edition was printed, Say's account of the Hessian Fly has been met with, where he distinguishes it by the above name. (Journal of the Acad. of Nat. Sciences of Philadelphia1817.) The Ichneumon he callsCeraphron Destructor.[983]De Geer, i. 605. This, as before observed, is not theI. Muscarumof Linné; but it ought to have that name, and the other instead to be named,I. Coccinellæ.[984]Ent. Carn.760, 761.[985]De Geer i. 587.[986]Ibid.ii. 876.[987]Reaum. ii. 417—.[988]Reaum. ii. 419—.[989]De Geer i. 583—.[990]Ibid.ii. 884.[991]See above, p.164.[992]Reaum. vi. 312.[993]Vol.I. p.99.[994]De Geerubi supr.[995]Ibid.883.[996]Linn. Fn. Suec.1609.[997]Reaum. ii. 443. De Geer i. 196—, 550—. vi. 24.[998]Reaum. ii. 440—.[999]Vol.I. p.99.[1000]Ibid.84,97.[1001]Vol.I. p. 163. note260.Vol.III. p. 162. note379.[1002]De Geer v. 8—.[1003]Naturf.xxiii.t.i.f.8.[1004]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.xx. 110—.[1005]Ent. Carn.1052-4.[1006]Histerparticularly.[1007]De Geer vii. 126—.[1008]De Geer vii. 144—.[1009]LamarckAnim. sans Vert.iii. 196.[1010]De Geer ii. 554—. PictetBibliotheq. Univers.num. ult.[1011]The existence of this animal has been satisfactorily ascertained by M. de Blainville, who had a specimen, extracted from a human body, sent him by M. Girard, a surgeon of Guadaloupe.[1012]De Geer ii. 555.[1013]Mattheyubi supr.[1014]Philos. Trans.1823. 8.t.i. ii.[1015]De Geer ii. 556.[1016]GouldAnts, 63.[1017]De Geer i. 551.[1018]Rösel I. iii. 20.[1019]Latr.Fourmis, 373.[1020]De Geer ii.ubi supr.t.xiv.f.12-14.[1021]Ibid.i. 553.[1022]Ibid. ii. 556.t.xiv.f.12, 13.[1023]Ubi supra.[1024]De Geer i. 553.[1025]Vol.III. p. 15. note21.[1026]Ibid.58—. See above, p.26.[1027]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.xxx. 584.[1028]Hor. Entomolog.37.[1029]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.xxx. 584—.[1030]Cuv.Anat. Comp.ii. 362.[1031]Syst. Nat.i. 535. BonnetŒuvr.ii. 36.[1032]Ibid.[1033]Vol.II. p.162.[1034]LehmannDe Sens. Extern. Animal. Exsang.22—.[1035]Ibid.De Antenn. Insect.ii. 79.[1036]Vol.III. p.43—.[1037]See above, p.1—.[1038]Vol.III. p.46.[1039]De Antenn. Insect.ii. 65—.[1040]De Antenn. Insect.ii. 42.[1041]Ibid.26.[1042]See above, p.218.[1043]Vol.II. p.64,198—.[1044]Vol.III. p.319—.[1045]Philos. Trans.1820. 314.[1046]LehmannDe Usu Antenn.ii. 66—.[1047]Vol.I. p.48,110.[1048]Compare what is said above (p.141) with respect to bees.[1049]See, for further arguments, Lehmannubi supr.c. ix.[1050]Marcel de Serres thinks he has discovered an organ of hearing in most insects, but he does not state its situation.Mém. du Mus.1819. 99. Treviranus, with regard to theBlattina, suspects it to be situated between the eye and the base of the antennæ, perhaps alluding to the spot noticed above. (Vol.III. p.505.) Carus, who mentions the above, says, "Is it not reasonable to ask if the sense of hearing may not reside in the membrane which connects the antennæ with the head?"Introd. to Comp. Anat.i. 80—.[1051]LehmannDe Sens. Extern. Anim. Exsang.De Olfactu.[1052]Cuv.Anat. Comp.ii. 675.[1053]Ubi supr.[1054]Marcel de Serres says they are connected withtestesseated in the trunk (Mem. du Mus.1819. 95); but Treviranus denies this (Arachnid.36—.t.iv.f.33).[1055]Vol.II. p.361—. III. p.544—.[1056]LehmannDe Sens. Extern. &c.De Olfactu.[1057]Lehmannubi supr.&c. 27.[1058]Ibid.andDe Usu Antenn.ii. 24—. Cuv.Anat. Comp.ii. 675.[1059]LehmannDe Usu Antenn.ii. 28.[1060]Ibid.31.[1061]Ibid.35—.[1062]Vol.III. p.475—.[1063]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.xxiii. 210.[1064]Ubi supr.[1065]See above, p.63. SprengelCommentar.14—.[1066]HuberAbeillesii. 375—. Dr. Bevan in his interesting work on theHoney-Beeadopts the opinion here stated with respect to the organ of smell in that animal. 265, 303.[1067]Vol.I. p.352—.[1068]Vol.III. p.480—.[1069]Vol.III. p.454—.[1070]Introd. to Comp. Anat.i. 76. The part he alludes to, is figuredPlateVI.Fig.4. a. g´.[1071]Ibid.This membrane likewise represents the Nose and Rhinarium in that fly.[1072]Vol.III. p.481.[1073]Cuv.Anat. Comp.ii. 682—.
[801]Vol.II.LetterXXII.Vol.III.LettersXXXIV.-XXXVI.
[802]Vol.II. p.280,295—,306,310—. &c.
[803]Philos. Trans.1818. 174.t.viii.f.4-6.
[804]See above, p.150—.
[805]Schmetterl.105.
[806]Philos. Trans.1819. 172, 174, 187.
[807]Anat. Comp.i. 90.
[808]Philos. Trans.1819. 175.
[809]Cuv.ubi supr.90—.
[810]Cuv.Ibid.i. 89—.
[811]See above, p.85.
[812]LyonetAnat.t.iv.f.3.
[813]Ibid.93—.
[814]Cuv.Anat. Comp.i. 134.
[815]ChabrierSur le Vol des Ins.c. i. 445.
[816]PlateXXI.Fig.6.a.
[817]De Geer iv.t.xv.f.11.m n, o p.
[818]LyonetAnat.93.
[819]LyonetAnat.t.xiii.f.1, 2.
[820]RamdohrAnat.t.v.f.1.e.f.3.
[821]Chabr.ubi supr.440—.
[822]Ibid.442, &c.
[823]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.xxii. 80.
[824]Vol.III. p.663,670. See above p.21.
[825]ChabrierSur le Vol des Ins.c. i. 446.
[826]Vol.III. p.411.
[827]Ubi supr.437, 439.
[828]PlateXXII.Fig.11, 12. c. Chabrierubi supr.c. iii.t.xi. viii.f.9. S. D.i, k.c. i. 440—.
[829]PlateXXII.Fig.11, 12. c. ChabrierSur le Vol des Ins.c. iii.t.xi. viii.f.9. S. D.i, k.c. i. 440—.
[830]Cuv.Anat. Comp.i. 94—.
[831]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.xxii. 80.
[832]Ubi supr.101—.
[833]Vol.I. p.67.
[834]Anat. Comp.i. 432—.
[835]Anat.t.vii.f.2. left hand.
[836]Ibid.right hand.
[837]Ibid.115—.
[838]Cuv.ubi supr.
[839]Vol.III. p.135—.
[840]Anat. Comp.i. 447.
[841]Vol.III. p.366.PlateXXVII.Fig.1, 4. n´.
[842]Ibid.Fig.3. n´.
[843]PlateXXVII.Fig.1.a.
[844]Vol.III. p.367—,541,584.PlateXXII.Fig.7. Cuv.ubi supr.448.
[845]PlateXXVII.Fig.5.a.
[846]Anat. Comp.i. 136.
[847]De Geer iv.t.xv.f.11.o, p.
[848]Marcel de SerresComparaison, &c.3—.
[849]Ibid.4.
[850]Ibid.5.
[851]PlateXXII.Fig.11.h´.
[852]Vol.III. p.579.
[853]PlateXXII.Fig.6.Vol.III. p.585—.
[854]Cuv.Anat. Comp.i. 436.PlateXXI.Fig.6.
[855]Ibid.a, b.LyonetAnat.37.
[856]Cuv.ubi supr.458—.Vol.III. p.368,378,382.
[857]Cuv.ubi supr.459.
[858]Chabr.Sur le Vol des Ins.c. i. 441.
[859]Chabr.Sur le Vol des Ins.c. i. 415.
[860]Ibid.
[861]Ibid.c. iii. 344.t.viii.f.8, 9.
[862]Ibid.c. i. 440.
[863]Ibid.444.
[864]Ibid.445. c. iii. 359.
[865]Ibid.c. ii. 332. c. iii. 359.
[866]Ibid.c. i. 445.
[867]Ibid.c. iv. 78.
[868]Chabr.Sur le Vol des Ins.c. i. 415, 442. c. iv. 80.
[869]Ibid.c. i. 442.
[870]Ibid.439—.
[871]ChabrierAnalyse, 28. The latter part of this passage is copied from a MS. note of the author's in my copy.—W. K.
[872]ChabrierAnalyse, Ibid.Sur le Vol des Ins.c. i. 445.Vol.III. p.617.
[873]Analyseubi supr.
[874]Sur le Vol des Ins.c. i. 448, c. ii. 336.
[875]Vol.III. p.579.—
[876]Chabr.Ibid.c. i. 443. ii. 316, 332.
[877]Chabr.Sur le Vol des Ins.c. ii. 333.
[878]Ibid.332.PlateXXII.Fig.11, 12. c. A cupuliform process is also observable at the side of the metaphragm. Ibid.Fig.10. a.
[879]Chabr.Ibid.c. iv.t.xi.-4.f.14.
[880]Ibid.c. i. 445. xi.-8.f.8, 9.
[881]Chabr.Sur le Vol des Ins.c. ii. 336. note 1.Vol.III. p.292—.
[882]Chabr.Ibid.c. i. 447.
[883]See above, p.66—.
[884]See above, p.73—.
[885]ChabrierSur le Vol des Ins.c. i.Addend.298.
[886]See above, p.178—.
[887]Vol.III. p.700—.
[888]Chabr.ubi supr.c. i. 422.
[889]Cuv.Anat. Comp.i. 451.
[890]Chabr.Analyse25.Sur le Vol des Ins.c. i. 423, 452.Addend.301.
[891]See above, p.83.
[892]LyonetAnat.t.xiii.f.1, 2.
[893]LyonetAnat.t.xiii. 188—, 584.
[894]Ibid.189.
[895]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.xxx. 421.
[896]Arachnid.9.t.i.f.7.r.
[897]Ibid.o.
[898]Ibid.10.
[899]Arachnid.45.t.iii.f.31.m, n, q, r, t.
[900]Vol.II. p.309—.
[901]MouffetTheatr.275.
[902]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.xxviii. 249.
[903]Phil. Acc. of Works of Nat.144.
[904]Clark inLinn. Trans.iii. 309.
[905]Fn. Suec.1799.
[906]Anatomy of Expression in Painting, 170.
[907]BonnetŒuvr.ii. 124.
[908]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.xxii. 81.
[909]1 Cor. xv. 50—.
[910]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.ubi. supr.
[911]Swamm.Bibl. Nat.t.xviii.f.2.l, m, n, o.Reaum. v.t.xxix.f.7.m, n, o, p, q.
[912]Vol.II.LetterXXVI.
[913]De Bombyc.5.
[914]Reaum. ii. 185—.
[915]Vol.II. p.186.
[916]t.vi.f.3.
[917]These directions for dissecting are chiefly taken from Swammerdam,Lifexiv.— and LyonetAnat.7—.
[918]Ps.civ. 29.
[919]Hist. Animal.l. viii. c. 27.
[920]The Principles of Botany and of Vegetable Physiology, § 310-353.
[921]Dr. Leach, from a communication of Sir Joseph Banks, has given a very interesting history of a spider which, having lost five of its legs, from a web-weaver had become a hunter; these legs it afterwards reproduced, though shorter than the others.Linn. Trans.xi. 393. Comp.N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.ii. 282.
[922]Vol.I. p.55—.
[923]Vol.II. p.166—.
[924]HuberAbeillesii. 409.
[925]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.i. 42.
[926]De Geer i. 72—.
[927]Reaum. iv. 342.
[928]Naturf.xii. 224.t.v.f.8.
[929]Naturf.xvi.t.iv.f.1-3.
[930]HuberFourmis, 174. note 1.
[931]Vol.II. p.365.
[932]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.i. 42.
[933]De Geer vi. 75. Latr.Hist. Nat.xiv. 371.
[934]JacquinCollectan.iii.t.xxiii.f.7.
[935]De Geerubi supr.
[936]Dr. Bevan asserts (The Honey-bee, 197) "that we have no evidence that pollen constitutes any part of the food ofadultbees." Had he consulted Reaumur (v. 418) he would have found that this great man examined the proceedings of a bee with a magnifying glass, and distinctly saw her devour very deliberately the masses of pollen on her hind legs. He says also (Ibid. 419.) that if the stomach and intestines are opened, they will be found filled with that substance.
[937]SchirachHist.&c. 54. Reaum. v. 713.N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.i. 42.
[938]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.i. 42. SchirachHist.56.
[939]Latr.Hist. Nat.xiv. 163—.N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.iv. 134—.
[940]Œuvr.ii. 48—.
[941]Lesser L. ii. 121.
[942]Synops. Meth. Fung.687.g.63.n.1, 2.
[943]Ibid.4.g.1.n.4.
[944]Vol.III. p.335—.
[945]Vol.I. p.267—.
[946]Mon. Ap. Angl.ii. 111.Linn. Trans.xi. 90—.
[947]Reaum. ii. 439.
[948]Ibid.415. Mouffet 57.
[949]Hist. Ins.Præf. xv.
[950]Cat. Cant.137.
[951]See above, p.162—.
[952]Reaum. vi. 306.
[953]Fn. Suec.1626.
[954]Linn. Trans.iii. 26.
[955]De Geer i. 608. Linné has made a mistake with regard to the Ichneumon here alluded to, in calling De Geer's saltatorious IchneumonI. Muscarum, and referring for it tot.xxxii.f.19, 20 of that author; whereas the Ichneumon that preys upon the aphidivorous flies does not jump, and is figured by De Geer 605.t.xxxiv.f.26-29. The jumping one feeds on the larva of aCoccinella.
[956]VallisnieriLettere, &c. 80.
[957]Reaum. vi. 296—.
[958]Linné evidently has described another species underI. Ovulorum, inFn. Suec.1644.
[959]De Geer i. 593—.
[960]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.vi. 10.
[961]Geoffr.Hist. Ins. Par.ii. 361.
[962]Linn. Trans.v. 102—.
[963]PlateXX.Fig.22.a.
[964]De Geer ii. 850—.
[965]Reaum. ii. 444—.
[966]De Geer ii. 863—.
[967]PanzerFn. Germ. Init.lxxii. 4.
[968]De Geer, i. 583—. ii. 822—. 907.
[969]Reaum. vi. 312.
[970]Leeuwenh.Epist.Oct. 6, 1700. De Geer ii. 869.
[971]Ibid.i. 604.
[972]Rai.Hist. Ins.259—.
[973]See above, p.217; andVol.I. p.356.
[974]Ibid.348.
[975]Reaum. vi. 303—.
[976]Reaum. ii. 454—.
[977]De Geer ii. 879—.
[978]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.xvii. 513.
[979]De Geer vi. 411—.
[980]Vol.I. p.172.
[981]Linn. Trans.iv. 236.
[982]Vol.I. p.50—.170—. Since that Volume of the present Edition was printed, Say's account of the Hessian Fly has been met with, where he distinguishes it by the above name. (Journal of the Acad. of Nat. Sciences of Philadelphia1817.) The Ichneumon he callsCeraphron Destructor.
[983]De Geer, i. 605. This, as before observed, is not theI. Muscarumof Linné; but it ought to have that name, and the other instead to be named,I. Coccinellæ.
[984]Ent. Carn.760, 761.
[985]De Geer i. 587.
[986]Ibid.ii. 876.
[987]Reaum. ii. 417—.
[988]Reaum. ii. 419—.
[989]De Geer i. 583—.
[990]Ibid.ii. 884.
[991]See above, p.164.
[992]Reaum. vi. 312.
[993]Vol.I. p.99.
[994]De Geerubi supr.
[995]Ibid.883.
[996]Linn. Fn. Suec.1609.
[997]Reaum. ii. 443. De Geer i. 196—, 550—. vi. 24.
[998]Reaum. ii. 440—.
[999]Vol.I. p.99.
[1000]Ibid.84,97.
[1001]Vol.I. p. 163. note260.Vol.III. p. 162. note379.
[1002]De Geer v. 8—.
[1003]Naturf.xxiii.t.i.f.8.
[1004]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.xx. 110—.
[1005]Ent. Carn.1052-4.
[1006]Histerparticularly.
[1007]De Geer vii. 126—.
[1008]De Geer vii. 144—.
[1009]LamarckAnim. sans Vert.iii. 196.
[1010]De Geer ii. 554—. PictetBibliotheq. Univers.num. ult.
[1011]The existence of this animal has been satisfactorily ascertained by M. de Blainville, who had a specimen, extracted from a human body, sent him by M. Girard, a surgeon of Guadaloupe.
[1012]De Geer ii. 555.
[1013]Mattheyubi supr.
[1014]Philos. Trans.1823. 8.t.i. ii.
[1015]De Geer ii. 556.
[1016]GouldAnts, 63.
[1017]De Geer i. 551.
[1018]Rösel I. iii. 20.
[1019]Latr.Fourmis, 373.
[1020]De Geer ii.ubi supr.t.xiv.f.12-14.
[1021]Ibid.i. 553.
[1022]Ibid. ii. 556.t.xiv.f.12, 13.
[1023]Ubi supra.
[1024]De Geer i. 553.
[1025]Vol.III. p. 15. note21.
[1026]Ibid.58—. See above, p.26.
[1027]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.xxx. 584.
[1028]Hor. Entomolog.37.
[1029]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.xxx. 584—.
[1030]Cuv.Anat. Comp.ii. 362.
[1031]Syst. Nat.i. 535. BonnetŒuvr.ii. 36.
[1032]Ibid.
[1033]Vol.II. p.162.
[1034]LehmannDe Sens. Extern. Animal. Exsang.22—.
[1035]Ibid.De Antenn. Insect.ii. 79.
[1036]Vol.III. p.43—.
[1037]See above, p.1—.
[1038]Vol.III. p.46.
[1039]De Antenn. Insect.ii. 65—.
[1040]De Antenn. Insect.ii. 42.
[1041]Ibid.26.
[1042]See above, p.218.
[1043]Vol.II. p.64,198—.
[1044]Vol.III. p.319—.
[1045]Philos. Trans.1820. 314.
[1046]LehmannDe Usu Antenn.ii. 66—.
[1047]Vol.I. p.48,110.
[1048]Compare what is said above (p.141) with respect to bees.
[1049]See, for further arguments, Lehmannubi supr.c. ix.
[1050]Marcel de Serres thinks he has discovered an organ of hearing in most insects, but he does not state its situation.Mém. du Mus.1819. 99. Treviranus, with regard to theBlattina, suspects it to be situated between the eye and the base of the antennæ, perhaps alluding to the spot noticed above. (Vol.III. p.505.) Carus, who mentions the above, says, "Is it not reasonable to ask if the sense of hearing may not reside in the membrane which connects the antennæ with the head?"Introd. to Comp. Anat.i. 80—.
[1051]LehmannDe Sens. Extern. Anim. Exsang.De Olfactu.
[1052]Cuv.Anat. Comp.ii. 675.
[1053]Ubi supr.
[1054]Marcel de Serres says they are connected withtestesseated in the trunk (Mem. du Mus.1819. 95); but Treviranus denies this (Arachnid.36—.t.iv.f.33).
[1055]Vol.II. p.361—. III. p.544—.
[1056]LehmannDe Sens. Extern. &c.De Olfactu.
[1057]Lehmannubi supr.&c. 27.
[1058]Ibid.andDe Usu Antenn.ii. 24—. Cuv.Anat. Comp.ii. 675.
[1059]LehmannDe Usu Antenn.ii. 28.
[1060]Ibid.31.
[1061]Ibid.35—.
[1062]Vol.III. p.475—.
[1063]N. Dict. d'Hist. Nat.xxiii. 210.
[1064]Ubi supr.
[1065]See above, p.63. SprengelCommentar.14—.
[1066]HuberAbeillesii. 375—. Dr. Bevan in his interesting work on theHoney-Beeadopts the opinion here stated with respect to the organ of smell in that animal. 265, 303.
[1067]Vol.I. p.352—.
[1068]Vol.III. p.480—.
[1069]Vol.III. p.454—.
[1070]Introd. to Comp. Anat.i. 76. The part he alludes to, is figuredPlateVI.Fig.4. a. g´.
[1071]Ibid.This membrane likewise represents the Nose and Rhinarium in that fly.
[1072]Vol.III. p.481.
[1073]Cuv.Anat. Comp.ii. 682—.