AUTOPSY.

AUTOPSY.

TheAutopsywas begun in the house of Eng, Sunday, February 1st, 1874, and finished in the Mütter Museum of the College of Physicians, at Philadelphia.

Age of subjects, 63 years. Examination made about fifteen days and eight hours after death. The weather had been cold. No preservative had been employed prior to the date of the autopsy.

I.Post-mortem Appearances.

The following is their description in Chang.

Body moderately emaciated.Rigor mortisnone. The fingers of the right hand were semi-flexed, a condition due doubtless to the long-standing paralysis of the right upper extremity. Passive congestion was marked over entire dorsal aspect of the neck, trunk, and upper extremities. It was less marked over the corresponding surfaces of the forearm and legs. The feet and hands were almost entirely free. The superficial veins in the last-named localities, especially in the left foot, were distended. The passive congestion extended over the right thoracic region as far as the median line, and on the front of both thighs, especially the right. Upon the head the congestion was seen behind and beneath the ears, and was sparsely distributed over both malar prominences. The lips were discolored. The integument of the genitals was infiltrated, the scrotum particularly being much swollen. There was extensive greenish discoloration on the anterior abdominal wall. The left external abdominal ring was enlarged. Both testicles were within the scrotum. The hair of the head was gray. That on the right side of the pubis was black, that on the left was of an iron-gray color.

The following is their description in Eng.

Body moderately well nourished, spare.Rigor mortisslight. Passive congestion less marked than in Chang. It was most conspicuous on the buttocks and infraspinous spaces. There was none in front of the body. The testicle of left side absent from scrotum. There was moderate greenish discoloration of anteriorwall of abdomen. The hair on the pubis was black on the right side, pure gray on left side of the median line.

Measurements.—Chang was 5 ft.2-1/2in.in height; Eng, 5 ft.3-1/2in.When the bodies were laid upon a table Chang’s left side and Eng’s right side were drawn somewhat toward one another. This was most marked in Chang, and gave a greater inclination of his trunk toward his brother’s. (See Figs.1and19.)

When the bodies were suspended and placed face to face, it was evident that the congenital position had been secured. All observations were made, as far as was possible, with the bodies in this position. With it the details of structure, it was thought, could be easily understood; without it the subject would be difficult and confused.

The “band” was a massive commissure placed between the bodies at the junction of the abdominal and thoracic regions of each. It was broader above than below, and had a circumference of nine inches. It presented four surfaces for examination, an upper, lower, and two lateral surfaces.

Theuppersurface was somewhat flattened in both Chang and Eng. The ensiform cartilage of each body could be felt deflected from the sternum and prolonged into the band. The base of the cartilage in Eng presented a rounded circular eminence, measuring one inch in diameter. There was no corresponding eminence in Chang. The upper aspect of each process could be well defined beneath the skin, the subcutaneous connective tissue being moreabundant in Chang than in Eng. The upper surface measured2-1/2in.in width at its base towards Eng, and2-1/3in. at its base towards Chang. It was 2 in. wide at its middle.

Fig. 2.The twins in the acquired position(E. R., C. L.),showing band and the primary incisions,a-b,c-d. From a photograph taken after death at Philadelphia.

Thelowersurface was much narrower than the upper. It was marked in the centre, but nearer the anterior than the posterior border, by a linear scar one inch in length, which it was thought answered to the position of the single umbilicus. The skin was adherent at this point, but elsewhere was easily raised in folds. Behind the scar,i. e., toward the posterior part of the band, theskin was somewhat corrugated. This portion answered, in position, to Chang’s umbilical pouch.

Thelateralsurfaces. The termsuppersurface andlowersurface have fixed values, no matter how they may be approached by the observer. This is not the case, however, with the lateral surfaces, as will appear from the following considerations. Viewing the band as a separate form—as it was spoken of during the life of the twins—we will see that the terms front (“anterior”) and back (“posterior”), as given to the lateral surfaces, were derived from studying the acquired position. Thus we were bound not to cut the “front” of the band, but allowed to make an incision on the “back.” Now this position of selection was destroyed, and its terms deprived of what meaning they may have had, by the reproduction of the congenital relations of the bodies.

There is no doubt that in infancy and early childhood there was no acquired position, and, therefore, neither “front” nor “back” to the band. And later, when, as we have reason to believe, the position of selection was gradually adopted, the terms “front” and “back” were reversible—the “front” meaning that which corresponded to the surface of least thoracic approximation. Thus when the adult condition was fixed, and the “front” answered to the widely separated right side of Eng’s chest and left side of Chang’s chest, the “back” was in relation with the closely approximated left side of Eng’s chest and right side of Chang’s.

To avoid awkward repetition of phrases expressing the facts of the last sentence, the following characterswill be employed in describing the “lateral” surfaces of the band.

E. R.,C. L.(Eng’s right, Chang’s left) will designate the “anterior” surface of the acquired position.C. R.,E. L.(Chang’s right, Eng’s left) will designate the “posterior” surface. Since the right side of Chang’s half of the band merged into the left on Eng’s half, while the right side of Eng’s half, after it passed the middle line, became the left half of Chang’s, we propose using the charactersE. L.,E. R., andC. R.,C. L., which will be understood as signifying left side Eng, right side Eng, etc.

Using the above signs we found that the surfaceE. R.,C. L.was inclined decidedly downward and backward when seen in the congenital position, and was 3 in. high and2-1/2in.wide. AtE. R., the border answering to the ensiform cartilage was marked by a large rounded tubercle; it was much more pronounced than on the corresponding border ofC. L.When seen in the acquired position,E. R.,C. L.became “anterior,” when, at its upper margin,C. L.was longer thanE. R.by one-half inch. The tubercle onE. R., already noticed, was much more prominent thanC. L.The contour of the inferior margin was also different, being more uneven.C. L.was not only longer, but was more obliquely placed downward and outward to the centre of the band thanE. R.(See cast in the Mütter Museum.)

In front (E. R.,C. L.)the superficies could not be well examined owing to the restrictions imposed by the families. A view of it from within can be obtained inFigs.8,9,q. v.Permission having been granted to make an incision “behind,” atC. R.,E. L.,a modified letter-H incision was employed, thus—

Turning the skin flaps here indicated upwards and downwards, and the lateral triangles outwards, there was found beneath, a layer of superficial fatty connective tissue, with a well-defined layer of fat on either side, but with an intermediate portion which was free from fat, and of greater thickness.

The skin could with some little trouble be raised over thedorsal or upper surface, showing here entire absence of fat. A very delicate artery was found running across the middle, from Eng to Chang.

The lower portion of the surfaceC. R.,E. L.was inseparably connected with the umbilicus. It was also united to the superficial fascia onC. L.,about1-1/2inches from the umbilicus; this did not have any connection with the deeper parts. The process of fibrous tissue which had been felt through the skin was conspicuous on this surface of the band, and was covered by a delicate non-fatty layer of connective tissue. Towards the lower part of the surface were seen several diverging lines of fibrous tissue, which were lost within the integument about the umbilical scar, at the lower surface of the band. They were exceedingly thin, and at one point lay directly over the posterior and inferior wall of the umbilical pouch of Chang.

Fig. 3.The surface,C. R.,E. L.,exposed by removal of skin and superficial fascia to display the tendons of the external oblique muscles and adjacent parts.A.The superficial fascia—lost over the position of Chang’s umbilical pouch.B, C.Supplemental layers of fibrous tissue of Eng not seen in Chang;Bis a continuation toward Eng of aponeurotic fibres having a source from the linea alba of Chang;Cis independent of the former, and is continuous with the deep pectoral fascia.D.The interlacing of fibres on tendon of external oblique muscle of Chang.E.The linea alba of Chang, beginning atC. R.F.Its continuation toE. L.,and insertion upon the ensiform cartilage.

Turning down the superficial layer, the aponeurosis of the external oblique muscle was exposed (Fig.3). A marked contrast was exhibited in the two sides of the band. In Chang the parts were normal so far as they were exposed—the characteristic apertures for the escape of small vessels being abundant and conspicuous. In turning down the superficial fascia in Eng (Fig.3,A), it was found to be continuous at its lower portion with an aponeurotic layer (Fig.3,B), which extended toward the median line, where it was continuous with the linea alba of Chang. In addition to this, a second layer (Fig.3,C), analogous in position to a deep layer of the superficial fascia, which wasentirely independent of Chang, extended over nearly the whole of Eng’s division, and was particularly well defined over the fibres of origin of the external oblique muscle. This was continuous with the deep layer of the superficial fascia which passed over the entire side of Eng’s thorax.

Toward the middle of the band this layer gradually lost its distinctive features, and was firmly incorporated with the tendon of the external oblique muscle. A number of fibres corresponding to it extended in inseparable intimacy with this tendon. These were gradually lost as they approached the linea alba of Chang, and the parts being in position these fibres were at their lower portion covered in by the aponeurotic extension of the linea alba already mentioned.

On Chang’s side, as we have seen, the parts comparable to these accessory layers were absent. There was no line of demarcation between the tendon of the oblique and the aponeurotic attachment of the pectoralis. The tendon of the external oblique presented a different appearance from the normal one in a more extensive interlacing of fibres of the linea alba with the tendon.

The part termed above the linea alba of Chang (Fig.3,E), has already been indicated through skin and superficial fascia. As can be seen, this band of fibres, having its origin from the middle line of the abdomen of Chang, was found to be a direct continuation of the linea alba. It was remarkable in not being inserted into the ensiform process of Chang, but into that of Eng, and in giving off the aponeurotic outshootB, already noticed, as well as in having a diffused point of insertion into Eng’s tissue as in the ensiformcartilage (F). In a word, the linea alba approaches the surfaceC. R.,E. L.fromC. R.below, and is inserted intoE. L.above.

Limited incisions being alone permitted, the large vessels of the abdomen were sought for in the process of embalmment, believing, as we did, that the procedures of securing them would enable us, by extending the cuts from below upward, to fairly open the abdomen and examine thereby the interior of the band.

In each body, therefore, an incision six inches long (Fig.2,ab,cd) was extended from the centre of the right iliac region to the centre of the right hypochondriac region. This was subsequently joined by an oblique incision passing from the upper end of the first mentioned to the lateral border of the ensiform cartilage at its base. This incision measured7-1/2in.The lower end of the vertical incision was met by a horizontal one passing to the centre of the hypogastric region, and measuring3-1/4in.

Through these incisions were studied (1) theumbilical ligamentsand (2)the abdominal viscera.

1.The umbilical ligaments.[2]—By turning forward the anterior flap in Eng as far as possible, the peritoneal lining was exhibited, and there was brought into view a structure beginning at the summit of the bladder, and which, ascending the abdominal wall and passing obliquely to the right side, could be tracedclearly to the scar-like tissue marking the remains of the umbilical structures situated upon the anterior abdominal wall within about1-1/2in.of the band. This structure was the umbilical ligament (Fig.4,A). It was loaded with fat, and, as it terminated at the scar, distinct lobules of fat (several of which were pedunculated) were abundantly deposited.

The bladder was distended and raised 5 in. above the pubis.

Fig. 4.The umbilical ligament in Eng.A.The umbilical ligament.B.The lobule of fat at position of the normal umbilicus.

In Chang (Fig.5), the same appearances were seen as those above given, save that no fat was deposited in the umbilical ligament. On the contrary, it resembled the omentum of an emaciated subject. When stretched, the fold was fully an inch wide, quite transparent, and marked by two longitudinal bands, whichrecalled the shapes of the obliterated vessels. But two rather small sessile fatty appendages were seen at the scar.

The bladder was empty, contracted, and lay within the true pelvis.

Fig. 5.The umbilical ligament in Chang.A.The umbilical ligament.B.The lobule of fat at position of the normal umbilicus.

In both Chang and Eng an isolated mass of subperitoneal fat, presenting a sub-circular form, and measuring 1 in. in diameter, was found in the position of the normal umbilicus (Figs.4and5).

2.The viscera.—In Eng the omentum was gathered up toward the transverse colon. It was abundantly furnished withfat.[3]The transverse colon extendedacross the abdomen, beginning on the right side on a level with the eleventh rib. It was contracted and contained a little flatus. The rest of the exposed region was occupied by coils of small intestine, yielding a mesentery very rich in fat. The stomach was not visible. By removing the small intestine, and bringing down the transverse colon and large intestine, the pyloric extremity of the stomach was seen. The fundus of stomach, spleen, and left kidney were not seen. (Fig.6.)

Fig. 6.The abdominal organs in Eng—the small intestines removed.A.Left lobe of liver.B.Right lobe of liver.C.Gall-bladder.D.Suspensory ligament.E.Lobules of fat in the position of the termination of the umbilical ligament.

The liver.—The right lobe was alone visible. This extended entirely across the right hypochondriac and epigastric regions. Its external free border was not in contact with the ribs. Between it and the external abdominal wall there was an interval of nearly an inch at its greatest part, which was crossed by the external lateral ligament. The inferior border of the lobe rested upon and nearly concealed the pylorus of the stomach as well as the upper half of right kidney. Corresponding in position to the upper portion of the right kidney was a well-defined layer of peritoneum, presenting a sharply defined internal border. Upon dissecting away the peritoneum from this border it was found to answer to the inferior vena cava. The lesser omentum occupied its usual position. The fundus of the gall-bladder was two-thirds of an inch beyond the anterior border of the lobe, immediately to the outer side of the caudal lobe. The position of the longitudinal fissure was well off to the left side of the abdomen, presenting, between the right and left lobes, a conspicuous cleft which was partially occupied by the base of the caudal lobe. The round ligament, with its associated suspensory ligament, had doubtless passed nearly vertically, before the relations had been disturbed by the incision in the abdominal wall, upwards and forwards to the anterior abdominal wall at a point lying one inch to the outer side of the centre of the umbilicus.

In the subject, as it lay on the table with the flapa, b(Fig.2), turned to the left, the suspensory ligament had the appearance of being much more obliquely inclined to the left, and could be made nearly horizontal by a little traction. Lying beneath thisligament, but belonging to the anterior abdominal wall, was a large mass of subperitoneal fat about the size of a pigeon’s egg. Extending to the extreme left, and continuous with the anterior border of the left lobe of the liver, was a delicate prolongation of liver substance which was lost within the connecting band.

Fig. 7.The abdominal organs of Chang in position—the small intestines removed.A.Left lobe of liver.B.Right lobe of liver.C.Gall-bladder.D.Suspensory ligament.E.Lobules of fat in the position of the termination of the umbilical ligament.

The upper surface of this prolongation was supported by a fold of peritoneum, extending directly upward, apparently attached to the base of the ensiformcartilage. Visible upon the anterior aspect of this fold was a tortuous artery, afterwards found to be the left internal mammary. This fold may be calledthe accessory suspensory ligament; nothing similar to it was seen in Chang. The left lobe of the liver, save a portion of its anterior edge, was not visible.

In Chang (Fig.7), by exposing the parts as in Eng, throwing the abdominal flap,c, d(Fig.2), to the right, there was at once brought into view the transverse colon, the greater omentum, and greater curvature of the stomach. The latter organ was large, empty, and without any undue traction could be so displayed as to yield its fundus and greater curvature in position. The fundus was not visible. Lying conspicuously within the left hypochondriac region was the spleen. Its inferior free border, with its peritoneal attachment, was distinctly seen; its upper portions, however, were invisible. The left lobe of the liver held a position answering to that of the right lobe in Eng—the external lateral ligament being stretched across the left hypochondriac region, pursuing a similar course to the external lateral ligament of Eng (q. v.). The left lobe at its outer portion rested upon the spleen, its inner portion upon the stomach. The outer portion of the left lobe presented a thin compressed border, the inner portion was divided by a deep sulcus into two lobes.

The right lobe lay deep within the right hypochondriac region, the portion about the longitudinal fissure anteriorly, alone appearing in the dissection. The suspensory ligament held a position similar to that in Eng. The gall-bladder held its normal position to the right lobe, and was moderately distended with bile.

Both Chang and Eng had the organs occupying the hypochondriac and epigastric regions retaining, on the whole, such relations as are usually observed.

This statement appears pertinent, at this stage of the autopsy, in order to explain—

We here describe (1)the hepatic pouches; (2)the umbilical pouches; (3)the vascular structures of the band; (4)the diaphragms; (5)the ensiform cartilages.

1.The hepatic pouches.—The photograph (Fig.2) indicates the position of the right lobe of Eng’s liver in the right hypochondriac region. The right lobe of Chang is of course not seen in the figure, since it lies on the side of the body which is not in the field of vision. It must follow from the rights and lefts of the two individuals being opposites that, in drawing a line between the livers (which, as already seen, occupy normal positions as to right and left) across the band, such a line will be diagonal to the axes of the ensiform cartilages; Chang’s half of the band having the line enter the band from his “right,” Eng from his “left.” It will also follow that any pouches of peritoneum which might accompany this line will pursue a similar direction—be on the same plane—be right or left with respect to the axis of that plane. Now it was actually demonstrated that such a line did extend between the livers, and was accompanied by such peritoneal pouches. These pouches were termed the hepatic pouches, and may be described as follows:—

Chang.—The subject lying on the table with rights and lefts determined as in the acquired position, the finger could be inserted behind the suspensoryligament (Fig.7) in a pouch lying directly beneath the ensiform cartilages, into which passed an extension of liver-like tissue.

Eng.—This fact could not be well demonstrated in Eng in this position, but is well seen in Fig.8.

It follows that the two hepatic pouches are on nearly the same plane, and that each approaches the central point of the band diagonally from the right side of the subject with whose abdominal cavity it is continuous.

2.The umbilical pouches.—Beneath the hepatic pouches, and between them and the inferior border of the band, were two pouches which, from their association with the round ligament, have been termedthe umbilical pouches.

When the finger was passed toward the band from the abdomen of Chang, and following the peritoneum of the anterior wall of the abdomen, it passed into a pouch of the band directly over the skin covering, across the band, over the umbilicus, and was received within the folds of the suspensory ligament of the liver of Eng. This pouch was so superficial that while the finger was in the pouch any motion of the finger was readily followed by the observer.

In the same way as above, if the finger was introducedbehindthe suspensory ligament of Eng, it slipped into a pouch which passed across the median line of the band, and was received within the folds of the suspensory ligament of the liver of Chang.

There were then two pouches communicating with the two abdominal cavities, arranged one above another in the band, Chang’s being the lower of the two. No remains of an umbilical vein were detected, nor wasthere any communication between the pouches and the umbilicus. It has already been noticed that the round ligament of each liver passed from the longitudinal fissure to a scar on the anterior wall of the abdomen near the band. It was not, therefore, within the round ligaments, but the folds of the suspensory ligaments, that the pouches were found.

Eng’s pouch measured2-1/2in.From edge of Chang’s suspensory ligament to end of hepatic pouch measured 3 in.

Extending across the band, about midway between the properties of the two individuals, was a septum. It was attached above and below to the respective boundaries of the band, and along its entire length was incorporated with its two peritoneal cavities, so that when in the course of the dissection of the “posterior” surface of the band the peritoneal covering of the band was displayed, several large lobules of fat were seen lying to Eng’s side of theseptum.[4]

It will be seen that Fig.8represents the band opened to display the pouches with the septum. The lower end of the septum is fixed near the scar of the umbilicus, and holds an immobile position over the umbilical pouches. At this point it is free from fat. But as it extends over the hepatic pouches it is more pliant. This portion of the septum has been carried a little to Chang’s side of the band to display the entire length of the hepatic pouch of Eng.

Figs.9and10are designed to exhibit the appearances presented in securing views of the septum from its sides. Fig.9is the side toward Chang, and Fig.10is the side toward Eng.

Fig. 8.The surface,C. R.,E. L.,showing the interior of band by free division of the aponeuroses seen in Fig.7, and their underlying peritoneal attachments.A.The orifice of umbilical pouch of Eng.B.The orifice of umbilical pouch of Chang, showing connection with suspensory ligament of Eng.C.The fenestrated umbilical pouch of Eng passing between the folds of the suspensory ligament of Chang.D.Suspensory ligament of liver of Eng.E.Hepatic tract.F.Hepatic pouch of Eng.G.The septum.

The pouches and septum were now removed and the position of the hepatic tract determined. It restedupon the incurved borders of the ensiform cartilages (see Fig.15), and as the subject lay on the table with the “posterior” surfaces of the band exposed (Fig.11) the hepatic tract was slightly arched. It measured three inches in length, was compressed, and measured six lines wide and three lines thick. The tract arose from the livers at the same point—namely, directly above the longitudinal fissure, having more fulness on the side of the right than of the left lobe. The round ligament, as it passed out of the longitudinal fissure of each liver, was placed beneath and a little to the left of the tract.

Fig. 9.The septum viewed from Chang’s side.A.The orifice of umbilical pouch of Chang.B.The orifice of the hepatic pouch of Chang.C.Suspensory ligament of Chang containing umbilical pouch of Eng.

Fig. 10.The septum viewed from Eng’s side.A.The orifice of the umbilical pouch of Eng.B.The orifice of the hepatic pouch of same.C.Suspensory ligament of Eng containing the umbilical pouch of Chang.

3.The vascular structures of the bandwere as follows:—

The livers being united, it was found that a colored injection thrown into the portal vein of Chang passed into the liver of Eng. A careful dissection of theblood vesselblood vessel(Fig.11,C) proved it to be a terminal twig of the portal system of Chang. It was of the thickness of a No. seven catheter, French scale, gradually diminished in size, and was lost toward the centre of the band. It did not pass as such across the band,but appeared to break up into minute branches before reaching the liver of Eng. At the same time there was undoubted distension of the portal capillaries with the colored fluid under the capsule of the dorsal surface of the right lobe of Eng’s liver, one and one-half inches from the band. Examination of the branches of the mesenteric veins of Eng revealed the curious fact that some of them had received the injection. This had not been transmitted through the liver, for the portal vein at the transverse fissure was empty, but through a distinct extra-hepatic portal track, which was found lying under the peritoneumbeneath the position of the hepatic pouches, and in association with the umbilical pouches. This vessel began by relatively large radicals towards Chang’s side, became larger as these encroached on Eng’s side, and was finally received within the portal system of Eng’s body, as a tributary to its mesenteric vein.

Fig. 11.The surface,C. R.,E. L.,with pouches removed to display the hepatic tract.A.Liver of Chang.B.Liver of Eng.C.Portal vessel of Chang.D, D.Minute branches of hepatic artery.E.Subcutaneous fat of surface,E. R.,C. L.

No other vessels were met with in the band excepting a few insignificant branches of the hepatic artery, and the terminal twigs of the right internal mammary of Eng. The former vessels are markedD, D, Fig.11. The latter vessel terminated by piercing the diaphragm, and giving ultimate filaments to the integument of the “front” of the band as shown in Fig.12.

Fig. 12.The surface,C. R.,E. L.,with pouches, hepatic tract, and peritoneal attachments removed to display the diaphragms.A.Subcutaneous fat of surface,E. R.,C. L.B, C.Symmetrical muscular fasciculi.D.Fasciculi of Eng crossing the median line of the band.

4.The diaphragms.—The subject being in the same position as in Fig.2, the livers were removed, theperitoneal coverings dissected from the band, and the diaphragms exposed (Fig.12). The point (A), marked by the terminal twigs of the right internal mammary of Eng, indicated the “anterior” of the band. A broad slip of fibres of Chang (B) was seen to pass across the median line, and to be inserted into the left border of the ensiform cartilage of Eng (Fig.17). This arrangement would appear to correspond to the smaller collection of fibres (C) belonging entirely to Eng. A second arrangement of fibres was seen above those just indicated, immediately under the cartilages (D). This appeared to arise from the border of the cordiform tendon of Eng by two distinct narrow slips, which crossed the median line to be inserted dispersedly on the diaphragm of Chang.

Fig. 13.The peritoneal linings of the anterior walls of both abdominal cavities.A, A.The summits of the bladders.B, B.The umbilical ligaments.C, C.The nodules of fat at the parietal scar.D, D.The isolated lobules of fat.

5.The ensiform cartilages.—After removing the diaphragms the cartilages were exposed. They may be described as follows:—

Chang.—The cartilage measured2-1/2in.wide, and 8 in. in length along its axis. The right border was very prominent, and projected1/2in. beyond the limit of the corresponding border in Eng. It was almost in close contact with the cartilage of the eighth rib; it was very robust, with upper surface convex, under surface nearly plane. The left lateral border was2-1/2in.in length, right lateral border 11 lines in length. The former was marked by three tubercles of about equal size. One situated about 1 in. from the sternal origin; the other about 2 in. from the same point; the third at its extreme anterior border. None of these were robust, or presented any of the thickening noticed on the right side. The middle of these tubercles was on a line with that of the posterior tubercle. The junction of the ensiform process with the sternum was not marked by the eminence characterizing the similar point in Eng.

Eng.—The cartilage differed from that of Chang in being2-1/3in.wide, 11 lines in length of axis. The left lateral border was abruptly deflected downward, and did not present the transverse smooth projection noticed in Chang. This deflection was almost at right angles to the dorsal surface, acuminate inferiorly, and presenting a straight surface toward Chang, and an oblique one toward the ribs. The length of left lateral border was 1 in. The right lateral border,1-1/3in.in length, presented a smooth sub-rounded edge without tubercles, and terminated in a free rounded border on a plane a little above that of Chang. On the wholethis border was more robust than that of Chang. On the dorsal aspect of the process near its base was seen the rounded eminence described in the account of the external appearances (see page 7).

A comparison between the two ensiform cartilages shows that in Chang the anterior border was longer than in the right in Eng. In other proportions Eng’s was equal if not larger than Chang’s, and was more robust.

Fig. 14.A section of both ensiform cartilages,C. R.,E. L.A.Chang’s cartilage.B.Eng’s cartilage.C.The synchondrosis.D.The bursa-like sac covering the same.E.An opening in the sac.F.Transversalis muscle of Eng.G.Transversalis muscle of Chang.

The union between the cartilages was of the character of a symphysis. The union was very intimate along the borderE. L.,C. R.,“posterior” (Fig.14); the exposure of the junction by a delicate transverse cut showed a close union between the cartilages, thus constituting this part of the band a synchondrosis. Thatthis, however, did not characterize the entire line of apposition was at once seen by turning to the borderE. R.,C. L.(“anterior”), where an interval, two lines in width, was seen between the cartilages, an interval which had been evidently susceptible of variation during life. This interval extended across one-fourth the width of the band. The portion of the band between the parts as above indicated, was occupied by a bursa-like sac (Fig.14,D), which was opened by a minute orifice (E) to display its true nature. This sac was crossed above by a stout band of fibrous tissue (Fig.15,A) an inch in width. Beneath, the sac was protected by a less well-defined band of the same width as the upper ligament, and which crossed between the two processes, to be lost in the perichondrium.


Back to IndexNext