[179]Od. v. 127.[180]Il. xxi. 318–21.[181]Od. xi. 324.[182]Cf. Il. xix. 59. Od. xviii. 201. xx. 61.[183]Od. xv. 407–11.[184]Il. xxiv. 753.[185]Il. xxiv. 606. Laodamia is an exception: see Il. vi. 205.[186]Od. xiii. 164.[187]Il. xv. 262. xvi. 528–9.[188]Od. xiii. 429. xvi. 172, 455.[189]Od. xxiii. 156–63.[190]Nägelsbach, i. 25.[191]Il. xxiv. 27–30.[192]Hymn. ad Ven. 8, 16.[193]Æsch. Suppl. 222.[194]Epigr. x. 63.[195]St. Matt. v. 8.[196]Inf. Sect.iii.[197]Höck’s Creta, vol. ii.[198]Il. ix. 564.[199]Il. ii. 513; xvi. 184, and other cases.[200]Il. xx. 234.[201]Il. iv. 73.[202]Od. ii. 117.[203]Od. xiii. 299.[204]Od. v. 7.[205]Heb. i. 2.[206]Il. xv. 463.[207]Od. xxi. 364.[208]Il. xvi. 715.[209]Ibid. 845.[210]Il. xix. 413.[211]Il. xxii. 209–14.[212]Il. x. 552–3. Comp. xi. 736.[213]Cf. Il. x. 462.[214]Od. xxiv. 518.[215]Il. viii. 287.[216]Od. xx. 42.[217]Od. v. 23. xxiv. 479.[218]Od. xvi. 256–61, 262–5.[219]Od. xxiv. 472–86, 515–41.[220]Od. xviii. 151–7.[221]Od. xviii. 346.[222]Exod. x. 20.[223]Od. xxii. 236.[224]Il. i. 69–72.[225]Il. xv. 247.[226]Od. vi. 163.[227]Il. xix. 413.[228]Od. xviii. 479.[229]Od. xiii. 359.[230]Il. xiv. 178.[231]Il. ii. 426.[232]Müller’s Dorians, II. viii. 12.[233]Il. iv. 327. xxiii. 678.[234]Il. vii. 154.[235]Il. v. 430. Compare xvii. 398. xiii. 127. Od. xiv. 216.[236]Od. vi. 233. xxiii. 159.[237]Il. xv. 412.[238]Od. ii. 69.[239]Od. iv. 750–3.[240]The character of Apollo the Destroyer is well represented in a fragment of Archilochus:ὤναξ Ἄπολλον, καί συ μὲν τοὺς αἰτίουςπήμαινε, καὶ σφᾶς ὄλλυ’, ὥσπερ ὀλλύεις.Archil. apud Macrob. Fragm. 79. Ed. Gaisford.[241]Which however has the sanction of Euripides as well as Archilochus, (sup. p. 131 n.);ὦ χρυσοφεγγὲς ἥλι’, ὥς μ’ ἀπώλεσαςὅθεν σ’ Ἀπόλλων’ ἐμφανῶς κλήσει βροτός.Eurip. Phaeth. ap. Macrob. Sat. i. 17.[242]Dorians, II. vi. 6, 7.[243]Strom. L. i. p. 349 B.[244]See Bunsen’s ‘Egypt’s Place,’ I. vi. A. 7.[245]See the observation of Neptune, Il. xv. 195–8.[246]Die Realien in der Iliade und Odyssee von J. B. Friedreich.Erlangen, 1856. In three parts. See P. iii. §. 194. p. 635, and §. 198. p. 689. Mure observes on the sublimity of the Apollo of Homer: but his account of the deities of the poems is brief and rather slight. B. II. ch. xii. sect. 4.[247]B. II. ch. ix. 2. and 9.[248]Hor. Od. I. xii. 21.[249]Ibid. 17. Compare the passages cited by Nägelsbach,Hom. Theol.I. ii. 21. Hesiod Theog. 896. Callim. Lav. Pall. 132. Plutarch. Sympos. ii. p. 617. C. Pind. Fragm. xi. 9. and the Orphic Poet in Düntzer, p. 9.[250]Dorians, ii. ch. 9.[251]See ‘Persephone’ in section iii.[252]Il. v. 49–52.[253]Od. xx. 61.[254]Il. ix. 533–7.[255]Il. v. 444–7.[256]Herod, iv. 59.[257]Welsford on the English Language, chap. iii. p. 78.[258]Herod, i. 131.[259]DöllingerHeid. u. Jud.p. 71. Smith’s Dict. art. Leto.[260]Il. xx. 40.[261]Ibid. 72.[262]Il. xx. 497–501.[263]Il. xxiv. 608.[264]I do not reckon theΕἰλιθυῖαι, who appear to be purely poetical and figurative daughters of Juno, like the Muses of Jupiter; and as Terror is the son of Mars. Il. xi. 270. 1. ii. 491. xiii. 299.[265]Hymn. ad Apoll. 62.[266]Theogon. 918–21.[267]Smith’s Dict., art. Leto.[268]Il. xx. 72.[269]Il. xxi. 496–504.[270]Il. v. 445.et seqq.[271]Gen. xi. 31. Acts vii. 2.[272]Il. xxiii. 198–212.[273]Il. xxiii. 198–212.[274]Il. iii. 121.[275]Il. xi. 27.[276]Il. xi. 29.[277]Od. xviii. 7.[278]Æsch. Agam. 696–715.[279]Il. ix. 499–514.[280]Il. xix. 95 seqq.[281]Tempest, I. 1.[282]Il. x. 390.[283]Il. xix. 91.[284]Od. i. 7.[285]Il. xiv. 203. viii. 478. where Iapetus is joined withΚρόνος. Of him we have no other mention in Homer.[286]Il. viii. 13–18.[287]Il. xiv. 273, 278.[288]Od. vii. 60.[289]Od. xi. 305–20.[290]Od. vii. 59.[291]St. Pet. ii. 2. 4. 5.[292]Arist. Eth. I. 10, 11.[293]Il. viii. 16, 479.[294]Od. xi. 391, 488.[295]V. 569.[296]Od. xi. 302–4.[297]Il. xiv. 274, 9.[298]Il. v. Od. xi. 313.[299]Il. v. 897, 8. viii. 10–17. 401–6.[300]Il. iii. 278. cf. xiv. 274, 9.[301]Od. xxiv. 481. 525–41. 546.[302]Il. v. 91. xix. 223. iv. 34. i. 353, 408.[303]Hom. Theol. Abschn.ii.[304]Il. xvii. 567.[305]Il. xi. 544. viii. 133–6. xv. 463. xi. 181–94.[306]Il. x. 5.[307]Il. xiii. 242.[308]Od. xii. 415–17. xxiv. 539.[309]Il. xi. 27.[310]Il. ix. 457.[311]Il. i. 533.[312]Il. i. 524–30. See however xix. 113.[313]viii. 201.[314]Il. i. 209–11.[315]Il. i. 397–405.[316]Il. xv. 49–52.[317]Il. xv. 228.[318]Il. v. 892.[319]Il. xiii. 1–6.[320]Il. xx. 23.[321]Il. xvi. 431–61.[322]Od. xii. 377.[323]Il. v. 753.[324]Il. v. 872.[325]Il. xxi. 505.[326]Il. ii. 2, 12–15. xiv. 294–6,et alibi.[327]Od. xi. 580. Il. xxi. 498.[328]Il. xxiv. 611.[329]Il. xiv. xix. 97. xviii. 168.[330]Il. xiii. 352, 6.[331]Il. xiii. 1–7.[332]Il. i. 611. xiv. 352.[333]Od. i. 66.[334]Il. xvi. 458.[335]Welsford on the English Language, p. 165.[336]Il. iv. 34–6.[337]Il. xviii. 395–9.[338]Hence theἘρινύεςare in conflict with her in Il. xix. 418. On this very curious subject see inf. sect.iv.[339]Il. v. 392.[340]Il. xv. 18–21.[341]Il. xviii. 358, 9.[342]Il. iv. 24.[343]Od. iv. 513.[344]Od. xii. 72.[345]Vid. Il. iv. 94.[346]Il. iv. 64.[347]Il. xv. 85.[348]Il. i. 55. Comp. viii. 218.[349]Il. ii. 156. v. 711. viii. 331.[350]Vid. supr. p. 66.[351]Il. i. 195.[352]Il. xv. 49–52.[353]Il. v. 784–92.[354]Il. xviii. 168.[355]Ibid. 239.[356]Il. viii. 193.[357]Il. xix. 407.[358]Il. ix. 254.[359]Od. xx. 70–2.
[179]Od. v. 127.[180]Il. xxi. 318–21.[181]Od. xi. 324.[182]Cf. Il. xix. 59. Od. xviii. 201. xx. 61.[183]Od. xv. 407–11.[184]Il. xxiv. 753.[185]Il. xxiv. 606. Laodamia is an exception: see Il. vi. 205.[186]Od. xiii. 164.[187]Il. xv. 262. xvi. 528–9.[188]Od. xiii. 429. xvi. 172, 455.[189]Od. xxiii. 156–63.[190]Nägelsbach, i. 25.[191]Il. xxiv. 27–30.[192]Hymn. ad Ven. 8, 16.[193]Æsch. Suppl. 222.[194]Epigr. x. 63.[195]St. Matt. v. 8.[196]Inf. Sect.iii.[197]Höck’s Creta, vol. ii.[198]Il. ix. 564.[199]Il. ii. 513; xvi. 184, and other cases.[200]Il. xx. 234.[201]Il. iv. 73.[202]Od. ii. 117.[203]Od. xiii. 299.[204]Od. v. 7.[205]Heb. i. 2.[206]Il. xv. 463.[207]Od. xxi. 364.[208]Il. xvi. 715.[209]Ibid. 845.[210]Il. xix. 413.[211]Il. xxii. 209–14.[212]Il. x. 552–3. Comp. xi. 736.[213]Cf. Il. x. 462.[214]Od. xxiv. 518.[215]Il. viii. 287.[216]Od. xx. 42.[217]Od. v. 23. xxiv. 479.[218]Od. xvi. 256–61, 262–5.[219]Od. xxiv. 472–86, 515–41.[220]Od. xviii. 151–7.[221]Od. xviii. 346.[222]Exod. x. 20.[223]Od. xxii. 236.[224]Il. i. 69–72.[225]Il. xv. 247.[226]Od. vi. 163.[227]Il. xix. 413.[228]Od. xviii. 479.[229]Od. xiii. 359.[230]Il. xiv. 178.[231]Il. ii. 426.[232]Müller’s Dorians, II. viii. 12.[233]Il. iv. 327. xxiii. 678.[234]Il. vii. 154.[235]Il. v. 430. Compare xvii. 398. xiii. 127. Od. xiv. 216.[236]Od. vi. 233. xxiii. 159.[237]Il. xv. 412.[238]Od. ii. 69.[239]Od. iv. 750–3.[240]The character of Apollo the Destroyer is well represented in a fragment of Archilochus:ὤναξ Ἄπολλον, καί συ μὲν τοὺς αἰτίουςπήμαινε, καὶ σφᾶς ὄλλυ’, ὥσπερ ὀλλύεις.Archil. apud Macrob. Fragm. 79. Ed. Gaisford.[241]Which however has the sanction of Euripides as well as Archilochus, (sup. p. 131 n.);ὦ χρυσοφεγγὲς ἥλι’, ὥς μ’ ἀπώλεσαςὅθεν σ’ Ἀπόλλων’ ἐμφανῶς κλήσει βροτός.Eurip. Phaeth. ap. Macrob. Sat. i. 17.[242]Dorians, II. vi. 6, 7.[243]Strom. L. i. p. 349 B.[244]See Bunsen’s ‘Egypt’s Place,’ I. vi. A. 7.[245]See the observation of Neptune, Il. xv. 195–8.[246]Die Realien in der Iliade und Odyssee von J. B. Friedreich.Erlangen, 1856. In three parts. See P. iii. §. 194. p. 635, and §. 198. p. 689. Mure observes on the sublimity of the Apollo of Homer: but his account of the deities of the poems is brief and rather slight. B. II. ch. xii. sect. 4.[247]B. II. ch. ix. 2. and 9.[248]Hor. Od. I. xii. 21.[249]Ibid. 17. Compare the passages cited by Nägelsbach,Hom. Theol.I. ii. 21. Hesiod Theog. 896. Callim. Lav. Pall. 132. Plutarch. Sympos. ii. p. 617. C. Pind. Fragm. xi. 9. and the Orphic Poet in Düntzer, p. 9.[250]Dorians, ii. ch. 9.[251]See ‘Persephone’ in section iii.[252]Il. v. 49–52.[253]Od. xx. 61.[254]Il. ix. 533–7.[255]Il. v. 444–7.[256]Herod, iv. 59.[257]Welsford on the English Language, chap. iii. p. 78.[258]Herod, i. 131.[259]DöllingerHeid. u. Jud.p. 71. Smith’s Dict. art. Leto.[260]Il. xx. 40.[261]Ibid. 72.[262]Il. xx. 497–501.[263]Il. xxiv. 608.[264]I do not reckon theΕἰλιθυῖαι, who appear to be purely poetical and figurative daughters of Juno, like the Muses of Jupiter; and as Terror is the son of Mars. Il. xi. 270. 1. ii. 491. xiii. 299.[265]Hymn. ad Apoll. 62.[266]Theogon. 918–21.[267]Smith’s Dict., art. Leto.[268]Il. xx. 72.[269]Il. xxi. 496–504.[270]Il. v. 445.et seqq.[271]Gen. xi. 31. Acts vii. 2.[272]Il. xxiii. 198–212.[273]Il. xxiii. 198–212.[274]Il. iii. 121.[275]Il. xi. 27.[276]Il. xi. 29.[277]Od. xviii. 7.[278]Æsch. Agam. 696–715.[279]Il. ix. 499–514.[280]Il. xix. 95 seqq.[281]Tempest, I. 1.[282]Il. x. 390.[283]Il. xix. 91.[284]Od. i. 7.[285]Il. xiv. 203. viii. 478. where Iapetus is joined withΚρόνος. Of him we have no other mention in Homer.[286]Il. viii. 13–18.[287]Il. xiv. 273, 278.[288]Od. vii. 60.[289]Od. xi. 305–20.[290]Od. vii. 59.[291]St. Pet. ii. 2. 4. 5.[292]Arist. Eth. I. 10, 11.[293]Il. viii. 16, 479.[294]Od. xi. 391, 488.[295]V. 569.[296]Od. xi. 302–4.[297]Il. xiv. 274, 9.[298]Il. v. Od. xi. 313.[299]Il. v. 897, 8. viii. 10–17. 401–6.[300]Il. iii. 278. cf. xiv. 274, 9.[301]Od. xxiv. 481. 525–41. 546.[302]Il. v. 91. xix. 223. iv. 34. i. 353, 408.[303]Hom. Theol. Abschn.ii.[304]Il. xvii. 567.[305]Il. xi. 544. viii. 133–6. xv. 463. xi. 181–94.[306]Il. x. 5.[307]Il. xiii. 242.[308]Od. xii. 415–17. xxiv. 539.[309]Il. xi. 27.[310]Il. ix. 457.[311]Il. i. 533.[312]Il. i. 524–30. See however xix. 113.[313]viii. 201.[314]Il. i. 209–11.[315]Il. i. 397–405.[316]Il. xv. 49–52.[317]Il. xv. 228.[318]Il. v. 892.[319]Il. xiii. 1–6.[320]Il. xx. 23.[321]Il. xvi. 431–61.[322]Od. xii. 377.[323]Il. v. 753.[324]Il. v. 872.[325]Il. xxi. 505.[326]Il. ii. 2, 12–15. xiv. 294–6,et alibi.[327]Od. xi. 580. Il. xxi. 498.[328]Il. xxiv. 611.[329]Il. xiv. xix. 97. xviii. 168.[330]Il. xiii. 352, 6.[331]Il. xiii. 1–7.[332]Il. i. 611. xiv. 352.[333]Od. i. 66.[334]Il. xvi. 458.[335]Welsford on the English Language, p. 165.[336]Il. iv. 34–6.[337]Il. xviii. 395–9.[338]Hence theἘρινύεςare in conflict with her in Il. xix. 418. On this very curious subject see inf. sect.iv.[339]Il. v. 392.[340]Il. xv. 18–21.[341]Il. xviii. 358, 9.[342]Il. iv. 24.[343]Od. iv. 513.[344]Od. xii. 72.[345]Vid. Il. iv. 94.[346]Il. iv. 64.[347]Il. xv. 85.[348]Il. i. 55. Comp. viii. 218.[349]Il. ii. 156. v. 711. viii. 331.[350]Vid. supr. p. 66.[351]Il. i. 195.[352]Il. xv. 49–52.[353]Il. v. 784–92.[354]Il. xviii. 168.[355]Ibid. 239.[356]Il. viii. 193.[357]Il. xix. 407.[358]Il. ix. 254.[359]Od. xx. 70–2.
[179]Od. v. 127.
[179]Od. v. 127.
[180]Il. xxi. 318–21.
[180]Il. xxi. 318–21.
[181]Od. xi. 324.
[181]Od. xi. 324.
[182]Cf. Il. xix. 59. Od. xviii. 201. xx. 61.
[182]Cf. Il. xix. 59. Od. xviii. 201. xx. 61.
[183]Od. xv. 407–11.
[183]Od. xv. 407–11.
[184]Il. xxiv. 753.
[184]Il. xxiv. 753.
[185]Il. xxiv. 606. Laodamia is an exception: see Il. vi. 205.
[185]Il. xxiv. 606. Laodamia is an exception: see Il. vi. 205.
[186]Od. xiii. 164.
[186]Od. xiii. 164.
[187]Il. xv. 262. xvi. 528–9.
[187]Il. xv. 262. xvi. 528–9.
[188]Od. xiii. 429. xvi. 172, 455.
[188]Od. xiii. 429. xvi. 172, 455.
[189]Od. xxiii. 156–63.
[189]Od. xxiii. 156–63.
[190]Nägelsbach, i. 25.
[190]Nägelsbach, i. 25.
[191]Il. xxiv. 27–30.
[191]Il. xxiv. 27–30.
[192]Hymn. ad Ven. 8, 16.
[192]Hymn. ad Ven. 8, 16.
[193]Æsch. Suppl. 222.
[193]Æsch. Suppl. 222.
[194]Epigr. x. 63.
[194]Epigr. x. 63.
[195]St. Matt. v. 8.
[195]St. Matt. v. 8.
[196]Inf. Sect.iii.
[196]Inf. Sect.iii.
[197]Höck’s Creta, vol. ii.
[197]Höck’s Creta, vol. ii.
[198]Il. ix. 564.
[198]Il. ix. 564.
[199]Il. ii. 513; xvi. 184, and other cases.
[199]Il. ii. 513; xvi. 184, and other cases.
[200]Il. xx. 234.
[200]Il. xx. 234.
[201]Il. iv. 73.
[201]Il. iv. 73.
[202]Od. ii. 117.
[202]Od. ii. 117.
[203]Od. xiii. 299.
[203]Od. xiii. 299.
[204]Od. v. 7.
[204]Od. v. 7.
[205]Heb. i. 2.
[205]Heb. i. 2.
[206]Il. xv. 463.
[206]Il. xv. 463.
[207]Od. xxi. 364.
[207]Od. xxi. 364.
[208]Il. xvi. 715.
[208]Il. xvi. 715.
[209]Ibid. 845.
[209]Ibid. 845.
[210]Il. xix. 413.
[210]Il. xix. 413.
[211]Il. xxii. 209–14.
[211]Il. xxii. 209–14.
[212]Il. x. 552–3. Comp. xi. 736.
[212]Il. x. 552–3. Comp. xi. 736.
[213]Cf. Il. x. 462.
[213]Cf. Il. x. 462.
[214]Od. xxiv. 518.
[214]Od. xxiv. 518.
[215]Il. viii. 287.
[215]Il. viii. 287.
[216]Od. xx. 42.
[216]Od. xx. 42.
[217]Od. v. 23. xxiv. 479.
[217]Od. v. 23. xxiv. 479.
[218]Od. xvi. 256–61, 262–5.
[218]Od. xvi. 256–61, 262–5.
[219]Od. xxiv. 472–86, 515–41.
[219]Od. xxiv. 472–86, 515–41.
[220]Od. xviii. 151–7.
[220]Od. xviii. 151–7.
[221]Od. xviii. 346.
[221]Od. xviii. 346.
[222]Exod. x. 20.
[222]Exod. x. 20.
[223]Od. xxii. 236.
[223]Od. xxii. 236.
[224]Il. i. 69–72.
[224]Il. i. 69–72.
[225]Il. xv. 247.
[225]Il. xv. 247.
[226]Od. vi. 163.
[226]Od. vi. 163.
[227]Il. xix. 413.
[227]Il. xix. 413.
[228]Od. xviii. 479.
[228]Od. xviii. 479.
[229]Od. xiii. 359.
[229]Od. xiii. 359.
[230]Il. xiv. 178.
[230]Il. xiv. 178.
[231]Il. ii. 426.
[231]Il. ii. 426.
[232]Müller’s Dorians, II. viii. 12.
[232]Müller’s Dorians, II. viii. 12.
[233]Il. iv. 327. xxiii. 678.
[233]Il. iv. 327. xxiii. 678.
[234]Il. vii. 154.
[234]Il. vii. 154.
[235]Il. v. 430. Compare xvii. 398. xiii. 127. Od. xiv. 216.
[235]Il. v. 430. Compare xvii. 398. xiii. 127. Od. xiv. 216.
[236]Od. vi. 233. xxiii. 159.
[236]Od. vi. 233. xxiii. 159.
[237]Il. xv. 412.
[237]Il. xv. 412.
[238]Od. ii. 69.
[238]Od. ii. 69.
[239]Od. iv. 750–3.
[239]Od. iv. 750–3.
[240]The character of Apollo the Destroyer is well represented in a fragment of Archilochus:ὤναξ Ἄπολλον, καί συ μὲν τοὺς αἰτίουςπήμαινε, καὶ σφᾶς ὄλλυ’, ὥσπερ ὀλλύεις.Archil. apud Macrob. Fragm. 79. Ed. Gaisford.
[240]The character of Apollo the Destroyer is well represented in a fragment of Archilochus:
ὤναξ Ἄπολλον, καί συ μὲν τοὺς αἰτίουςπήμαινε, καὶ σφᾶς ὄλλυ’, ὥσπερ ὀλλύεις.Archil. apud Macrob. Fragm. 79. Ed. Gaisford.
ὤναξ Ἄπολλον, καί συ μὲν τοὺς αἰτίουςπήμαινε, καὶ σφᾶς ὄλλυ’, ὥσπερ ὀλλύεις.Archil. apud Macrob. Fragm. 79. Ed. Gaisford.
ὤναξ Ἄπολλον, καί συ μὲν τοὺς αἰτίουςπήμαινε, καὶ σφᾶς ὄλλυ’, ὥσπερ ὀλλύεις.Archil. apud Macrob. Fragm. 79. Ed. Gaisford.
ὤναξ Ἄπολλον, καί συ μὲν τοὺς αἰτίους
πήμαινε, καὶ σφᾶς ὄλλυ’, ὥσπερ ὀλλύεις.
Archil. apud Macrob. Fragm. 79. Ed. Gaisford.
[241]Which however has the sanction of Euripides as well as Archilochus, (sup. p. 131 n.);ὦ χρυσοφεγγὲς ἥλι’, ὥς μ’ ἀπώλεσαςὅθεν σ’ Ἀπόλλων’ ἐμφανῶς κλήσει βροτός.Eurip. Phaeth. ap. Macrob. Sat. i. 17.
[241]Which however has the sanction of Euripides as well as Archilochus, (sup. p. 131 n.);
ὦ χρυσοφεγγὲς ἥλι’, ὥς μ’ ἀπώλεσαςὅθεν σ’ Ἀπόλλων’ ἐμφανῶς κλήσει βροτός.Eurip. Phaeth. ap. Macrob. Sat. i. 17.
ὦ χρυσοφεγγὲς ἥλι’, ὥς μ’ ἀπώλεσαςὅθεν σ’ Ἀπόλλων’ ἐμφανῶς κλήσει βροτός.Eurip. Phaeth. ap. Macrob. Sat. i. 17.
ὦ χρυσοφεγγὲς ἥλι’, ὥς μ’ ἀπώλεσαςὅθεν σ’ Ἀπόλλων’ ἐμφανῶς κλήσει βροτός.Eurip. Phaeth. ap. Macrob. Sat. i. 17.
ὦ χρυσοφεγγὲς ἥλι’, ὥς μ’ ἀπώλεσας
ὅθεν σ’ Ἀπόλλων’ ἐμφανῶς κλήσει βροτός.
Eurip. Phaeth. ap. Macrob. Sat. i. 17.
[242]Dorians, II. vi. 6, 7.
[242]Dorians, II. vi. 6, 7.
[243]Strom. L. i. p. 349 B.
[243]Strom. L. i. p. 349 B.
[244]See Bunsen’s ‘Egypt’s Place,’ I. vi. A. 7.
[244]See Bunsen’s ‘Egypt’s Place,’ I. vi. A. 7.
[245]See the observation of Neptune, Il. xv. 195–8.
[245]See the observation of Neptune, Il. xv. 195–8.
[246]Die Realien in der Iliade und Odyssee von J. B. Friedreich.Erlangen, 1856. In three parts. See P. iii. §. 194. p. 635, and §. 198. p. 689. Mure observes on the sublimity of the Apollo of Homer: but his account of the deities of the poems is brief and rather slight. B. II. ch. xii. sect. 4.
[246]Die Realien in der Iliade und Odyssee von J. B. Friedreich.Erlangen, 1856. In three parts. See P. iii. §. 194. p. 635, and §. 198. p. 689. Mure observes on the sublimity of the Apollo of Homer: but his account of the deities of the poems is brief and rather slight. B. II. ch. xii. sect. 4.
[247]B. II. ch. ix. 2. and 9.
[247]B. II. ch. ix. 2. and 9.
[248]Hor. Od. I. xii. 21.
[248]Hor. Od. I. xii. 21.
[249]Ibid. 17. Compare the passages cited by Nägelsbach,Hom. Theol.I. ii. 21. Hesiod Theog. 896. Callim. Lav. Pall. 132. Plutarch. Sympos. ii. p. 617. C. Pind. Fragm. xi. 9. and the Orphic Poet in Düntzer, p. 9.
[249]Ibid. 17. Compare the passages cited by Nägelsbach,Hom. Theol.I. ii. 21. Hesiod Theog. 896. Callim. Lav. Pall. 132. Plutarch. Sympos. ii. p. 617. C. Pind. Fragm. xi. 9. and the Orphic Poet in Düntzer, p. 9.
[250]Dorians, ii. ch. 9.
[250]Dorians, ii. ch. 9.
[251]See ‘Persephone’ in section iii.
[251]See ‘Persephone’ in section iii.
[252]Il. v. 49–52.
[252]Il. v. 49–52.
[253]Od. xx. 61.
[253]Od. xx. 61.
[254]Il. ix. 533–7.
[254]Il. ix. 533–7.
[255]Il. v. 444–7.
[255]Il. v. 444–7.
[256]Herod, iv. 59.
[256]Herod, iv. 59.
[257]Welsford on the English Language, chap. iii. p. 78.
[257]Welsford on the English Language, chap. iii. p. 78.
[258]Herod, i. 131.
[258]Herod, i. 131.
[259]DöllingerHeid. u. Jud.p. 71. Smith’s Dict. art. Leto.
[259]DöllingerHeid. u. Jud.p. 71. Smith’s Dict. art. Leto.
[260]Il. xx. 40.
[260]Il. xx. 40.
[261]Ibid. 72.
[261]Ibid. 72.
[262]Il. xx. 497–501.
[262]Il. xx. 497–501.
[263]Il. xxiv. 608.
[263]Il. xxiv. 608.
[264]I do not reckon theΕἰλιθυῖαι, who appear to be purely poetical and figurative daughters of Juno, like the Muses of Jupiter; and as Terror is the son of Mars. Il. xi. 270. 1. ii. 491. xiii. 299.
[264]I do not reckon theΕἰλιθυῖαι, who appear to be purely poetical and figurative daughters of Juno, like the Muses of Jupiter; and as Terror is the son of Mars. Il. xi. 270. 1. ii. 491. xiii. 299.
[265]Hymn. ad Apoll. 62.
[265]Hymn. ad Apoll. 62.
[266]Theogon. 918–21.
[266]Theogon. 918–21.
[267]Smith’s Dict., art. Leto.
[267]Smith’s Dict., art. Leto.
[268]Il. xx. 72.
[268]Il. xx. 72.
[269]Il. xxi. 496–504.
[269]Il. xxi. 496–504.
[270]Il. v. 445.et seqq.
[270]Il. v. 445.et seqq.
[271]Gen. xi. 31. Acts vii. 2.
[271]Gen. xi. 31. Acts vii. 2.
[272]Il. xxiii. 198–212.
[272]Il. xxiii. 198–212.
[273]Il. xxiii. 198–212.
[273]Il. xxiii. 198–212.
[274]Il. iii. 121.
[274]Il. iii. 121.
[275]Il. xi. 27.
[275]Il. xi. 27.
[276]Il. xi. 29.
[276]Il. xi. 29.
[277]Od. xviii. 7.
[277]Od. xviii. 7.
[278]Æsch. Agam. 696–715.
[278]Æsch. Agam. 696–715.
[279]Il. ix. 499–514.
[279]Il. ix. 499–514.
[280]Il. xix. 95 seqq.
[280]Il. xix. 95 seqq.
[281]Tempest, I. 1.
[281]Tempest, I. 1.
[282]Il. x. 390.
[282]Il. x. 390.
[283]Il. xix. 91.
[283]Il. xix. 91.
[284]Od. i. 7.
[284]Od. i. 7.
[285]Il. xiv. 203. viii. 478. where Iapetus is joined withΚρόνος. Of him we have no other mention in Homer.
[285]Il. xiv. 203. viii. 478. where Iapetus is joined withΚρόνος. Of him we have no other mention in Homer.
[286]Il. viii. 13–18.
[286]Il. viii. 13–18.
[287]Il. xiv. 273, 278.
[287]Il. xiv. 273, 278.
[288]Od. vii. 60.
[288]Od. vii. 60.
[289]Od. xi. 305–20.
[289]Od. xi. 305–20.
[290]Od. vii. 59.
[290]Od. vii. 59.
[291]St. Pet. ii. 2. 4. 5.
[291]St. Pet. ii. 2. 4. 5.
[292]Arist. Eth. I. 10, 11.
[292]Arist. Eth. I. 10, 11.
[293]Il. viii. 16, 479.
[293]Il. viii. 16, 479.
[294]Od. xi. 391, 488.
[294]Od. xi. 391, 488.
[295]V. 569.
[295]V. 569.
[296]Od. xi. 302–4.
[296]Od. xi. 302–4.
[297]Il. xiv. 274, 9.
[297]Il. xiv. 274, 9.
[298]Il. v. Od. xi. 313.
[298]Il. v. Od. xi. 313.
[299]Il. v. 897, 8. viii. 10–17. 401–6.
[299]Il. v. 897, 8. viii. 10–17. 401–6.
[300]Il. iii. 278. cf. xiv. 274, 9.
[300]Il. iii. 278. cf. xiv. 274, 9.
[301]Od. xxiv. 481. 525–41. 546.
[301]Od. xxiv. 481. 525–41. 546.
[302]Il. v. 91. xix. 223. iv. 34. i. 353, 408.
[302]Il. v. 91. xix. 223. iv. 34. i. 353, 408.
[303]Hom. Theol. Abschn.ii.
[303]Hom. Theol. Abschn.ii.
[304]Il. xvii. 567.
[304]Il. xvii. 567.
[305]Il. xi. 544. viii. 133–6. xv. 463. xi. 181–94.
[305]Il. xi. 544. viii. 133–6. xv. 463. xi. 181–94.
[306]Il. x. 5.
[306]Il. x. 5.
[307]Il. xiii. 242.
[307]Il. xiii. 242.
[308]Od. xii. 415–17. xxiv. 539.
[308]Od. xii. 415–17. xxiv. 539.
[309]Il. xi. 27.
[309]Il. xi. 27.
[310]Il. ix. 457.
[310]Il. ix. 457.
[311]Il. i. 533.
[311]Il. i. 533.
[312]Il. i. 524–30. See however xix. 113.
[312]Il. i. 524–30. See however xix. 113.
[313]viii. 201.
[313]viii. 201.
[314]Il. i. 209–11.
[314]Il. i. 209–11.
[315]Il. i. 397–405.
[315]Il. i. 397–405.
[316]Il. xv. 49–52.
[316]Il. xv. 49–52.
[317]Il. xv. 228.
[317]Il. xv. 228.
[318]Il. v. 892.
[318]Il. v. 892.
[319]Il. xiii. 1–6.
[319]Il. xiii. 1–6.
[320]Il. xx. 23.
[320]Il. xx. 23.
[321]Il. xvi. 431–61.
[321]Il. xvi. 431–61.
[322]Od. xii. 377.
[322]Od. xii. 377.
[323]Il. v. 753.
[323]Il. v. 753.
[324]Il. v. 872.
[324]Il. v. 872.
[325]Il. xxi. 505.
[325]Il. xxi. 505.
[326]Il. ii. 2, 12–15. xiv. 294–6,et alibi.
[326]Il. ii. 2, 12–15. xiv. 294–6,et alibi.
[327]Od. xi. 580. Il. xxi. 498.
[327]Od. xi. 580. Il. xxi. 498.
[328]Il. xxiv. 611.
[328]Il. xxiv. 611.
[329]Il. xiv. xix. 97. xviii. 168.
[329]Il. xiv. xix. 97. xviii. 168.
[330]Il. xiii. 352, 6.
[330]Il. xiii. 352, 6.
[331]Il. xiii. 1–7.
[331]Il. xiii. 1–7.
[332]Il. i. 611. xiv. 352.
[332]Il. i. 611. xiv. 352.
[333]Od. i. 66.
[333]Od. i. 66.
[334]Il. xvi. 458.
[334]Il. xvi. 458.
[335]Welsford on the English Language, p. 165.
[335]Welsford on the English Language, p. 165.
[336]Il. iv. 34–6.
[336]Il. iv. 34–6.
[337]Il. xviii. 395–9.
[337]Il. xviii. 395–9.
[338]Hence theἘρινύεςare in conflict with her in Il. xix. 418. On this very curious subject see inf. sect.iv.
[338]Hence theἘρινύεςare in conflict with her in Il. xix. 418. On this very curious subject see inf. sect.iv.
[339]Il. v. 392.
[339]Il. v. 392.
[340]Il. xv. 18–21.
[340]Il. xv. 18–21.
[341]Il. xviii. 358, 9.
[341]Il. xviii. 358, 9.
[342]Il. iv. 24.
[342]Il. iv. 24.
[343]Od. iv. 513.
[343]Od. iv. 513.
[344]Od. xii. 72.
[344]Od. xii. 72.
[345]Vid. Il. iv. 94.
[345]Vid. Il. iv. 94.
[346]Il. iv. 64.
[346]Il. iv. 64.
[347]Il. xv. 85.
[347]Il. xv. 85.
[348]Il. i. 55. Comp. viii. 218.
[348]Il. i. 55. Comp. viii. 218.
[349]Il. ii. 156. v. 711. viii. 331.
[349]Il. ii. 156. v. 711. viii. 331.
[350]Vid. supr. p. 66.
[350]Vid. supr. p. 66.
[351]Il. i. 195.
[351]Il. i. 195.
[352]Il. xv. 49–52.
[352]Il. xv. 49–52.
[353]Il. v. 784–92.
[353]Il. v. 784–92.
[354]Il. xviii. 168.
[354]Il. xviii. 168.
[355]Ibid. 239.
[355]Ibid. 239.
[356]Il. viii. 193.
[356]Il. viii. 193.
[357]Il. xix. 407.
[357]Il. xix. 407.
[358]Il. ix. 254.
[358]Il. ix. 254.
[359]Od. xx. 70–2.
[359]Od. xx. 70–2.