With Other Day as guide, the march was resumed. The party reached the river, about one mile below the camp, just at dawn. The camp was pitched on a plateau or open prairie about a quarter of a mile from the river. To reach the shelter of the river it would be necessary for one fleeing from the camp to pass across the open space and go down a precipitous descent of about fifty feet. When within ahalf mile of the camp, a charge was ordered by Lieutenant Murry. Nearly simultaneously with this command an Indian, leading a squaw, ran from one of the lodges toward the river. Other Day at once called out that there was the man, and rifles instantly cracked. Obviously the fugitive was not hit, for he safely made the shelter of the brush along the river in the face of a continued fire.
In his hurried flight the Indian was not unarmed, for he carried a double-barreled shot-gun. This fact made it extremely dangerous to go into the brush after him or even to attempt a reconnaissance. That he intended to defend himself was evident, for as soon as he reached the shelter of the brush he began firing on the attacking party. Each shot from him was greeted with a volley from the soldiers, which soon put an end to his firing. When found the body of the man was riddled with bullets. Upon investigation the individual proved to be none other than Roaring Cloud, son of Inkpaduta, the Indian who had so atrociously attacked and murdered Mrs. Noble.
The squaw whom he led at the beginning of his dash for the river was taken prisoner in the hope that she might assist in identifying the Indian who had been killed, as well as give information about other inhabitants of the camp. Taking her prisoner, however, proved most unfortunate, for it produced a great commotion at the Upper Agency which only added fuel to the excitement over the deferred annuities. On the return it was necessary to passthrough the camps of over seven thousand Indians. According to Agent Flandrau “the excitement among them was terrible. The squaw kept up a howling such as a squaw in distress only can make. The Indians swarmed about us, guns in hand, and scowled upon us in the most threatening manner.... I then began to realize the desperate temerity of the enterprise. Our salvation was simply the moral force of the government that was behind us. We reached the Agency buildings in safety, and took possession of a log house, where we remained several days in a state of sleepless anxiety, until relieved by Major Sherman with the famous old Buena Vista battery.... We felt ... like the man who was chased by a bear, and finally seized his paws around a tree; he wanted somebodyto help him let go.”[338]With the coming of the battery the Indians became quiet.
From what has preceded one might conclude that Minnesota Territory alone was sufficiently interested in the welfare of the captives and the punishment of the marauders to take official action relative thereto. Although such was not the case, it is true that Minnesota Territory through its legislative body was the first to take official notice of the situation and attempt a remedy. To be sure the Governors of Iowa had for several years been insistent in making demands upon the Federal government for the protection of the northwestern frontier; but nothing was accomplished. Both the Iowa legislature and Congress remained obdurate.
The delay on the part of Iowa was in large part due to the belief that the frontier troubles demanded action by the Federal authorities rather than by the State.[339]After the presentation of numerous petitions and following considerable debate, the Thirty-fifth Congress enacted a relief measure on June 14, 1858, by which the sum of twenty thousand dollars was appropriated “for defraying the expenses of the several expeditions against Ink-pa-du-tah’s band, and in the search, ransom, and recovery of the female captives taken by said band ineighteen hundred and fifty-seven”.[340]This fund was to be expended under the direction of the Secretary of the Interior, who in turn designated the Superintendent of Indian Affairs, W. J. Cullen of St. Paul, Minnesota, as the disbursing agent of the Department.
Under the provisions of this act claims aggregating $7180.36 were presented by Iowans to Superintendent Cullen.[341]Upon the submission of required proof and the auditing of claims submitted, Superintendent Cullen recommended a payment of $3156.36 to apply on supplies furnished the Iowa relief expedition, and $1657.00 for services rendered by individual members of the expedition, making a total of $4813.36.[342]These claims were duly certified to the Secretary of the Interior, and the auditors of the Department, after eight months of examination of proof, advised the payment of $3628.43—a cut of $1184.93 from the Superintendent’s recommendations.[343]
The act of the Thirty-fifth Congress was later supplemented by a second and a third act by the Thirty-sixth Congress under dates of June 19 and 21, 1860—the first[344]of which set aside $16,679.90, and the second[345]$18,988.84 for the further reimbursement of the State. These measures were further supplemented during the same Congress by an act, under date of March 2, 1861, indemnifying the “citizens of Iowa and Minnesota for the destruction of property at or near Spirit Lake by Ink-pa-du-tah’s band of Sioux Indians”, to theamount of $9,640.74.[346]By these acts the Federal government had set aside a total of $65,308.48 to indemnify the citizens of Iowa and Minnesota for lives lost, property destroyed, and expenses incurred in connection with the rescue of the captives and the punishment of the outlaws. Further than this Congress refused to act, the consensus of opinion in Congress being that the States concerned should supply any further needed relief.
Almost two years after Congress had officially recognized the need of the State for assistance in handling the Indian frontier problem, the Iowa legislature took action. On March 12, 1860, a bill was enacted into law whereby “the sum of three thousand dollars, or so much thereof as shall be necessary” was appropriated for the aid of those members of the relief expedition who had drawn largely upon their private means to finance the undertaking, but who had not been afforded the expected relief by the Federal government.
Under the provisions of this act the Governor was made the auditor of all claims presented in accordance with its provisions. He was directed to secure copies of all claims filed with the Federal government and, when satisfied by the evidence submitted that such as were yet unpaid were just, he might issue an order upon the Treasurer of State to pay the claims.[347]This law was supplemented on March twenty-second by a second act looking toward the relief of persons specifically named in the law,[348]although no additional funds for such purpose wereprovided. Under the provisions of these acts there was disbursed under order of the Governor a total of $1126.02, which was distributed among eighty-two claimants.[349]
Before the matter had been finally closed the strife between North and South eliminated from the public mind an interest in all things save the momentous struggle then in progress. Thus it happened that the Spirit Lake Massacre and the relief expeditions were lost from view for more than a generation. But there was one individual with an abiding interest who for thirty years cherished the hope of commemorating in some way the heroic struggles of that little group of men who went from Webster City in March, 1857, to relieve the settlers at the lakes. In the summer of 1887 Charles Aldrich, long a resident of Webster City, proposed placing a brass tablet in some suitable place in that city in memory of Company C of the relief expedition. The decision was quickly reached to place the memorial in the Hamilton County court house and to ask the board of supervisors to appropriate three hundred dollars to meet the expense. A petition was circulated in the city and throughout the county requesting such action. Owing to the good will and work of Charles T. Fenton, president of the board, the petition was granted and a committee was appointed to secure and place the memorial.[350]
August twelfth was the date set for the unveiling and dedication of the tablet. Mr. Aldrich planned an elaborate program which was to be given in thecourt room of the newly erected building; but more than two thousand people attended the ceremony, and so the exercises were held on the lawn in front of the court house. Brief addresses were made by Governor William Larrabee, ex-Governor C. C. Carpenter, Mayor McMurray, Captains Richards and Duncombe, Lieutenant John N. Maxwell, Privates William Laughlin and Michael Sweeney, and Mr. Charles Aldrich. The speeches were so planned as to offer a complete review of the attempt to carry relief to the settlers at Spirit Lake and Lake Okoboji. The tablet consisted of “a slab of Champlain marble, upon which is artistically mounted a plate of polished brass containing the names of the Hamilton county members of the expedition and a number of other suitable inscriptions.”[351]Thus did Hamilton County place “in a position of honor in the Hamilton County court house a lasting attestation to the patriotic spirit of appreciation which animates her citizens.”[352]
Encouraged by the response in his home county, Mr. Aldrich set about the stimulation of sentiment in the State at large favoring the erection by the State of some fitting memorial to those pioneers whose lives were sacrificed in March, 1857. This proved a long drawn out and arduous task. The public had all but forgotten the incident; memories had to be refreshed, and a desire for commemoration aroused. This proved too great an undertaking for one person, and so Mr. Aldrich turned to the legislative body of the State. Here he obtained onlyan indifferent response. But with the awakening in Hamilton County the interest in the project spread; and when the Twenty-fifth General Assembly convened in January, 1894, it became evident that favorable action might be hoped for.
By far the most active and efficient work was done by Mrs. Abbie Gardner Sharp, who came to Des Moines at the very beginning of the session and remained until near its close. In her efforts to secure action she was most ably seconded by Senator A. B. Funk of Spirit Lake. On January twenty-ninth a bill was simultaneously introduced in the Senate and House of Representatives, providing for the proper interment of the remains of the victims of the massacre and the erection of a suitable commemorative monument.[353]The bill carried an appropriation of five thousand dollars which was to be expended under the supervision of a commission of five persons appointed by the Governor. Suitable grounds were to be selected near the scene of the massacre. These grounds were to “be purchased, reinterments made and monument erected before the 4th day of July, 1895.”[354]So well had the matter been canvassed among the members of the legislature that there were but few negative votes on the measure. The bill was approved by the Governor on March 30th, and went into effect on April 4, 1894.
On April tenth Governor Frank D. Jackson appointed as members of the commission Hon. J. F. Duncombe and ex-Governor C. C. Carpenter of Fort Dodge, Mrs. Abbie Gardner Sharp of Okoboji, Hon.R. A. Smith of Spirit Lake, and Charles Aldrich of Des Moines. Within a short time the commission met at Fort Dodge and later at the Gardner cabin on Lake Okoboji. The commission effected an organization by selecting ex-Governor Carpenter as chairman and Mrs. Sharp as secretary. They quickly decided on the selection of the lot adjacent to and south of the Gardner cabin. This site was immediately presented to the State by its owners, the Okoboji South Beach Company. On June 20, 1894, the P. N. Peterson Granite Company of St. Paul, Minnesota, was awarded the contract for the erection of the memorial. The specifications provided that the monument should be “a shaft 55 feet high above the foundation, in alternate blocks of rough and polished Minnesota granite, with a die 6 × 6 feet, upon which should be placed four bronze tablets—for the sum of $4,500. The inscriptions placed upon the tablets may be described as follows: On the east, the list of murdered settlers; on the west, a complete roster of the relief expedition commanded by Major William Williams; on the south, historical memoranda relating to the loss of Capt. J. C. Johnson and Private W. E. Burkholder, the list of settlers who escaped from Springfield (now Jackson), Minn., etc.; and on the north, the coat of arms of Iowa, with these words: ‘Erected by order of the 25th General Assembly of the State of Iowa.’”[355]
So diligently did the contracting company apply itself in the erection of the memorial that early in March, 1895, four months before the expiration ofits contract, the monument was ready for inspection. On March 14, 1895, the commission met at Okoboji and inspected and accepted the work. Upon July twenty-eighth over five thousand people came by wagon and excursion train, from a radius of over fifty miles, to witness the formal dedication of the memorial and its presentation to the State. The gathering was significant in that it marked the opening of a new era in the appropriate marking of historic sites not only in Iowa but in the Middle West. In the words of the Hon. R. A. Smith, it was “meet and fitting that to the pioneer the same as the soldier should be accorded the meed of praise and recognition ... a just, though long delayed, tribute to the memory of the brave and hardy, though unpretentious and unpretending, band of settlers who sacrificed their lives in their attempts to build them homes on this then far away northwestern frontier.”[356]
Upon the platform were seated ex-Governor C. C. Carpenter and Hon. R. A. Smith, members of the relief expedition; Mrs. I. A. Thomas, Rev. Valentine C. Thomas, and Jareb Palmer, who fortunately escaped the massacre at Springfield; Judge Charles E. Flandrau, the Indian agent who made possible the project to rescue Abbie Gardner, and Chetanmaza, the Siouan Indian whose intrepidity secured her release; Mrs. Abbie Gardner Sharp a survivor of the massacre at Okoboji; and various State officials. The memorial was presented to the State by ex-Governor C. C. Carpenter upon behalf of the commissionunder whose direction it had been erected, and was accepted for the State by Lieutenant Governor Warren S. Dungan and Hon. W. S. Richards.
Thus the people of Iowa, through their law-making body, paid a fitting though somewhat tardy tribute to the memory of the pioneers who, imbued with the true American spirit of progress, were willing to brave the hardships of the frontier that those who came later might share the blessings of a richer civilization. In the words of one of the speakers of the occasion, “Let us hope that this awakening is not ephemeral or temporary.... The story told by this memorial shaft is but a faint expression of the toils endured, the dangers braved and the sacrifices made by the unfortunate victims whose remains lie buried here”.[357]The memorial “not only commemorates the great tragedy which crimsoned the waters of these lakes, but it will keep alive the memory of a species of American character which will soon become extinct. As we look away to the west, we are impressed that there is no longer an American frontier; and when the frontier shall have faded away, the pioneer will live only in history, and in the monuments which will preserve his memory.”[358]
When one looks back over the sixty years that have elapsed since Ma-za-ku-ta-ma-ni delivered his bitter invective against white infidelity at the Upper Agency on the Yellow Medicine, one can only wonder at the transformation which has been wrought in what was popularly known east of the Alleghenies as the Great American Desert. In sixty years the frontier has moved steadily westward until to-day it is gone not alone from the Mississippi Valley but from the American continent. What was a vast expanse of prairie in 1857 has become a country of prosperous homes.
Where then not a town was to be found to-day may be seen numerous large cities throbbing with industrial life, while towns and villages dot the landscape everywhere. Loneliness and desolation have given way to that condition where man’s habitation is found at every turn. In sixty years this area has changed from the frontier of civilization to the very center of its arts and industries. In a country where Indians were met with by the thousands in 1857, one may now travel for days across the plains without catching a glimpse of a red man. The Indianhas all but gone from a land where he once roamed free and uncontrolled.
Similarly time has dealt with the people of a different race who played major or minor parts in the tragedy at Spirit Lake and Springfield in 1857. Indeed, time has not always dealt kindly with them, and in more than one instance they have suffered much from its ravages. No one who survived the terrible experience of March, 1857, on the borders of the northwestern lakes was able to regain title to the claims of murdered relatives. The Gardner, Thatcher, and Marble claims were all preëmpted by the settlers of 1858 without regard to their former holders. Those preëmpting were perhaps acting within their legal rights; but the first comers, under the customs of the frontier, were entitled to the claims which they had staked out.
So widely have the survivors of the events of 1857 scattered that to-day but one individual, Mrs. Abbie Gardner Sharp, remains at or near the scene of the massacre. While living with her sister Eliza at Hampton, Iowa, Miss Abbie Gardner became acquainted with Casville Sharp, a young relative of the Noble and Thatcher families. On August 16, 1857, they were married. About a year after the marriage, Mr. and Mrs. Sharp visited the scene of the tragedy at Okoboji in the hope of securing some settlement for the Gardner claim. Although a small amount was paid Mrs. Sharp by J. S. Prescott who had preëmpted the claim, the sum was only nominaland in no sense an adequate compensation for the property lost.
Mrs. Sharp continued to live in Iowa; but not until 1891 did she regain the site of her childhood home at Okoboji. At that time a company interested in the promotion of the Okobojis as a pleasure resort acquired title to some thirteen acres of land at Pillsbury’s Point, West Okoboji. This area included the Gardner cabin. The syndicate at once plotted the land for sale as sites for summer cottages. Out of the proceeds derived from the sale of her history of the massacre, Mrs. Sharp acquired the lot upon which stands the original log cabin home—the scene of the massacre.[359]The summer tourist at Okoboji may yet (in 1918) enter the original log cabin and learn from Mrs. Sharp the story of her captivity and rescue.
Mrs. Marble, the only other survivor of the massacre at Lake Okoboji and Spirit Lake, likewise found her husband’s claim preëmpted upon her return. Less fortunate than Mrs. Sharp, she was unable to secure any compensation. For some years she was lost to the knowledge of her Iowa and Minnesota friends. At length, in the early eighties, she was located at Sidell, Napa County, California. Meanwhile, she had married a Mr. Silbaugh. Since then little information has been obtained concerning her, other than that of her death a number of years ago.[360]Thus Mrs. Sharp is now the sole survivor of the massacre at the lakes.
With the survivors of the Springfield massacre it has been different. All who survived were able to regain their claims, since they returned within a brief time to the scene of the massacre and before their holdings had been preëmpted by settlers in the rush of 1857-1858. In 1913 occurred the death of Mrs. Irene A. Thomas whose cabin was made the rendezvous of the settlers at Springfield, and whose son Willie was the first known victim of the Indian attack. Her husband, it will be recalled, had one arm so badly shattered as to necessitate amputation upon reaching Fort Dodge. A remaining son, Valentine C. Thomas, who was a young boy at the time of the massacre, later served as a minister in Marshalltown, Iowa, where he died in August, 1915. Mrs. Eliza Gardner McGowan was at that time still living in Fort Wayne, Indiana. It will be recalled that following the return of the relief expedition to Fort Dodge she married William R. Wilson, a member of the expedition. For many years Mr. and Mrs. Wilson lived at Hampton and Mason City, Iowa. Some time after Mr. Wilson’s death, Mrs. Wilson married a Mr. McGowan and removed to Fort Wayne.
It may be remembered that Johnnie Stewart escaped by hiding in the dooryard of his home while the members of his family were being ruthlessly slaughtered by the Indians. After the Indians left he crawled to the Thomas cabin, which he reached at dusk, was recognized and taken in. In 1915 he was living at Byron, Minnesota; and, from the latest information obtained he is still living at that place.There also survives a Mrs. Gillespie of Blaine, Washington, who at the time of the Springfield attack was Miss Drusilla Swanger, sister of Mrs. William L. Church.
As we of another generation seek recreation at Okoboji, let us pause in retrospection. Let us, “when we contemplate the dangers braved, the hardships and privations endured, and the final suffering and sacrifice which fell to the lot of the victims whose dust and ashes have been gathered together and interred in this historic spot”, be conscious that we are paying “a deserved tribute to courage and self-denial, endurance and self-sacrifice”.[361]
[1]See Richman’sJohn Brown Among the Quakers, and Other Sketches, p. 203.
[1]See Richman’sJohn Brown Among the Quakers, and Other Sketches, p. 203.
[2]Senate Documents, 1st Session, 32nd Congress, Vol. III, Doc. No. 1, p. 411.
[2]Senate Documents, 1st Session, 32nd Congress, Vol. III, Doc. No. 1, p. 411.
[3]Flandrau’sState-Building in the Westin theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. VIII, pp. 483, 484.
[3]Flandrau’sState-Building in the Westin theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. VIII, pp. 483, 484.
[4]Judge Charles E. Flandrau’sState-Building in the Westin theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. VIII, p. 483.
[4]Judge Charles E. Flandrau’sState-Building in the Westin theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. VIII, p. 483.
[5]Rev. Moses N. Adams’sThe Sioux Outbreak in the Year 1862in theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. IX, p. 432.
[5]Rev. Moses N. Adams’sThe Sioux Outbreak in the Year 1862in theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. IX, p. 432.
[6]“The inferior power knows perfectly well that, if it does not accept the terms, it will ultimately be forced out of its domains, and it accepts. This comprises the elements of all Indian treaties.”—Flandrau’sState-Building in the Westin theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. VIII, p. 483.
[6]“The inferior power knows perfectly well that, if it does not accept the terms, it will ultimately be forced out of its domains, and it accepts. This comprises the elements of all Indian treaties.”—Flandrau’sState-Building in the Westin theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. VIII, p. 483.
[7]Flandrau’sState-Building in the Westin theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. VIII, pp. 483, 484.
[7]Flandrau’sState-Building in the Westin theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. VIII, pp. 483, 484.
[8]The massacre at Ash Hollow, often mentioned as a cause of the massacre at Okoboji, was the culmination of a campaign of terror planned by Gen. Harney against the Oglala and Brulé Sioux. The line of march was Fort Leavenworth, Fort Kearney, Fort Laramie, and Fort Pierre. At Ash Hollow near the Blue River and about four miles from the left bank of the North Platte he found Little Thunder’s band of the Brulé Sioux. When his cavalry had surrounded the Indians, he planned an advance with his infantry. Little Thunder desired a council. Gen. Harney refused, saying that he had come to fight. As Harney advanced, he motioned the Indians to run. They did so and ran directly into Harney’s cavalry. Finding themselves trapped, they fought savagely to the end. “The battle of Ash Hollow was little more than a massacre of the Brulés.... Though hailed as a great victory ... the battle of Ash Hollow was a ... disgrace to the officer who planned and executed it. The Indians were trapped and knew it ... and the massacre which ensued was as needless and as barbarous as any which the Dakotas have at any time visited upon the white people.”—Robinson’sHistory of the Dakota or Sioux Indiansin theSouth Dakota Historical Collections, Vol. II, pp. 224, 225. See alsoGeneral Harneyin theSouth Dakota Historical Collections, Vol. I, pp. 107, 108; Beam’sReminiscences of Early Days in Nebraskain theTransactions and Reports of the Nebraska State Historical Society, Vol. III, pp. 301, 302;House Executive Documents, 1st Session, 34th Congress, Vol. I, Pt. II, Doc. No. 1, pp. 49-51.
[8]The massacre at Ash Hollow, often mentioned as a cause of the massacre at Okoboji, was the culmination of a campaign of terror planned by Gen. Harney against the Oglala and Brulé Sioux. The line of march was Fort Leavenworth, Fort Kearney, Fort Laramie, and Fort Pierre. At Ash Hollow near the Blue River and about four miles from the left bank of the North Platte he found Little Thunder’s band of the Brulé Sioux. When his cavalry had surrounded the Indians, he planned an advance with his infantry. Little Thunder desired a council. Gen. Harney refused, saying that he had come to fight. As Harney advanced, he motioned the Indians to run. They did so and ran directly into Harney’s cavalry. Finding themselves trapped, they fought savagely to the end. “The battle of Ash Hollow was little more than a massacre of the Brulés.... Though hailed as a great victory ... the battle of Ash Hollow was a ... disgrace to the officer who planned and executed it. The Indians were trapped and knew it ... and the massacre which ensued was as needless and as barbarous as any which the Dakotas have at any time visited upon the white people.”—Robinson’sHistory of the Dakota or Sioux Indiansin theSouth Dakota Historical Collections, Vol. II, pp. 224, 225. See alsoGeneral Harneyin theSouth Dakota Historical Collections, Vol. I, pp. 107, 108; Beam’sReminiscences of Early Days in Nebraskain theTransactions and Reports of the Nebraska State Historical Society, Vol. III, pp. 301, 302;House Executive Documents, 1st Session, 34th Congress, Vol. I, Pt. II, Doc. No. 1, pp. 49-51.
[9]Royce’sIndian Land Cessions in the United Statesin theEighteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, Part II, pp. 710-712, 726; Kappler’sIndian Affairs: Laws and Treaties, Vol. II, pp. 250-255, 305-310.
[9]Royce’sIndian Land Cessions in the United Statesin theEighteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, Part II, pp. 710-712, 726; Kappler’sIndian Affairs: Laws and Treaties, Vol. II, pp. 250-255, 305-310.
[10]See references in note 9 above.
[10]See references in note 9 above.
[11]Royce’sIndian Land Cessions, p. 736; Kappler’sIndian Affairs: Laws and Treaties, Vol. II, p. 346.
[11]Royce’sIndian Land Cessions, p. 736; Kappler’sIndian Affairs: Laws and Treaties, Vol. II, p. 346.
[12]Royce’sIndian Land Cessions, p. 737.
[12]Royce’sIndian Land Cessions, p. 737.
[13]Royce’sIndian Land Cessions, pp. 736, 737, 762, 763, 766-768, 778, 779; Kappler’sIndian Affairs: Laws and Treaties, Vol. II, pp. 349, 474-477, 495, 546-549.
[13]Royce’sIndian Land Cessions, pp. 736, 737, 762, 763, 766-768, 778, 779; Kappler’sIndian Affairs: Laws and Treaties, Vol. II, pp. 349, 474-477, 495, 546-549.
[14]Royce’sIndian Land Cessions, pp. 768, 772; Kappler’sIndian Affairs: Laws and Treaties, Vol. II, pp. 500, 518.
[14]Royce’sIndian Land Cessions, pp. 768, 772; Kappler’sIndian Affairs: Laws and Treaties, Vol. II, pp. 500, 518.
[15]Royce’sIndian Land Cessions, p. 778; Kappler’sIndian Affairs: Laws and Treaties, Vol. II, pp. 557-560.
[15]Royce’sIndian Land Cessions, p. 778; Kappler’sIndian Affairs: Laws and Treaties, Vol. II, pp. 557-560.
[16]In exchange for all lands claimed by the Sioux in northwestern Iowa and southwestern Minnesota they were granted a reservation as follows: “all that tract of country on either side of the Minnesota River, from the western boundary of the lands herein ceded, east, to the Tchay-tam-bay River on the north, and to Yellow Medicine River on the south side, to extend, on each side, a distance of not less than 10 miles from the general course of said river; the boundaries of said tract to be marked out by as straight lines as practicable”.—Kappler’sIndian Affairs: Laws and Treaties, Vol. II, p. 590; Hughes’sThe Treaty of Traverse des Sioux in 1851in theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. X, Pt. I, pp. 112, 113.
[16]In exchange for all lands claimed by the Sioux in northwestern Iowa and southwestern Minnesota they were granted a reservation as follows: “all that tract of country on either side of the Minnesota River, from the western boundary of the lands herein ceded, east, to the Tchay-tam-bay River on the north, and to Yellow Medicine River on the south side, to extend, on each side, a distance of not less than 10 miles from the general course of said river; the boundaries of said tract to be marked out by as straight lines as practicable”.—Kappler’sIndian Affairs: Laws and Treaties, Vol. II, p. 590; Hughes’sThe Treaty of Traverse des Sioux in 1851in theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. X, Pt. I, pp. 112, 113.
[17]Royce’sIndian Land Cessions, p. 784; Kappler’sIndian Affairs: Laws and Treaties, Vol. II, pp. 591-593.
[17]Royce’sIndian Land Cessions, p. 784; Kappler’sIndian Affairs: Laws and Treaties, Vol. II, pp. 591-593.
[18]“It was with great reluctance that the Sioux Indians consented to surrender this favorite hunting and camping ground to the whites, as they did by the treaty of 1851.”—Gue’sHistory of Iowa, Vol. I, p. 288.
[18]“It was with great reluctance that the Sioux Indians consented to surrender this favorite hunting and camping ground to the whites, as they did by the treaty of 1851.”—Gue’sHistory of Iowa, Vol. I, p. 288.
[19]The Indian Chief Jagmani said of this treaty: “The Indians sold their lands at Traverse des Sioux. I say what we were told. For fifty years they were to be paid $50,000 per annum. We were also promised $300,000 that we have not seen.”—Bryant and Murch’sA History of the Great Massacre by the Sioux Indians, in Minnesota, pp. 34, 35. SeeHouse Executive Documents, 1st Session, 35th Congress, Vol. II, Pt. I, p. 401.
[19]The Indian Chief Jagmani said of this treaty: “The Indians sold their lands at Traverse des Sioux. I say what we were told. For fifty years they were to be paid $50,000 per annum. We were also promised $300,000 that we have not seen.”—Bryant and Murch’sA History of the Great Massacre by the Sioux Indians, in Minnesota, pp. 34, 35. SeeHouse Executive Documents, 1st Session, 35th Congress, Vol. II, Pt. I, p. 401.
[20]Senate Documents, 1st Session, 32nd Congress, Vol. III, Doc. No. 1, p. 414.
[20]Senate Documents, 1st Session, 32nd Congress, Vol. III, Doc. No. 1, p. 414.
[21]Pond’sThe Dakotas or Sioux in Minnesota as They Were in 1834in theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. XII, p. 377.
[21]Pond’sThe Dakotas or Sioux in Minnesota as They Were in 1834in theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. XII, p. 377.
[22]Pond’sThe Dakotas or Sioux in Minnesota as They Were in 1834in theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. XII, p. 376.
[22]Pond’sThe Dakotas or Sioux in Minnesota as They Were in 1834in theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. XII, p. 376.
[23]“At Crow-wing [Minnesota] there are no less than five whiskey shops, and [they] are only five miles from this agency. Five whiskey shops and not half a dozen habitations beside!”—Senate Documents, 1st Session, 35th Congress, Vol. II, Pt. I, pp. 339, 340, 342. See theLetter of Governor Grimes to President Piercein theRoster and Record of Iowa Soldiers, Vol. VI, p. 890;Annals of Iowa(Third Series), Vol. III, p. 136.
[23]“At Crow-wing [Minnesota] there are no less than five whiskey shops, and [they] are only five miles from this agency. Five whiskey shops and not half a dozen habitations beside!”—Senate Documents, 1st Session, 35th Congress, Vol. II, Pt. I, pp. 339, 340, 342. See theLetter of Governor Grimes to President Piercein theRoster and Record of Iowa Soldiers, Vol. VI, p. 890;Annals of Iowa(Third Series), Vol. III, p. 136.
[24]This treaty “did away with all the employés ... whereas, before, the agent had a force to assist him in finding, destroying, and preventing the introduction of whiskey; now, he is entirelyalone.”—Senate Documents, 1st Session, 35th Congress, Vol. II, Pt. I, p. 342.
[24]This treaty “did away with all the employés ... whereas, before, the agent had a force to assist him in finding, destroying, and preventing the introduction of whiskey; now, he is entirelyalone.”—Senate Documents, 1st Session, 35th Congress, Vol. II, Pt. I, p. 342.
[25]Senate Documents, 1st Session, 35th Congress, Vol. II, Pt. I, p. 338.
[25]Senate Documents, 1st Session, 35th Congress, Vol. II, Pt. I, p. 338.
[26]Hughes’sThe Treaty of Traverse des Sioux in 1851in theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. X, Pt. I, pp. 106, 107.
[26]Hughes’sThe Treaty of Traverse des Sioux in 1851in theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. X, Pt. I, pp. 106, 107.
[27]Murray’sRecollections of Early Territorial Days and Legislationin theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. XII, p. 120.
[27]Murray’sRecollections of Early Territorial Days and Legislationin theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. XII, p. 120.
[28]Hughes’sThe Treaty of Traverse des Sioux in 1851in theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. X, Pt. I, p. 107.
[28]Hughes’sThe Treaty of Traverse des Sioux in 1851in theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. X, Pt. I, p. 107.
[29]Robinson’sHistory of the Dakota or Sioux Indiansin theSouth Dakota Historical Collections, Vol. II, p. 210.
[29]Robinson’sHistory of the Dakota or Sioux Indiansin theSouth Dakota Historical Collections, Vol. II, p. 210.
[30]Thomas Hughes, in his article onThe Treaty of Traverse des Sioux in 1851, says concerning this: “The Indians, however, repudiated this agreement, and asserted that it was a base fraud, that, as they were told and believed at the time, the paper they signed was represented to be only another copy of the treaty, and that they did not discover its real import, and the trick played upon them, until long afterward.”—Collections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. X, Pt. I, p. 114.
[30]Thomas Hughes, in his article onThe Treaty of Traverse des Sioux in 1851, says concerning this: “The Indians, however, repudiated this agreement, and asserted that it was a base fraud, that, as they were told and believed at the time, the paper they signed was represented to be only another copy of the treaty, and that they did not discover its real import, and the trick played upon them, until long afterward.”—Collections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. X, Pt. I, p. 114.
[31]Address of Greenleaf Clark onThe Life and Influence of Judge Flandrauin theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. X, Pt. II, p. 774; Daniels’sReminiscences of Little Crowin theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. XII, p. 519.
[31]Address of Greenleaf Clark onThe Life and Influence of Judge Flandrauin theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. X, Pt. II, p. 774; Daniels’sReminiscences of Little Crowin theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. XII, p. 519.
[32]C. C. Carpenter’sMajor William WilliamsinAnnals of Iowa(Third Series), Vol. II, p. 150;Senate Executive Documents, 1st Session, 31st Congress, Vol. II, pp. 235, 242, 243.
[32]C. C. Carpenter’sMajor William WilliamsinAnnals of Iowa(Third Series), Vol. II, p. 150;Senate Executive Documents, 1st Session, 31st Congress, Vol. II, pp. 235, 242, 243.
[33]This fort was established by Brevet Major Samuel Woods, Sixth Infantry, with Company E of the same, from Ft. Snelling, Minnesota. It was established by General Orders No. 19, War Department, Adjutant General’s Office, of May 31, 1850. Major Woods and menwere detailed by Orders No. 22, 6th Military District, St. Louis, Missouri, July 14, 1850. Major Woods and men arrived on the site August 23, 1850. SeeFort Dodge, Iowa, in theAnnals of Iowa(Third Series), Vol. IV, pp. 534, 535; Jacob Van der Zee’sForts in the Iowa CountryinThe Iowa Journal of History and Politics, Vol. XII, pp. 197-199.
[33]This fort was established by Brevet Major Samuel Woods, Sixth Infantry, with Company E of the same, from Ft. Snelling, Minnesota. It was established by General Orders No. 19, War Department, Adjutant General’s Office, of May 31, 1850. Major Woods and menwere detailed by Orders No. 22, 6th Military District, St. Louis, Missouri, July 14, 1850. Major Woods and men arrived on the site August 23, 1850. SeeFort Dodge, Iowa, in theAnnals of Iowa(Third Series), Vol. IV, pp. 534, 535; Jacob Van der Zee’sForts in the Iowa CountryinThe Iowa Journal of History and Politics, Vol. XII, pp. 197-199.
[34]Fort Dodge, Iowa, in theAnnals of Iowa(Third Series), Vol. IV, p. 535.
[34]Fort Dodge, Iowa, in theAnnals of Iowa(Third Series), Vol. IV, p. 535.
[35]Flickinger’sPioneer History of Pocahontas County, Iowa, p. 27; Fulton’sRed Men of Iowa, p. 288.
[35]Flickinger’sPioneer History of Pocahontas County, Iowa, p. 27; Fulton’sRed Men of Iowa, p. 288.
[36]Samuel J. Albright’sFirst Organized Government of Dakotain theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. VIII, p. 139; Fulton’sRed Men of Iowa, p. 288.
[36]Samuel J. Albright’sFirst Organized Government of Dakotain theCollections of the Minnesota Historical Society, Vol. VIII, p. 139; Fulton’sRed Men of Iowa, p. 288.
[37]Fort Clarke, by General Orders No. 34, Army Headquarters, on June 25, 1851, had been changed in name to Fort Dodge. By Order No. 9, Sixth Military Department Headquarters, St. Louis, Missouri, on March 30, 1853, the abandonment of Fort Dodge was ordered. By the same order, Major Woods was directed to establish the new post.—SeeFort Dodge, Iowa, in theAnnals of Iowa(Third Series), Vol. IV, pp. 536, 537; Carpenter’sMajor William Williamsin theAnnals of Iowa(Third Series), Vol. II, pp. 148, 149; Van der Zee’sForts in the Iowa CountryinThe Iowa Journal of History and Politics, Vol. XII, p. 199.
[37]Fort Clarke, by General Orders No. 34, Army Headquarters, on June 25, 1851, had been changed in name to Fort Dodge. By Order No. 9, Sixth Military Department Headquarters, St. Louis, Missouri, on March 30, 1853, the abandonment of Fort Dodge was ordered. By the same order, Major Woods was directed to establish the new post.—SeeFort Dodge, Iowa, in theAnnals of Iowa(Third Series), Vol. IV, pp. 536, 537; Carpenter’sMajor William Williamsin theAnnals of Iowa(Third Series), Vol. II, pp. 148, 149; Van der Zee’sForts in the Iowa CountryinThe Iowa Journal of History and Politics, Vol. XII, p. 199.
[38]Flickinger’sPioneer History of Pocahontas County, Iowa, p. 26.
[38]Flickinger’sPioneer History of Pocahontas County, Iowa, p. 26.
[39]Carpenter’sMajor William Williamsin theAnnals of Iowa(Third Series), Vol. II, p. 151.
[39]Carpenter’sMajor William Williamsin theAnnals of Iowa(Third Series), Vol. II, p. 151.
[40]While Major Woods’ detail was on its way from Fort Snelling en route to the future site of Fort Dodge it was joined on the Iowa River by Major Williams who became later the post sutler and was destined to play a large part in the history of northwestern Iowa. This was in 1850.—Carpenter’sMajor William Williamsin theAnnals of Iowa(Third Series), Vol. II, p. 147.
[40]While Major Woods’ detail was on its way from Fort Snelling en route to the future site of Fort Dodge it was joined on the Iowa River by Major Williams who became later the post sutler and was destined to play a large part in the history of northwestern Iowa. This was in 1850.—Carpenter’sMajor William Williamsin theAnnals of Iowa(Third Series), Vol. II, p. 147.
[41]Carpenter’sMajor William Williamsin theAnnals of Iowa(Third Series), Vol. II, p. 151; letter from William Williams to Governor Hempstead, September 1, 1854, in the Public Archives, Des Moines, Iowa.
[41]Carpenter’sMajor William Williamsin theAnnals of Iowa(Third Series), Vol. II, p. 151; letter from William Williams to Governor Hempstead, September 1, 1854, in the Public Archives, Des Moines, Iowa.