Chapter 90

54Kükenthal,Forschungsreise in den Molukken und Borneo, i. 188.

55Junghuhn,Die Battaländer auf Sumatra, ii. 239.

56Ling Roth,Natives of Sarawak, i. 74, 76.

57Low,Sarawak, p. 246.

58Stone,A Few Months in New Guinea, p. 95.

59Chalmers,Pioneering in New Guinea, p. 187.

60von Kotzebue,Voyage of Discovery into the South Sea, iii. 214.

61Moseley, ‘Inhabitants of the Admiralty Islands,’ inJour. Anthr. Inst.vi. 416.

62Waitz-Gerland,op. cit.vi. 116.

63Ling Roth,Aborigines of Tasmania, pp. 47, 62, 64.

64Ridley,Aborigines of Australia, p. 24. See alsoibid.p. 20sqq.

65Wyatt, ‘Manners and Superstitions of the Adelaide and Encounter Bay Aboriginal Tribes,’ in Woods,Native Tribes of South Australia, p. 162.

66Spencer and Gillen,Native Tribes of Central Australia, p. 48sqq.

67Salvado,Mémoires historiques sur l’Australie, p. 146.

68Fraser,Aborigines of New South Wales, p. 44.

Concerning the people of Madagascar the missionary Ellis writes:—“Whether the noble and generous feeling of gratitude has much place amongst the Malagasy has been questioned. Though often characterised by extreme apathy, they are certainly susceptible of tenderness of feeling, and their customs furnish various modes of testifying their sense of any acts of kindness shewn them, and their language contains many forms of speech expressive of thankfulness. The following are among those in most general use: ‘May you live to grow old—may you live long—may you live sacred—may you see, or obtain, justice from the sovereign.’” Moreover, with all their expressions of thankfulness, considerable action is used: sometimes the two hands are extended open as if to make a present; or the party stoops down to the ground, and clasps the legs, or touches the knee and the feet of the person he is thanking.69Ingratitude,again, is expressed by many strong metaphors, such as “son of a thunderbolt,” or “offspring of a wild boar.”70The Bushmans, according to Burchell, are not incapable of gratitude.71The statement made by certain travellers or colonists that the Zulus are devoid of this feeling, is contradicted by Mr. Tyler, who asserts that “many instances might be related in which a thankful spirit has been manifested, and gifts bestowed for favours received.”72The Basutos have words to express gratitude.73Among the Bakongo, says Mr. Ward, “evidences of gratitude are rare indeed, although occasionally one meets with this sentiment in odd guises. Once, by a happy chance, I saved a baby’s life. The child was brought to me by its mother in convulsions, and I was fortunate enough to find in my medicine chest a drug that effected an almost immediate cure. Yet the service I rendered to this woman, instead of meeting with any appreciation, only procured for me the whispered reputation of being a witch.” But twenty months afterwards, at midnight when all the people were sleeping, the same woman came to Mr. Ward and gave him some fowl’s eggs in payment. “I come,” she said, “in the darkness that my people may not know, for they would jeer at me if they knew of this gift.”74A traveller tells us that the inhabitants of Great Benin “if given any trifles expressed their thanks.”75Writing on the natives of Accra, Monrad states that gratitude is among the virtues of the Negroes, and induces them even to give their lives in return for benefits conferred on them.76The Feloops, bordering on the Gambia, “display the utmost gratitude and affection towards their benefactors.”77As regards the Eastern Central Africans, Mr. Macdonald affirms without any hesitation that they have gratitude, “even though we define gratitude as being much more than an ‘acute sense of favours to come.’”78The Masai and Wadshagga have “a curious habit of spitting on things or people as a compliment or sign of gratitude”79—originally, I presume, with a view to transferring to them a blessing. The Barea are said to be thankful for benefits.80According to Palgrave, “gratitude is noless an Arab than a European virtue, whatever the ignorance or the prejudices of some foreigners may have affirmed to the contrary”;81and Burckhardt says that an Arab never forgets the generosity shown to him even by an enemy.82

69Ellis,History of Madagascar, i. 258. See also Rochon,Voyage to Madagascar, p. 56.

70Ellis,op. cit.i. 139sq.

71Burchell,Travels in the Interior of Southern Africa, ii. 68, 86, 447.

72Tyler,Forty Years among the Zulus, p. 194.

73Casalis,Basutos, p. 306.

74Ward,Five Years with the Congo Cannibals, p. 47sqq.

75Punch, quoted by Ling Roth,Great Benin, p. 45.

76Monrad,Skildring af Guinea-Kysten, p. 8.

77Mungo Park,Travels in the Interior of Africa, p. 14.

78Macdonald,Africana, i. 10.

79Johnston,Kilima-njaro Expedition, p. 438.

80Munzinger,Ostafrikanische Studien, p. 533.

81Palgrave, quoted in Spencer’sDescriptive Sociology, ‘Asiatic Races,’ p. 31.

82Burckhardt,Notes on the Bedouins and Wahábys, p. 105.

In other statements gratitude is directly represented as an object of praise, or its absence as an object of disapproval. Among the Atkha Aleuts, according to Father Yakof, gratitude to benefactors was considered a virtue.83Among the Omahas, if a man receives a favour and does not manifest his thankfulness, the people exclaim:—“He does not appreciate the gift! He has no manners.”84The Kamchadales “are not only grateful for favours, but they think it absolutely necessary to make some return for a present.”85The Chinese say that “kindness is more binding than a loan.”86According to the ‘Divine Panorama,’ a well-known Taouist work, those who forget kindness and are guilty of ingratitude shall be tormented after death and “shall not escape one jot of their punishments.”87In one of the Pahlavi texts gratitude is represented as a means of arriving at heaven, whilst ingratitude is stigmatised as a heinous sin;88and according to Ammian ungrateful persons were even punished by law in ancient Persia.89The same, we are told, was the case in Macedonia.90The duty of gratitude was strongly inculcated by Greek and Roman moralists.91Aristotle observes that we ought, as a general rule, rather to return a kindness to our benefactor than to confer a gratuitous favour upon a brother in arms, just as we ought rather to repay a loan to a creditor than to spend the same sum upon a present to a friend.92According toXenophon the requital of benefits is enjoined by a divine law.93“There is no duty more indispensable than that of returning a kindness,” says Cicero; “all men detest one forgetful of a benefit.”94Seneca calls ingratitude a most odious vice, which it is difficult to punish by law, but which we refer for judgment to the gods.95The ancient Scandinavians considered it dishonourable for a man to kill even an enemy in blood-revenge if he had received a benefit from him.96

83Yakof, quoted by Petroff,Report on the Population, &c. of Alaska, p. 158.

84Dorsey, ‘Omaha Sociology,’ inAnn. Rep. Bur. Ethn.iii. 270.

85Dobell,Travels in Kamtschatka, i. 75.

86Davis,China, ii. 123.

87Giles,Strange Stories from a Chinese Studio, ii. 374sq.See alsoThâi-Shang, 4.

88Dînâ-î Maînôg-î Khirad, xxxvi. 28; xxxvii. 6; xliii. 9.

89Ammianus Marcellinus, xxiii. 6. 81.

90Seneca,De beneficiis, iii. 6. 2.

91See Schmidt,Die Ethik der alten Griechen, ii. 305sqq.

92Aristotle,Ethica Nicomachea, x. 2. 3.

93Xenophon,Memorabilia, iv. 4. 24.

94Cicero,De officiis, i. 15 (47); ii. 18 (63).

95Seneca,De beneficiis, iii. 6. 1sq.

96Maurer,Die Bekehrung des Norwegischen Stammes, ii. 174.

We may assume that among beings capable of feeling moral emotions the general disposition to be kind to a benefactor will inevitably lead to the notion that ungrateful behaviour is wrong. Such behaviour is offensive to the benefactor; as Spinoza observes, “he who has conferred a benefit on anyone from motives of love or honour will feel pain, if he sees that the benefit is received without gratitude.”97This by itself tends to evoke in the bystander sympathetic resentment towards the offender; but his resentment is much increased by the retributive kindliness which he is apt to feel, sympathetically, towards the benefactor. He wants to see the latter’s kindness rewarded; and he is shocked by the absence of a similar desire in the very person who may be naturally expected to feel it more strongly than anybody else.

97Spinoza,Ethica, iii. 42. A Japanese proverb says that “thankless labour brings fatigue” (Reed,Japan, ii. 109).

The moral ideas concerning conduct which affects other persons’ welfare vary according as the parties are members of the same or different families, or of the same or different communities. For reasons which have been stated in previous chapters parents have in this respect special duties towards their children, and children towards their parents; and a tribesman or a fellow-countryman has claims which are not shared by a foreigner. But there are duties not only to particular individuals, but also towhole social aggregates. Foremost among these is the duty of patriotism.

The duty of patriotism is rooted in the patriotic sentiment, in a person’s love of the social body of which he is himself a member, and which is attached to the territory he calls his country. It involves a desire to promote its welfare, a wish that it may prosper for the time being and for all future. This desire is the outcome of a variety of sentiments: of men’s affection for the people among whom they live, of attachment to the places where they have grown up or spent part of their lives, of devotion to their race and language, and to the traditions, customs, laws, and institutions of the society in which they were born and to which they belong.

Genuine patriotism presupposes a power of abstraction which the lower savages can hardly be supposed to possess. But it seems to be far from unknown among uncultured peoples of a higher type. North American Indians are praised for their truly patriotic spirit, for their strong attachment to their tribe and their country.98Carver says of the Naudowessies:—“The honour of their tribe, and the welfare of their nation, is the first and most predominant emotion of their hearts; and from hence proceed in a great measure all their virtues and their vices. Actuated by this, they brave every danger, endure the most exquisite torments, and expire triumphing in their fortitude, not as a personal qualification, but as a national characteristic.”99Patriotism and public spirit were often strongly manifested by the Tahitians.100The Maori “loves his country and the rights of his ancestors, and he will fight for his children’s land.”101Of the Guanches of Teneriffe we are told that patriotism wastheir chief virtue.102The same quality distinguishes the Yorubas of West Africa; “no race of men,” says Mr. MacGregor, “could be more devoted to their country.”103Burckhardt writes:—“As to the attachment which a Bedouin entertains for his own tribe, the deep-felt interest he takes in its power and fame, and the sacrifices of every kind he is ready to make for its prosperity—these are feelings rarely operating with equal force in any other nation; and it is with an exulting pride of conscious patriotism, not inferior to any which ennobled the history of Grecian or Helvetian republics, that an Aeneze, should he be suddenly attacked, seizes his lance, and waving it over his head exclaims, ‘I am an Aeneze.’”104

98Adair,History of the American Indians, p. 378sq.Heriot,Travels through the Canadas, p. 317. Loskiel,History of the Mission of the United Brethren among the Indians, i. 17 (Iroquois).

99Carver,Travels through the Interior Parts of North America, p. 412.

100Ellis,Polynesian Researches, i. 128.

101Angas,Savage Life and Scenes in Australia and New Zealand, i. 338. See also Travers, ‘Life and Times of Te Rauparaha,’ inTrans. and Proceed. New Zealand Institute, v. 22.

102Bory de St. Vincent,Essais sur les Isles Fortunées, p. 70.

103MacGregor, ‘Lagos, Abeokuta, and the Alake,’ inJour. African Soc.1904, p. 466.

104Burckhardt,Notes on the Bedouins and Wahábys, p. 205.

Many of the elements out of which patriotism proper has grown are clearly distinguishable among savages, even the very lowest. We have previously noticed the savage’s attachment to members of his own community or tribe. Combined with this is his love of his native place, and of the mode of life to which he is habituated. There is a touching illustration of this feeling in the behaviour of the wild boy who had been found in the woods near Aveyron—where he had spent most part of his young life in perfect isolation from all human beings—when he, after being removed to Paris, was once taken back to the country, to the vale of Montmorence. Joy was painted in his eyes, in all the motions and postures of his body, at the view of the hills and the woods of the charming valley; he appeared more than ever restless and savage, and “in spite of the most assiduous attention that was paid to his wishes, and the most affectionate regard that was expressed for him, he seemed to be occupied only with an anxious desire of taking his flight.”105How much greater must not the love of home be in him who has there his relatives and friends! Mr. Howitt tells us ofan Australian native who, on leaving his camp with him for a trip of about a week, burst into tears, saying to himself once and again, “My country, my people, I shall not see them.”106The Veddahs of Ceylon “would exchange their wild forest life for none other, and it was with the utmost difficulty that they could be induced to quit even for a short time their favourite solitude.”107The Stiêns of Cambodia are so strongly attached to their forests and mountains that to leave them seems almost like death.108Solomon Islanders not seldom die from home-sickness on their way to the Fiji or Queensland plantations.109The Hovas of Madagascar, when setting out on a journey, often take with them a small portion of their native earth, on which they gaze during their absence, invoking their god that they may be permitted to return to restore it to the place from which it was taken.110Mr. Crawfurd observes that in the Malay Archipelago the attachment to the native spot is strongest with the agricultural tribes;111but, though a settled life is naturally most favourable to its development, this feeling is not inconsistent with nomadism. The Nishinam, who are the most nomadic of all the Californian tribes, have very great attachment for the valley or flat which they count their home.112

105Itard,Account of the Discovery and Education of a Savage Man, p. 70sqq.

106Brough Smyth,Aborigines of Victoria, ii. 305.

107Hartshorne, ‘Weddas,’ inIndian Antiquary, viii. 317.

108Mouhot,Travels in the Central Parts of Indo-China, i. 243.

109Guppy,op. cit.p. 167.

110Ellis,History of Madagascar, i. 141.

111Crawfurd,History of the Indian Archipelago, i. 84.

112Powers,op. cit.p. 318sq.For other instances of love of home among uncivilised races see von Spix and von Martius,op. cit.ii. 242, note (Coroados); von Kotzebue,op. cit.iii. 45 (Indians of California); Gibbs,Tribes of Western Washington and North-Western Oregon, p. 187; Elliott,Report of the Seal Islands of Alaska, p. 240; Hooper,Ten Months among the Tents of the Tuski, p. 209; von Siebold,Aino auf der Insel Yesso, p. 11; Mallat,Les Philippines, ii. 95 (Negritos); von Brenner,Besuch bei den Kannibalen Sumatras, p. 194 (Bataks); Earl,Papuans, p. 126 (natives of Rotti, near Timor); Ling Roth,Aborigines of Tasmania, p. 46; Dieffenbach,Travels in New Zealand, ii. 174; Cumming,In the Himalayas, p. 404 (Paharis); Lane,Manners and Customs of the Modern Egyptians, p. 302 (Bedawees); Tristram,Great Sahara, p. 193sq.(Beni M’zab); Burton,Zanzibar, ii. 96 (Wanika);Emin Pasha in Central Africa, p. 315 (Monbuttu); Andersson,Lake Ngami, p. 198 (Ovambo); Rowley,Africa Unveiled, p. 63sq.(Kroos of the Grain Coast below Liberia); Price, ‘Quissama Tribe,’ inJour. Anthr. Inst.i. 187.

Moreover, as we have noticed above, savages have the greatest regard for their native customs and institutions.113Many of them have displayed that love of national independence which gives to patriotism its highest fervour.114And among some uncivilised peoples, at least, the force of racial and linguistic unity shows itself even outside the social or political unit. Burckhardt observes that the Bedouins are not only solicitous for the honour of their own respective tribes, but consider the interests of all other tribes as more or less attached to their own, and frequently evince a generalesprit de corps, lamenting “the losses of any of their tribes occasioned by attacks from settlers or foreign troops, even though at war with those tribes.”115A Tongan “loves the island on which he was born, in particular, and all the Tonga islands generally, as being one country, and speaking one language.”116Travellers have noticed how gratifying it is, when visiting an uncultured people, to know a little of their language; there is at once a sympathetic link between the native and the stranger.117Even the almost inaccessible Berber of the Great Atlas, in spite of his excessive hatred of the European, will at once give you a kindly glance as soon as you, to his astonishment, utter to him a few words in his own tongue.

113Seesupra,i. 118sq.

114Cf.Dobrizhoffer,Account of the Abipones, ii. 95, 105; Lomonaco, ‘Sulle razze indigene del Brasile,’ inArchivio per l’antropologia e la etnologia, xix. 57 (Tupis); Brett,Indian Tribes of Guiana, p. 348; Schoolcraft,Indian Tribes of the United States, iii. 189 (Iroquois); Nansen,Eskimo Life, p. 323 (Greenlanders); Macpherson,Memorials of Service in India, p. 81 (Kandhs); Sarasin,op. cit.iii. 530 (Veddahs); Casati,Ten Years in Equatoria, i. 188, 304 (Negroes of Central Africa); Fritsch,Die Eingeborenen Süd-Afrika’s, p. 422sq.(Bushmans).

115Burckhardt,Bedouins and Wahábys, p. 205.

116Mariner,Natives of the Tonga Islands, ii. 156.

117See Stokes,Discoveries in Australia, ii. 25.

Like other species of the altruistic sentiment, patriotism is apt to overestimate the qualities of the object for which it is felt; and it does so all the more readily as love of one’s country is almost inseparably intermingled with love of one’s self. The ordinary, typical patriot has a strong will to believe that his nation is the best. If, as manypeople nowadays seem to maintain, such a will to believe is an essential characteristic of true patriotism, savages are as good patriots as anybody. In their intercourse with white men they have often with astonishment noticed the arrogant air of superiority adopted by the latter; in their own opinion they are themselves vastly superior to the whites. According to Eskimo beliefs, the first man, though made by the Great Being, was a failure, and was consequently cast aside and calledkob-lu-na, which means “white man”; but a second attempt of the Great Being resulted in the formation of a perfect man, and he was calledin-nu, the name which the Eskimo give to themselves.118Australian natives, on being asked to work, have often replied, “White fellow works, not black fellow; black fellow gentleman.”119When anything foolish is done, the Chippewas use an expression which means “as stupid as a white man.”120If a South Sea Islander sees a very awkward person, he says, “How stupid you are; perhaps you are an Englishman.”121Mr. Williams tells us of a Fijian who, having been to the United States, was ordered by his chiefs to say whether the country of the white man was better than Fiji, and in what respects. He had not, however, gone far in telling the truth, when one cried out, “He is a prating fellow”; another, “He is impudent”; and some said, “Kill him.”122The Koriaks are more argumentative; in order to prove that the accounts they hear of the advantages of other countries are so many lies, they say to the stranger, “If you could enjoy these advantages at home, what made you take so much trouble to come to us?”123But the Koriaks, in their turn are looked down upon by their neighbours, the Chukchi, who call the surrounding peoples old women, only fit to guard their flocks, and to be their attendants.124The Ainu despise the Japanesejust as much as the Japanese despise them, and are convinced of “the superiority of their own blood and descent over that of all other peoples in the world.”125Even the miserable Veddah of Ceylon has a very high opinion of himself, and regards his civilised neighbours with contempt.126As is often the case with civilised men, savages attribute to their own people all kinds of virtue in perfection. The South American Mbayás, according to Azara, “se croient la nation la plus noble du monde, la plus généreuse, la plus exacte à tenir sa parole avec loyauté, et la plus vaillante.”127The Eskimo of Norton Sound speak of themselves asyu’-pĭk, meaning fine or complete people, whereas an Indian is termediñ-kĭ-lĭk, from a word which means “a louse egg.”128When a Greenlander saw a foreigner of gentle and modest manners, his usual remark was, “He is almost as well-bred as we,” or, “He begins to be a man,” that is, a Greenlander.129The savage regards his people as the people, as the root of all others, and as occupying the middle of the earth. The Hottentots love to call themselves “the men of men.”130The Indians of the Ungava district, Hudson Bay, give themselves the namenenenot, that is, true or ideal red men.131In the language of the Illinois Indians the wordillinoismeans “men”—“as if they looked upon all other Indians as beasts.”132The aborigines of Hayti believed that their island was the first of all things, that the sun and moon issued from one of its caverns, and men from another.133Each Australian tribe, says Mr. Curr, regards its country as the centre of the earth, which in most cases is believed not to extend more than a couple of hundred miles or so in any direction.134

Back to Index Next